ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Pacific Rim (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=267168)

Fish 04-30-2013 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9647633)
Needs to get brought back to the top.

One of two movies I'm looking forward to (other is Superman with mayyyybe Wolverine)

Any engineers here? What kind of energy would be needed to power heavy robots to be able to do the stuff they are doing in the trailer?

An impossible amount. Massively more than our current technology could ever provide. Current nuclear reactor power provides a nice long source of usable energy, but we still have considerable difficulty with dispersing the energy in the quantities necessary and at the rates necessary. Because it would take incredible instantaneous transfers of a great deal of energy. More than anything we're currently capable of. Not to mention that the idea of building a mech or gundam or whatever, in the form of a bipedal human, is just reeruned. Stupidly inefficient. You'd waste a shitload of energy just trying to make it bipedal human like. There are infinitely more efficient forms if we're making a giant badass mech. And it definitely wouldn't be powered by two people at the same time. Derp.

notorious 04-30-2013 09:43 PM

"2,500 tons of awesomeness"


Yet, it lifts a Oil Tanker (50,000-500,000 tons) which it's size is way out of proportion compared to the surrounding buildings and one of it's foes is about 75% as long as a Nimitz Class Aircraft Carrier (100,000 tons).


:hmmm:

(I must shut off brain and enjoy movie)

Rausch 04-30-2013 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 9647723)
And it definitely wouldn't be powered by two people at the same time. Derp.

I have no idea how they'll explain why that's a good idea...

notorious 04-30-2013 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9647757)
I have no idea how they'll explain why that's a good idea...

It isn't obvious?!


They need a woman/man team to power one of the machines so they can inject a love story.

Miles 04-30-2013 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9647757)
I have no idea how they'll explain why that's a good idea...

That does seem like a bad idea and also why is a ****ing giant human shaped robot the best way to combat ****ing giant aliens. Still the trailer looks great and it's Del Toro and he makes good things.

Simply Red 04-30-2013 11:23 PM

This looks like it could actually be WORSE than Speed 2

Rausch 05-01-2013 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9647761)
It isn't obvious?!


They need a woman/man team to power one of the machines so they can inject a love story.

This reminds me of Signs.

Someone ****ing other than me: "Yes, the science was piss poor, but the whole point of the movie was FAITH. It sucked you in to teach you about FAITH."

Me: "Love alien stuff. Love Sci-fi stuff. And right after 9/11 this was the perfect time to make this movie. Sucked me in. Completely.

I was that guy in the closet watching TV.

BUT ****ING WATER? REALLY? ****ING SERIOUSLY?

You ****ing point out in the movie that some people in the middle east found out how to beat them first. You pointed out before that they moved to areas AWAY FROM WATER.

SO IT HAS TO BE FRESH WATER THAT KILLS THEM.

THE EXACT SAME $3IT IN CORN FIELDS 3 HOURS AFTER SUNSET!

I'm out. Done. I know...it's still a good movie in the way.....just.....****ing away with you..."

Aspengc8 05-01-2013 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9647757)
I have no idea how they'll explain why that's a good idea...

How would you explain that its a BAD idea? It's pretty obvious they use two pilots for operational redundancy/reliability, and even say in one of the trailers the two pilots are linked 'neurally' thus acting as one.

Rausch 05-01-2013 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspengc8 (Post 9648068)
How would you explain that its a BAD idea? It's pretty obvious they use two pilots for operational redundancy/reliability, and even say in one of the trailers the two pilots are linked 'neurally' thus acting as one.

IT'S ****ING STUPID!

They take the time to point out it's a brain/spinal link and then point out TWO ****ing people steer the damned thing.

Ok, no. You're right. You're right.

Next time you go for groceries have your wife/gf/bf steer and you work the pedals.

IT DOESN'T ****ING WORK!1!

KC_Lee 05-01-2013 07:16 AM

As a fan of all things daikaiju eiga I cannot wait to see this movie. Also, considering the Legendary Pictures is doing the Godzilla re-boot next year I want to see how the CGI effects are done in thei film, and how well they are done.

Rausch 05-01-2013 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 9648134)
Also, considering the Legendary Pictures is doing the Godzilla re-boot next year I want to see how the CGI effects are done in thei film, and how well they are done.

Exactly.

To me (I hope) this is only a prelim...

Aspengc8 05-01-2013 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9648124)
IT'S ****ING STUPID!

They take the time to point out it's a brain/spinal link and then point out TWO ****ing people steer the damned thing.

Ok, no. You're right. You're right.

Next time you go for groceries have your wife/gf/bf steer and you work the pedals.

IT DOESN'T ****ING WORK!1!

Perhaps you missed the point where they are 'neurally linked as one'. The trailers mentioned it briefly and so far we see them operating in synch because they are bridged. This is why they mentioned sharing memories, etc.

Buehler445 05-01-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 9647723)
An impossible amount. Massively more than our current technology could ever provide. Current nuclear reactor power provides a nice long source of usable energy, but we still have considerable difficulty with dispersing the energy in the quantities necessary and at the rates necessary. Because it would take incredible instantaneous transfers of a great deal of energy. More than anything we're currently capable of. Not to mention that the idea of building a mech or gundam or whatever, in the form of a bipedal human, is just reeruned. Stupidly inefficient. You'd waste a shitload of energy just trying to make it bipedal human like. There are infinitely more efficient forms if we're making a giant badass mech. And it definitely wouldn't be powered by two people at the same time. Derp.

This. I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks this movie looks turrible/Barkley.

Some of that stuff could be done with hydraulics. Virtually everything on the sprayer and combine is done with hydraulics. But yeah, the response rate of the pump to do quick motions would have to be other worldly. Not to mention risk exposure of having the hydraulic hoses exposed to maintain range of motion.

I'm as big of a sci-fi nut as the next guy, but this movie does very little for me.

Deberg_1990 05-01-2013 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 9649623)
This. I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks this movie looks turrible/Barkley.

Some of that stuff could be done with hydraulics. Virtually everything on the sprayer and combine is done with hydraulics. But yeah, the response rate of the pump to do quick motions would have to be other worldly. Not to mention risk exposure of having the hydraulic hoses exposed to maintain range of motion.

I'm as big of a sci-fi nut as the next guy, but this movie does very little for me.

Yea I normally like Del Toro, but I'm sort of let down by the trailers. I mentioned earlier I hate the dark, murky cinematography. Have a feeling they set the action scenes at night in the rain to mask budget limitations. I think I like the idea better than the execution, but I hope it turns out better than what I've seen so far.

Tribal Warfare 05-02-2013 12:10 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mDNetVJThYs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Halfcan 05-02-2013 12:21 PM

Looks awesome!!

Fish 05-02-2013 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aspengc8 (Post 9649292)
Perhaps you missed the point where they are 'neurally linked as one'. The trailers mentioned it briefly and so far we see them operating in synch because they are bridged. This is why they mentioned sharing memories, etc.

Even if that were possible, which it's not regardless of the level of technology, there's still no logical reason for it. There's no advantage to having two people neurally linked as one, while there would be countless disadvantages. If redundancy is a concern, then you have a backup pilot.

KC_Lee 05-02-2013 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 9652649)
Even if that were possible, which it's not regardless of the level of technology, there's still no logical reason for it. There's no advantage to having two people neurally linked as one, while there would be countless disadvantages. If redundancy is a concern, then you have a backup pilot.

Or perhaps they are following along in the line of Godzilla having two brains (as seen in Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla II (1993)), one in his head & the other in the base of his spine?

Or perhaps it's just a cheap plot device?

Or perhaps, to paraphrase the MST3K theme song, it's just a movie and you should realy just relax? :p

notorious 05-02-2013 01:54 PM

They need a love story, that is why there are two pilots.

Aspengc8 05-02-2013 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 9652649)
Even if that were possible, which it's not regardless of the level of technology, there's still no logical reason for it. There's no advantage to having two people neurally linked as one, while there would be countless disadvantages. If redundancy is a concern, then you have a backup pilot.

redundancy is the logical reason for it. They never say if they act in unison or if one is a backup, my guess is that the main pilot has primary control, and other is a back up.

Fish 05-02-2013 08:45 PM

If it's necessary for redundancy, then why would a neural link be necessary? They could have redundancy without a neural link.

What happens when they have to piss?

Aspengc8 05-03-2013 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 9653940)
If it's necessary for redundancy, then why would a neural link be necessary? They could have redundancy without a neural link.

What happens when they have to piss?

I'm guessing so the transition from primary to backup would happen instantly without any delay. They are neurally linked so the backup is in constant sync, kind of how redundant CPU processors work with bridge technology.

Bowser 05-03-2013 10:46 AM

Listen nerds, it's a goddamned giant monster vs. giant supermech Guillermo del Toro movie. Who gives a shit about the amount of reality you're going to need to suspend to watch this geekporn. Shut up with the technobabble and fap furiously to the trailers already.

notorious 05-03-2013 11:09 AM

Am I the only sick bastard that sees "Pacific Rimjob" when reading the tread title?

Buehler445 05-03-2013 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9654979)
Am I the only sick bastard that sees "Pacific Rimjob" when reading the tread title?

Seriously? God ****ing damn you notorious. Seriously. Go **** yourself.

What used to be a perfectly acceptable movie title is now ass licking. And that power source in the chest of the mech...Yeah. Asshole.

I hate you.

ROFL

notorious 05-03-2013 09:32 PM

LMAO

I know, I have a sick, sick mind.

KC_Lee 05-06-2013 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9654946)
Listen nerds, it's a goddamned giant monster vs. giant supermech Guillermo del Toro movie. Who gives a shit about the amount of reality you're going to need to suspend to watch this geekporn. Shut up with the technobabble and fap furiously to the trailers already.

:whackit::whackit::whackit:

Tribal Warfare 05-16-2013 02:08 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5guMumPFBag" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

KC_Lee 05-16-2013 02:42 PM

:whackit::whackit::whackit::whackit::whackit:

ThaVirus 05-16-2013 02:47 PM

**** me.

sd4chiefs 05-16-2013 10:50 PM

1 Attachment(s)
:clap:

Hammock Parties 05-16-2013 11:33 PM

See now...that's the kind of movie Abrams should be directing.

Give him THAT movie.

Not Star Trek.

Tribal Warfare 05-21-2013 05:44 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/l805hTyUzPg?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Rausch 05-21-2013 08:35 PM

Quote:

Director Guillermo del Toro’s giant-robots giant-robots-versus-giant-monsters sci-fi action epic Pacific Rim won’t stomp into theaters until July 12, but the film’s backers already see its franchise potential as, well, giant—so much so that a sequel was greenlit before the movie was finished. After the first screening, Legendary Entertainment CEO Thomas Tull immediately told del Toro to start writing a follow-up. “He said, ‘Do you think you can come up with a great idea?’ ” del Toro remembers. “I said, ‘F—, yeah!’ ! Because on the way to the finished screenplay, there were entire angles and ideas that we chopped off because they were too much.”
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/05/2...ic-rim-sequel/

Aspengc8 05-22-2013 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9698035)
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/l805hTyUzPg?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

:drool:

keg in kc 05-26-2013 09:01 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vFWco9V9cfE?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

keg in kc 06-04-2013 12:02 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BcsFMTjgsCM?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

keg in kc 06-25-2013 10:27 AM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/e3h51pKZO9A?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

keg in kc 06-25-2013 11:54 AM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/83i9gp1IBPU?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Deberg_1990 06-25-2013 04:23 PM

I want to see this, but I'm still not feeling it 100%. I'm expecting it to disappoint.

-King- 06-25-2013 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9774908)
I want to see this, but I'm still not feeling it 100%. I'm expecting it to disappoint.

You can just watch this instead <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TVpQmZmKNmo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BigBeauford 06-25-2013 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9774908)
I want to see this, but I'm still not feeling it 100%. I'm expecting it to disappoint.

It has potential based on the fact that del Toro is directing, and not Michael Bay.

KC_Lee 06-26-2013 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 9776011)
It has potential based on the fact that del Toro is directing, and not Michael Bay.

This and Roland Emmerich is nowhere near this movie either.

keg in kc 06-26-2013 09:54 AM

There's apparently a lot more to it than the trailers are showing. Character stuff.

KC_Lee 06-26-2013 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9776635)
There's apparently a lot more to it than the trailers are showing. Character stuff.

True, I really am looking forward to seeing what Ron Pearlman's role in the film will be.

GordonGekko 06-26-2013 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9774908)
I want to see this, but I'm still not feeling it 100%. I'm expecting it to disappoint.

I honestly don't understand this.

It is being directed by a person who has an insane passion for this type of genre, and is himself a fantastic talent.

The cgi looks par for the course, and this is definitely a movie that must be seen in theater. If you go in expecting Saving Private Ryan or something deep, then probably skip this. This has giant ****ing robots fighting giant ****ing monsters in cityscapes.

Deberg_1990 06-26-2013 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9777572)
I honestly don't understand this.

It is being directed by a person who has an insane passion for this type of genre, and is himself a fantastic talent.

The cgi looks par for the course, and this is definitely a movie that must be seen in theater. If you go in expecting Saving Private Ryan or something deep, then probably skip this. This has giant ****ing robots fighting giant ****ing monsters in cityscapes.

I like Del Toro, and im hoping for the best.....But the movie doesnt look that interesting so far. I also hate the look of it. Its shot all dark and murky. Are there any daytime scenes???

underEJ 06-27-2013 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9777887)
I like Del Toro, and im hoping for the best.....But the movie doesnt look that interesting so far. I also hate the look of it. Its shot all dark and murky. Are there any daytime scenes???

"Dooon't be afraaaiiiid of the daaaarrrkkkkk." -G dT (said to me way before he produced a movie called the same thing)

Setsuna 06-27-2013 05:25 PM

If this takes off, then Japan might make a Gundam movie. ROFL

Since my boy Idris Elba is in it, I'm watching it.

notorious 06-27-2013 08:48 PM

SyFy channel strikes again.

KC_Lee 06-28-2013 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9780777)
SyFy channel strikes again.

:spock:

BigMeatballDave 06-28-2013 08:24 AM

Did I see Treach from Naughty By Nature?

Deberg_1990 06-28-2013 10:40 AM

I read a.story about how this movie is tracking horribly low right now. They said there was more awareness right now for Grown Ups 2 than this. I hope this doesn't flop, but I can see it underperforming.
Posted via Mobile Device

Fish 06-28-2013 10:43 AM

I'm getting bad vibes about this movie....

KC_Lee 06-28-2013 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9781486)
I read a.story about how this movie is tracking horribly low right now. They said there was more awareness right now for Grown Ups 2 than this. I hope this doesn't flop, but I can see it underperforming.
Posted via Mobile Device

Does that say more about the state of the US movie going public or the movies themselves?

notorious 06-28-2013 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 9781338)
:spock:

Isn't that what "Atlantic Rim" was made for?

-King- 06-28-2013 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9781912)
Isn't that what "Atlantic Rim" was made for?

Mockbuster direct to dvd movie.

Fish 06-28-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9781932)
Mockbuster direct to dvd movie.

It's like Transmorphers all over again... Cheap ass POS movies made intentionally for idiots who can't spell...

DMAC 06-28-2013 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 9782010)
It's like Transmorphers all over again... Cheap ass POS movies made intentionally for idiots who can't spell...

They are in Redbox's everywhere. It must work.

Deberg_1990 06-28-2013 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 9781545)
Does that say more about the state of the US movie going public

Mostly this i guess...heh. but i dont know..... I always hear how the modern movie audience is sort of "dumbed down", but people have always naturally leaned towards the familiar. Thats just how we are wired.

I think a big problem is the budgets for alot of these modern blockbusters. 150-200 million +. Movies dont play nearly as long as they used to back in the day......so now days if you dont get that HUGE opening weekend number in relation to your budget, your viewed instantly as a disappointment, which then helps drive away business in later weeks, because "word of mouth" thinks the movie sucks.

My guess is this movie disappoints stateside, but is probably HUGE overseas. Stateside its the type of film that looks like its only going to appeal to die hard fanboy types. I dont see much female, older or family appeal.

notorious 06-28-2013 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9781932)
Mockbuster direct to dvd movie.

Oh.


Straight from filming to the trash.

KC_Lee 06-28-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9782275)
Mostly this i guess...heh. but i dont know..... I always hear how the modern movie audience is sort of "dumbed down", but people have always naturally leaned towards the familiar. Thats just how we are wired.

I think a big problem is the budgets for alot of these modern blockbusters. 150-200 million +. Movies dont play nearly as long as they used to back in the day......so now days if you dont get that HUGE opening weekend number in relation to your budget, your viewed instantly as a disappointment, which then helps drive away business in later weeks, because "word of mouth" thinks the movie sucks.

My guess is this movie disappoints stateside, but is probably HUGE overseas. Stateside its the type of film that looks like its only going to appeal to die hard fanboy types. I dont see much female, older or family appeal.

Well being a daikaiju eiga fanboy I will be dragging the wife to see this with me.

I do see your point. This will be huge overseas. Plus this will essentially be trial run for Legendry’s Godzilla re-boot.

Buehler445 06-28-2013 09:59 PM

Wait, this is based on a comic or something?

Tribal Warfare 06-29-2013 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 9782872)
Wait, this is based on a comic or something?

Nope, Del Toro said in previous videos that it's a tribute to mech anime and manga.

Imon Yourside 06-29-2013 01:45 AM

I think this looks really Awesome, can't wait to see it.

keg in kc 06-29-2013 12:50 PM

<iframe src="http://widgets.ign.com/video/embed/content.html?url=http://www.ign.com/videos/2013/06/28/pacific-rim-elbow-rocket-clip" width="468" height="263" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

keg in kc 06-29-2013 01:04 PM

Interesting read from Forbes about box office tracking being used as a weapon: by studios http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmen...omes-a-weapon/
Quote:

'Pacific Rim' And How Box Office Tracking Becomes A Weapon

Scott Mendelson, Contributor
6/28/2013 @ 10:13AM

Here’s a shocker for you: Two weeks prior to release, a wholly original science-fiction action-fantasy with no major stars and a somewhat goofy concept is tracking for a lower opening weekend than the star-laden comedy sequel to a general audience-pleasing and financially successful original opening on the same day.

The reports of “doom” being leveled at Warner Bros.’ $180 million monsters vs. robots epic Pacific Rim may be indeed accurate.

The Guillermo del Toro ode to Japanese monster movies is “tracking” at around $30 million for the weekend, which would indeed be a little underwhelming. Grown Ups 2: The Grown Upping is tracking at around $40 million for the weekend, which makes sense since Adam Sandler and friends’ Grown Ups opened at $40.5 million back in June 2010. I know, next you’ll tell me that The To-Do List has less awareness than The Wolverine a month out from their July 26th release date.

What we have here is a classic example of pre-release tracking being used as an offensive weapon against a film to create the impression of upcoming box office failure, with the end-game goal of creating what amounts to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Back in the olden days before movie news was a general-audiences entertainment, pre-release tracking was relatively secret, and it was used as a way to measure the effectiveness of a marketing campaign and/or possibly signal where and how additional marketing dollars should be spent.

If, and I’m making this all up, Spider-Man wasn’t tracking as well with women, Sony would cut an ad highlighting the romantic drama between Mary Jane and Peter Parker and air it during the Oprah Winfrey Show and/or Friends. But now that said information is out in the open, the tracking figures become a weapon both for a flop-happy media and for rival studios. I’ve written about this before, but this is such a classic example that it bears repeating.

Hidden in the middle of Variety’s “Is Pacific Rim Doomed to Be This Year’s Battleship?” piece is the fact that Warner Bros. has only spent 30% of their marketing budget thus far. This is actually a wonderful thing to hear. I’ve long argued at the pointlessness of these insanely expensive long-lead marketing campaigns, with copious trailers, clips, and posters designed mostly to capture the interest of hardcore film fans who already bought their midnight IMAX ticket as soon as it was available.

Warner Bros. is holding most of its marketing money for the last couple weeks, which makes sense since most general moviegoers don’t really care about what’s coming out months from now. Even with the social media that seemingly surrounds every single living soul, there is still a large percentage of moviegoers that still choose to see a new release because that trailer they saw in front of Man Of Steel looks good or they liked the TV spot that aired during the NBA finals the night before opening day. So when Del Toro takes to the Internet to reassure fans that the tracking numbers are going up, that’s probably true since Warner Bros. hasn’t exactly been spreading awareness.

If I may put on my conspiratorial hat for a moment, I don’t think this is a coincidence considering the ongoing discussions for producer Legendary Pictures (which funded 75% of the film’s $180-$200 million budget) to align itself with a studio other than Warner Bros (talks to re-up their distribution deal broke down last week). If Pacific Rim tanks, then the asking price for whatever studio chooses to align itself with Legendary Pictures goes down. Heck, all of this talk of doom makes the theoretical price go down too, while the pressure to close a deal with a studio before Pacific Rim debuts rises in case the film becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

But putting aside the reasons for what feels like a preemptive strike, Pacific Rim doesn’t have much awareness because Warner Bros. hasn’t had the time to focus on it. With Man Of Steel taken care of following a successful domestic and overseas launch, and The Hangover 3 and The Great Gatsby wrapping up their successful theatrical runs (both films cost around $105 million and made well over $300 million worldwide), WB now has two weeks to sell the heck out of giant robots doing battle with giant monsters.

I wrote back in April that Pacific Rim‘s fortunes were somewhat tied to the relative quality and/or audience satisfaction of the summer slate up to that point. And, at this point in time, it still looks like Pacific Rim, if it’s as good as I’m hearing from those who have seen it, may well be ‘the one we’ve been waiting for’ in the vein of Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl, Transformers, and Inception.

But either way, trashing the future box office performance of a major release where most of its advertising budget hasn’t been spent yet is both silly and counter-productive. It’s also the kind of preemptive strike that dissuades original would-be blockbusters, since audience awareness is always going to be higher in the early going for known entities and/or sequels. Pacific Rim may well tank domestically and may even tank overseas (although I’d argue the latter is highly unlikely), but no good comes from screaming *flop!* before the campaign has really begun, especially as Warner Bros. marketing actually waiting until it matters should be encouraged.

keg in kc 07-02-2013 12:33 PM

Bit of a weird clip:

<object id="flashObj" width="700" height="394" classid="clsid:D<param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=2516128179001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.time.com%2F2013%2F07%2F01%2Fexcl usive-clip-a-mega-brawl-from-pacific-rim%2F&playerID=1917933886001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAABGEUMg~,hNlIXLTZFZn-NQOazMchMDWH0SI1hX7f&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=2516128179001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.time.com%2F2013%2F07%2F01%2F exclusive-clip-a-mega-brawl-from-pacific-rim%2F&playerID=1917933886001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAABGEUMg~,hNlIXLTZFZn-NQOazMchMDWH0SI1hX7f&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="700" height="394" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>

Pepe Silvia 07-02-2013 12:37 PM

The movie title is just asking to be porn parodied.

keg in kc 07-02-2013 04:22 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mNwECmiJNFw?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

-King- 07-02-2013 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9788399)
Bit of a weird clip:

<object id="flashObj" width="700" height="394" classid="clsid:D<param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=2516128179001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.time.com%2F2013%2F07%2F01%2Fexcl usive-clip-a-mega-brawl-from-pacific-rim%2F&playerID=1917933886001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAABGEUMg~,hNlIXLTZFZn-NQOazMchMDWH0SI1hX7f&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=2516128179001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.time.com%2F2013%2F07%2F01%2F exclusive-clip-a-mega-brawl-from-pacific-rim%2F&playerID=1917933886001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAABGEUMg~,hNlIXLTZFZn-NQOazMchMDWH0SI1hX7f&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="700" height="394" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>

:eek: This movie is going to suck something fierce.

Mav 07-02-2013 05:30 PM

IM a huge SOA fan. So, being that Ron Perlman, and Charlie are in this, I want to see it. But, nahhhh. Ill red box it....MAYBE.....

keg in kc 07-02-2013 07:47 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/C5fyl7AzU68?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lcWnGXBST8A?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ace Gunner 07-02-2013 08:18 PM

CGI: how to ruin a monster movie

Pants 07-02-2013 08:22 PM

Can't ****ing wait to see this.

Valiant 07-02-2013 09:06 PM

It is a live action manga movie.. Should be great..

underEJ 07-03-2013 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9789421)
CGI: how to ruin a monster movie

CG is just a tool, and much like a weapon, in the wrong hands, it is terrifying, but in the right hands, it is magic. Del Toro is generally on the side of the good. He chooses his weapons pretty well, using practical effects where they are best suited and even through the lens stuff when needed like in Devil's Backbone which was lovely and simple.

I'll be there for this one.

Pants 07-03-2013 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9789421)
CGI: how to ruin a monster movie

I agree, puppets are better. :spock:

Tribal Warfare 07-03-2013 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 9790950)
I agree, puppets are better. :spock:

Hollywood doesn't use high quality animatronics anymore like Jurassic Park's utilization of it.

Deberg_1990 07-03-2013 05:29 PM

I'm not a huge fan of CGI, but it looks well utilized here. Looks like they even gave some of the monsters that intentionally cheesy look and movement. Like to honor the old films that inspired this.
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.