ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Tony Sparano scheduled to interview Monday for OLine Job (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268839)

RealSNR 01-13-2013 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9313862)
You wouldn't want a true C?

Barrett Jones is hardly a true C either. He's a guy who has shifted around the line just like Hudson

-King- 01-13-2013 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9313862)
You wouldn't want a true C?

Hudson is a true center.


This is like the guys who want to switch Albert to guard so they can get a "true" LT.

ChiefMojo 01-13-2013 02:49 PM

I don't see any reason to replace Hudson at center. Sure we could draft another OG in the 3rd-5th round area and I would be cool with that. Adding another OG for challenging for a starting spot or at worst quality depth is fine in my book.

King_Chief_Fan 01-13-2013 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9313893)
The Chiefs NEED a starting Cornerback. They NEED a starting Safety opposite Berry that can ****ing stay on the field. They NEED a staring ILB next to Derrick Johnson.

EVERY ****ING SCOUT agreed that Hudson was the best center prospect in the 2011 draft. He broke his leg - BFD. He'll be fine in 2013.

Furthermore, it's just ****ing dumb, unless your team is absolutely LOADED at every position, to spend the #34 overall selection on a center.

Dane has a colorful way of making good points

seaofred 01-13-2013 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9313981)
Hudson is a true center.


This is like the guys who want to switch Albert to guard so they can get a "true" LT.

It drives me nuts when people still say that about Albert. The guy has played more games in his life at Lt than he did at guard! Plus the only reason he played G in college is because they had Da'Brickeshaw Ferguson at LT. Albert is a Pro Bowl level LT, leave him there!

dallaschiefsfan 01-13-2013 03:06 PM

He's just interviewing, right? Not hired yet, no? I'd say no scheme is guaranteed until someone is hired...after all, we thought Warhop was coming, right?

Titty Meat 01-13-2013 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9313686)
The other concerning thing is that Sparano and Reid have different blocking schemes.

Sparano likes a power running scheme and Reid is more zone blocking.

Like Milk said the other day it's refreshing to know Reid is flexible with scheme.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 03:19 PM

Is he bringing Jake Long with him?

saphojunkie 01-13-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314521)
Is he bringing Jake Long with him?

Only way I am okay with letting Albert walk....

DJ's left nut 01-13-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314521)
Is he bringing Jake Long with him?

We can move him to guard!!!!

BigMeatballDave 01-13-2013 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9313925)
Barrett Jones is hardly a true C either. He's a guy who has shifted around the line just like Hudson

I was referring to moving Hudson.

He played G at FSU and played very well.

He didn't play much at C.

BigMeatballDave 01-13-2013 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9313981)
Hudson is a true center.

How is that when he didn't play it much in college?

I mean, I have no problem with him playing C, but I'd rather have a guy there who played the position mostly in college.

mcaj22 01-13-2013 03:27 PM

the only reason people are entertaining Albert to guard is he is the exact size of Evan Mathis and Todd Herremans, two guards on the Eagles that Andy Reid had a boner sized hard on for

also Danny Watkins, the 45 year old Canadian Fireman 1 year football player, is also 6'3'' 310 lbs, at guard, that Andy Reid reached for in the FIRST ROUND of a draft. Similar to Brandon Albert.

He likes big ****ing guards. That is a fact. I don't agree with it, but that's what Andy Reid will go out and find. If Jeff Allen is not progressing fast enough he is ****ed. Andy isnt going to just give spots away to these guys, he will bring in competition.

Whether that's a high draft pick is yet to be seen.

BigMeatballDave 01-13-2013 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9313981)


This is like the guys who want to switch Albert to guard so they can get a "true" LT.

And it's not the same because Albert has established himself as a LT in the NFL.

NJChiefsFan 01-13-2013 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9313427)
Evan Mathis 6'5'' 302 lbs
Todd Herremans 6'6'' 321 lbs
Brandon Albert 6'5'' 315 lbs

two of them are Guards, one has been a cornerstone LT. LOL

So lets use the first overall pick on his replacement/ actual people

AustinChief 01-13-2013 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9314551)
Only way I am okay with letting Albert walk....

There are a lot of ways I am ok with letting Albert walk.. BUT you don't let an above average (barely) LT walk unless his back is going to be a concern or he is demanding top 5 money.

Sparano did draft Jake Long... and Long has struggled in Miami's new scheme.. and he is due a crap load of money making Martin a MUCH cheaper option for them. I wonder if we could get him for something as low as a 3rd rounder.

-King- 01-13-2013 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9314594)
And it's not the same because Albert has established himself as a LT in the NFL.

And Hudson was establishing himself as a C in the NFL before he got hurt. He was playing very well before the injury.

milkman 01-13-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314652)
There are a lot of ways I am ok with letting Albert walk.. BUT you don't let an above average (barely) LT walk unless his back is going to be a concern or he is demanding top 5 money.

Sparano did draft Jake Long... and Long has struggled in Miami's new scheme.. and he is due a crap load of money making Martin a MUCH cheaper option for them. I wonder if we could get him for something as low as a 3rd rounder.

I may be wrong here, but isn't Long a free agent this year?

One thing I am sure of, though, Long is as overrated at LT as any in the last 20 years.

-King- 01-13-2013 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314733)
I may be wrong here, but isn't Long a free agent this year?

One thing I am sure of, though, Long is as overrated at LT as any in the last 20 years.

Yeah he's a FA.

Hoover 01-13-2013 03:53 PM

Umm yeah, the second Andy tells Albert we are going to play him at guard he walks.

NOT going to happen.

aturnis 01-13-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9313657)
One thing about Allen and Hudson is they are still young. Allen was a rookie this year, playing a new position (which was stupid in the first place).

Dumb statement. There are college tackles playing guard all over the NFL. Very normal.

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314652)
BUT you don't let an above average (barely) LT walk

LMAO

He gave up ONE SACK last season.

Get real, man. Man up and admit you were so, so ****ing wrong all along.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314733)
I may be wrong here, but isn't Long a free agent this year?

One thing I am sure of, though, Long is as overrated at LT as any in the last 20 years.

Yes he will be a free agent but I can see Miami tagging him. I'd love to get him without giving up anything but I doubt the rest of the league is as pigheadedly moronic about judging Long as you are.

Long would be a MASSIVE upgrade over Albert even in a ZBS which doesn't play to his strengths in the least.

Of course he has been battling injuries all year so (just like Albert) I'd want to be certain that isn't going to be an ongoing concern.

When it comes to Jake Long you really are a complete dumbass and I hope we sign him just to piss you off.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9314770)
LMAO

He gave up ONE SACK last season.

Get real, man. Man up and admit you were so, so ****ing wrong all along.

No I am not wrong. Albert is a top 15 LT NOT a top 10 LT... that makes him above average... but not by a lot. If you think he is a top 5 or even top 8 LT than you have ZERO ability to evaluate the position. Something YOU have proven time and again.

I am not advocating letting Albert go, he is above average and we have bigger needs to address but the idiots like you who think he is ALL WORLD are dead wrong.

milkman 01-13-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314773)
Yes he will be a free agent but I can see Miami tagging him. I'd love to get him without giving up anything but I doubt the rest of the league is as pigheadedly moronic about judging Long as you are.

Long would be a MASSIVE upgrade over Albert even in a ZBS which doesn't play to his strengths in the least.

Of course he has been battling injuries all year so (just like Albert) I'd want to be certain that isn't going to be an ongoing concern.

When it comes to Jake Long you really are a complete dumbass and I hope we sign him just to piss you off.

Sorry Austin, I am not pigheadedly moronic about Long.

He is a good, but not great, LT that is at best, a marginal upgrade to Albert, and I think Albert is still growing, while Long is pretty much at his ceiling.

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314773)

Long would be a MASSIVE upgrade over Albert

ROFLROFL

Long gave up 4 sacks last season in only 745 snaps. He also had more penalties than Albert.

You can't blame that on scheme.

He is not better than Albert. Not by a long shot.

ChiefsCountry 01-13-2013 04:02 PM

If I am the Rams I go after Jake Long. Sign Long, draft Warmack and give Bradford zero excuses to suck.

BossChief 01-13-2013 04:03 PM

I'd like to see the top 10 offensive tackles in the NFL ranked by one metric.

The total amount of sacks allowed all year divided into the total amount of sacks the opposing defenders had that he faced.

That would give a good metric to gauge how well the player actually performs.

mcaj22 01-13-2013 04:05 PM

so you have a hard on for Jake Long

but Brandon Albert isnt top 5?

then please, name me 5 LTs better

Joe Thomas
Jason Peters

who else. Dont say the idiot from Denver either

The Bad Guy 01-13-2013 04:05 PM

The only thing I'm concerned about Albert with is his back.

Long has plenty of injury problems too.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314784)
Sorry Austin, I am not pigheadedly moronic about Long.

He is a good, but not great, LT that is at best, a marginal upgrade to Albert, and I think Albert is still growing, while Long is pretty much at his ceiling.

He is great but I do agree that the upgrade isn't worth the money if we use a zone blocking scheme.

The Bad Guy 01-13-2013 04:06 PM

Long is super overhyped. He's a good player, but he's not a top LT.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9314821)
The only thing I'm concerned about Albert with is his back.

Long has plenty of injury problems too.

Yep, I worry slightly more with Albert because it is his back but when it comes to injuries it's a crap shoot and Albert could be fine.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9314792)
ROFLROFL

Long gave up 4 sacks last season in only 745 snaps. He also had more penalties than Albert.

You can't blame that on scheme.

He is not better than Albert. Not by a long shot.

HAHAHAHAHAHA. NO ONE except complete morons and Chiefs homers think this. This statement alone proves that you have no clue.

Brock 01-13-2013 04:09 PM

Michigan homer on the loose

mcaj22 01-13-2013 04:09 PM

there are not 5 LTs I'd take as an upgrade to Albert currently in the NFL.

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314822)
He is great

ROFLROFLROFL

You are a joke with this Long stuff. Great players don't have a season like he had this year.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9314807)
I'd like to see the top 10 offensive tackles in the NFL ranked by one metric.

The total amount of sacks allowed all year divided into the total amount of sacks the opposing defenders had that he faced.

That would give a good metric to gauge how well the player actually performs.

Except that you are relying on uninformed people like GoChiefs to decide when a sack is given up by a particular player. that is impossible to determine if you don't know the responsibilities on each and every play. Sounds great in theory, impossible to accurately measure.

htismaqe 01-13-2013 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314733)
I may be wrong here, but isn't Long a free agent this year?

One thing I am sure of, though, Long is as overrated at LT as any in the last 20 years.

There's a reason he's going to hit the open market, too.

Damaged goods.

O.city 01-13-2013 04:12 PM

Austin is a big Wolverine, IIRC.

Take of the college glasses there man.

htismaqe 01-13-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314859)
Except that you are relying on uninformed people like GoChiefs to decide when a sack is given up by a particular player. that is impossible to determine if you don't know the responsibilities on each and every play. Sounds great in theory, impossible to accurately measure.

Pro Football Focus really isn't "uninformed". Just sayin.

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 04:15 PM

Jake Long....

22nd in pass blocking efficiency in 2012.

25th in pass blocking efficiency in 2011.

HE IS A GREAT PLAYER.

GREAT.

Easy 6 01-13-2013 04:16 PM

A guy with head coaching experience to coach the line?

Get it done, nothing not to like about that.

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314859)
Except that you are relying on uninformed people like GoChiefs to decide when a sack is given up by a particular player. that is impossible to determine if you don't know the responsibilities on each and every play. Sounds great in theory, impossible to accurately measure.

You're ****ing serious with this shit. It's not hard to tell when a guy gets beat by a player he's supposed to be blocking.

Incredible. ROFL

mcaj22 01-13-2013 04:17 PM

it's kind of funny in this thread alone

you call him a GREAT player and defend him, but mention "HMMM I WONDER IF THE CHIEFS COULD GET HIM FOR A 3RD ROUNDER ON THE CHEAP" like this is a Madden video game.

Newsflash, if he was a great player, he's not being traded for a 3rd rounder.

Easy 6 01-13-2013 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314842)
HAHAHAHAHAHA. NO ONE except complete morons and Chiefs homers think this. This statement alone proves that you have no clue.

THIS... statement is garbage.

SAUTO 01-13-2013 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9314896)
it's kind of funny in this thread alone

you call him a GREAT player and defend him, but mention "HMMM I WONDER IF THE CHIEFS COULD GET HIM FOR A 3RD ROUNDER ON THE CHEAP" like this is a Madden video game.

Newsflash, if he was a great player, he's not being traded for a 3rd rounder.

What did we give up for roaf?


And I'm not comparing the two, roaf was definitely great and also had health issues
Posted via Mobile Device

milkman 01-13-2013 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9314884)
Jake Long....

22nd in pass blocking efficiency in 2012.

25th in pass blocking efficiency in 2011.

HE IS A GREAT PLAYER.

GREAT.

I know you've posted before, but how does Albert compare, and how do they rate as run blockers?

Just a guess, but Albert has to be top 10 in pass protection and around 15 in run blocking, while Long is probaly top 12 in run blocking.

O.city 01-13-2013 04:20 PM

If I'm giving up a 3rd round pick, it's for a CB or a DE that can rusht he passer. Not a LT.

milkman 01-13-2013 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9314901)
What did we give up for roaf?


And I'm not comparing the two, roaf was definitely great and also had health issues
Posted via Mobile Device

2nd, and his knee issues were considered to be career threatening.

SAUTO 01-13-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314911)
2nd, and his knee issues were considered to be career threatening.

i read it as a fourth that moved to a two by playing clauses
Posted via Mobile Device

Brock 01-13-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314911)
2nd, and his knee issues were considered to be career threatening.

A coonditioal 4th.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9314820)
so you have a hard on for Jake Long

but Brandon Albert isnt top 5?

then please, name me 5 LTs better

Joe Thomas
Jason Peters

who else. Dont say the idiot from Denver either

Joe Thomas
Jason Peters
Jake Long
Duane Brown
Andrew Whitworth

I can keep going if you need more.

milkman 01-13-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9314918)
i read it as a fourth that moved to a two by playing clauses
Posted via Mobile Device

Don't remember if it was conditional, just remember that it was a 2nd round pick that we eventually gave up.

This for a HoF, and probably top 3 LT ever.

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314904)
I know you've posted before, but how does Albert compare, and how do they rate as run blockers.

Just a guess, but Albert has to be top 10 in pass protection and around 15 in run blocking, while Long is probaly top 12 in run blocking.

Jake Long was by far a better run blocker than Albert before his injury. But the last two seasons, even though Albert's run blocking grade hasn't been great, it was still better than Long's.

Albert the last two seasons was 7th and 8th in PBE.

Long was nothing even close to good last year. He didn't even have a positive grade.

SAUTO 01-13-2013 04:24 PM

Didn't Peters blow his Achilles twice?
Posted via Mobile Device

mcaj22 01-13-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314925)
Joe Thomas
Jason Peters
Jake Long
Duane Brown
Andrew Whitworth

I can keep going if you need more.


Duane Brown and Brandon Albert are basically the same

I will give you Thomas and Peters are the two best by far.

Albert is definitely better than Long and Whitworth

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9314875)
Pro Football Focus really isn't "uninformed". Just sayin.

When it comes to certain stats yes they are. You do know it is just some random dudes watching regular game tape, right? You and I could start a website that does the exact same thing and be no more or less of an "authority."

O.city 01-13-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314925)
Joe Thomas
Jason Peters
Jake Long
Duane Brown
Andrew Whitworth

I can keep going if you need more.

Jake Long has been ****ing awful the last 2 years. Awful

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9314889)
You're ****ing serious with this shit. It's not hard to tell when a guy gets beat by a player he's supposed to be blocking.

Incredible. ROFL

And you know on each and every play who that player was supposed to block? right? you KNOW on every play what every player's assignment was supposed to be and when the play breaks down? ****ing idiot.

the Talking Can 01-13-2013 04:27 PM

let albert walk and trade a 3rd for long...


AustinComo...

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9314938)
Jake Long has been ****ing awful the last 2 years. Awful

No, he was not AWFUL. Although he wasn't great THIS year I'll admit that. Injuries and a scheme change certainly didn't help.

mcaj22 01-13-2013 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314943)
And you know on each and every play who that player was supposed to block? right? you KNOW on every play what every player's assignment was supposed to be and when the play breaks down? ****ing idiot.


well yea, anybody that has played the sport of football can figure that out

how else do football players themselves breakdown and study film lol?

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314952)
No, he was not AWFUL. Although he wasn't great THIS year I'll admit that. Injuries and a scheme change certainly didn't help.

LMAO

This was his worst year as a pro.

You are an ostrich.

milkman 01-13-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9314949)
let albert walk and trade a 3rd for long...


AustinComo...

Austin isn't CoMo in any way.

He just has a Michigan homer blindness when it comes to Long.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9314949)
let albert walk and trade a 3rd for long...


AustinComo...

Again, I said you DON'T let Albert walk unless his back is a major concern or he wants Top 5 money.

It amazes me how NO ONE outside of KC thinks Albert is anything special but on CP because of idiots like GoChiefs he is a hall of famer.

He is in the 8-15 range among LTs... plenty good enough to keep around but not someone you go crazy about.

the Talking Can 01-13-2013 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314962)
Austin isn't CoMo in any way.

He just has a Michigan homer blindness when it comes to Long.

that idea is absolutely ridicule worthy...and this is the planet...

Hammock Parties 01-13-2013 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314943)
And you know on each and every play who that player was supposed to block? right? you KNOW on every play what every player's assignment was supposed to be and when the play breaks down? ****ing idiot.

Again, it is not hard to tell if a left tackle is getting beat in pass protection. It is typically obvious to everyone.

You are grasping at straws.

O.city 01-13-2013 04:31 PM

So there are 8 better LT's than Albert in the NFL?

htismaqe 01-13-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314943)
And you know on each and every play who that player was supposed to block? right? you KNOW on every play what every player's assignment was supposed to be and when the play breaks down? ****ing idiot.

Again, he's using Pro Football Focus.

They absolutely DO watch every play and employ several people who played/coached the game.

mcaj22 01-13-2013 04:31 PM

there isnt he tried naming 5 and threw in Andrew Shitworth and Jake Schlong and well Albert is a ****load better than both of them and it's not even close

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9314962)
Austin isn't CoMo in any way.

He just has a Michigan homer blindness when it comes to Long.

I will admit to being Long-biased BUT at least I am honest about Albert. I have no desire to see him leave because we have much bigger needs. I just want to debunk the myth that some here have that place him as a top 5 LT. I hope someday he is but he sure as shit isn't NOW. And it's laughable to here people say there aren;t 5 LTs they'd rather have. Do you people even watch the games?

the Talking Can 01-13-2013 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9314968)
Again, I said you DON'T let Albert walk unless his back is a major concern or he wants Top 5 money.

It amazes me how NO ONE outside of KC thinks Albert is anything special but on CP because of idiots like GoChiefs he is a hall of famer.

He is in the 8-15 range among LTs... plenty good enough to keep around but not someone you go crazy about.

you said Albert wasn't a top 10 LT

now you're saying "top 8..." because people are laughing at you...and as if being #8 is some how a knock on Albert

it's ok, every college fan has some player they can't see straight about...bosschief would have drafted stanzi in the 2nd

O.city 01-13-2013 04:33 PM

Joe Thomas
Joe Staley (maybe)?

I'd say Albert is right there with Brown

FringeNC 01-13-2013 04:33 PM

So...Sparano would probably move us away from zone blocking....how suited are our presumed returning starters for a man scheme?

mcaj22 01-13-2013 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9314992)
So...Sparano would probably move us away from zone blocking....how suited are our presumed returning starters for a man scheme?

I already answered this. Eric Winston sucks big donkey cock at man

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9314980)
Again, he's using Pro Football Focus.

They absolutely DO watch every play and employ several people who played/coached the game.

No they don't unless they just starting hiring them last year. Before last year(when I last checked out the operation) it was just a bunch of guys. Most of whom had never even PLAYED the game much less coached it. A few years before THAT it was TWO guys in England. That's it. One of which had never even watched football until he was an adult.

O.city 01-13-2013 04:35 PM

Reid is a ZBS guy, Sparano is a man guy. Have to wait and see. Seeing as we are set for a ZBS, I'd say we would stay with that.

AustinChief 01-13-2013 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9314954)
well yea, anybody that has played the sport of football can figure that out

how else do football players themselves breakdown and study film lol?

Because THEY know what the play called for? How the **** is this not evident? Yes, on many plays you can guess and be right about things... on many others you simply can't without knowing the playbook and blocking assignments.

BossChief 01-13-2013 04:36 PM

The ONLY way I'd trade for Long and let Albert walk is if BOTH Albert and Bowe want out and we try to fill the LT spot while tagging Bowe.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.