Sincerely,

15 year old reactionary girl

:doh!:What kinda of crap is that. I really don't mean to pick on you Luv, but every damn time you post something it reeks of insecurities and just a shitty view of ones self.

Well, stop it dammit. I've seen your pics, you're hot, but you're self esteem is pulling you down. NO MORE

Wait, are we talking you or me?

I wouldn't say hot, but I'm working on getting there.

Don't you worry, I'm just fine IRL. Thanks for the concern, though.

I think we both know the answer to this.

Sorry for being a nosey neighbor, I just always see you putting yourself down and no one should do that to themselves.

If I wanted passive-aggressive bullshit in my life, I'd hang out with my family more.

Funny. I would have pegged you as being much older.

Surely you can slam someone without really slamming them.

And no, I'm not calling you Shirley.

Guys, just because this is a sticky thread doesn't mean you have to actually, ya know, get sticky, . . to post in it.

:spock:

I'll keep that in mind.

Where's the fun in that?

Well, I guess I can call you Shirley, if that's what you're into.

Oh, c'mon. This was actually funny. Nothin'? :harumph:

This is an excellent question if you can't recognize that a previously little known username adopted behaviors of the real troublemakers. It was essentially another suicide by mod. But you did raise an interesting point for those who can't perform deductive reasoning without flow charts.

I'd imagine your dad's parents would have had themselves a chuckle but that whole bit is pretty much played out for anybody under 70.

What can I say? I'm an old soul. LMAO

Did you see the threads he bumped? And the comments he used to bump those threads? He just added zero content posts to threads that had no current value.

It's pretty evident that he performed a search for thread titles with "taste" and "ass", and bumped the results of that search, in an attempt to fill the front page with threads about tasting ass (to go with the current licking ass threads)

If you can explain to me what his purpose was beyond being a jerkoff, go ahead.

You were still shitting your pants when Leslie Nielsen wore that "Shirley/Surely bit out in Airplane.

Actually, I was taking your post at face value. I don't know the poster.

And it's stupid as hell if such a bump of 3 threads is the cause of a banning.

5 days.

5 days to think about next time he feels like being annoying on Chiefsplanet.

What's your solution? Ignore the seven complaints (reported posts and infractions) and clean it up later? Wait to see if he bumps 5 threads? 10? 20?

FFS, he was begging to be banned...

It was actually 4 threads, not that it probably makes any difference to you.

So did you.

You just don't know how to quit me.

Really?

It can get a lot more "stupid".

Payton manning

Sorry kids, been traveling today.

I just wonder if anybody else is ****ing stupid enough to believe that on a day when a there's a stickied thread about banning somebody for bumping old threads, Bitchy Lee bumps an old thread, and he claims it's a complete coincidence? LMAO

And like I said, I didn't do anything about it anyway, other than calling it for what it was.

Anyway, I won't be around much this weekend, so carry on. Enjoy the melodic strains of Zach's menstrations.

going to the Cubs/Cards games?

he seems to be Just Not Gettin' It.

No he is following his wife around to different Karaoke bars.

No, in Kirksville, visiting friends, shooting my new/old rifle.

Going and ****ing Himself.

LMAO

I guess calling you out as a lying twat has ruffled your delicate parts.

JFC, obsess much?

Yeah, I tend to notice when someone threatens to ban me for perfectly reasonable BB activity, particularly when said someone is a fixated gadfly with a penchant for picking unsolicited tickle fights out of the blue.

And now you're lying about posts contained in this very thread.

Keep in mind, most of the people here are smarter than your clients. Certainly not all, but most.

I haven't read the whole thread, but has this been nominated for the Hall of Classics?

It was, but then it was also nominated to be removed if it was put in. So it's kind of a standoff at the moment.

Heh

For all the talk about moderation of this board changing and it being the main cause of good posters leaving, allow me to say that as someone who is firmly against banning for anything other than racism and personal threats, I'm convinced a lot of those great posters are leaving because they're tired of watching grown men act like little ****ing girls. At least they expect it from the girl...(Hope that was passive aggressive enough)

I'm struggling to find the right response, so I suppose this will do:

ROFL

If John Goodman dies before I do, I think I'm pretty ****ed.

:D

Welcome back, Dane.

Uhhhmm... hi Dane

Sweet.....:popcorn:

Well said. Thanks.

Hey SoCal. Hope all is well with you and your family.

Thanks, Dude. Good to see you as well!

Hey, Tampa Chief! What's shakin' in the intercoastals? Did they personally interview for "Magic Mike" or just your family members?

:D

Family is good and expanding. What's up with you, Captain Sully?

Coming any further south?

When does overt racism ever make it onto your ban-radar?

If someone unnecessarily bumps an old racist thread, they will be dealt with just as strongly as someone who bumps any other thread.

We're doing well to keep the blatant racist crap off this site. The passive crap is quite a bit more difficult.

FYP.

Let's just put it this way. Being racist is not against the rules. Posting racial slurs is.

**** no. It's going to be hot enough here!

:thumb:

Other than Dane being back (missed you man) I've not only decided that I don't give 2 shits. Better yet I've decided to share that with you. Sorry about that.

( bumps thread "TTT' pumps fist)

It's not the mods. It's the losers that have infraction giving power AND the people blowing their loads at every chance to complain about ****ing nothing. Honestly that's some bullshit. We need to be getting on those people not the mods. I've seen the light and the light are the mods. The shadows and the darkness are the reeruns with chips on their shoulders who can't look at anything, let alone themselves, and not ****ing complain. But the idea of giving people power to give infractions is ****ing reeruned in and of itself.

You do a lot of complaining yourself. The fact is there's less than a dozen rules here that are actively enforced, so I don't feel sorry for the handful of dipshits who can't follow them.

We quickly remove infraction giving powers from the people who are a little too enthusiastic about the feature. I don't think it's anything that is abused... more than once or twice.

Oh I do complain, but I mean complaining behind closed doors, in the form of reporting, to the people that can realistically do something about it. Bugeater you're not even getting the ****ing point. But then again you never do.

And that's good to know Phobia. I suppose you do have to give the power to someone because if I had it, I'd never use it and would defeat the purpose.

I don't think you have a point outside of the one on your head.

Yes, the constant whining you do about every little thing with no need for any kind of solution is better than complaints regarding breaking actual rules to those who could do something about it.... the more passive aggressive, the better.

Reported



Now I have to poop.

Is there a rule on how old a thread must be (either from the original date of the thread, or the last date any given thread was last replied to), that constitutes said violation? The "Drink of Choice Tonight" and "Workout" threads are of potential concern to me... So many rules!

Only if you try and make everything in the world black and white. There's nothing wrong with bumping an old thread if there's a reason other than being obnoxious.

Was it Joey that used to bump random shit at an ADD pace? I remember getting on here early one morning and seeing all these random threads with the last poster KurtCobain. That might have been the time when Bob Dole went on his Lock-A-Thread Rampage. Heh.

And if they're drinking an Obnoxious beer??? Ha! ;)

It's all good! I'll try not to be obnoxious... :D

You may be thinking of this:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=157139

There are lots of other sites on the internet with stricter rules than that. IE - when vailpass makes some veiled reference to monkeys and black people that he knows is just going to skirt the boundaries of what he can get away with - that would get him banned in most other moderated internet forum sites. At least from my experience.

So are you saying you want MORE rules, or are you just making a general observation?

:hmmm: I don't think I like you. Not one bit.

Sounds like a blueballs special.

I don't know anything about Evolve27 so I don't have a comment about his banning.

I have two other relevant comments/questions for Phobia (or another moderator) though:

1. Before this "ban for bump" rule came about, it was my understanding that when you had something to post, it was polite (but not mandatory) to first see if there was a relevant existing thread in which to post it before starting a new thread. Baby Lee's bump about Fred Willard a great example. Is this preferable or should we err on the side of creating a new thread?

2. Could we either do away with the infraction system or start banning people who infract others for something that the mods determine isn't really a bannable offense?

Bearcat's head is going to explode when he reads this.