ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Per 610 Sports. Russ Ball and Bill Cowher GM HC targets (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265284)

dannybcaitlyn 10-17-2012 08:55 AM

Im in!

Old Dog 10-17-2012 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 9023641)
I'd like to dig up that Lombardi fellar and see if he's interested........

Well, he would show as much emotion as Romeo on the sideline.

Molitoth 10-17-2012 08:56 AM

Ya know, I've been anti-cowher... but he will get respect from his players.
I really do think this roster has the talent (minus QB) to go all the way.

If Cowher drafts Geno Smith, I will be all about it.

ChiefMojo 10-17-2012 08:58 AM

BS!!!! You can still win in this league running the ball but you need a good QB as well for balance/moving the chains when needed.

Sounds like you just want to throw throw throw... might as well get Andy Reid then.

MTG#10 10-17-2012 08:59 AM

Dont forget this is the same Cowher that stood up for Cassel just two weeks ago and said he was a good QB.

BoneKrusher 10-17-2012 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 9023713)
Well, he would show as much emotion as Romeo on the sideline.

excellent. ROFL

htismaqe 10-17-2012 09:05 AM

LMAO

Does anybody realize that Russ Ball has never been in personnel? We are needing to replace PIOLI, not Mark Donovan.

This would mean that Cowher would be making the majority of the personnel decisions. I am NOT in favor of that AT ALL.

Mother****erJones 10-17-2012 09:06 AM

I think Cowher was just kissing ass because he knows Clark is gona hire him lol

Molitoth 10-17-2012 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTG#10 (Post 9023723)
Dont forget this is the same Cowher that stood up for Cassel just two weeks ago and said he was a good QB.

Yeah, Cowher's takes on Cassel have been very disappointing....

although I don't really think he's watched Cassel play... he's another idiot that looks at 2010 stats and thinks... "oh this guy is a pro bowl qb..."

dumbfucks.

Mother****erJones 10-17-2012 09:07 AM

How bout we hire a personnel guy that isnt egotistical and Adolf Hitler?

BoneKrusher 10-17-2012 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9023755)
How bout we hire a personnel guy that isnt egotistical and Adolf Hitler?

this would work. :clap:

htismaqe 10-17-2012 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9023595)
Regardless of what people think of the "marty era" it sort of makes sense for Clark to reach back into that particular era of Chiefs football.

It was the only recent era of prolonged success for the Chiefs. It would also help build goodwill with the fanbase to bring back in a "Native son" so to speak.

Because building good will with the fans is better built on warm fuzzies and nostalgia than on winning playoff games and Super Bowls.

ChiefsCountry 10-17-2012 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9023746)
Does anybody realize that Russ Ball has never been in personnel? We are needing to replace PIOLI, not Mark Donovan.

Not true Parker. Donovan is the marketing/business guy. Ball's has been in coaching and then working in the personal departments. He has been salary cap and contract man.

-King- 10-17-2012 09:22 AM

No to Cowher.


Russ Ball is fine with me. But doesn't he do the same thing Pioli did in NE? Worries me a bit.

DaWolf 10-17-2012 09:22 AM

When's the last time the local media got a Chiefs rumor right? Wasn't the guy from 610 saying that Pioli would be canned if we lost to Tampa? This takes me back to the "we've hired Shanarat" rumor.

Wake me up when Schefter reports on this...

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9023654)
I've been saying Russ Ball for a while now. You ****ers just need to listen to me. :)

I'm betting that these guys got the idea from you

Blick 10-17-2012 09:25 AM

I'm skeptical about Ball. Reminds me of Pioli. I'd rather have a guy like Dimitroff or DeCosta...guys who came up in scouting.

ChiefsCountry 10-17-2012 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9023818)
I'm betting that these guys got the idea from you

They sure as hell didn't get Cowher from me thats for sure. :)

listopencil 10-17-2012 09:26 AM

Why not hire Cowher as the GM and let him hire a new Head Coach?

DaWolf 10-17-2012 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blick (Post 9023823)
I'm skeptical about Ball. Reminds me of Pioli. I'd rather have a guy like Dimitroff or DeCosta...guys who came up in scouting.

Reading the article about him linked earlier in the thread, it sounds like he'd be more of a GM in name only. He'd be the perfect guy to come in as GM if you planned on giving all personnel control to the coach, which is something Cowher I'm sure would demand...

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9023746)
LMAO

Does anybody realize that Russ Ball has never been in personnel? We are needing to replace PIOLI, not Mark Donovan.

This would mean that Cowher would be making the majority of the personnel decisions. I am NOT in favor of that AT ALL.

Exactly. I think Ball would be a candidate as team president that would hire the GM and be involved in the coaching hire. But Ball would report to Clark Hunt, not the general manager.

Chain of command.

DaWolf 10-17-2012 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 9023831)
Why not hire Cowher as the GM and let him hire a new Head Coach?

You'd be saying hello to Russ Grimm. No thanks...

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9023827)
They sure as hell didn't get Cowher from me thats for sure. :)

The Ball thing. We kow the local media scours this forum for ideas.

htismaqe 10-17-2012 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9023806)
Not true Parker. Donovan is the marketing/business guy. Ball's has been in coaching and then working in the personal departments. He has been salary cap and contract man.

He's been an administrator his entire NFL career. He has never evaluated talent.

htismaqe 10-17-2012 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 9023836)
Reading the article about him linked earlier in the thread, it sounds like he'd be more of a GM in name only. He'd be the perfect guy to come in as GM if you planned on giving all personnel control to the coach, which is something Cowher I'm sure would demand...

Precisely why I hate the idea.

DaKCMan AP 10-17-2012 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9023699)
Whine whine whine.... :deevee: :deevee: :deevee:

You're a sad, crusty, bitter old man.

ToxSocks 10-17-2012 09:41 AM

What time is Pioli suppose to be on? And it's 610, right?

DaKCMan AP 10-17-2012 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 9023831)
Why not hire Cowher as the GM and let him hire a new Head Coach?

Hell no.

ToxSocks 10-17-2012 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9023703)
Execpt you cant win and run MartyBall in 2013 or going forward...

Martyball is a bit of a myth.

Martyball seemingly ceased to exist when he drafted a 1st round QB for the Chargers.

Same goes for Cowher in Pitt.

I'd take Cowher as long as a 1st round QB came along with him.

No Qb? No Cowher.

Bowser 10-17-2012 09:45 AM

Clark is waiting for the Norf to get fired in San Diego so he can bring him in and fix Cassel. Only then will we see Pioli's genious in sticking with him all these years.

ToxSocks 10-17-2012 10:05 AM

So...what time is the Pioli interview? Anyone?

htismaqe 10-17-2012 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9023939)
Martyball is a bit of a myth.

Martyball seemingly ceased to exist when he drafted a 1st round QB for the Chargers.

Same goes for Cowher in Pitt.

I'd take Cowher as long as a 1st round QB came along with him.

No Qb? No Cowher.

Martyball did NOT disappear in San Diego.

Martyball isn't just 3 yards and a cloud of dust. Martyball is risk avoidance to the point that it adversely affects the outcome of the game - aka "play not to lose".

Martyball doesn't just affect the offense. Marty had a propensity to use the prevent defense and other methods to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

TEX 10-17-2012 10:11 AM

Are the Chiefs going to have TWO GM's, because Pioli isn't going ANYWHERE...

Deberg_1990 10-17-2012 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9024036)
Martyball did NOT disappear in San Diego.

Martyball isn't just 3 yards and a cloud of dust. Martyball is risk avoidance to the point that it adversely affects the outcome of the game - aka "play not to lose".

Martyball doesn't just affect the offense. Marty had a propensity to use the prevent defense and other methods to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Well said, playing for the FG instead of the TD.

listopencil 10-17-2012 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 9023843)
You'd be saying hello to Russ Grimm. No thanks...

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 9023921)
Hell no.


I'd have to think that Cowher won't sign with anyone as the HC unless he's the de facto GM, and I don't think that really works out well. If it's Cowher then he's going to be a one man show running your team...I don't think he could handle that.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9023939)
Martyball is a bit of a myth.

Martyball seemingly ceased to exist when he drafted a 1st round QB for the Chargers.

Marty didn't "draft" Brees or Rivers. That would have been John Butler and A.J. Smith.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9023939)
Same goes for Cowher in Pitt.

I'd take Cowher as long as a 1st round QB came along with him.

No Qb? No Cowher.

The Steelers didn't draft a QB in the first round of the NFL draft from 1981-2004. That's almost as pathetic as KC's record. Cowher continually convinced ownership that he would win with scrubs like Kent Graham, Mike Tomczak, Kordell Stewart and Tommy Maddox.

That's just another reason he backed Cassel: The guy doesn't know QB's for shit.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9024036)
Martyball did NOT disappear in San Diego.

Martyball isn't just 3 yards and a cloud of dust. Martyball is risk avoidance to the point that it adversely affects the outcome of the game - aka "play not to lose".

Martyball doesn't just affect the offense. Marty had a propensity to use the prevent defense and other methods to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

I'll never forget the playoff game in San Diego between Marty's Chargers and Herm's Jets.

It was a war of attrition: Each coach was daring each other to lose.

Simply Red 10-17-2012 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9023450)
this team has enough pieces in place that a HC that knows what he's doing can make a quick impact.

by 'pieces' - do you mean turd or poop pieces?

vailpass 10-17-2012 10:29 AM

Why on earth would Cowher leave his sweet gig? And if he did, why on earth would he do it for a job like KC?

Simply Red 10-17-2012 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 9024135)
Why on earth would Cowher leave his sweet gig? And if he did, why on earth would he do it for a job like KC?

clearly you've never been to Hiboy or Gates or Taco Johns!!!!

saphojunkie 10-17-2012 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9023615)
No to Cowher. I know this might be unpopular but I think Cowher's time has passed and I think he is a tad overrated and a product of the Steeler's system.

He WAS the Steelers system.

Consistent teams. Always played tough. I loved/hated Cowher teams. And when he finally got his QB? Super Bowl appearance in the first year. Won it in the fourth year.

Cowher won't get out of bed without a top quarterback. I guarantee this guy saw the light once he got a playmaker under center. Like, "how the HELL did I ever go to movies without assigned seating before?"

Titty Meat 10-17-2012 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9024036)
Martyball did NOT disappear in San Diego.

Martyball isn't just 3 yards and a cloud of dust. Martyball is risk avoidance to the point that it adversely affects the outcome of the game - aka "play not to lose".

Martyball doesn't just affect the offense. Marty had a propensity to use the prevent defense and other methods to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

To be fair he should of beat New England if that dumbass goes down after the Int.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9024148)
He WAS the Steelers system.

Consistent teams. Always played tough. I loved/hated Cowher teams. And when he finally got his QB? Super Bowl appearance in the first year. Won it in the fourth year.

Cowher won't get out of bed without a top quarterback. I guarantee this guy saw the light once he got a playmaker under center. Like, "how the HELL did I ever go to movies without assigned seating before?"

Cowher didn't win a Super Bowl title until his 15th season in Pittsburgh.

Edit: Just re-read your comment. I disagree that Ben was "his" QB. Cowher never advocated spending a first round choice on a QB. The only reason Ben went 15-1 that season is because Cowher started Maddox. Who knows? They may have been 16-0.

If not for the injury to Maddox in game one that season, who knows how long it would have been before Rothlisberger saw the field. How many losses would it have taken?

saphojunkie 10-17-2012 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9024155)
Cowher didn't win a Super Bowl title until his 15th season in Pittsburgh.

And four years after he finally got a QB. I get what you're saying, dude. I just think that Cowher had competitive, tough, winning teams until that point. When he got his QB, he got to the Super Bowl.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Cowher would win a Super Bowl with KC. But someone needs to right the ship, and fast. I have confidence that Cowher could do that. I don't understand this revisionist history where Cowher was a mediocre coach.

And I have zero doubt that Marty would have won a SB if they had kept Brees.

He got fired after a 14-2 season, because he wanted to keep Brees over Rivers. That doesn't sound like a guy who the game had passed.

EDIT: I don't mean "his" QB as in his hand-picked guy that he championed. I mean he finally had a QB that could make plays when the game is on the line. That, to me, is the difference now between good teams and championship teams. If you don't have a guy who can make plays throwing the ball in crunchtime, you don't have a chance.

Simply Red 10-17-2012 10:41 AM

http://i.imgur.com/DwOYM.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/KdlJ2.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/BBxis.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/4zrKP.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/ovooD.jpg

Brock 10-17-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9024164)
And I have zero doubt that Marty would have won a SB if they had kept Brees.

You have to win a playoff game or two to go to the SB.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9024164)
And four years after he finally got a QB. I get what you're saying, dude. I just think that Cowher had competitive, tough, winning teams until that point. When he got his QB, he got to the Super Bowl.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Cowher would win a Super Bowl with KC. But someone needs to right the ship, and fast. I have confidence that Cowher could do that. I don't understand this revisionist history where Cowher was a mediocre coach.

I don't think there's any revisionist history happening. Cowher was a good coach that went to a Super Bowl and won another in 15 years.

Since then, his replacement has won a Super Bowl and lost another, in just a few short years (and with FAR less talent than Cowher's teams).

He was far from mediocre but his stubborn attitude towards QB's cost him and Pittsburgh several more shots at Super Bowl titles.

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9024164)
And I have zero doubt that Marty would have won a SB if they had kept Brees.

He got fired after a 14-2 season, because he wanted to keep Brees over Rivers. That doesn't sound like a guy who the game had passed.

I've mentioned this before but I guess it's worth mentioning again: Marty hasn't been employed by an NFL team since 2006. Why?

Well, it has nothing to due with his coaching. It has to due with the fact that he wants personnel control.

1: Cleveland. He was fired for Mike Junkin (#5 overall, bust) and the failure to hire an offensive coordinator after Lindy Infante left for Green Bay.
2. Resigned in KC after terrible 1998 season in which he wrestled personnel control from Carl Peterson.
3. Fired in Washington after 8-8 season for attempting to wrestle personnel control from Vinny Cerato.
4. Fired in San Diego after 2006 for attempting to wrestle control from A.J. Smith in San Diego.

In each of those situations, Marty pulled the "Me or Him" routine, in which he lost in every city but KC. If he'd shut up and coach, he'd be in the NFL right now.

But he can't.

saphojunkie 10-17-2012 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 9024174)
You have to win a playoff game or two to go to the SB.

Touche.

saphojunkie 10-17-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9024185)
I don't think there's any revisionist history happening. Cowher was a good coach that went to a Super Bowl and won another in 15 years.

Since then, his replacement has won a Super Bowl and lost another, in just a few short years (and with FAR less talent than Cowher's teams).

He was far from mediocre but his stubborn attitude towards QB's cost him and Pittsburgh several more shots at Super Bowl titles.

I can't possibly speak to the inner workings of the Steelers and the power struggles over who wanted what QB.

I will say this... Tomlin won a Super Bowl and went to another the exact same way that Cowher did: defense and a legit QB.

I mean, it's not rocket science. And I, for one, don't believe in the power of coaches nearly as much as some.

I think you're right in that the biggest thing a coach can do to shoot himself in the foot is to resist getting the QB. You have to find your quarterback, and when you do, don't try to run the ball 60% of the time.

If Cowher doesn't understand that the game has changed from the 90's era run-first, punt, defend style championed by Marty, then I don't want him. I want a coach who realizes that the game is played through the pass now, and without the ability and willingness to pass it deep, you will NOT win in the postseason.

God-willing, Cowher's distance from the game as an analyst has allowed him some perspective to realize that. If not, thanks but no thanks.

keg in kc 10-17-2012 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9024036)
Martyball did NOT disappear in San Diego.

Martyball isn't just 3 yards and a cloud of dust. Martyball is risk avoidance to the point that it adversely affects the outcome of the game - aka "play not to lose".

Martyball doesn't just affect the offense. Marty had a propensity to use the prevent defense and other methods to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

I'd say it's even more than that. Martyball (or Martyocrity as I like to call it) as a philosophy infects every level of an organization. Coaching, roster, you name it. And the end result is a team that can perform against the NFL average, but not against the NFL elite. That'll net you consistent seasons between 9-7 and 13-3, depending on how the schedule falls, keeps the stands full, but rarely gives you meaningful wins.

DaKCMan AP 10-17-2012 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9024210)
I'd say it's even more than that. Martyball (or Martyocrity as I like to call it) as a philosophy infects every level of an organization. Coaching, roster, you name it. And the end result is a team that can perform against the NFL average, but not against the NFL elite. That'll net you consistent seasons between 9-7 and 13-3, depending on how the schedule falls, keeps the stands full, but rarely gives you meaningful wins.

Martyball = risk averse coaching.

I want a coach that is not risk averse and, instead, plays the odds.

keg in kc 10-17-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 9024214)
Martyball = risk averse coaching.

I want a coach that is not risk averse and, instead, plays the odds.

I don't want any more defensive coaches. It hasn't made the team any tougher, and as the league moves more and more towards scoring, it's been putting us further and further behind everyone else. I'd rather try with someone like Haley and fail, then fail before we even start with another Herm or Romeo.

Titty Meat 10-17-2012 10:58 AM

I don't see how the Chiefs get Cowher. Clark will be paying 5 mil next year and 3 mil a year for the next few years with Romeo. You figure Cowher would command 7-8 mil a year.

Simply Red 10-17-2012 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9024227)
I don't see how the Chiefs get Cowher. Clark will be paying 5 mil next year and 3 mil a year for the next few years with Romeo. You figure Cowher would command 7-8 mil a year.

Gates bro - Gates BBQ will win him in.

htismaqe 10-17-2012 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9024223)
I don't want any more defensive coaches. It hasn't made the team any tougher, and as the league moves more and more towards scoring, it's been putting us further and further behind everyone else. I'd rather try with someone like Haley and fail, then fail before we even start with another Herm or Romeo.

This.

KCrockaholic 10-17-2012 11:23 AM

Ball has a large Missouri background. I could see the fit.

KCrockaholic 10-17-2012 11:25 AM

Although I do like Cowher, and I think he'd be a fun coach to have, I don't want him.

Give me somebody who is hungry. Cowher has his ring. And it took him forever to get it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-17-2012 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9023458)
Hey Gang,

LMAO

That takes me back...

And now, where is the post where Dane's head explodes?

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-17-2012 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic (Post 9024314)
Although I do like Cowher, and I think he'd be a fun coach to have, I don't want him.

Give me somebody who is hungry. Cowher has his ring. And it took him forever to get it.

You know what though?

There is a thing called "learning from your mistakes", and Cowher kind of strikes me as a guy who gets that.

BryanBusby 10-17-2012 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9024227)
I don't see how the Chiefs get Cowher. Clark will be paying 5 mil next year and 3 mil a year for the next few years with Romeo. You figure Cowher would command 7-8 mil a year.

If Romeo retires, he's on the hook for nothing.

BigMeatballDave 10-17-2012 12:39 PM

Exercise in futility.

NO ****ING RETREADS

whoman69 10-17-2012 12:39 PM

Fantasyland

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/17fiMhIkVu0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BoneKrusher 10-17-2012 12:41 PM

just give me a winner and i'm good to go.

ChiefsCountry 10-17-2012 12:44 PM

I think Winston Moss would be the guy who would follow Ball knowing the track record with both of them. But there is one guy I would keep an eye on and its not who I would look at but he fits the criteria that alot are looking for.

Brian Schottenheimer.

The history is there we know with the name. He does have a pretty decent resume with who he worked under. And he has worked with young quarterbacks. Brees, Rivers, Sanchez and now Bradford. Just file it away and don't jump my ass - because its not who I want, but its a name that will probably be considered.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9024527)
I think Winston Moss would be the guy who would follow Ball knowing the track record with both of them. But there is one guy I would keep an eye on and its not who I would look at but he fits the criteria that alot are looking for.

Brian Schottenheimer.

The history is there we know with the name. He does have a pretty decent resume with who he worked under. And he has worked with young quarterbacks. Brees, Rivers, Sanchez and now Bradford. Just file it away and don't jump my ass - because its not who I want, but its a name that will probably be considered.

I know for a fact that when Rex Ryan was interviewing for the Jet, B.S. interviewed as well. He lost the job to Rex but was the runner-up.

If the Rams have a good season, he'll most definitely be a hot candidate in 2013.

CoMoChief 10-17-2012 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9024527)
I think Winston Moss would be the guy who would follow Ball knowing the track record with both of them. But there is one guy I would keep an eye on and its not who I would look at but he fits the criteria that alot are looking for.

Brian Schottenheimer.

The history is there we know with the name. He does have a pretty decent resume with who he worked under. And he has worked with young quarterbacks. Brees, Rivers, Sanchez and now Bradford. Just file it away and don't jump my ass - because its not who I want, but its a name that will probably be considered.

God no....I'd rather have Marty....and I don't want Marty.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-17-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 9023895)
You're a sad, crusty, bitter old man.

Reerun can't get over his longstanding FAIL in the Pioli/Cassel argument.

Titty Meat 10-17-2012 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 9024503)
If Romeo retires, he's on the hook for nothing.

Romeo isn't going to retire.

DaKCMan AP 10-17-2012 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarthCarlSatan (Post 9024566)
Reerun can't get over his longstanding FAIL in the Pioli/Cassel argument.

Link?

okoye35chiefs 10-17-2012 01:14 PM

"come to KC"

Our fans fly banners,

The owner won't spend money,

and we Boooo injured players.

Lol that is one hell of a slogan!

Titty Meat 10-17-2012 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9024535)
I know for a fact that when Rex Ryan was interviewing for the Jet, B.S. interviewed as well. He lost the job to Rex but was the runner-up.

If the Rams have a good season, he'll most definitely be a hot candidate in 2013.

No thanks

Molitoth 10-17-2012 01:16 PM

Quote:

The owner won't spend money,
Isn't there a forced cap next year? Won't Clark HAVE to spend a league minimum?

BigMeatballDave 10-17-2012 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9024527)
I think Winston Moss would be the guy who would follow Ball knowing the track record with both of them. But there is one guy I would keep an eye on and its not who I would look at but he fits the criteria that alot are looking for.

Brian Schottenheimer.

The history is there we know with the name. He does have a pretty decent resume with who he worked under. And he has worked with young quarterbacks. Brees, Rivers, Sanchez and now Bradford. Just file it away and don't jump my ass - because its not who I want, but its a name that will probably be considered.

I wouldn't hate this. He would be completely different than Marty.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9024619)
No thanks

While I tend to agree, I'm not going to pass judgement until I see one complete season removed from Sanchez and the Jets.

I can tell you that he was putting together a very impressive coaching staff, he's organized and detailed. He's been in the business his whole life now and he was born, raised and played high school and college football in Kansas.

When you put it all together, it certainly makes sense from a P.R. standpoint, especially if the Rams have a good to great season offensively.

My opinion, at this point in time, is that I wouldn't love it nor would I hate it. It would depend on the GM, the structure of the organization and his staff. All that said, I'd be shocked if he weren't more successful than the previous two coaching staffs and administrations.

Mike McCarthy, another Chiefs alum (and Baker University) didn't appear to have a strong resume but look what he's been able to do in Green Bay with a great staff, GM and team president.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-17-2012 01:36 PM

Brian Schottenhiemer does a good job. It's not his fault that Snatchez is FAIL.

Molitoth 10-17-2012 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarthCarlSatan (Post 9024774)
Brian Schottenhiemer does a good job. It's not his fault that Snatchez is FAIL.

That's kinda being proven this year, huh?

okoye35chiefs 10-17-2012 01:51 PM

thoughts on Perry Fewell from the Giants (d coord). I think he is going to be a hot commodity come the off-season.

Cassel of love 10-17-2012 02:49 PM

Noob here guys.........I just heard on our local talk radio that Bobby Petrino is rumored to at least be on the Chiefs list if not already in talks to join the Chiefs. Any one else heard this.

Reerun_KC 10-17-2012 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarthCarlSatan (Post 9024566)
Reerun can't get over his longstanding FAIL of Marty and his cronies.

IT might take me awhile...

Gotta get a GM and HC in here to cleanse us of the stench of Marty's Mediocrity.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9025173)
IT might take me awhile...

Gotta get a GM and HC in here to cleanse us of the stench of Marty's Mediocrity.

Yeah, because the Chiefs weren't mediocre for the 18 years prior to his arrival.

:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.