ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I actually enjoy watching Palko play QB (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=253300)

Coogs 12-04-2011 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 8171061)
his issue is in his midsection (core strength) - it's lacking. I'm pretty sure he is a good athelete, I was just telling clay, I bet the guy shoots a 75, bowls a 300 and could hit ten free throws in a row. But he needs core strenghth. STRENGTH is his problem.

Is this fixable?

Phobia 12-04-2011 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 8171073)
Elway? He really stank.

Nah - same era though.

okcchief 12-04-2011 10:50 PM

He is better than Cassel at certain aspects but he can't throw the ****ing ball at all. Even compared to Cassel.

FAX 12-04-2011 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171063)
It is hard to get worse than 3 turnovers in 3 plays, but really since that point he has played pretty solid football. Not spectaulr, but solid.

And our defense is playing lights out since then too. It may not be a coincidence. I belive this team was closer to quiting on Cassel than they are to quiting on Palko.

In my highly undervalued opinion, I think you're right there, Mr. Coogs.

A change at quarterback can mean as much to a team as it does to a fanbase. I firmly believe that every player on the Chiefs was reaching the end of their rope for Cassel. I'll bet that if you took an anonymous poll of the players, they'd vote him off the team entirely ... or, at least as a starter.

It seems to me it would be very difficult to get up for the game week after week when you know in your heart that your quarterback is a certified, gold-star doofus.

Professional sports teams function at a high level depending on a variety of factors. There's money. There's pride. There's competitive nature. There's purple drank. There's self-preservation. There's the roar of the crowd and the smell of the grease paint. There's all that stuff.

Win or lose, you're going to get paid, but I think a lot of these guys would just as soon win and anything a staff can do to make them believe they have a chance is a net positive. A change at quarterback is one of those things.

FAX

Hydrae 12-04-2011 10:59 PM

I was not able to see the game but I am curious about something. I noticed that Palko looked like a different QB on the last two drives last week. He was active before the snap and seemed to be much more in charge, moving people around before the snap and pointing out defenders. Was he like that at all this week?

FAX 12-04-2011 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrae (Post 8171102)
I was not able to see the game but I am curious about something. I noticed that Palko looked like a different QB on the last two drives last week. He was active before the snap and seemed to be much more in charge, moving people around before the snap and pointing out defenders. Was he like that at all this week?

Pretty much. From the standpoint of breaking the huddle, evaluating the defensive look, and making moose ears, he seemed in control.

Then things would go downhill for a few seconds.

You could tell, though, that he was extremely well prepared.

FAX

Frankie 12-05-2011 12:57 AM

Actually watching Palko in action today I was making this comment to the wife, that he seems to have an understanding of the game and some talent in directing formation changes, reading the D, etc. He's just so woefully unarmed in the physical talent department that it's painful to watch him sometimes. It's like his mind is willing but the almighty just has not put the arm strength, accuracy into his body. Palko is just the type of player that might make a very good coach someday.

JCharles1981 12-05-2011 01:09 AM

Tell me we don't have a thread featuring a guy who almost seems to be worshiping Tyler Palko. One decent game out of three has yet to convince me that he has done any better than Matt Cassell this season.

jd1020 12-05-2011 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 8171084)
He is better than Cassel at certain aspects but he can't throw the ****ing ball at all. Even compared to Cassel.


I'll give Palko 1 thing. He doesn't take sacks on hail mary's.

Phobia 12-05-2011 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 8171084)
He is better than Cassel at certain aspects but he can't throw the ****ing ball at all. Even compared to Cassel.

His arm isn't his best feature but he did chuck the rock 55+ yards today. I know most of us throw 70+ but 55 isn't really a completely weak arm. He just has some mechanics to work out. Don't misunderstand. Still not a Palko fan but he's not as awful as some of you would like to think. He is what he is - a journeyman career backup from 3 leagues. That's not going to get you far but he is what we have for now and I happen to enjoy watching him scamper away from pressure. Haven't really seen that in 3 years.

KC Hawks 12-05-2011 03:29 AM

If we could just combine Palko's awareness and heart with Cassel's ability and toughness...wait, we'd still have a piece of shit QB.

AndChiefs 12-05-2011 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 8171068)
Here are some stats for a QB's first 11 games.
155 for 293 52.9 comp per 1749 yards 9 td's 18 int 159.0 yards per game 55.7 rating 19 sacks

Steve Young?

cdcox 12-05-2011 06:28 AM

In the 20 some odd drives led by Palko we have 1 TD on a fluke
play on a hail Mary. I don't enjoy watching Palko
play at all. Cassel is a more viable QB even though his pocket mechanics and reads are worse. This is not an edirsement of Cassel, but a demonstration of how bad Palko is.

InChiefsHeaven 12-05-2011 07:02 AM

Indeed. If Cassel were in there, likely we'd have won against the Steelers and I believe we would have won yesterday as well.

BUT...Palko is fun to watch simply because he moves around, and also just seeing his fail has GOT to get the Chiefs in a better position to draft a QB while at the same time guys are getting some experience. The Defense I believe (barring injury) is going to be downright scary as hell next year. Add to that Charles, Moeaki and hopefully an improved QB and the Chiefs are going to be a good team.

outhega 12-05-2011 07:07 AM

When I watch Palko play I get the same empty inside, light headed feeling i get right after an huge shit.

King_Chief_Fan 12-05-2011 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8171291)
I'll give Palko 1 thing. He doesn't take sacks on hail mary's.

and he doesn't throw his hand into the opposing D's helmets!:)

Inspector 12-05-2011 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCharles1981 (Post 8171236)
Tell me we don't have a thread featuring a guy who almost seems to be worshiping Tyler Palko. One decent game out of three has yet to convince me that he has done any better than Matt Cassell this season.


Ok.

We don't have a thread featuring a guy who almost seems to be worshiping Tyler Palko.

There ya go. Glad to help out.

MahiMike 12-05-2011 07:16 AM

He'll make a good coach.

BoneKrusher 12-05-2011 07:33 AM

as opposed to Cassel, Yes.

Tribal Warfare 12-05-2011 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8170278)
I know I am going to be in the major minority, but the dude is far, far easier for me to watch than Cassel. His pocket presence, and movements within the pocket are not painful to watch. When he is on the move outside the pocket, I actually expect something positive to happen. And he can find receivers who are open down the field, not recievers who are blanketed damn near every single pass play.

Carry on.

I agree to a point too, because he's not the untouchable goldenboy when he ****s up.

BoneKrusher 12-05-2011 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 8171332)
If we could just combine Palko's awareness and heart with Cassel's ability and toughness...wait, we'd still have a piece of shit QB.

agreed.

Coogs 12-05-2011 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 8171304)
His arm isn't his best feature but he did chuck the rock 55+ yards today. I know most of us throw 70+ but 55 isn't really a completely weak arm. He just has some mechanics to work out. Don't misunderstand. Still not a Palko fan but he's not as awful as some of you would like to think. He is what he is - a journeyman career backup from 3 leagues. That's not going to get you far but he is what we have for now and I happen to enjoy watching him scamper away from pressure. Haven't really seen that in 3 years.

:clap::clap::clap:

Coogs 12-05-2011 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCharles1981 (Post 8171236)
Tell me we don't have a thread featuring a guy who almost seems to be worshiping Tyler Palko. One decent game out of three has yet to convince me that he has done any better than Matt Cassell this season.

Trust me, I do not worship Palko. But the dude is giving me hope. Hope that the front office can see the need for a real QB, and a real leader at the QB position.

Personally, I don't think Cassel is all that as a leader. His post game comments have to piss off his teammates. Such things as... "I impressed myself".

Palko on the other hand states he is bothered by the fact that he let his teammates down. And I think they are all paying harder... on both sides of the ball... but especially on defense.

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171476)
Trust me, I do not worship Palko. But the dude is giving me hope. Hope that the front office can see the need for a real QB, and a real leader at the QB position.

I disagree completely. I think Pioli looks at the team with Palko and says that with the D playing like they are now, Cassel would be putting up more points and they'd be winning comfortably.

Coogs 12-05-2011 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171487)
I disagree completely. I think Pioli looks at the team with Palko and says that with the D playing like they are now, Cassel would be putting up more points and they'd be winning comfortably.

We are going to be on opposite sides of the fence on this one nj. You know the defense has to sit in on film sessions... if not live action on Sundays... and see Cassel miss open receiver after open receiver, and then say things like he was very good in his performance during the game. Same goes for the offense.

whoman69 12-05-2011 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 8170868)
L.A. Chieffan is the least interesting person I know.

FYP

BoneKrusher 12-05-2011 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171487)
I disagree completely. I think Pioli looks at the team with Palko and says that with the D playing like they are now, Cassel would be putting up more points and they'd be winning comfortably.

the Defense probably would give the effort we've seen vs the Steelers and the Bears if Cassel was playing. they know they have as much of a chance at winning with him as a snowball in hell.

Lzen 12-05-2011 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 8170473)
I know we're in the minority, but like you, when Palko goes back I don't expect the worst, which is unfortunately the case whenever I see Cassel drop back.

Granted, Palko is likely statistically worse than Cassel on things like interceptions, so I'm not sure why I feel differently about them. Interceptions aside, I think it's because I don't see Palko doing inexplicable things like throwing the ball 20 yards into the stands instead of looking at his second read.

Palko is an enigma. He looks decent in several areas and seems to be able to move the ball. But then he'll make some bone headed decision and its a turnover. Kinda like Grbac.

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8171539)
the Defense probably would give the effort we've seen vs the Steelers and the Bears if Cassel was playing. they know they have as much of a chance at winning with him as a snowball in hell.

They didn't make the playoffs with him last year.

Coogs 12-05-2011 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 8171547)
Palko is an enigma. He looks decent in several areas and seems to be able to move the ball. But then he'll make some bone headed decision and its a turnover. Kinda like Grbac.

He is a journeyman QB. But he does a lot of good things. If you were expecting our backup QB to be Rodgers, Brees, or Brady... then yes you probably think he totally sucks, like many people here do.

And he really hasn't turned it over since early in the game against the Steelers where he had the 3 in 3 plays. The one at the end of the game you really can't fault anyone. Time was running short, and a play had to be made. That's just football.

BoneKrusher 12-05-2011 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171655)
They didn't make the playoffs with him last year.

the Playoff season with cassel last year was tainted with a cupcake schedule, just look at it as if it didn't really happen.

L.A. Chieffan 12-05-2011 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 8171536)
FYP

You know whoreman, you really need to get out of this slump. Maybe a lithium or a diet coke

Nightfyre 12-05-2011 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171660)
And he really hasn't turned it over since early in the game against the Steelers where he had the 3 in 3 plays. The one at the end of the game you really can't fault anyone. Time was running short, and a play had to be made. That's just football.

Sure I can. That was a reeruned play. You have to protect the ball, especially on a game-winning drive. An incomplete pass there is far more acceptable than forcing it into pentuple coverage. Pumping off the safety and hitting Baldwin over the top would also have been better. Or throwing the ball out of bounds.

Deberg_1990 12-05-2011 11:08 AM

Yea, i enjoy watching him play too. Heres our 13 drives yesterday:


punt
punt
punt
punt
punt
Hail Mary TD
FG
punt
punt
punt
punt
punt
punt


Masterful!

Coogs 12-05-2011 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8171765)
Sure I can. That was a reeruned play. You have to protect the ball, especially on a game-winning drive. An incomplete pass there is far more acceptable than forcing it into pentuple coverage. Pumping off the safety and hitting Baldwin over the top would also have been better. Or throwing the ball out of bounds.

We had 38 yards to go and 38 seconds left with no timeouts. It's doeable yes, but at the same time we were not talking Rodgers here. This is a journeyman QB in his 2nd career start against the Steelers defense. Plus his #1 WR apparently communicated something to him during the route, then proceeded to do something different. Hard to fault a journeyman QB with virtually no experience from throwing to his #1 WR with the game on the line.

Coogs 12-05-2011 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8171790)
Yea, i enjoy watching him play too. Heres our 13 drives yesterday:


punt
punt
punt
punt
punt
Hail Mary TD
FG
punt
punt
punt
punt
punt
punt


Masterful!

I guess I can enjoy a defensive game just as much as a 45-42 shootout. Now I really don't want to see 10-3 or so every week, but hey! :shrug:

Nightfyre 12-05-2011 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171798)
We had 38 yards to go and 38 seconds left with no timeouts. It's doeable yes, but at the same time we were not talking Rodgers here. This is a journeyman QB in his 2nd career start against the Steelers defense. Plus his #1 WR apparently communicated something to him during the route, then proceeded to do something different. Hard to fault a journeyman QB with virtually no experience from throwing to his #1 WR with the game on the line.

1) IIRC, we still had a timeout.
2) Tyler Palko isn't some rookie. He's 28 and has been in and out of the nfl for several seasons.
3) You can speculate all you'd like on who miscommunicated what, but you don't know shit, so don't state it like its a fact.
4) And yes, I can blame Palko for that pass. It was awful.
5) Palko single-handedly LOST that game.
6) I'm not sure why you are white-knighting on Palko's behalf here. He has zero talent. He is not fun to watch. But hey, at least he can administer an offense.

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171809)
I guess I can enjoy a defensive game just as much as a 45-42 shootout. Now I really don't want to see 10-3 or so every week, but hey! :shrug:

There is a big difference between saying "I enjoy defensive games" and "I enjoy watching my offense punt 11 times".

Nightfyre 12-05-2011 11:18 AM

There is also a big difference between a defensive game and a game in which both offenses are horribly incompetent.

Coogs 12-05-2011 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8171821)
1) IIRC, we still had a timeout.
2) Tyler Palko isn't some rookie. He's 28 and has been in and out of the nfl for several seasons.
3) You can speculate all you'd like on who miscommunicated what, but you don't know shit, so don't state it like its a fact.
4) And yes, I can blame Palko for that pass. It was awful.
5) Palko single-handedly LOST that game.
6) I'm not sure why you are white-knighting on Palko's behalf here. He has zero talent. He is not fun to watch. But hey, at least he can administer an offense.

You are correct on the first one.

As for the rest of it... damn dude!

Coogs 12-05-2011 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8171826)
There is also a big difference between a defensive game and a game in which both offenses are horribly incompetent.

So our defense had nothing to do with that game?

Nightfyre 12-05-2011 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171833)
So our defense had nothing to do with that game?

Any NFL defense should dominate each of these offenses.

Rausch 12-05-2011 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171809)
I guess I can enjoy a defensive game just as much as a 45-42 shootout.

I enjoy a defensive game more.

That said, I don't want it to be due to our complete ineptitude on offense with weapons out there...

Deberg_1990 12-05-2011 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171823)
There is a big difference between saying "I enjoy defensive games" and "I enjoy watching my offense punt 11 times".

This might deserves its own thread, but Colquitt was pretty masterful yesterday. He did a nice job of hanging the punts so Hester couldnt return them. The one he had to hit after the pentalty was pure awesome. He hung it to the side of the field where Hester had to let it bounce and couldnt return it. Beautiful.

HemiEd 12-05-2011 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 8171024)
It'd be fun to bring Muir in for a few snaps at some point, just to see how he'd do.

I think he has used up his eligibility.

Gonzo 12-05-2011 11:34 AM

You must live in a different dimension or something. Wither that or you're mistaking Palko for Flacco. Ya, that could be it.
Posted via Mobile Device

HemiEd 12-05-2011 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171037)
Like I said, I know I am in the minority. This place is not easy to go against the mainstream thinking, but I like a lot of the things I see him do. I just wish he had an arm.

I agree, it is like getting a tooth pulled, instead of your ear cut off with a butter knife.

Pocket awareness is a huge improvement, but damn, the guy is left handed and has his left foot forward in a gay pose at release.

Nobody could throw it very far doing that.

You would have thought the California Redwoods might have cured that problem.

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 11:37 AM

If you take away the lucky hail mary, Palko has a 4 ypa. That's remarkably low.

The only bright side that I saw to Palko was that he didn't let the Bears early domination get in his head like it would have Cassel. The first quarter the OL was atrocious. That would have set Cassel off into a downward spiral. At least Palko was able to shake it off and play to his normal level of suckitude rather than get worse.

Lzen 12-05-2011 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 8171821)
1) IIRC, we still had a timeout.
2) Tyler Palko isn't some rookie. He's 28 and has been in and out of the nfl for several seasons.
3) You can speculate all you'd like on who miscommunicated what, but you don't know shit, so don't state it like its a fact.
4) And yes, I can blame Palko for that pass. It was awful.
5) Palko single-handedly LOST that game.
6) I'm not sure why you are white-knighting on Palko's behalf here. He has zero talent. He is not fun to watch. But hey, at least he can administer an offense.

This.

SPATCH 12-05-2011 11:43 AM

Tyler "Pro Bowl" Palko

boogblaster 12-05-2011 11:47 AM

id like to watch him play russian roulette with 5 loaded cylinders ....

Reerun_KC 12-05-2011 11:49 AM

There is nothing fun about watching this guy play football..

Only thing he has done is prove to us that the OL still needs desperate Help and that Cassel sucks a lot less than Palko...

Watching him play football destroys the soul of NFL fans everwhere.

htismaqe 12-05-2011 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171870)
If you take away the lucky hail mary, Palko has a 4 ypa.

So he's actually BETTER for what these coaches want to do than Matt Cassel.

:deevee:

htismaqe 12-05-2011 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8171901)
Only thing he has done is prove to us that the OL still needs desperate Help.

You must not be watching the games.

His play has definitively proven that this line is more than adequate.

Coogs 12-05-2011 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8171901)
There is nothing fun about watching this guy play football..

Only thing he has done is prove to us that the OL still needs desperate Help and that Cassel sucks a lot less than Palko...

Watching him play football destroys the soul of NFL fans everwhere.

O-line got a lot better when Lilja went out for Hudson.

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8171906)
You must not be watching the games.

His play has definitively proven that this line is more than adequate.

Not really. The running game is still bad.

Coogs 12-05-2011 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 8171862)
I agree, it is like getting a tooth pulled, instead of your ear cut off with a butter knife.

Yep!

Reerun_KC 12-05-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8171906)
You must not be watching the games.

His play has definitively proven that this line is more than adequate.

That is why Battle and Jones are ripping the NFL a new one right now...

I watched about as much as my stomach could take....

Reerun_KC 12-05-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8171911)
O-line got a lot better when Lilja went out for Hudson.

Agree... Thanks to one of Palkos moronic passes....

Frosty 12-05-2011 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171912)
Not really. The running game is still bad.

That might have to do with how bad the RBs are.

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 8171927)
That might have to do with how bad the RBs are.

A good OL can open lanes for anyone.

Frosty 12-05-2011 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171932)
A good OL can open lanes for anyone.

Shitty RBs + no fear of the passing game by the defense = running game the o-line from the 2005 Chiefs couldn't save

htismaqe 12-05-2011 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171912)
Not really. The running game is still bad.

Minus the hail mary he's averaging about FOUR yards per attempt. Other teams know we can't throw.

It's pretty simple.

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8171984)
Minus the hail mary he's averaging about FOUR yards per attempt. Other teams know we can't throw.

It's pretty simple.

The running game is still bad. I'd say KC's run game is actually worse than it is statistically because of all the garbage yardage picked up on draw plays on 3rd and 10+.

FringeNC 12-05-2011 12:19 PM

I had hoped Palko would play well enough to demonstrate that Cassel was the main problem. He really hasn't, but he does some things obviously better than Cassel.

The one thing playing Palko demonstrates though is that Cassel and Haley can't get along. Look at the relationship a good QB and good coach have. These guys are so obviously estranged from one another that Muir had to be the intermediary and call the plays. Haley works with Palko.

I have to believe Pioli sees it can't work between the two, and will dump one of them. Sure hope it's Cassel.

htismaqe 12-05-2011 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8171997)
The running game is still bad. I'd say KC's run game is actually worse than it is statistically because of all the garbage yardage picked up on draw plays on 3rd and 10+.

They're outmanned on every play because of our shit QBs.

Other teams can stack the box against the run and blitz on every pass because we can't throw downfield. There's no threat of getting burned deep so they don't have to defend it.

FAX 12-05-2011 12:22 PM

Statistically speaking, when you break it down, we only need to improve in a few areas; first down, second down, and third down. We have fourth down down pretty good. We don't have those other downs down, though, so it's easy for the casual fan to get down on those downs.

We need to get up for downs.

FAX

Pasta Little Brioni 12-05-2011 12:25 PM

9th in the league in rushing, but 24th in YPC. Top 3-5 running game again with a healthy Charles.

Chief Henry 12-05-2011 12:26 PM

Does anyone know if Stanzi is receiving any snaps with the 1st team in practise ?

Chief Henry 12-05-2011 12:26 PM

Does anyone know if Stanzi is receiving any snaps with the 1st team in practise ?

BigChiefFan 12-05-2011 12:29 PM

I sure don't want Palko as the future of the franchise, but I'd say he seems more comfortable under center than Cassel does.

Micjones 12-05-2011 12:33 PM

He's definitely got poise, but his arm is AWFUL.

Okie_Apparition 12-05-2011 12:37 PM

Looks like Cassel has flat out worn out his welcome in KC

Chiefnj2 12-05-2011 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Henry (Post 8172035)
Does anyone know if Stanzi is receiving any snaps with the 1st team in practise ?

They don't even tell Stanzi the address of the practice field.

ChiefsCountry 12-05-2011 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Okie_Apparition (Post 8172063)
Looks like Cassel has flat out worn out his welcome in KC

Cassel was never welcomed in Kansas City.

Mr. Kotter 12-05-2011 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8170330)
I just said I enjoy watching him compared to Cassel. The dude does give me hope that the front office can see that a major upgrade is needed at the QB position... and that the Cassel experiment has failed. Palko makes plays behind the same offensive line that Cassel can not even see. And I for one, have enjoyed watching that piece be brought to light.

This much should be 100% crystal clear to anyone with eyes. :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 8172056)
He's definitely got poise, but his arm is AWFUL.

Yup. Immediate search for a real QB better be priority #1 for the off-season. Period.

WhiteWhale 12-05-2011 12:46 PM

JFC, you guys are goddamn insane.

Palko is the worst thing ever. The only passes he can complete are bubble screens.

ChiefsCountry 12-05-2011 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 8172085)
JFC, you guys are goddamn insane.

Palko is the worst thing ever. The only passes he can complete are bubble screens.

You are just looking at his arm, everybody knows that sucks but the rest of his game is fine. The OL isn't looking down right horrible, he has made the right reads and goes through progressions very well. Generally he makes the right throw, just doesn't have the talent to do it.

RealSNR 12-05-2011 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8171919)
That is why Battle and Jones are ripping the NFL a new one right now...

I watched about as much as my stomach could take....

Green Bay sucks at running the ball. Do they need a new offensive line?

ChiefsCountry 12-05-2011 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8172104)
Green Bay sucks at running the ball. Do they need a new offensive line?

They have two first round OTs how can they suck? ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.