ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Mellinger: In the Jets, there's a lesson for Chiefs fan about taking the safe route (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=287965)

Jimmya 10-31-2014 09:07 AM

Coaching is important...just ask any QB if they would like to go to the New York Jets AKA Where QB's go to die

Lzen 10-31-2014 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 11073134)
Coaching is important...just ask any QB if they would like to go to the New York Jets AKA Where QB's go to die

Very true. Coaching makes a big difference. But even the best coaches can fail with a QB who just doesn't have it.

Bearcat 10-31-2014 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 11073105)
I am getting so sick of this argument comparing the Royals and the Chiefs. Baseball is a completely different animal. They are series', not single elimination games (WC game, notwithstanding). And let us not forget that the Royals had not even been to the playoffs for 3 decades. Also, let us not forget that they barely got in as a WC and nearly lost that game, as well. I suppose you could compare winning a series in baseball as similar to winning a playoff game in the NFL. Even then, I don't believe it is a completely accurate comparison. But I do think that if the Chiefs had series' to win against teams they lost to over the years that they would have won a few of those. Finally, as the Royals proved this year is that the first step to winning a championship is getting into the tournament.

Yeah, I know, 29 years is quite pathetic, but so are the Chiefs.

As far as just getting in, it's completely different between baseball and football, or at least it should be.

What I find amusing is that baseball teams should definitely aim for just getting into the playoffs based on the fact there's not a huge difference between the best and worst playoff teams (the best teams only win ~60% of the time and is heavily dependent on pitching, so you get one game that's 7-1 Giants and another game that's 10-0 Royals), as opposed to the large difference in football (~50-62% for WC teams and 80-93% for the best teams).... yet (and here's the amusing part), the Chiefs have played the baseball strategy of "let's just get in" for decades AND the fans not only go for it AND not only eat it up, they practically demand it.

I'm not saying anything definitive about this group after two years, except that SO FAR it's looks exactly like the same old shit, and until that actually changes, fans can eat up mediocre beating mediocre and the occasional upset all they want and bring up that one Ravens team or that one Giants team, but playing the baseball strategy is clearly not the way to go... of course, just my opinion after watching that strategy fail for 30 years, minus that one time they acquired Joe freakin' Montana. I'll give it another two or three decades though just to be sure. :(

Hootie 10-31-2014 09:52 AM

I sure wish we had Derek Carr or uhm, one of those other magical franchise qbs that grow on trees

Easy 6 10-31-2014 10:12 AM

Seems like even Smith haters agree that Reid is great with QB's, both coaching them and finding them... yet refuse to give him the benefit of the doubt about his choice of Smith.

"Yeah his history with QB's is good, but Bray? LMAO"

"Yeah his history with QB's is good, but Murray? LMAO"

Yeah his history with QB's is good, but Smith? LMAO"

So yeah, he's good at coaching and finding QB's... its just that all three of these guys suck balls, is that about right?

RealSNR 10-31-2014 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 11072907)
God forbid a new regime addressed their qb position with a proven NFL qb, vs drafting a walking shit storm of a qb in their first draft. Because yeah, Reid doesn't have a history of drafting qbs even if he has one. I swear reading comprehension is horrible on here. We should have drafted a qb that most decent teams could see there were problems with instead of trading for one who knows how to win in the NFL. When the right qb comes along and is sitting in a position to draft I feel confidant they will draft him. But I don't want them to draft one just to make a bunch of dumbass fans happy they finally took one in the first round when he's gonna suck much like Geno has! Some people are actually good and get paid for scouting talent (Dorsey) while others are better suited for running the fryer at McDonalds (most of CP)

Nothing wrong with acquiring a veteran to ease the rookie into the league.

The problem I have is when teams like the Chiefs trade for those veteran backups and act like just because they used the draft to acquire their guy, that means they basically drafted their own QB.

They didn't. All they did was pay an unnecessarily high price for a stop gap-level talent QB who could have been had in free agency.

And yet people like me last year who advocated making the "stabilization period" for the QB position on this team as brief as possible with a free agent like Carson Palmer were ridiculed because Palmer wasn't good enough. You're right, he's not. He would have given us Alex Smith, basically.

Only, you know... we'd be up two 2nd round picks by now, we'd be free to pick any young QB we wanted to wait in the wings, and could ditch the free agent QB at any time without being wasteful

Bearcat 10-31-2014 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11073194)
I sure wish we had Derek Carr or uhm, one of those other magical franchise qbs that grow on trees

It's not about going down to the dollar store and picking up a franchise QB, it's about trying a clearly superior strategy while finding a middle ground between not trying at all and picking a QB for the sake of picking one... or at least trying a different strategy besides the one that's obviously failed for most of the past 4 decades (outside of Joe Montana and that one time they actually drafted a QB in the first round).

RealSNR 10-31-2014 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 11073252)
It's not about going down to the dollar store and picking up a franchise QB, it's about trying a clearly superior strategy while finding a middle ground between not trying at all and picking a QB for the sake of picking one... or at least trying a different strategy besides the one that's obviously failed for most of the past 4 decades (outside of Joe Montana and that one time they actually drafted a QB in the first round).

It also comes down to NOTHING is ever good enough for the Chiefs when it comes to QBs in the draft.

"Chiefs should definitely pull the trigger on a QB!


...but only if the thing they're shooting at puts the gun in its mouth for you and gives you a thumbs up when it's time to pull. Otherwise you might miss, and then we might go 2-14! Scary!"

jkw87 10-31-2014 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Zarth (Post 11072554)
Signing Alex does...maybe not afraid...but head over heels for Alex.

READ MY LIPS: NO FIRST ROUND QBS

What is your obsession with first round quarterbacks? Name the one Dorsey could have grabbed the past two drafts that wouldn't have been a waste. Your obsession with the first round or bust is idiotic and overplayed. Switch things up a bit. Try harder

Imon Yourside 10-31-2014 10:22 AM

I think where GENO is and who coaches him makes a world of difference. That being said we would not have made the playoffs with GENO last year, for better or worse it would have taken time to develop him. New York is a dumpster fire though, everyone has to see that.

jkw87 10-31-2014 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11072578)
The Hunt family went 1 of 2 in Super Bowls and earns a playoff bid once every fourth or fifth year with veteran QBs acquired from another team.

Drafting a first Round QB risks that kind of run. That's why you'll never see the Chiefs draft a Geno Smith or an Andrew Luck.

That and they're afraid of investing a guaranteed 70 million in one guy.

You're an idiot if you think they would have passed on Luck if we'd had the opportunity. Throwing Geno into the same category with Luck shows your stupidity.

Rasputin 10-31-2014 10:24 AM

Chiefs are penetrating mediocrity champions.

Imon Yourside 10-31-2014 10:24 AM

We definitely should have sucked for Luck, man everyone was on board here except for the idiots running the organization.

jkw87 10-31-2014 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11073096)
Chiefs Planet is awful at evaluating QB play. Just unbelievably bad....End of thread and every other one like it

Yeah, but when they get on that bandwagon with shitty quarterbacks and scream first round... Shit like that will never stop.

Marcellus 10-31-2014 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 11072397)
There's not really anything controversial in the article. The guy's right. In the 'battle' of Geno v. Alex, Alex is the clear winner.

Reading comprehension skills are lacking here though.

The article didn't say you should never draft a QB, just that in that scenario it worked out better not drafting Geno.

The same idiots here are going to attempt to claim that Clark "won't allow" his very high paid hand picked coach and GM to draft a QB if they wanted to.

It's pretty hilarious.

I am willing to bet good money our next every day starting QB will com from the draft.

jkw87 10-31-2014 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11073251)
Nothing wrong with acquiring a veteran to ease the rookie into the league.

The problem I have is when teams like the Chiefs trade for those veteran backups and act like just because they used the draft to acquire their guy, that means they basically drafted their own QB.

They didn't. All they did was pay an unnecessarily high price for a stop gap-level talent QB who could have been had in free agency.

And yet people like me last year who advocated making the "stabilization period" for the QB position on this team as brief as possible with a free agent like Carson Palmer were ridiculed because Palmer wasn't good enough. You're right, he's not. He would have given us Alex Smith, basically.

Only, you know... we'd be up two 2nd round picks by now, we'd be free to pick any young QB we wanted to wait in the wings, and could ditch the free agent QB at any time without being wasteful

I actually agree with you on this. We overpaid for Smith in both draft picks and money... It was a mistake and I hope it wasn't the only thing Dorsey will be remembered for here.

Bearcat 10-31-2014 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11073272)
Reading comprehension skills are lacking here though.

The article didn't say you should never draft a QB, just that in that scenario it worked out better not drafting Geno.

The same idiots here are going to attempt to claim that Clark "won't allow" his very high paid hand picked coach and GM to draft a QB if they wanted to.

It's pretty hilarious.

I am willing to bet good money our next every day starting QB will com from the draft.

The article comes oh so close to saying the 'boring' strategy is better whenever you don't have a chance to draft a QB like Andrew Luck.... because, like he said, Geno Smith in the 2nd round was such a stretch.

The Bad Guy 10-31-2014 10:35 AM

Overpaid in draft picks?

Just Passin' By 10-31-2014 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 11073290)
The article comes oh so close to saying the 'boring' strategy is better whenever you don't have a chance to draft a QB like Andrew Luck.... because, like he said, Geno Smith in the 2nd round was such a stretch.

The article is specific to the Geno/Alex debate.

Easy 6 10-31-2014 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 11073294)
Overpaid in draft picks?

I know right, like a couple of seconds is some kind of franchise killer raping for a steady handed veteran.

Discuss Thrower 10-31-2014 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkw87 (Post 11073263)
You're an idiot if you think they would have passed on Luck if we'd had the opportunity. Throwing Geno into the same category with Luck shows your stupidity.

No first round QBs since Blackledge in 1983.
No second round QBs since Matt Bludnin 1992.
Brodie Croyle in the 3rd round in 2006.
Pat Barnes in the 4th in 1997.
Aaron Murray and Ricky Stanzi in the 5th in 2014 and 2011 respectively.


There's all the evidence in the world that if the gun was put to any given Chiefs' GM's head, he doesn't select a QB.

Because that gun is being held by a member of the Hunt family, and they believe a high round QB is too risky.

Hootie 10-31-2014 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 11073252)
It's not about going down to the dollar store and picking up a franchise QB, it's about trying a clearly superior strategy while finding a middle ground between not trying at all and picking a QB for the sake of picking one... or at least trying a different strategy besides the one that's obviously failed for most of the past 4 decades (outside of Joe Montana and that one time they actually drafted a QB in the first round).

Outside of Andrew Luck and Russell Wilson, what QBs have been drafted lately that you would have wanted more than Alex Smith?

If Joe Flacco can win a Super Bowl, pretty sure Alex Smith can, too.

Rausch 10-31-2014 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 11073296)
The article is specific to the Geno/Alex debate.

So it's an argument over 0/1 VS. 0/0...

RealSNR 10-31-2014 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11073300)
I know right, like a couple of seconds is some kind of franchise killer raping for a steady handed veteran.

I'll never understand this line of argument that "It was only a couple of 2nd round picks."

They're only ever just a couple of 2nd round picks... unless you actually draft good players with them. Then, yeah, they ARE a couple of 2nd round picks that we no longer have. And that ****ing sucks.

Saccopoo 10-31-2014 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11073272)
Reading comprehension skills are lacking here though.

The article didn't say you should never draft a QB, just that in that scenario it worked out better not drafting Geno.

The same idiots here are going to attempt to claim that Clark "won't allow" his very high paid hand picked coach and GM to draft a QB if they wanted to.

It's pretty hilarious.

I am willing to bet good money our next every day starting QB will com from the draft.

This front office has already made investments at the QB position.

They've selected/drafted or signed a rookie QB in each of the last two off-seasons. They signed the best known commodity at the position that was available to them when they absolutely needed to (Alex Smith).

They are not sitting on their hands at the position.

I'm pretty sure that they will draft a QB in the higher rounds when one is available that fits their parameters for the position.

Reid has done it in the past and Dorsey did it in Green Bay.

I concur that our next QB will be one that was drafted and developed by the KC Chiefs.

It's not going to be next year or the year after, but it will happen.

Discuss Thrower 10-31-2014 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11073360)
I'll never understand this line of argument that "It was only a couple of 2nd round picks."

They're only ever just a couple of 2nd round picks... unless you actually draft good players with them. Then, yeah, they ARE a couple of 2nd round picks that we no longer have. And that ****ing sucks.

It was only a chance to select Justin Hunter, Zach Ertz, Giovanni Bernard, Kiko Alonso or Le'Veon Bell in 2013 and Cody Latimer, Jimmy Garoppolo or Allen Robinson in 2014.

Not like any of those guys would help or anything.

RealSNR 10-31-2014 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11073368)

I'm pretty sure that they will draft a QB in the higher rounds when one is available that fits their parameters for the position.

Until "one just wasn't available"

Saccopoo 10-31-2014 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11073360)
I'll never understand this line of argument that "It was only a couple of 2nd round picks."

They're only ever just a couple of 2nd round picks... unless you actually draft good players with them. Then, yeah, they ARE a couple of 2nd round picks that we no longer have. And that ****ing sucks.

No it doesn't.

You got a franchise level QB with a couple of second rounders.

There isn't a team in the league that wouldn't give those picks up for that. Not one.

What did the Redskins give up just for the hope of getting one in Bobby Griffin?

What did the Raiders give up hoping they'd still have one in Palmer?

The Chiefs gave up peanuts for Smith considering what he's provided in return.

RealSNR 10-31-2014 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11073379)
No it doesn't.

You got a franchise level QB with a couple of second rounders.

We got a franchise level QB with a 1st rounder in Trent Green.

That was pretty fun. For 5 years.

Then he was gone.

ChiefsCountry 10-31-2014 11:33 AM

I bet Sanchez and Pennington have more playoff starts than Chiefs drafted quarterbacks have regular season starts.

ShortRoundChief 10-31-2014 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11073393)
We got a franchise level QB with a 1st rounder in Trent Green.

That was pretty fun. For 5 years.

Then he was gone.

He got Hermed.

Just Passin' By 10-31-2014 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11073339)
So it's an argument over 0/1 VS. 0/0...

No

Just Passin' By 10-31-2014 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11073360)
I'll never understand this line of argument that "It was only a couple of 2nd round picks."

They're only ever just a couple of 2nd round picks... unless you actually draft good players with them. Then, yeah, they ARE a couple of 2nd round picks that we no longer have. And that ****ing sucks.

You could use that argument for any draft pick, from 1.1 to Mr. Irrelevant. It's so broad that it's meaningless.

Easy 6 10-31-2014 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11073360)
I'll never understand this line of argument that "It was only a couple of 2nd round picks."

They're only ever just a couple of 2nd round picks... unless you actually draft good players with them. Then, yeah, they ARE a couple of 2nd round picks that we no longer have. And that ****ing sucks.

We needed a QB and there wasnt one worth trading those two picks for in the draft.

You're acting like they were wasted picks, they werent. Our QB-centric coach was able to hand pick his guy for those two slots.

saphojunkie 10-31-2014 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Zarth (Post 11072413)
Not drafting Geno was the right choice.

Paying Alex wasn't, though.

I still maintain that Geno Smith's fate was sealed BECAUSE he was drafted by the Jets.

That's what Mellinger fails to understand. Did it ever occur to them that Rex Ryan is a shitty head coach? That NY doesn't develop QB well? That between the media and the meadowlands and the poor front office decisions, that the Jets are historically bad at giving a young QB the right environment for maturing into a quality leader?

If Geno Smith had been drafted by a patient franchise that could handle him correctly, given offensive coaches that knew what the hell they were doing, and was allowed to sit and learn for a couple of seasons, he might have had a different story.

But that's not what happened. He's a bust. He's a bum. He sucks.

That's the story of Geno Smith. But I still believe it didn't have to be.

saphojunkie 10-31-2014 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 11073462)
He got Hermed.

He got Schiavoed.

Lzen 10-31-2014 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 11073449)
I bet Sanchez and Pennington have more playoff starts than Chiefs drafted quarterbacks have regular season starts.

:rolleyes:

Look, many of us that are glad that we didn't draft Geno also agree that the Chiefs should try to draft an early round QB at some point. And I understand the need to make a point about the Chiefs being afraid to do that. But this goes beyond stupidity.

A quick search reveals that Brodie Croyle has more career starts (18) than Pennington and Sanchez have playoff starts (12).

ChiefsCountry 10-31-2014 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 11073519)
:rolleyes:

Look, many of us that are glad that we didn't draft Geno also agree that the Chiefs should try to draft an early round QB at some point. And I understand the need to make a point about the Chiefs being afraid to do that. But this goes beyond stupidity.

A quick search reveals that Brodie Croyle has more career starts (18) than Pennington and Sanchez have playoff starts (12).

Actually Brodie has only started 10 games.

Reerun_KC 10-31-2014 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 11073492)
I still maintain that Geno Smith's fate was sealed BECAUSE he was drafted by the Jets.

That's what Mellinger fails to understand. Did it ever occur to them that Rex Ryan is a shitty head coach? That NY doesn't develop QB well? That between the media and the meadowlands and the poor front office decisions, that the Jets are historically bad at giving a young QB the right environment for maturing into a quality leader?

If Geno Smith had been drafted by a patient franchise that could handle him correctly, given offensive coaches that knew what the hell they were doing, and was allowed to sit and learn for a couple of seasons, he might have had a different story.

But that's not what happened. He's a bust. He's a bum. He sucks.

That's the story of Geno Smith. But I still believe it didn't have to be.


All I hear is Genocuses in this post....

Carlota69 10-31-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 11072993)
(insert same old arguments from the past 4000 times it's been discussed)

Black and white argument!

(insert same old arguments from the past 4001 times it's been discussed, but worded slightly differently)

Hyperbole!

(insert same old argument from the past 4002 times it's been discussed, but very sarcastically)

Personal attack!

(insert that one gif of Matt Cassel trying to put on his cap, for no apparent reason)

LMAOLMAO:LOL::LOL:LMAOLMAO

RunKC 10-31-2014 12:28 PM

Alex was easily worth those picks, especially considering that the QB's drafted the last 2 years don't look special at all.

You get the best player to win. Alex was clearly that. And even without a 2nd the 2013 class looks really solid at the top

Easy 6 10-31-2014 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 11073571)
Genocuses

LMAO whats good for the goose...

GoChargers 10-31-2014 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11073096)
Chiefs Planet is awful at evaluating QB play. Just unbelievably bad....End of thread and every other one like it

That goes for both sides, by the way. The drafturbators do themselves no favors by dickriding obvious busts from day 1 like Geno Smith; meanwhile, the true fans literally defend scrubs like Cassel until they can no longer be defended by any rational human being.

Reerun_KC 10-31-2014 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 11073602)
That goes for both sides, by the way. The drafturbators do themselves no favors by dickriding obvious busts from day 1 like Geno Smith; meanwhile, the true fans literally defend scrubs like Cassel until they can no longer be defended by any rational human being.


That is what he just said...

CP is dogshit when it comes to QB evaluation....

ChiefsCountry 10-31-2014 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11073589)
Alex was easily worth those picks, especially considering that the QB's drafted the last 2 years don't look special at all.

You get the best player to win. Alex was clearly that. And even without a 2nd the 2013 class looks really solid at the top

Hey look its Mr. Tyler Wilson trying to act like he didn't want to draft somebody.

O.city 10-31-2014 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 11073630)
Hey look its Mr. Tyler Wilson trying to act like he didn't want to draft somebody.

Weren't you matt Barkley biggest fan?

ChiefsCountry 10-31-2014 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11073645)
Weren't you matt Barkley biggest fan?

Yes, still wish they would have drafted him. But that douche was deep throating Tyler Wilson hard and acts like he didn't want to draft a qb. So **** him.

ThaVirus 10-31-2014 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 11072964)
Every time someone mentions Alex as a QB who knows how to win when he's got 1 playoff win in 10 years I throw up in my mouth.


"Well he had shitty coaches and talent around him for his first 5 seasons!"

"He was one muffed punt away from the Super Bowl!"

"He played well enough to win last year in Indy!"

Apparently all those shoulda, coulda, wouldas count as playoff wins.

RunKC 10-31-2014 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 11073630)
Hey look its Mr. Tyler Wilson trying to act like he didn't want to draft somebody.

I wanted to draft Tyler Wilson for later and trade Alex smith for the present. But okay.

Bearcat 10-31-2014 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11073674)
"Well he had shitty coaches and talent around him for his first 5 seasons!"

"He was one muffed punt away from the Super Bowl!"

"He played well enough to win last year in Indy!"

Apparently all those shoulda, coulda, wouldas count as playoff wins.

Alex Smith has been the victim of circumstance his entire career.
Geno Smith obviously sucks and has no one to blame but himself.

Facts.

Marcellus 10-31-2014 01:09 PM

Quote:

The same idiots here are going to attempt to claim that Clark "won't allow" his very high paid hand picked coach and GM to draft a QB if they wanted to.
And bingo.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11073307)
No first round QBs since Blackledge in 1983.
No second round QBs since Matt Bludnin 1992.
Brodie Croyle in the 3rd round in 2006.
Pat Barnes in the 4th in 1997.
Aaron Murray and Ricky Stanzi in the 5th in 2014 and 2011 respectively.


There's all the evidence in the world that if the gun was put to any given Chiefs' GM's head, he doesn't select a QB.

Because that gun is being held by a member of the Hunt family, and they believe a high round QB is too risky.


Marcellus 10-31-2014 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11073370)
It was only a chance to select Justin Hunter, Zach Ertz, Giovanni Bernard, Kiko Alonso or Le'Veon Bell in 2013 and Cody Latimer, Jimmy Garoppolo or Allen Robinson in 2014.

Not like any of those guys would help or anything.

Who is playing QB if we don't give 2 2nds for Smith and draft the guys you mentioned?

Or are you one of those insiders that know we could have Smith for 1 pick?

I am sure Dorsey threw in the 2nd pick for fun.

Marcellus 10-31-2014 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11073674)
"Well he had shitty coaches and talent around him for his first 5 seasons!"

"He was one muffed punt away from the Super Bowl!"

"He played well enough to win last year in Indy!"

Apparently all those shoulda, coulda, wouldas count as playoff wins.

Or you could just call them the facts.

Playoff wins or not, they are facts.

ThaVirus 10-31-2014 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11073724)
Or you could just call them the facts.

Playoff wins or not, they are facts.


I like to think of myself as a rational guy when it comes to Alex. I probably come off as a detractor but it's really only because he's my QB and I hold him to a high standard.

We've already dispelled the notion that he was just a muffed punt away from a Super Bowl, and he played well in Indy but didn't turn in a complete game. People like to rag on Bowe for not getting his foot down but if you want to go that far the pass was NOT perfect. It was thrown a hit behind, causing Bowe to have to slow up and allowing the defender a chance to make a play on the ball. Not to mention the fact that we had three downs prior to that play to get the 1st and he couldn't get the job done.

Marcellus 10-31-2014 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11073736)
I like to think of myself as a rational guy when it comes to Alex. I probably come off as a detractor but it's really only because he's my QB and I hold him to a high standard.

We've already dispelled the notion that he was just a muffed punt away from a Super Bowl, and he played well in Indy but didn't turn in a complete game. People like to rag on Bowe for not getting his foot down but if you want to go that far the pass was NOT perfect. It was thrown a hit behind, causing Bowe to have to slow up and allowing the defender a chance to make a play on the ball. Not to mention the fact that we had three downs prior to that play to get the 1st and he couldn't get the job done.

Good grief dude you are as impartial and opinionated on this subject as 49ers fans are.

And to say any of that stuff has been dispelled is laughable. Its all opinion driven. For every statement made there is a counter opinion. Its not dispelled in any way shape or form. Maybe in your mind but you didn't need any help there anyway.

Its OK to simply admit you are wrong when the evidence keep slapping you in the face. But some people just can't do it.

saphojunkie 10-31-2014 01:38 PM

I want us to draft a first round QB so badly it hurts, but it's ridiculous that the Chiefs could literally draft a Jamarcus Russel type bust, and that would placate posters like Discus Thrower.

It shouldn't be about drafting a QB in the first. It should be about getting a franchise QB. It just so happens that a first round pick is statistically the best way to get one. But I don't give a shit if they trade for him or sign him off the street.

Or trade two second round picks to the San Francisco 49'ers.

Just get a guy who will win a super bowl. Everything else is just noise.

temper11 10-31-2014 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 11073492)
I still maintain that Geno Smith's fate was sealed BECAUSE he was drafted by the Jets.

That's what Mellinger fails to understand. Did it ever occur to them that Rex Ryan is a shitty head coach? That NY doesn't develop QB well? That between the media and the meadowlands and the poor front office decisions, that the Jets are historically bad at giving a young QB the right environment for maturing into a quality leader?

If Geno Smith had been drafted by a patient franchise that could handle him correctly, given offensive coaches that knew what the hell they were doing, and was allowed to sit and learn for a couple of seasons, he might have had a different story.

But that's not what happened. He's a bust. He's a bum. He sucks.

That's the story of Geno Smith. But I still believe it didn't have to be.

This.

Just Passin' By 10-31-2014 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 11073790)
I want us to draft a first round QB so badly it hurts, but it's ridiculous that the Chiefs could literally draft a Jamarcus Russel type bust, and that would placate posters like Discus Thrower.

It shouldn't be about drafting a QB in the first. It should be about getting a franchise QB. It just so happens that a first round pick is statistically the best way to get one. But I don't give a shit if they trade for him or sign him off the street.

Or trade two second round picks to the San Francisco 49'ers.

Just get a guy who will win a super bowl. Everything else is just noise.

:spock:

BryanBusby 10-31-2014 01:51 PM

I don't believe Mellinger was saying that the safe route is the best choice always and forever.

Basically he was saying sometimes it's best to past on the dream girl if you hear that her vagina is blown out like a spare tire that has been used for 12 months and thousands of miles and is covered in da herps for the safe route. That tire is Geno Smith.

People should back off the ledge if they think he is definitely verbally blowing Alex Smith.

Marcellus 10-31-2014 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by temper11 (Post 11073799)
This.

Is a bunch of crap.

Geno has the exact same issues he did the second half of his senior season. He knows what the issues are but cant correct them because that's who he is.

RealSNR 10-31-2014 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11073676)
I wanted to draft Tyler Wilson for later and trade Alex smith for the present. But okay.

When the idea of trading for Alex Smith was proposed in the regular season, NOBODY but n00bs and 12-year olds liked it.

People eventually warmed up to the idea, some faster than others, but the universal reaction across the board was **** NO

BigCatDaddy 10-31-2014 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11073096)
Chiefs Planet is awful at evaluating QB play. Just unbelievably bad....End of thread and every other one like it

In our defense it's not like we've seen many good ones up close and personal. Joe Montana and Trent Green in my lifetime. About what 6-7 seasons worth.

Reerun_KC 10-31-2014 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 11073938)
In our defense it's not like we've seen many good ones up close and personal.


even if you did you would still **** it up....

Sandy Vagina 10-31-2014 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11073820)
Is a bunch of crap.

Geno has the exact same issues he did the second half of his senior season. He knows what the issues are but cant correct them because that's who he is.

I would agree with this. I keep hearing Rex Ryan, Jets.. never had a chance.. blah blah...

The reality of it is.. Geno had plenty of talent around him. He just couldn't keep from making the huge, game-changing mistakes. Stupid decision-making put him on the bench... not the Jets.

I say this while acknowledging that he's very young. Not at all hating on him or condemning Geno's career. He still could learn from his stupidity and become a quality starter.... maybe... but I wouldn't bet money on this happening. Just as I thought of him as a prospect.. I am skeptical that he has the mental makeup to strengthen through this process. If I turn out to be wrong later, hey, good for him.

saphojunkie 10-31-2014 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 11073801)
:spock:

That's the whole ****ing point. I am capable of acknowledging that what I want might not be what is best.

RunKC 10-31-2014 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11073927)
When the idea of trading for Alex Smith was proposed in the regular season, NOBODY but n00bs and 12-year olds liked it.

People eventually warmed up to the idea, some faster than others, but the universal reaction across the board was **** NO

After the first rd was over everyone reasonable was like "well this is one shitty draft class for QB's, no less players in general."

Sandy Vagina 10-31-2014 03:12 PM

If it hasn't been posted in some other thread.... (from AP)

Quote:

Berry will return to the field on Sunday against the New York Jets, Andy Reid confirmed on Friday.

Reid did say that Berry would play but he did not say whether Berry would start the game.

:clap:

Easy 6 10-31-2014 03:33 PM

God bless Norm, one of the most underrated funny guys of all time, I'll never forgive Lorne Michaels for letting NBC pressure him into dumping Norm over the OJ jokes.

Matter of fact, I'm gonna let my old pal Lorne know just how I feel about it... he put me and kept me on his front page of friends on Myspace, so yeah, we're pretty tight.

edit* dammit SNR, now MY post looks outta place!

temper11 10-31-2014 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11073820)
Is a bunch of crap.

Geno has the exact same issues he did the second half of his senior season. He knows what the issues are but cant correct them because that's who he is.

I disagree... the kid obviously has talent. You don't get to where he is without talent. He just isn't the rare, 1 in a million, person that can step onto any football field day one, regardless of scheme and personnel, and magically turn a franchise around.

Like most of these QB's out of college, they would benefit tremendously if they were afforded the opportunity to develop behind a veteran for at least a year (I'd actually like to see Rookie QB's "red-shirt" in the NFL for a year) and then give him a coach/coordinator that understands his strengths as well as his "issues" and 1) coaches him up and 2) puts him in the best position to succeed. With QB's I personally think it is rarely the QB that busts but rather the environment that he is thrown into. I think it is incumbent upon the organization to know all of that before they select in the draft to make sure the QB and the system/coach are a good fit. Otherwise you are just wrecking a potential career.

Just Passin' By 10-31-2014 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11073820)
Is a bunch of crap.

Geno has the exact same issues he did the second half of his senior season. He knows what the issues are but cant correct them because that's who he is.

He's a one read QB who's not particularly accurate, and who folds under pressure. Those QBs don't generally improve, at least not early on. People who think the kid would have made it somewhere other than NY (though I'm sure NY isn't helping) are people who insist that he'd have been that special snowflake.

Marcellus 10-31-2014 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by temper11 (Post 11074146)
I disagree... the kid obviously has talent. .

I will keep this simple for you.

Yes he has talent, physically.

But he doesn't have the head for it and that will not change.

He is Tony Banks V2. Not because he is black but because he is black, isn't really mobile, has a big arm, and makes terrible decisions.

temper11 10-31-2014 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11074186)
I will keep this simple for you.

Yes he has talent, physically.

But he doesn't have the head for it and that will not change.

He is Tony Banks V2. Not because he is black but because he is black, isn't really mobile, has a big arm, and makes terrible decisions.

Maybe... I don't know. I just know that the Jets were shit and the coaching staff not great. I think it would have been tough for most QB's to just come in there and immediately have success without any of the structure I talked about before.

For as much as everyone talks about how important the position is... not many organizations do much to protect their investment. They just draft a kid and throw him to the wolves. If you think someone is good enough to select high, why not try to do what you can to make that pick work?

Sandy Vagina 10-31-2014 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by temper11 (Post 11074199)
I just know that the Jets were shit and the coaching staff not great.

For as much as everyone talks about how important the position is... not many organizations do much to protect their investment. They just draft a kid and throw him to the wolves. If you think someone is good enough to select high, why not try to do what you can to make that pick work?

Can you explain to me where the NYJ are lacking so horribly in support cast for Geno?

Saccopoo 10-31-2014 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by temper11 (Post 11074199)
Maybe... I don't know. I just know that the Jets were shit and the coaching staff not great. I think it would have been tough for most QB's to just come in there and immediately have success without any of the structure I talked about before.

For as much as everyone talks about how important the position is... not many organizations do much to protect their investment. They just draft a kid and throw him to the wolves. If you think someone is good enough to select high, why not try to do what you can to make that pick work?

Also consider that Marty Morinwheg is his offensive coodinator.

Geno Smith hasn't really had a lot of support (talent wise around him) or coaching at this point in the NFL.

Quesadilla Joe 10-31-2014 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11072583)
would have had the money to afford Emmanuel Sanders,

The Chiefs didn't miss out on Sanders because of money. They missed out on Sanders because they didn't have Peyton Manning.

Quesadilla Joe 10-31-2014 05:28 PM

SNR truly believes he could run an NFL franchise. ROFL

Mother****erJones 10-31-2014 05:51 PM

We weren't truly in on Sanders. He ****ed us. It's ok. He will get his and break his ****ing leg

RealSNR 10-31-2014 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Herpe (Post 11074230)
SNR truly believes he could run an NFL franchise. ROFL

Great, now you're a ****ing liar in addition to being a dumbass and a bet-welcher.

Let me know when you add axe-murderer to the list. Then I'll go buy a gun.

Easy 6 10-31-2014 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11074219)
Also consider that Marty Morinwheg is his offensive coodinator.

Geno Smith hasn't really had a lot of support (talent wise around him) or coaching at this point in the NFL.

I'm just fine with the fact that Andy didnt bring Marty along with him here, but lets not act like its all his fault that Geno sucks... after all, you're talking about the same OC that made Mike Vick look like a legit superstar QB for atleast two seasons.

He even had me sold on Vick in 2010, what with the 21 to 6 td/pick ratio and 100+ QBR... so dont pass it all of on Marty, let Geno suck on his own.

Easy 6 10-31-2014 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Herpe (Post 11074229)
The Chiefs didn't miss out on Sanders because of money. They missed out on Sanders because they didn't have Peyton Manning.

This is the ONLY correct thing you've said since you've been here... there was nothing Dorsey could've done to prevent that.

He got snookered by a shady agent and player that wanted to use us as leverage against the team he wanted all along... oh, and **** your shady ass team ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.