ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Poll shows 76% of Americans don't miss the NBA (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=252291)

BigCatDaddy 11-08-2011 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8092470)
I stand by that the talent is better now. And think about what I said before you talk. I didn't say guys were as good as Jordan. I said had similar skills and amazing game.

If you can't see how Kobe Bryant's game is similar to Jordans, then you just don't get basketball. Maybe it's best that you're not that into the NBA anymore because you obviously just don't get it.

You are confusing being better athletes and being better players and I'm sure there is a huge difference there.

Magic > Lebron
Jordan > Kobe
Bird > Dirk
Olajuan > Howard

dirk digler 11-08-2011 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8092435)
I'll admit there was a lull after MJ for a good number of years but I don't know, 5-8 years ago the league really started to be infused with some special players.

I'd argue the talent is far better today than vs the Jordan era.

When I think of the Jordan era and great players, I think...

Jordan, Barkley, Drexler, Ewing, Malone, Shawn Kemp for a short period.... Starting to run out already.

Shoot now in the league you have a few guys with Jordan like skills. Obviously not Jordan but amazing game.

Bryant, James, Wade, Durant, Rose, Nowitzki, Dwight Howard, Chris Paul, Tim Duncan (although getting up there).

I don't know what's not to like.

Totally agree. People who think that the NBA of today doesn't have extreme talent they really aren't watching the game.

The downside of the NBA is as evenfall stated there is no parity in the league which hopefully if the CBA ever gets signed that will take care of that problem.

CoMoChief 11-08-2011 03:38 PM

I could give a shit about the NBA. They mock the actual game of basketball anymore. NCAA bball is a lot better game....fanbase is more into it....atmosphere is a lot more exciting.

Quesadilla Joe 11-08-2011 04:01 PM

I'd miss it in May. Just because I ****ing hate baseball season and the only thing that is on ESPN from April to August is baseball.

Ming the Merciless 11-08-2011 04:03 PM

I enjoy beer, football on Sundays and I have a decent job. I am the 76%

dirk digler 11-08-2011 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 8092675)
I enjoy beer, football on Sundays and I have a decent job. I am the 76%

You are also the .0000005% that likes Matt Cassel so you got that going for you :p

warpaint* 11-08-2011 04:09 PM

It's been almost as refreshing as that year we had no NHL.

TEX 11-08-2011 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 8092675)
I enjoy beer, football on Sundays and I have a decent job. I am the 76%

I'm with ya. I'd also like to add that I'll likely never watch another complete NBA game again. I doubt I'll even watch part of one. Dont miss a single thing about it.

vailpass 11-08-2011 04:19 PM

This survey is so racist.

Ming the Merciless 11-08-2011 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 8092691)
You are also the .0000005% that likes Matt Cassel so you got that going for you :p

If liking him better than our other options means I 'like' him than ok....I like him

Ming the Merciless 11-08-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 8092698)
I'm with ya. I'd also like to add that I'll likely never watch another complete NBA game again. I doubt I'll even watch part of one. Dont miss a single thing about it.

Yep...I used to like watching it.....donno what happened theres just no excitement in it except maybe the last few minutes it seems like....

March madness sure...NBA...nah.

FAX 11-08-2011 04:23 PM

I kinda lost interest when they started giving them three steps to the basket.

FAX

lcarus 11-08-2011 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 8092451)
Nailed it.

Except it was the Bad Boy Pistons. Unless that's what he meant was the Pistons vs the Celtics. I don't know.

Easy 6 11-08-2011 04:32 PM

I enjoyed the championhip series last year, it was rewarding to watch that heartless phony choke yet again.

And i may or may not care about the next one, either way i wont lose any sleep, the nba has just lost something for me, not even 100% sure what it is.

blaise 11-08-2011 04:33 PM

Heavy D will miss the NBA season.

vailpass 11-08-2011 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 8092730)
Except it was the Bad Boy Pistons. Unless that's what he meant was the Pistons vs the Celtics. I don't know.

Shit, thanks for catching that. Meant to stick Celtics in after Pistons and left out the Piston part. Bill Laimbeer ought to smack me around for that.

KevB 11-08-2011 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092305)
I was a huge NBA fan as a kid in the 80s through the MJ era. Used to sneak downstairs after bedtime at night to be able to watch the playoffs between the Showtime Lakers and the Bird Celtics. Before that I rooted for Dr. J and his 6ers to get a ring for the Doc. Moses Malone, Cheeks, Toney, Jones and Jones along with Julius were great to watch play. Bad Boy Celtics, Malone & Stock in Utah were great to watch. Clyde and the Nigerian in Houston, even the Cavs were all part of a great time in the NBA.

Michael came just in time to take over for Magic and Larry. Fantastic ball, great rivalries, team play and hard D.

The minute MJ left was the day the music died and the song hasn't been close to the same since.

I grew up in the same era, and it's what planted the seed for my enjoyment of the NBA today. But if you don't think Kobe, LeBron, Wade, Rose, Dirk, Durant, Howard, Paul, Melo, etc. aren't of the same caliber as the names you mentioned above, I think you're just being nostalgic about that era. The exciting part is that some of the names I rattled off are still young with much of their career to play out, and they play the right way and carry themselves well.

Now, has there been another MJ? Nope. Kobe is close, but just doesn't quite measure up.

vailpass 11-08-2011 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8092798)
I grew up in the same era, and it's what planted the seed for my enjoyment of the NBA today. But if you don't think Kobe, LeBron, Wade, Rose, Dirk, Durant, Howard, Paul, Melo, etc. aren't of the same caliber as the names you mentioned above, I think you're just being nostalgic about that era. The exciting part is that some of the names I rattled off are still young with much of their career to play out, and they play the right way and carry themselves well.

Now, has there been another MJ? Nope. Kobe is close, but just doesn't quite measure up.

The players you mention are not the same caliber IMO. Nor do they have near the same likability factor as the players in the Golden Age. Magic Johnson has more charisma and charm in his little finger than LeBron has in his whole body. Bird Celtics, Bad Boys, Showtime, etc. were a whole lot cooler, played a whole lot more as a team, and had "it".
Not so today and their lack of popularity since MJ left reflects this.

KevB 11-08-2011 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092815)
The players you mention are not the same caliber. Nor do they have near the same likability factor as the players in the Golden Age. Magic Johnson has more charisma and charm in his little finger than LeBron has in his whole body. Bird Celtics, Bad Boys, Showtime, etc. were a whole lot cooler, played a whole lot more as a team, and had "it".
Not so today and their lack of popularity since MJ left reflects this.

So you're going to compare the least likable player to the guy with more charisma than perhaps anyone ever? Seems fair. If you're arguing whether the league currently has one of the top 3 players of all time (MJ, Magic, Bird) the answer is probably no. But beyond that, the league and it's players easily compare to the 80's and 90's. They're a bit younger, so we'll see if they ultimately progress and maintain the longevity of a Malone or Hakeem.

vailpass 11-08-2011 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8092821)
So you're going to compare the least likable player to the guy with more charisma than perhaps anyone ever? Seems fair. If you're arguing whether the league currently has one of the top 3 players of all time (MJ, Magic, Bird) the answer is probably no. But beyond that, the league and it's players easily compare to the 80's and 90's. They're a bit younger, so we'll see if they ultimately progress and maintain the longevity of a Malone or Hakeem.

Easily compares to the 80s and 90s in what way?
We are each welcome to our opinions. However the numbers over the years since MJ left tell a definite story.

Deberg_1990 11-08-2011 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092815)
The players you mention are not the same caliber IMO. Nor do they have near the same likability factor as the players in the Golden Age. Magic Johnson has more charisma and charm in his little finger than LeBron has in his whole body. Bird Celtics, Bad Boys, Showtime, etc. were a whole lot cooler, played a whole lot more as a team, and had "it".
Not so today and their lack of popularity since MJ left reflects this.

Maybe not to you, but there are tons of young fans of Lebron, Kobe etc that cant relate to Magic, Bird and even MJ because they never saw them play. Thats how sports works....there will always be a new generation of players and fans ready to replace the old.

vailpass 11-08-2011 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8092856)
Maybe not to you, but there are tons of young fans of Lebron, Kobe etc that cant relate to Magic, Bird and even MJ because they never saw them play. Thats how sports works....there will always be a new generation of players and fans ready to replace the old.

Of course there are new generations of fans. The fact they don't know anything about the original product doesn't affect the quality of either product.

KevB 11-08-2011 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092869)
Of course there are new generations of fans. The fact they don't know anything about the original product doesn't affect the quality of either product.

I'd love to hear your opinion on why the 80's and 90's was so definitely superior? What numbers prove this? Attendance? It's not really quantifiable.

vailpass 11-08-2011 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8092876)
I'd love to hear your opinion on why the 80's and 90's was so definitely superior? What numbers prove this? Attendance? It's not really quantifiable.

Congratulations, you started and completed that conversation without need of a second party.

dirk digler 11-08-2011 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8092876)
I'd love to hear your opinion on why the 80's and 90's was so definitely superior? What numbers prove this? Attendance? It's not really quantifiable.

He bases it some on TV ratings but the NBA had the best season ever for their ratings along with attendance.

KevB 11-08-2011 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092869)
Of course there are new generations of fans. The fact they don't know anything about the original product doesn't affect the quality of either product.

Duncan and Kobe are two of the top 10 or 12 players of all time. Dirk is probably top 20 or 30. Durant, Rose, LeBron, Wade, Paul and Howard are on that kind of trajectory if their careers go as planned. Nash and Garnett have been incredibly compelling players who warrant top 50 player in history talk. That's a pretty distinguished and exciting list of players.

KevB 11-08-2011 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092883)
Congratulations, you started and completed that conversation without need of a second party.

So attendance is your guide? Really? I don't even know how it compares, but it's not terribly relevant. The world (primarily media, economy and ticket pricing) is a very different place today than it was 20 years ago.

vailpass 11-08-2011 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8092894)
So attendance is your guide? Really? I don't even know how it compares, but it's not terribly relevant. The world (primarily media, economy and ticket pricing) is a very different place today than it was 20 years ago.

No, attendance is not my guide. Nor is TV ratings. Though both favor the golden age.

Your last statement, "it's not really quantifiable", is one with which I agree.
Everyone has their own opinion. If you feel like the quality of play is as good today, the players are as likable, the game is as popular, as was the case during the golden age of the NBA then that is your opinion.

vailpass 11-08-2011 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8092888)
Duncan and Kobe are two of the top 10 or 12 players of all time. Dirk is probably top 20 or 30. Durant, Rose, LeBron, Wade, Paul and Howard are on that kind of trajectory if their careers go as planned. Nash and Garnett have been incredibly compelling players who warrant top 50 player in history talk. That's a pretty distinguished and exciting list of players.

Do you see anything that compares to the Showtime Lakers, the Bird Celtics, the Thomas Bad Boys, the MJ Bulls in talent, quality of play, style?
How about popularity, fan involvement, likability?
I don't.

KevB 11-08-2011 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092908)
No, attendance is not my guide. Nor is TV ratings. Though both favor the golden age.

Your last statement, "it's not really quantifiable", is one with which I agree.
Everyone has their own opinion. If you feel like the quality of play is as good today, the players are as likable, the game is as popular, as was the case during the golden age of the NBA then that is your opinion.

Fair enough, can't argue with that. That said, I listed a pretty impressive group of players at the high end of the spectrum that would be hard to argue weren't worthy of previous eras. There probably aren't as many vets these days, and there are certainly younger players than back in the day, so you could argue that comes at a cost to quality of play. On the flip side of that argument however, is the excitement of watching guys develop over time.

vailpass 11-08-2011 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8092914)
Fair enough, can't argue with that. That said, I listed a pretty impressive group of players at the high end of the spectrum that would be hard to argue weren't worthy of previous eras. There probably aren't as many vets these days, and there are certainly younger players than back in the day, so you could argue that comes at a cost to quality of play. On the flip side of that argument however, is the excitement of watching guys develop over time.

You need to factor in that I'm a 45 year old white guy with a margarita in my hand.

Deberg_1990 11-08-2011 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092917)
You need to factor in that I'm a 45 year old white guy with a margarita in my hand.

I feel like your the old guy on the porch chanting "In my day......"

Saul Good 11-08-2011 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092917)
You need to factor in that I'm a 45 year old white guy with a margarita in my hand.

http://i1176.photobucket.com/albums/...5502630-21.jpg

KevB 11-08-2011 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092912)
Do you see anything that compares to the Showtime Lakers, the Bird Celtics, the Thomas Bad Boys, the MJ Bulls in talent, quality of play, style?
How about popularity, fan involvement, likability?
I don't.

Players don't stay with teams like they did in those days, and that's true of all sports. Having said that, I'd say the Lakers and Celtics have been pretty compelling, as have the Spurs through the 2000's. Kobe and Shaq, Duncan/Parker/Ginobili, Garnett/Pierce/Allen, etc.

It's funny --- you're arguing that we don't have the consolidation of talent/power to create these semi-dynasties, and therefore the game is worse. That's somewhat true to an extent. Yet, the Heat, Knicks, Bulls try to accumulate that same concentrated talent, and people complain that would kill parity.

I really think guys like Durant, Rose, Griffin, etc. are going to bring us into a really exciting era where guys establish themselves on one team and stay there. In addition, they'll be likable guys who play the right way and carry themselves well off the court.

Saul Good 11-08-2011 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092912)
Do you see anything that compares to the Showtime Lakers, the Bird Celtics, the Thomas Bad Boys, the MJ Bulls in talent, quality of play, style?
How about popularity, fan involvement, likability?
I don't.

I would say the Heat compare very closely to the Bad Boy Pistons.

Saul Good 11-08-2011 06:00 PM

The Suns of a few years back were a lot like the Showtime Lakers, but they were a star away from getting it done.

CoMoChief 11-08-2011 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groupon (Post 8092925)
I would say the Heat compare very closely to the Bad Boy Pistons.

:spock: how so?

teedubya 11-08-2011 06:16 PM

"Overall, 76 percent said they weren't missing NBA games, 12 percent were and 12 percent did not have an opinion."

Really only 12% actually miss the NBA. heh

Bane 11-08-2011 06:20 PM

Pass shoot repeat.Repeat.Repeat...****'em.


Well..... Bye......

Saul Good 11-08-2011 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 8092938)
:spock: how so?

Lots of star power, embrace the role of villains... They aren't they same style of team, but they fit the "bad guys" bill.

Saul Good 11-08-2011 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bane (Post 8092969)
Pass shoot repeat.Repeat.Repeat...****'em.


Well..... Bye......

They pass now? I thought that stopped around the time Allen Iverson got drafted.

teedubya 11-08-2011 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 8092962)
"Overall, 76 percent said they weren't missing NBA games, 12 percent were and 12 percent did not have an opinion."

Really only 12% actually miss the NBA. heh

WE. ARE. THE 88%.

dirk digler 11-08-2011 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8092912)
Do you see anything that compares to the Showtime Lakers, the Bird Celtics, the Thomas Bad Boys, the MJ Bulls in talent, quality of play, style?
How about popularity, fan involvement, likability?
I don't.

Showtime Lakers = Lakers from 2000-today
Bird Celtics = current Celtics team
Bad Boys = Miami Heat
MJ Bulls = no comparison

If you want to talk about popularity, fan involvement, likability, and exciting go watch the Oklahoma Thunder play. They are one if not the most exciting and likable team in the NBA. And Kevin Durant is a star.

Brock 11-08-2011 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 8093019)
Showtime Lakers = Lakers from 2000-today
Bird Celtics = current Celtics team
Bad Boys = Miami Heat
MJ Bulls = no comparison.

ROFL no.

Saul Good 11-08-2011 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 8093019)
Showtime Lakers = Lakers from 2000-today
Bird Celtics = current Celtics team
Bad Boys = Miami Heat
MJ Bulls = no comparison

If you want to talk about popularity, fan involvement, likability, and exciting go watch the Oklahoma Thunder play. They are one if not the most exciting and likable team in the NBA. And Kevin Durant is a star.

I could see something more like:

Showtime Lakers = Shaq and Kobe Lakers or Suns with Nash, Stoudemire, and Marion
Bird Celtics = Dallas Mavericks
Bad Boys = Miami Heat
MJ Bulls = Lakers post Shaq

RealSNR 11-08-2011 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 8092670)
I'd miss it in May. Just because I ****ing hate baseball season and the only thing that is on ESPN from April to August is baseball.

I agree with Knowmo???!!?!?!

dirk digler 11-08-2011 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 8093021)
ROFL no.

At least give me some credit for trying :D

Seriously though the Showtime Lakers won 5 Championships which is the same that the Lakers from 2000-current have.

The book isn't written on the Heat yet but the villain role fits them.

And I absolutely stand by my statement in regards to the Thunder.

whoman69 11-08-2011 06:56 PM

I think the game is as popular as ever but the number of strikes they've had and the economic forces have caused people not to care. The last time they had a strike eat into the season like this the NBA players were striking for the right to smoke dope. It took a long time for me to turn an NBA game on after that.

FAX 11-08-2011 07:07 PM

Hey everybody!

Tombstone is on.

FAX

KevB 11-08-2011 09:26 PM

Interesting that there are nine pages of posts filled with people who don't care one bit about the NBA. For something so unworthy of attention, there seems to be quite a bit of attention being paid. I didn't realize the NBA was this polarizing, I just assumed people that don't like it simply disregard it entirely.

Saul Good 11-08-2011 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevB (Post 8093422)
Interesting that there are nine pages of posts filled with people who don't care one bit about the NBA. For something so unworthy of attention, there seems to be quite a bit of attention being paid. I didn't realize the NBA was this polarizing, I just assumed people that don't like it simply disregard it entirely.

I think there are people who actively dislike it.

Pitt Gorilla 11-08-2011 09:46 PM

I miss it already. LOVE the NBA.

Saul Good 11-08-2011 09:46 PM

Is the WNBA on strike?

Mike in SW-MO 11-08-2011 10:03 PM

First thought from headline was that means 72 mil do miss it. Sounds pretty good for nba. Then saw another 12% had no opinion. Means only 36 mil care. That not so good for nba.

Dr. Johnny Fever 11-08-2011 10:07 PM

I can't say I actively miss it but I wouldn't mind seeing some games. It would be better than 99% of the other shit on tv. I like the stretch run and playoffs pretty well. If KC had a team I'd probably care more right now.

blaise 11-09-2011 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 8093019)
Showtime Lakers = Lakers from 2000-today
Bird Celtics = current Celtics team
Bad Boys = Miami Heat
MJ Bulls = no comparison

If you want to talk about popularity, fan involvement, likability, and exciting go watch the Oklahoma Thunder play. They are one if not the most exciting and likable team in the NBA. And Kevin Durant is a star.

I like the current NBA but no way were the 2000-today Lakers as fun to watch as the Showtime Lakers.
And the current Celts aren't the Bird Celtics.
Those are very high standards, though. If you're talking about the Showtime Lakers and Bird Celts you're talking about two teams that were among the most interesting in NBA history. I don't think there's any shame in not being their equal. The current era Celtics and Lakers have had some exciting teams and have been fun to watch.
I would say the Bad Boys=Heat is good. Although, the Bad Boys were sort of the likable villain. The Heat were sort of whiny jerk villains last year. But they are very compelling, no doubt. And I think Lebron is starting to get it. Poking fun at himself in the McDonalds ads was smart. He made himself more likable with those, in my opinion.
I think the NBA is great right now. The NHL too, by the way. Both leagues have been very entertaining the last few years.

notorious 11-09-2011 08:43 AM

The playoffs are worth watching, but the regular season sucks unless you attend the game.

vailpass 11-09-2011 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8092922)
I feel like your the old guy on the porch chanting "In my day......"

Nah, just voicing my honest opinion. Not trying to force it on anyone else. I understand we all like what we like and there is no right or wrong about it.

vailpass 11-09-2011 11:47 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Groupon (Post 8093037)
I could see something more like:

Showtime Lakers = Shaq and Kobe Lakers or Suns with Nash, Stoudemire, and Marion
Bird Celtics = Dallas Mavericks
Bad Boys = Miami Heat
MJ Bulls = Lakers post Shaq

*

BWillie 11-09-2011 07:05 PM

The reason why ppl don't like NBA. It's because it is now Euro Trash infested. Think about it. Ever since it went international, casual fans haven't cared as much about it. What is the most popular sport in the US? NFL, by far. And there are literally no international players. Hmm ?

milkman 11-09-2011 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 8095741)
The reason why ppl don't like NBA. It's because it is now Euro Trash infested. Think about it. Ever since it went international, casual fans haven't cared as much about it. What is the most popular sport in the US? NFL, by far. And there are literally no international players. Hmm ?

I just clicked on this thread and randomly read this post.

Gotta say, that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

BWillie 11-09-2011 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8095752)
I just clicked on this thread and randomly read this post.

Gotta say, that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

LOL, I mean, I'm not really serious, but it seems right as Euro Trash came to the NBA. It dropped off in popularity.

blaise 11-09-2011 07:28 PM

The Euro players are part of the reason it got better, I think. They run and shoot. It was Steve Francis and AI and them that did the whole dribble out the shot clock, then drive the lane with 5 seconds to go and jack up some crappy shot iso-game. Not the Euros.

milkman 11-09-2011 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 8095778)
LOL, I mean, I'm not really serious, but it seems right as Euro Trash came to the NBA. It dropped off in popularity.

It has more to do with the fact that everything is under the microscope more than it used to be because of the internet, and player's images can't hold up under the scrutiny.

Because of that, you don't have the Magic-Bird-Jordan celebrity to sell the sport.

dirk digler 11-09-2011 08:13 PM

There is some rumblings that a deal is close so hopefully we won't have to miss the NBA much longer

Spott 11-09-2011 08:53 PM

I don't miss the NBA now, but the other day I saw a rerun of a Bulls/Lakers game from the 88-89 season and couldn't keep my eyes off it. Nothing from the past 10-15 years matches watching Magic, Kareem and James Worthy going up against MJ, Scottie, etc.

keg in kc 11-09-2011 08:54 PM

The only thing better would be if the league dissolved and I never had to hear about it ever again.

KevB 11-09-2011 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8095793)
It has more to do with the fact that everything is under the microscope more than it used to be because of the internet, and player's images can't hold up under the scrutiny.

Because of that, you don't have the Magic-Bird-Jordan celebrity to sell the sport.

This is a HUGE part of it. Bird and Jordan were assholes. Magic was an arrogant womanizer. Those guys would get slaughtered in today's media with the likes of Twitter and Deadspin.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.