ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football NFL eyeing proposal to abolish extra points (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280812)

Rain Man 01-20-2014 05:18 PM

And here's my post suggesting it, made on October 28th.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...a#post10135913


I'm not bragging, I'm just proud to be part of the Hunt consulting team.

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 10383251)
And the transformation of a once great game continues. Why in the hell do they have to keep ruining this sport.

This...

KChiefer 01-20-2014 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 10383268)
Kind of like a 1 percent chance to blow a 28 point lead.

That's lower than 1%.

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsChoke010414 (Post 10383243)
That gets around the issue. The point is, people always think of a touchdown as being 7 points. Why not just leave that alone, and get rid of the meaningless play that goes with it? Does anyone actually enjoy watching the extra point?

To move it back to the 20 would result in more 6 point touchdowns, with more misses. Maybe not many overall, because today's kickers are so good, but still enough to screw things up.

So you say it's meaningless.

Ok, fine. I offer a way to give it more meaning.

You complain that it might give it too much meaning.

Who's wife are you?...

KChiefer 01-20-2014 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10383270)
A ****ing RT just went no 1 in the draft.

Yeah, that's ****ing providing excitement...

At least RTs actually play the game. We're talking about kickers, man, kickers /in best AI voice.

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsChoke010414 (Post 10383257)
Getting rid of the extra point is the transformation of a great game? Hardly, unless this brings other changes, which are less sensible.

When has this NOT been the case?...

kcpasco 01-20-2014 05:22 PM

Just automatically award FG's less then 30 yards. Those are rarely missed also.

POND_OF_RED 01-20-2014 05:22 PM

Sure it's pretty pointless, but I've never heard of anyone complaining about it. Just leave it alone. Gives me more time to refill my drunk or take a leak.

KChiefer 01-20-2014 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 10383281)
Just automatically award FG's less then 30 yards. Those are rarely missed also.

Ha. You know you're beat when you have to start saying reeruned shit like this.

chiefzilla1501 01-20-2014 05:25 PM

Are we ****ing serious here?

This rule would be so stupid in so many ways. It doesn't matter if the XP is pretty automatic. What's more important is that every time you kick an XP, you make a decision not to go for 2. I like the fact that teams have the option of laying up and getting a safe one point. Especially late in games.

Rain Man 01-20-2014 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED (Post 10383283)
Sure it's pretty pointless, but I've never heard of anyone complaining about it. Just leave it alone. Gives me more time to refill my drunk or take a leak.

Rob Gronkowski hates extra points.

listopencil 01-20-2014 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10383288)
Are we ****ing serious here?

This rule would be so stupid in so many ways. It doesn't matter if the XP is pretty automatic. What's more important is that every time you kick an XP, you make a decision not to go for 2. I like the fact that teams have the option of laying up and getting a safe one point. Especially late in games.

This rule would not get rid of the option of getting the one point.

KChiefer 01-20-2014 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10383288)
Are we ****ing serious here?

This rule would be so stupid in so many ways. It doesn't matter if the XP is pretty automatic. What's more important is that every time you kick an XP, you make a decision not to go for 2. I like the fact that teams have the option of laying up and getting a safe one point. Especially late in games.

They still get the option. And nobody runs fake xps if that's where you're going next.

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsChoke010414 (Post 10383296)
Well, I guess giving bigger distances more points does give the extra point more meaning, but I'm not willing to go that far. I just want a minor change to the system.

WHY?...

Rain Man 01-20-2014 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsChoke010414 (Post 10383296)
Well, I guess giving bigger distances more points does give the extra point more meaning, but I'm not willing to go that far. I just want a minor change to the system. I suspect most fans wouldn't accept a drastic change either.

The system in the OP, henceforth known as the "Rain Man Sytem", eliminates the boring part and makes the exciting part more exciting, while not changing the basic structure of scoring or the game. It satisfies every goal.

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 10383290)
Rob Gronkowski hates extra points.

He also hates the multitude of bacteria found in bath houses...

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsChoke010414 (Post 10383309)
I feel like I've answered both those questions already.

I'd disagree.

I don't think it adds to the "action" or "excitement."

I think it makes us more like ****ing Canadian football...

Rain Man 01-20-2014 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10383307)
He also hates the multitude of bacteria found in bath houses...

Based on the pictures I've seen, he also dislikes shirts.

kcpasco 01-20-2014 05:36 PM

Would you guys be in favor of this trickling down to the college and even high school levels?

listopencil 01-20-2014 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10383312)
I'd disagree.

I don't think it adds to the "action" or "excitement."

I think it makes us more like ****ing Canadian football...

I think it would speed up the flow of the game. Score TD. Take the point, go to commercial while Special Teams sets up for the kick off/Go for two, go to commercial while Special Teams sets up for the kick off. Either way we come back from commercial and they kick it off to start the next series.

Discuss Thrower 01-20-2014 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 10383324)
Would you guys be in favor of this trickling down to the college and even high school levels?

I'd say half of all high school football teams can't make 75% of XPs on a regular basis.

chiefzilla1501 01-20-2014 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsChoke010414 (Post 10383301)
Well, I think you could still give the teams the option to go for 2. If they make it, they get 8 points, if they miss, they get 6.

If they score a touchdown and choose to do nothing else, they get 7.

You could do that, but I still hate the idea on principal. You're essentially saying that if you go for 2... you gain a point if you convert and lose a point if you don't. I don't like freebies. If you're going to go for 1, then earn it. You shouldn't take that away just because it saves you a few minutes of your day.

Just Passin' By 01-20-2014 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefer (Post 10383238)
There is no logic problem. If they do this they can remove 5-10 worthless plays per game. Heck, now when teams get inside the 2 often they'll just go for it on 4th. There were a whopping 12 19yd fgs in the entire NFL this year out of 998 total. There were 1267 xps.

There is a logic problem. It's there. your numbers don't eliminate it.

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10383325)
I think it would speed up the flow of the game. Score TD. Take the point, go to commercial while Special Teams sets up for the kick off/Go for two, go to commercial while Special Teams sets up for the kick off. Either way we come back from commercial and they kick it off to start the next series.

How about instead of that we invest more in the replay system and make sure ALL change of possession and game changing plays get reviewed?

That Seattle/49'er game was HORRID. There were three plays there that could have changed the game.

You know, improve the current product before we worry about changing it...

Tombstone RJ 01-20-2014 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10383087)
NFL eyeing proposal to abolish extra points
1


By Marc Sessler
Around the League Writer
Published: Jan. 20, 2014 at 04:53 p.m.
Is the extra point about to go the way of the dinosaur?

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell told NFL Network's Rich Eisen on Monday that the league's Competition Committee might eventually abolish the time-tested point after touchdown in favor of a brand-new scoring system.

"The extra point is almost automatic," Goodell said. "I believe we had five missed extra points this year out of 1,200 some odd. So it's a very small fraction of the play, and you want to add excitement with every play.

"There's one proposal in particular that I've heard about. It's automatic that you get seven points when you score a touchdown, but you could potentially go for an eighth point, either by running or passing the ball, so if you fail, you go back to six."

Extra points have become an afterthought. Unless you're up against Lawrence Taylor in Tecmo Bowl, there's virtually zero drama attached to the point after. Taylor's old coach Bill Belichick has often opined about about how unnecessary the extra point feels.

Goodell said "some issues" stand in the way of a change, asking: "Is that going to discourage people from going for two?"

We doubt it. Teams inclined to go for the deuce will continue to do so in situations that call for an eight-point score -- with the same potential consequences. Traditionalists might disagree, but this is a good idea long overdue.

Well, unless you're a kicker.

Goodell's entire interview will air Monday night at 8 p.m. ET on NFL Network's "Total Access."

I think this proposal is kind of stupid. Let me ge this right: if a team scores a TD they automatically get 7 points witout kicking the extra point, right? But if they choose to go for 2 points, but don't make the attempt, they get penalized for it and only get a total of 6 points?

Meh.

You gotta pay the kicker for something, right, I mean, the kicker has to contribute something to the friggen bottom line, right? So those extra points are important.

Here's what I'd do--if a team wants to not kick the extra point, but wants to "go for it" why not make it for 3 points? So, if a team scores a traditional TD for 6 points, but instead of kicking the traditional extra point, they decide to go for more points, get rid of the 2 points and have it be for 3 points.

So a TD and going for it will net a team 9 points. While a TD and a traditional extra point will still net 7 points. This way the kicker is still getting paid to make the extra point, which is the vast majority of how they contribute to scoring, but going for it, instead of kicking the extra point will really be more enticing as it's an additional 3 points, or the same thing as kicking a field goal.

Rain Man 01-20-2014 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10383328)
You could do that, but I still hate the idea on principal. You're essentially saying that if you go for 2... you gain a point if you convert and lose a point if you don't. I don't like freebies. If you're going to go for 1, then earn it. You shouldn't take that away just because it saves you a few minutes of your day.

I would argue to take it away if it's a boring routine that takes a few minutes of your day and makes no difference at all 99.7% of the time.

Rausch 01-20-2014 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsChoke010414 (Post 10383357)
That kind of thing should be one of the top priorities. The replay system has been around since 1999, and it's still too broken. Shouldn't take that long to set up an almost foolproof system.

Other than challenging penalties, the replay system should be simple. Unfortunately, it isn't.

There we go: quit worrying about a given play and start worrying about the big plays this league consistently ****s up...

KChiefer 01-20-2014 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 10383339)
There is a logic problem. It's there. your numbers don't eliminate it.

.4%

That's what you're trying to protect.

Sannyasi 01-20-2014 05:59 PM

I think the only argument in favor of the extra point is "Well, this is how we've always done it."

Chaunceythe3rd 01-20-2014 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 10383110)
Make it a 35 yard attempt.

This. Would be incentive for teams go for the 2-point conversion.

Rain Man 01-20-2014 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefer (Post 10383374)
.4%

That's what you're trying to protect.

It's also a 0.4% that really angers and frustrates a fan base. There's a marketing value in eliminating that 0.4%.

Rain Man 01-20-2014 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaunceythe3rd (Post 10383381)
This. Would be incentive for teams go for the 2-point conversion.

It would be very hard to convert a two-point play from 35 yards out.


(I know. I just couldn't resist.)

Rausch 01-20-2014 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sannyasi (Post 10383380)
I think the only argument in favor of the extra point is "Well, this is how we've always done it."

I think the only argument for abolishing it is that it isn't exciting enough...

Tombstone RJ 01-20-2014 06:09 PM

Fact is, kickers are the highest scoring players in the overall history of the NFL and most of it is because of the extra points...

Tombstone RJ 01-20-2014 06:11 PM

for me, the extra point is like the cherry on top of the TD, it's kindof like, "it's a TD and here's the icing on the cake"

ChiefRocka 01-20-2014 06:12 PM

..

Rain Man 01-20-2014 06:13 PM

Maybe they should follow the lead of cricket and a team can keep taking extra points as long as they make it. If people like the extra point play, this would give us about 500 of them per game.

Tombstone RJ 01-20-2014 06:15 PM

I do like the idea of making the extra point mean something by pushing it out to the 35 yard line or so. If you combine that with having a 3 point conversion instead of a 2 point conversion (when teams want to "go for it") then maybe that would "make it more exciting"?

Simplicity 01-20-2014 06:15 PM

I'm in... Move it back to a challenging spot or just take it away... It's literally a waste of time in the NFL...

Rain Man 01-20-2014 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 10383419)
I do like the idea of making the extra point mean something by pushing it out to the 35 yard line or so. If you combine that with having a 3 point conversion instead of a 2 point conversion (when teams want to "go for it") then maybe that would "make it more exciting"?

Right now I think the expected value of an extra point versus a two-point play is about the same. It's about .997 points per attempt and 33 of 69 for two point plays, or .956 points per attempt.

If you make a two-point play suddenly worth three points, and you move the 1-point play out, the expected values will end up something like .96 points for the 1-point play and 1.5 points for the 3-point play. Teams would never go for the 1-point play other than rare situations.

GloryDayz 01-20-2014 06:25 PM

I think I'd prefer to the kicking team lose a player, maybe two for that play. Make it 9-on-11 if they line-up for a kick and you might see more blocked kicks (making it more exciting), and you'd not have to move the ball back to make it a harder attempt.

If they line up for a regular play, then you get all 11 players (and none can be a kicker). If 11 players can fake a real play and turn it into a kick, well that's fine and good luck.

Rain Man 01-20-2014 06:26 PM

Another option would be to have the cheerleaders run the extra point play against each other. That would be entertaining. Or maybe the coaching staff.

Or - OH! FANS! You pull fans wearing jerseys out of the stands, randomly assign them positions, and they run the extra point play. How exciting would that be?

GloryDayz 01-20-2014 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sannyasi (Post 10383380)
I think the only argument in favor of the extra point is "Well, this is how we've always done it."

Like hitting??? Yeah, Roger does what Roger wants (or is told to want)...

Rain Man 01-20-2014 06:28 PM

If a player scores, he turns and runs back in the opposite direction. If he reaches the 20, it's one point. If he reaches the 50, it's two points. If he reaches the other end zone it's three points and he turns back around to try again. The play keeps going until he's tackled.

mikey23545 01-20-2014 06:30 PM

Since a sack occurs on 10% of all passes, an automatic 10 yard loss will be called on every 10th pass play, and all pass rushing will be banned...

mikey23545 01-20-2014 06:31 PM

Since running plays average 3.9 yards per attempt...

Brock 01-20-2014 06:31 PM

I've heard the arguments. I acknowledge it's a worthless play.

I still vote no.

Sannyasi 01-20-2014 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GloryDayz (Post 10383445)
Like hitting??? Yeah, Roger does what Roger wants (or is told to want)...

Good argument.

The extra point is like an appendix. It is a remnant from a different historical period, when football was not the same game that we know today. It serves no purpose anymore. If the extra point did not already exist, there would not be single person arguing in its favor.

Presumably the people who want to keep it around are the types that a century ago would have been arguing against the legalization of the forward pass.

Rain Man 01-20-2014 06:39 PM

How about this?

No two-point plays, and the extra point kick must be attempted from the spot in the end zone where the touchdown was scored. Catch a nice fade in the back corner? Let's see if your kicker can bend it like Beckham.

-King- 01-20-2014 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 10383457)
Since a sack occurs on 10% of all passes, an automatic 10 yard loss will be called on every 10th pass play, and all pass rushing will be banned...

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 10383459)
Since running plays average 3.9 yards per attempt...

You'd have a point except here we're not talking averages. We're talking about near certainties.

Brock 01-20-2014 06:42 PM

Stop changing the game, unless we're changing it back to the near perfect game it was in the 70s, 80s, and 90s.

mikey23545 01-20-2014 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10383479)
You'd have a point except here we're not talking averages. We're talking about near certainties.

Bullshit. It's exactly the same thing. In the case of the extra point, the average is one missed extra point every 0.4% of attempts so they're saying let's just say they're all good...It's still being based on averages...

Simplicity 01-20-2014 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 10383461)
I've heard the arguments. I acknowledge it's a worthless play.

I still vote no.


I like to waste 30 mins a game on worthless plays also.


:shake:

Brock 01-20-2014 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simplicity (Post 10383498)
I like to waste 30 mins a game on worthless plays also.


:shake:

So after 50 years of play, the games are too long all of a sudden?

Simplicity 01-20-2014 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 10383502)
So after 50 years of play, the games are too long all of a sudden?

Yes.

tk13 01-20-2014 07:08 PM

It's funny, at first I thought this idea had some merit. However, I was surprised there were even 5 misses last year. That almost makes me want to keep it. That's one game every 3 weeks affected by a missed XP. These guys are professionals, if you can't execute that play you almost deserve to be punished.

Easy 6 01-20-2014 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sannyasi (Post 10383380)
I think the only argument in favor of the extra point is "Well, this is how we've always done it."

Theres something to be said for tradition... Goodell has went ****ing bonkers with his power, one day its change the extra point the next its make the defense count to 3 mississippi before rushing the QB.

listopencil 01-20-2014 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10383347)
How about instead of that we invest more in the replay system and make sure ALL change of possession and game changing plays get reviewed?

That Seattle/49'er game was HORRID. There were three plays there that could have changed the game.

You know, improve the current product before we worry about changing it...

They can do both.

ILChief 01-20-2014 07:32 PM

Make the player that scored the touchdown kick the extra point

listopencil 01-20-2014 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefer (Post 10383374)
.4%

That's what you're trying to protect.

Is it 0.4% or 0.04%?

Superbowltrashcan 01-20-2014 08:09 PM

So here is the extra point rule:

After a touchdown, the scoring team is allowed a try during one scrimmage down. The ball may be spotted anywhere between the inbounds lines, two or more yards from the goal line. The successful conversion counts one point by kick; two points for a successful conversion by touchdown; or one point for a safety.
The defensive team never can score on a try. As soon as defense gets possession or the kick is blocked or a touchdown is not scored, the try is over.
Any distance penalty for fouls committed by the defense that prevent the try from being attempted can be enforced on the succeeding try or succeeding kickoff. Any foul committed on a successful try will result in a distance penalty being assessed on the ensuing kickoff.
Only the fumbling player can recover and advance a fumble during a try.

So based on all of this how does the offense score a safety? Sorry had a root canal today and still kinda foggy.

Superbowltrashcan 01-20-2014 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superbowltrashcan (Post 10383629)
So here is the extra point rule:

After a touchdown, the scoring team is allowed a try during one scrimmage down. The ball may be spotted anywhere between the inbounds lines, two or more yards from the goal line. The successful conversion counts one point by kick; two points for a successful conversion by touchdown; or one point for a safety.
The defensive team never can score on a try. As soon as defense gets possession or the kick is blocked or a touchdown is not scored, the try is over.
Any distance penalty for fouls committed by the defense that prevent the try from being attempted can be enforced on the succeeding try or succeeding kickoff. Any foul committed on a successful try will result in a distance penalty being assessed on the ensuing kickoff.
Only the fumbling player can recover and advance a fumble during a try.

So based on all of this how does the offense score a safety? Sorry had a root canal today and still kinda foggy.

Found my answer:
The only scenario in which a one-point safety could be scored in NFL play would involve the defense kicking or batting a loose ball out the back of the end zone without taking possession of the ball.

listopencil 01-20-2014 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superbowltrashcan (Post 10383643)
Found my answer:
The only scenario in which a one-point safety could be scored in NFL play would involve the defense kicking or batting a loose ball out the back of the end zone without taking possession of the ball.

I seem to remember that happening once.

Dayze 01-20-2014 08:19 PM

I know I'm probably in the minority, and probably just speaking from my bias, but I hate the extra point. It's just an extra, unnecessary play IMO.

Superbowltrashcan 01-20-2014 08:21 PM

Is there any thought given to moving the two point conversion closer? Maybe put it at the 1 or 1.5 yard mark while also putting the kick attempt out farther? Some combination could be figured out that makes both plays worth watching but still provides greater risk with the one worth twice the other.

chiefzilla1501 01-20-2014 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sannyasi (Post 10383380)
I think the only argument in favor of the extra point is "Well, this is how we've always done it."

No, the argument is that when you plan a major rule change like this and your only rationale is to shorten the game, that's silly. I was a huge fan of the OT rule change and still am. Because the old system was horribly broken. In this case, we're talking about a rule change that, even if only in a small way, makes the system worse.

chiefzilla1501 01-20-2014 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 10383382)
It's also a 0.4% that really angers and frustrates a fan base. There's a marketing value in eliminating that 0.4%.

Does it? Was anybody even talking about until the NFL brought it up?

-King- 01-20-2014 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10383667)
No, the argument is that when you plan a major rule change like this and your only rationale is to shorten the game, that's silly. I was a huge fan of the OT rule change and still am. Because the old system was horribly broken. In this case, we're talking about a rule change that, even if only in a small way, makes the system worse.

Contradicted yourself in one post. Nice.

Superbowltrashcan 01-20-2014 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10383652)
I seem to remember that happening once.

In the NFL it was 1940 I think but in the college game it happened in the KSU-Oregon Fiesta Bowl.

listopencil 01-20-2014 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superbowltrashcan (Post 10383670)
In the NFL it was 1940 I think but in the college game it happened in the KSU-Oregon Fiesta Bowl.

I was just digging around and saw college examples, but couldn't find any NFL examples.

chiefzilla1501 01-20-2014 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10383669)
Contradicted yourself in one post. Nice.

Why? We know that this affects a small % of points scored. But it's a change that majorly affects the way the game is played.

Mr. Derek 01-20-2014 08:34 PM

Thr extra point "try" in its current format is useless.
Need to make it much more challenging, however, increasing the distance substantially will eliminate the fake option.
How about ball must hit the crossbar (any of the three) for 1 point, 2 points rules stay the same?

lcarus 01-20-2014 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 10383126)
This actually sounds excellent, but make a maximum distance so that the 35 yard line or something like that is the maximum distance for a kick. But this also punishes teams for scoring long touchdowns so I don't know. Sounds exciting though.

Another option would be to bring in a random fan for the extra point. That would be cool but would never happen. Funny to think though a big 250 lb. woman coming in for the PAT. Haha

Scahrew that. What if a team is down 7 late? You wanna make them kick a 50 yard XP just because they scored a long TD?

Dayze 01-20-2014 08:42 PM

put the goal post on a golf cart and drive it back and forth like the old QB Skills competition in the Pro Bowl.

listopencil 01-20-2014 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 10383740)
put the goal post on a golf cart and drive it back and forth like the old QB Skills competition in the Pro Bowl.

I wish they still did that stuff. They should just do a skills competition instead of the Pro Bowl.

Tribal Warfare 01-20-2014 08:48 PM

Eliminating the extra point attempt, and extending the season into the playoffs while contradicting the notion of player safety? Man, Goodell really loves this games integrity.

:rolleyes:

listopencil 01-20-2014 08:48 PM

Wouldn't it be cool to see linemen pushing a sled that was rigged like a tractor pull?

GloryDayz 01-20-2014 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10383747)
I wish they still did that stuff. They should just do a skills competition instead of the Pro Bowl.

This........

ILChief 01-20-2014 08:56 PM

I could see us losing a playoff game due to a missed extra point. So get rid of them

Start Croyle 01-20-2014 08:58 PM

The NBA will soon switch its rules and just award a team points when a player is fouled instead of having them shoot free throws,


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.