![]() |
I've got the hopes that the reason they have not offered Orton a contract is because we really are going to try to get a QB in the draft.
|
Quote:
MAYBE 1 or 2 per team. I would expect them to get Bowe and Carr locked up before proceeding to Orton, if that is who they are targeting. |
I think Romeo really wants Orton. Hopefully we get him.
I think he could become a Gannon type thing, if put in the right situation. |
Quote:
|
I just can't imagine ANY kind of scenario where Orton would want to sign with the Chiefs if Cassel is on the roster. Unless the Chiefs are willing to overpay him to a long, guaranteed contract, which means that: 1) we're committing a shitload of money to two QBs who probably aren't the answer; 2) we hurt our ability to develop a QB in the next 3 years.
The path is simple. Trade Cassel. Sign Orton. Draft a QB in the next 3 years, hopefully sooner rather than later. At least... it SHOULD be this simple. |
Quote:
|
Been coming across a handful of articles favoring the Orton to Washington move...here is one of them.
I really hope we sign him as he seems to be the most realistic upgrade at the moment... http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...el1Q_blog.html Posted at 01:24 PM ET, 02/09/2012 Why signing Kyle Orton would make sense for the Redskins By Mike Jones It definitely wouldn’t make the headline splash of bringing Peyton Manning to town, but the Washington Redskins might be better off going after Kyle Orton as they look for a solution to the quarterback position. Not much is better than a healthy Peyton Manning, but at this point, no one knows whether Manning can regain his health, whether he even will be available, and whether he even wants to come to Washington. Landing Orton involves less risk and could ensure better continuity for a number of reasons, however. Don’t get me wrong, Orton is no franchise quarterback. A seven-year veteran, Orton has played a full season only once in his career, and twice he played 15 games. But the Purdue product is a solid quarterback who limits his mistakes and has the ability to keep a team in the game. The Redskins still need to draft a quarterback — whether they trade up for Robert Griffin III or take someone like Ryan Tannehill in the second round — and Orton would make a better bridge than Rex Grossman. Grossman had the respect of his Redskins teammates and coaches because he’s fearless, hangs tough and fires the ball downfield even though he knows a big hit is coming, and because he puts receivers in position to make plays. But he doesn’t have a conscience, makes poor decisions and too often keeps opponents in the games as well. So the Redskins most likely have gotten as far as they can with Grossman. An outside chance remains that he would return, but it won’t shock anyone if Mike Shanahan & Co. opt to go in another direction. When it comes to ability, Orton isn’t all that different from Grossman and is actually a little better. In 54 NFL games, Grossman has completed 55.2 percent of his passes for 10,232 yards (189.5 ypg). He has thrown 56 touchdowns and 60 interceptions. He owns a career passer rating of 71.4. Orton has played in 71 games and is a 58.3-percent passer. He has thrown for 14,532 yards (204.7 ypg) and 80 touchdowns, with 57 interceptions, and has a 79.4 passer rating. That touchdown-to-interception column is the difference. The Redskins would be able to bring in Orton, coach him up, plug him into the system and basically keep the system intact. The acquisition of Manning would require all sorts of modifications. Orton likely would be cheaper than Manning, as well. He had a base salary of $4.5 million last year, and probably would come at a similar price. That contract could include escalators that could increase it to $8 million to $9 million depending on how much he plays and how well he does. Mike Shanahan has said repeatedly that getting a quarterback won’t solve everything. He has added that the key to helping a young quarterback — or any passer, for that matter — is assembling a strong supporting cast. Signing Orton to a modest deal could still allow the Redskins to meet other needs. They need a big-play receiver, and the top two on the market, San Diego’s Vincent Jackson and Indianapolis’ Pierre Garcon, won’t come cheap. Washington also needs a right tackle, could need a left guard, and on defense must re-sign London Fletcher and address the safety and nickel back positions. The Redskins, entering Shanahan’s third season, could get a solid veteran in Orton and remain competitive while, at the same time, grooming a rookie who could take the keys in another year or so. |
We just signed Orton.
|
Quote:
Nut hooks? |
Nah just playing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think Vince Young would be perfect for the Shanny offense.
|
Quote:
|
I knew Tomahawk was trolling around in this thread, just wanted to get a rise out of him.
By bad though. |
How was I trolling this thread?
|
Trolling around was a bad use of words.
I knew you were reading this thread, just giving you a jilt Sorry, was playing a joke on ya. My fault apologies in order. |
Quote:
|
abORTON?
|
Orton, Campbell forgotten men among free agent quarterbacks
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-quarterbacks/
Orton, Campbell forgotten men among free agent quarterbacks The Peyton Manning story will be a daily soap opera for most of the offseason. Matt Flynn is this year’s Kevin Kolb. Drew Brees and Alex Smith aren’t going anywhere. After those four men, there hasn’t been a lot of talk about free agent quarterbacks. We’d argue that two players — Kyle Orton and Jason Campbell — would be better options than Flynn all money considered. Are Orton and Campbell ever going to be top-10 quarterbacks? Probably not, but the same holds true for Flynn. Orton and Campbell can perform at a competent level for a cheap price and win games if they have the right team around them. Teams like Washington, Miami, Cleveland, and even Jacksonville have to think about adding a veteran like them to the mix. Only one team gets Manning. After Orton and Campbell, there are some wild cards. Chad Henne, Vince Young, Josh Johnson, and David Garrard should all get work. We predicted where Manning, Flynn, and the two Rodney Dangerfields of this free agent class would end up on NBC SportsTalk. |
Would Pioli be pressing to get two draft picks for trading Orton?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Josh Looney @JoshLooney
Pioli: "We've talked with Kyle's people." #Chiefs going to continue trying to make something work with re-signing Kyle Orton. |
Dan Kadar @MockingTheDraft
Pioli said the team wants Kyle Orton back and he seems to want to come back. |
http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2012/2...as-city-chiefs
Door Is Still Open On Kyle Orton Coming Back To Chiefs http://cdn0.sbnation.com/entry_photo...8994_large.jpg Kansas City Chiefs GM Scott Pioli had a number of interesting things to say at his 2012 NFL Combine press conference. The trio of ACL tears -- Jamaal Charles, Tony Moeaki and Eric Berry -- should be ready to roll by next season. The Chiefs don't want to let Dwayne Bowe get away in free agency. The signing of Stanford Routt doesn't rule out Brandon Carr. And then this: the Chiefs want to re-sign Kyle Orton and it sounds like, Pioli said, Orton would like to return as well. Big difference between wanting something to happen and actually getting it done but interesting stuff nonetheless. To be fair to the Chiefs, they've been consistent in saying they wanted to try and bring Orton back. Romeo Crennel said the same thing as his season-ending press conference. We just didn't think Orton would want to return to Kansas City if Matt Cassel is the starting quarterback. There have been rumors connecting Orton to the Washington Redskins but they could be just that -- rumors. So maybe the Chiefs quarterback competition has been right in front of us this whole time -- Cassel vs. Orton? |
So what do we draft if we roll with Orton?
|
Quote:
|
I guess so.
I'm starting to warm up to the RT pick, but if Richardson is there I'd take him. |
Takers?
|
BPA.
|
Quote:
|
I want better.
But he's better than Cassel. Thats enough to tide me over for now, if it comes to that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'll just hope for a career year from Orton, its certainly possible, he's presumably going to have some killer weapons to work with. |
Quote:
|
Sign Soliai and Orton, draft Richardson.
I coudl get on board with that. |
Quote:
2. What are you talking about? What "replacement receivers"? D. Thomas had some injuries but Orton still had Lloyd, Royal and Decker. The only WR that was not on the team from the previous year was Gaffney. Otherwise same group of WRs. 3. Broncos fans said the same thing "Orton is better than everyone thinks, he doesn't get much credit, blah, blah, blah." Fact is, Orton stunk up the place and the Broncos were 1-4 with him starting. The Broncos even had a decent running game with McGahee. 4. Orton got a fat contract with the Broncos and he stunk. The only thing he's looking for is a big contract so he "may" be motivated to play for that reason. |
Quote:
<sarcasm sent> |
Quote:
Dipshit. |
|
Well....?
|
The Orton Yugo will be picking up steam shortly me thinks.
|
Gimme Orton and and Trent Richardson.
Let's go! |
I'll get on board with that.
Maybe we can get him for a visit? |
No thanks. I'd rather keep Cassel so we can speed up the process of Pioli being fired and Clark losing money.
|
AbOrton can die in a ****ing aids tree...
Just say no to Trash... |
Quote:
|
I'm OK with Orton. I'm not OK with Cassel.
|
I'd rather inject myself with aids than have Orton.
|
If Cassel is AIDS, Orton is HIV.
|
Orton is the next best option now that Griffin and Manning our out. Sad but true. Unless you dickfores want Cassel to trout out under center next year?
|
Cassel will not be the starter no worry.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would rather the Chiefs go with Stanzi then with Orton. Orton may have won 2 0f 3 games with the Chiefs last year but he wasn't all that impressive. Signing Orton just to replace Cassel is just going to shift the Cassel hate to Orton hate once he gets the job and doesn't do much with it.
|
I'd rather hate a reasonably prices Orton than a Matt Cassel.
|
Quote:
|
My thoughts have pretty much been covered by others already. I'd rather risk an awful season for the chance at a very good team than have one that's almost sure to be "just good". Stanzi > Orton
|
Would Shane Falco have played any better if Lou Gossett, Jr. played his coach?
|
Two Words
Carson Palmer... Tell me you wouldn't like to have him in KC |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your funny dude. Enjoy your draft picks there buddy, or lack there of them. |
Quote:
|
LIAR! You are just jealous because nobody wants to play in KC.... Hell Orton is gonna dump you now, How bad is it when Orton wants to get the hell out
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Orton? Why? You like 9-7 perpetually?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Way to set the bar really high.
|
I am gonna go ahead and call it for next year
Manning < CARSON |
Today.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.