ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Bill Maas on 610 said he expects Pioli fired this week (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265160)

Ace Gunner 10-15-2012 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9015659)
Clark is a business man 100%.

Until anything effects his bottom line, he aint gonna give a shit.

It's like what Whitlock said....TV contracts have gotten to a point where fans not showing up to games just may not be enough....because they're still making money hand over fist.

It hasn't been so far. 32 peas in Goodell's NFL corporate pod backed fully by the US military. Salute those troops, fans & thank your god for those great NFL punts.

http://www.trbimg.com/img-504d17a9/t...63yard-001/600

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015685)
Or the next John Harbaugh.

We might fail! Too scared! Get me me my Bill Cowher blankie!

I've already stated i'm not a Cowher fan, I would want a good Coach that was hungry if we're talking retreads.

Lzen 10-15-2012 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015685)
Or the next John Harbaugh.

We might fail! Too scared! Get me me my Bill Cowher blankie!

Are there any more Harbaugh brothers? LMAO

Reerun_KC 10-15-2012 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9015684)
It can stay right where it's at....

/Bengals, Browns, DUmpster fires

We are the Browns or the Bengals...

We havent won anything in over 20 years....

We are not better than the dumpster NFL franchises, WE ARE A DUMPSTER FRANCHISE....

Reerun_KC 10-15-2012 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015685)
Or the next John Harbaugh.

We might fail! Too scared! Get me me my Bill Cowher blankie!

Exactly!!!

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015685)
Or the next John Harbaugh.

We might fail! Too scared! Get me me my Bill Cowher blankie!

**** John Harbaugh.

Not only is he the maestro of one of the greatest sources of playoff misery for Chiefs fans but he's built EXACTLY THE TYPE OF TEAM THIS BB HATES.

HARBAUGH IS MARTYBALL...

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9015692)
We are the Browns or the Bengals...

We havent won anything in over 20 years....

We are not better than the dumpster NFL franchises, WE ARE A DUMPSTER FRANCHISE....

HEY! We are not those teams, we're better than that.

Reerun_KC 10-15-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015686)
That's fine.

We all have our preferences.

It's your complete refusal to allow anyone who's ever won a SB to be considered that irks me...

I would consider Gruden or Billick

Just not Cowher or Marty.

And Marty never won a superbowl....

notorious 10-15-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015673)
Because no coach in the entirety of NFL history has won a Super Bowl with 2 different teams.

In the modern NFL, I can't think of a single coach that, after winning a Super Bowl with 1 team, brought a 2nd team even CLOSE to another Super Bowl win.

You can call him an idiot all you want but NFL history is FIRMLY on his side.

Homgren.

Reerun_KC 10-15-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9015697)
HEY! We are not those teams, we're better than that.

LMAO

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 9015691)
Are there any more Harbaugh brothers? LMAO

They can suck it if molded after Jim.

MIAdragon 10-15-2012 08:15 AM

Clark must have noticed my thread that was so thoroughly mocked here. Suck it haters :).

cookster50 10-15-2012 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9015697)
HEY! We are not those teams, we're better than that.

Proof?

Predarat 10-15-2012 08:20 AM

Wish it was yesterday.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 9015688)
I sure as Hell don't want Cowher after he said he would stick with Cassel last week. 4321

It's TV.

I highly doubt "Chucky" would fellate half the QB's he does on the air if they were his QB.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9015698)
I would consider Gruden or Billick

Just not Cowher or Marty.

And Marty never won a superbowl....

**** Marty.

Why he's even in this conversation is beyond me...

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cookster50 (Post 9015704)
Proof?

We don't sit back and enjoy the rape, look at all the meltdowns here.

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015686)
It's your complete refusal to allow anyone who's ever won a SB to be considered that irks me...

Why would you WANT someone who has won a Super Bowl?

Do you use the lottery as your primary source of income, too?

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015715)
**** Marty.

Why he's even in this conversation is beyond me...

Only because I want him here unless someone makes a valid argument for someone else of course. :)

notorious 10-15-2012 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015715)
**** Marty.

Why he's even in this conversation is beyond me...

:D

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015696)
**** John Harbaugh.

Not only is he the maestro of one of the greatest sources of playoff misery for Chiefs fans but he's built EXACTLY THE TYPE OF TEAM THIS BB HATES.

HARBAUGH IS MARTYBALL...

Except that they have a QB. And they're using him more and more as he comes into his own.

The defense isn't even that good.

They're not Martyball anymore.

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9015719)
:D

Fine bring in forthmeal! At least KU will benefit.

ShortRoundChief 10-15-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015715)
**** Marty.

Why he's even in this conversation is beyond me...

It's the Chiefs way. Better than horrendous=good.

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015722)
Except that they have a QB. And they're using him more and more as he comes into his own.

The defense isn't even that good.

They're not Martyball anymore.

Meh, the Ravens almost lost to the Chiefs. If Catt Massel doesn't fumble the snap we probably beat them. No thANKS!

ShortRoundChief 10-15-2012 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015722)
Except that they have a QB. And they're using him more and more as he comes into his own.

The defense isn't even that good.

They're not Martyball anymore.

It is now fattyball.

ShortRoundChief 10-15-2012 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9015727)
Meh, the Ravens almost lost to the Chiefs. If Catt Massel doesn't fumble the snap we probably beat them. No thANKS!

Don't confuse a brief moment of inspired luck with consistent goodness.

FringeNC 10-15-2012 08:27 AM

I think it's doubtful that Pioli gets fired, BUT you really can't fire Crennel without firing Pioli. There will be either no changes or a complete purge.

(I don't count some BS move as making Gibbs DC in title only a change.)

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9015727)
Meh, the Ravens almost lost to the Chiefs. If Catt Massel doesn't fumble the snap we probably beat them. No thANKS!

Wow, all of that based on 1 game?

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9015732)
Don't confuse a brief moment of inspired luck with consistent goodness.

Exactly.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 9015712)
Wish it was yesterday.

I want a cryogenic chamber.

Wake me when we're respectable again...

http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pu...quint_9256.jpg

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9015734)
I think it's doubtful that Pioli gets fired, BUT you really can't fire Crennel without firing Pioli. There will be either no changes or a complete purge.

(I don't count some BS move as making Gibbs DC in title only a change.)

Yep.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015722)
Except that they have a QB.

LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015722)
The defense isn't even that good.

LMAO

chiefs1okie 10-15-2012 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN (Post 9015718)
Only because I want him here unless someone makes a valid argument for someone else of course. :)

I really don't see Marty being hired as a head coach... but I could see the logic in him being considered as a G.M. candidate. He is passionate about winning, especially within the division. He may not have always made the best decisions, (Gannon), but he was always a good motivator. Just sayin.....

BoneKrusher 10-15-2012 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefs1okie (Post 9015751)
I really don't see Marty being hired as a head coach... but I could see the logic in him being considered as a G.M. candidate. He is passionate about winning, especially within the division. He may not have always made the best decisions, (Gannon), but he was always a good motivator. Just sayin.....

yep.
during the Marty days it was cool to be a Chiefs fan.

Reerun_KC 10-15-2012 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefs1okie (Post 9015751)
I really don't see Marty being hired as a head coach... but I could see the logic in him being considered as a G.M. candidate. He is passionate about winning, especially within the division. He may not have always made the best decisions, (Gannon), but he was always a good motivator. Just sayin.....

Marty was a consultant to Hunt when we hired pioli....


Why trust Martha again?

Denver Mike 10-15-2012 08:33 AM

Maybe you guys will get lucky and pickup Denver reject Brian Xanders

BourbonMan 10-15-2012 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefs1okie (Post 9015751)
I really don't see Marty being hired as a head coach... but I could see the logic in him being considered as a G.M. candidate. He is passionate about winning, especially within the division. He may not have always made the best decisions, (Gannon), but he was always a good motivator. Just sayin.....

THIS!!!!!

Deberg_1990 10-15-2012 08:33 AM

All i know is Pioli has been awfully quiet and Clark has been the only one to say anything.

Not looking good for Pioli.

Reerun_KC 10-15-2012 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9015762)
All i know is Pioli has been awfully quiet and Clark has been the only one to say anything.

Not looking good for Pioli.

lets hope buddy lets hope.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9015762)
All i know is Pioli has been awfully quiet and Clark has been the only one to say anything.

Not looking good for Pioli.

There is nothing Pioli can say at this point that would help.

The best thing he can do is keep his mouth shut...

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015750)
LMAO

LMAO

Have you been watching the Ravens at all this season?

ChiefMojo 10-15-2012 08:36 AM

I think the best thing Marty can do for the Chiefs is just be Clark's consultant like he pretty much is already.

Sure I think most have entertained the Cowher thought as GM/HC but I just don't know if he has the want to/fire for the job anymore.

I think Billick and Gruden are the best choices but if Andy Reid comes available he should be seriously considered as well.

Whoever is the next HC, they will have extreme personnel powers I would bet.

As for firing Pioli now? Just promote Donovan to run things and Farmer to control personnel for the remainder of the season.

the Talking Can 10-15-2012 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9015762)
All i know is Pioli has been awfully quiet and Clark has been the only one to say anything.

Not looking good for Pioli.

pioli is just a coward hiding from accountability...he loves the $$$ and hates anyone beneath him

chiefs1okie 10-15-2012 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9015759)
Marty was a consultant to Hunt when we hired pioli....


Why trust Martha again?

At the time that happened, Pioli was the darling of the NFL. Bigger coup (supposedly) than any free agent player on the market. All the ability in the world doesn't always equate to success, but at the time he was a hot commodity. Peter principled. I only made those comments about Marty because there is a night and day difference in my mind about how the two interact with the fans, as a business decision I could definitely see Clark understanding how Marty would bring passion back to Arrowhead. BOTH ON THE FIELD AND IN THE STANDS.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015717)
Why would you WANT someone who has won a Super Bowl?

Do you use the lottery as your primary source of income, too?

When you need anything accomplished do you hire someone who's done that and done a good job or look for some young guy who's never done it and think " yeah, he looks like he could do this"?

boogblaster 10-15-2012 08:41 AM

in truth the whole damn team needs to pull their heads outt .. we dont look professional at all ..... clear outt the offices then clear outt the trash on the field .....

Bewbies 10-15-2012 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015782)
When you need anything accomplished do you hire someone who's done that and done a good job or look for some young guy who's never done it and think " yeah, he looks like he could do this"?

There's a long list of coaches that have won Super Bowl's with 2 teams. They're listed below:

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015770)
Have you been watching the Ravens at all this season?

I thought you were talking about the 49'ers...

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 9015785)
There's a long list of coaches that have won Super Bowl's with 2 teams. They're listed below:

There's a longer list of those that have never won a single one...

ChiTown 10-15-2012 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015782)
When you need anything accomplished do you hire someone who's done that and done a good job or look for some young guy who's never done it and think " yeah, he looks like he could do this"?

I have hired a lot of managers in my time. I generally assess the business first, and look for the right fit to the business, regardless of their background. Certainly, they have to be a qualified candidate, but they don't have to have previous experience in a like job. I'm generally looking for qualities that will make a good fit to the organization.

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9015774)
I think the best thing Marty can do for the Chiefs is just be Clark's consultant like he pretty much is already.

Marty was one of the people that told Clark to hire Pioli. Just FYI.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 9015789)
I have hired a lot of managers in my time. I generally assess the business first, and look for the right fit to the business, regardless of their background. Certainly, they have to be a qualified candidate, but they don't have to have previous experience in a like job. I'm generally looking for qualities that will make a good fit to the organization.

So you wouldn't disqualify a person due to the fact they'd previously run a successful business in the same field?

Does the absolute reeruned nature of that question stand out at all to you?...

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015782)
When you need anything accomplished do you hire someone who's done that and done a good job or look for some young guy who's never done it and think " yeah, he looks like he could do this"?

It depends on what I need accomplished.

If history tells me that, despite his track record, the guy that has done it before won't ever do it again, I won't hire him. Period.

TEX 10-15-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9015523)
Said he expects unprecedented things.

:rolleyes: Yeah right.

DBOSHO 10-15-2012 08:45 AM

Lets demote crennel and hire stanzi as hc

Bewbies 10-15-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015787)
There's a longer list of those that have never won a single one...

You missed the point. Entirely. LMAO

Lex Luthor 10-15-2012 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9015759)
Marty was a consultant to Hunt when we hired pioli....


Why trust Martha again?

Hindsight is always a perfect 20/20. Based upon the information available at the time, Pioli was a very solid choice. I don't think you can blame Marty for not knowing that Pioli would turn out to be such a train wreck. EVERYBODY supported the hire at the time.

Bringing Marty back in some role would be the best thing this screwed up team could do. Marty has ALWAYS turned shit teams into solid winning teams. ALWAYS.

Is he too old to be a head coach again? Probably. Expecting him to come back at his advanced age and instantly turn the team into a winner would be like expecting Bill Snyder to be able to do that at K-State. It's impossible.

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015786)
I thought you were talking about the 49'ers...

I figured that out about the same time as I posted that. :thumb:

I was talking about JOHN Harbaugh. I appreciate what Jim as done in SF but I like John as a HC much more...

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015790)
Marty was one of the people that told Clark to hire Pioli. Just FYI.

We've all made mistakes.

When you fail take a long hard look at why and move on.

Don't repeat them.

Molitoth 10-15-2012 08:47 AM

Bill Cowher has made a living trotting mediocre QB's on the field until he drafted Big Ben.

He is a hard nosed defense/running game guy that took 14 years?? to win a Superbowl in Pit.

No thanks.

Chiefshrink 10-15-2012 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9015523)
Said he expects unprecedented things.

:rolleyes:

Rooster 10-15-2012 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 9015525)
Unprecedented ... like a public hanging on the Plaza?

LMAOLMAO

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015794)
So you wouldn't disqualify a person due to the fact they'd previously run a successful business in the same field?

Does the absolute reeruned nature of that question stand out at all to you?...

Are you going to pick up a spent shell casing, load it in your gun, and attempt to fire it again, even though you KNOW it doesn't have a bullet in it?

TEX 10-15-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 9015808)
Bill Cowher has made a living trotting mediocre QB's on the field until he drafted Big Ben.

He is a hard nosed defense/running game guy that took 14 years?? to win a Superbowl in Pit.

No thanks.

He would be the best coach the Chifs have had in a long time, if hired. I'd take him in a second.

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015806)
We've all made mistakes.

When you fail take a long hard look at why and move on.

Don't repeat them.

All the more reason to not have anything to do with Marty. Very little evidence to suggest he's actively learning from his mistakes.

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9015815)
He would be the best coach the Chifs have had in a long time, if hired. I'd take him in a second.

Why?

ChiTown 10-15-2012 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015794)
So you wouldn't disqualify a person due to the fact they'd previously run a successful business in the same field?

Does the absolute reeruned nature of that question stand out at all to you?...

No, I certainly would not disqualify anybody that has had a track record of proven success in a like position. You'd be foolish to at least not interview that candidate. The real question is: Given their success, do they still have the same drive and passion to replicate their efforts on a start up business (Chiefs Organization).

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015805)
I figured that out about the same time as I posted that. :thumb:

I was talking about JOHN Harbaugh. I appreciate what Jim as done in SF but I like John as a HC much more...

JOHN has taken a defensive team and tried his best to infuse some offense into the franchise.

Jim has taken an offensive franchise and tried to sell them on Martyball...

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015806)
We've all made mistakes.

When you fail take a long hard look at why and move on.

Don't repeat them.

This is what I want from our new GM, if you make a mistake recognize it post haste and move on. Carl and Pioli were both horrible in that respect.

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015822)
JOHN has taken a defensive team and tried his best to infuse some offense into the franchise.

Jim has taken an offensive franchise and tried to sell them on Martyball...

I agree.

Like I said, I appreciate what Jim has done in SF. But I'm a big John Harbaugh fan.

TEX 10-15-2012 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015819)
Why?

Gonna combine two takes in my answer here. First, you're right about Marty not changing. However, Cowher did. I'd only want Cowher as a HC, not GM and NOT in a combined capacity.

HemiEd 10-15-2012 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9015600)
Well.... at least Marty could teach the young'uns how to properly hate the Raiders.

That would be a start.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 9015820)
No, I certainly would not disqualify anybody that has had a track record of proven success in a like position.

Of course not, it flies in the face of logic.

I rest my case.

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015825)
I agree.

Like I said, I appreciate what Jim has done in SF. But I'm a big John Harbaugh fan.

I don't like either of them.

htismaqe 10-15-2012 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9015829)
Of course not, it flies in the face of logic.

I rest my case.

NO HC has EVER won the Super Bowl with 2 different teams.

ZERO. ZILCH. NADA.

If you want to talk about coaches who are winners and have been CLOSE (Jeff Fisher comes to mind) then let's talk.

But if you want to talk about an argument that flies in the face of logic, it's the argument that a team should hire Cowher, Billick, or Gruden.

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015836)
NO HC has EVER won the Super Bowl with 2 different teams.

ZERO. ZILCH. NADA.

If you want to talk about coaches who are winners and have been CLOSE (Jeff Fisher comes to mind) then let's talk.

But if you want to talk about an argument that flies in the face of logic, it's the argument that a team should hire Cowher, Billick, or Gruden.

I was all for Fisher, most here hated the idea. He's certainly hungry and has some great experiences.

ChiefMojo 10-15-2012 08:57 AM

Marty and the whole NFL world thought Pioli was the hottest thing since sliced bread. To blame Marty for approving is short sighted and wrong.

Rausch 10-15-2012 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015825)
I agree.

Like I said, I appreciate what Jim has done in SF. But I'm a big John Harbaugh fan.

John appears to have that perfect balance of fire and calm.

It's his personality the team responds to.

He appears to be the "speak softly but carry a big stick" type of guy...

Imon Yourside 10-15-2012 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9015840)
Marty and the whole NFL world thought Pioli was the hottest thing since sliced bread. To blame Marty for approving is short sighted and wrong.

I agree.

HemiEd 10-15-2012 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9015685)
Or the next John Harbaugh.

We might fail! Too scared! Get me me my Bill Cowher blankie!

There it is, without question. The same problem with developing a QB, no patience.

Brady Quinn played that game yesterday with hand cuffs on, but he sucks!

Draft a first round Rookie, we will be patient then, promise.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.