ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   KU ***** OFFICIAL 2015 KANSAS FOOTBALL THREAD ***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289748)

Saul Good 03-25-2015 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11403677)
This photo goes a long way explaining why the Wall Street Journal pegs the value of their football program on par with KUs.

What a weird thing to brag about...

Bambi 03-26-2015 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11403644)
Doesn't matter. TCU kicks the crap out of ku on both.

http://www.thestadiumshoppe.com/images/TCU2.jpg

omg! We have one of these too!

great post dude ROFL

http://www.thestadiumshoppe.com/images/UKAN1.jpg

Bambi 03-26-2015 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11403677)
This photo goes a long way explaining why the Wall Street Journal pegs the value of their football program on par with KUs.

Won't take Beaty much winning at all to overtake these two.

51 Missouri $40,587,884 $115,110,000

53 TCU $44,706,086 $111,110,000

57 Kansas $32,846,803 $103,890,000

Saul Good 03-26-2015 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404089)
omg! We have one of these too!

great post dude ROFL

http://www.thestadiumshoppe.com/images/UKAN1.jpg

Yeah. One of those stadiums is considerably more impressive than the other, though.

WhawhaWhat 03-26-2015 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404089)
omg! We have one of these too!

great post dude ROFL

http://www.thestadiumshoppe.com/images/UKAN1.jpg

They put the track back in? I knew they'd miss it before too long.

KC native 03-26-2015 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11403677)
This photo goes a long way explaining why the Wall Street Journal pegs the value of their football program on par with KUs.

:facepalm:

We've been over this. The WSJ is reporting the work of one professor at an Illinois school.

Aside from that, our stadium doesn't look anything like that anymore.

KC native 03-26-2015 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404089)
omg! We have one of these too!

great post dude ROFL

Your stadium is hideous. The University of North Texas' stadium is nicer than yours. What an embarrassment to the Big 12.

Edit: Here is University of North Texas' stadium
http://northtexan.unt.edu/sites/defa...Stadium018.jpg

KC native 03-26-2015 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11404148)
Yeah. One of those stadiums is considerably more impressive than the other, though.

LMAO

It's hilarious that he's even trying to argue this.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-26-2015 08:36 AM

Love how fans of other Universities obsess over Kansas Football in....March.

Lzen 03-26-2015 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat (Post 11404156)
They put the track back in? I knew they'd miss it before too long.

ROFL

KC native 03-26-2015 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 11404174)
Love how fans of other Universities obsess over Kansas Football in....March.

Obsess? No

Laugh at until we can't breathe? Yes

Mr_Tomahawk 03-26-2015 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11404182)
Obsess? No

Laugh at until we can't breathe? Yes

Sure.

Thanks for keeping KU Football at the top of the forum and most importantly, #1 in your heart. I never have trouble finding it....unlike the TCU thread.

KC native 03-26-2015 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 11404187)
Sure.

Thanks for keeping KU Football at the top of the forum and most importantly, #1 in your heart. I never have trouble finding it....unlike the TCU thread.

LMAO @ top of the forum.

Considering I'm the lone TCU alumnus on Chiefsplanet, it would be pretty ridiculous to start a thread on TCU football. Besides, I don't need a bbs to track down all of the news on our program. I can read national media and see my team discussed.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404092)
Won't take Beaty much winning at all to overtake these two.

51 Missouri $40,587,884 $115,110,000

53 TCU $44,706,086 $111,110,000

57 Kansas $32,846,803 $103,890,000

TCU and Mizzouche must be giving away hordes of free tix. That's really the only explanation.

KC native 03-26-2015 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404092)
Won't take Beaty much winning at all to overtake these two.

51 Missouri $40,587,884 $115,110,000

53 TCU $44,706,086 $111,110,000

57 Kansas $32,846,803 $103,890,000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404201)
TCU and Mizzouche must be giving away hordes of free tix. That's really the only explanation.


You realize that TCU hasn't received a full revenue share yet right?

TCU's revenues will go up this year as it is our first year to receive 100% of our Big 12 revenue allocation.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-26-2015 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11404196)
LMAO @ top of the forum.

Considering I'm the lone TCU alumnus on Chiefsplanet, it would be pretty ridiculous to start a thread on TCU football. Besides, I don't need a bbs to track down all of the news on our program. I can read national media and see my team discussed.

You have the 2nd most post in this thread....if it wasn't for your KU fandom, this thread would be buried at the bottom of the forum with all the other D1 football threads....

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 09:05 AM

We should never have allowed that little shit school into the league, they bring nothing and their revenues are crap. At least keep them permanent junior members at 10m per. What were they going to do? Stick with the Big East at $3m instead and with all that travel and irrelevancy? No reason giving them Jack shit, nobody in Dallas even follows that microscopic sports program

KC native 03-26-2015 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404240)
We should never have allowed that little shit school into the league, they bring nothing and their revenues are crap. At least keep them permanent junior members at 10m per. What were they going to do? Stick with the Big East at $3m instead and with all that travel and irrelevancy? No reason giving them Jack shit, nobody in Dallas even follows that microscopic sports program

Yes, because TCU being in the picture for a national championship is clearly bad for the Big 12. LMAO

Saul Good 03-26-2015 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11404261)
Yes, because TCU being in the picture for a national championship is clearly bad for the Big 12. LMAO

It's been a decade since a Big 12 team won a NC in football. It would be hilarious if TCU finally ended the streak.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 09:30 AM

It'd be hilarious if Mizzou could ever just win their league

Al Czervik 03-26-2015 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404305)
It'd be hilarious if Mizzou could ever just win their league

LMAO

kcchiefsus 03-26-2015 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404305)
It'd be hilarious if Mizzou could ever just win their league

Yeah, since Kansas has won their league...

oh, wait

Bambi 03-26-2015 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404240)
We should never have allowed that little shit school into the league, they bring nothing and their revenues are crap. At least keep them permanent junior members at 10m per. What were they going to do? Stick with the Big East at $3m instead and with all that travel and irrelevancy? No reason giving them Jack shit, nobody in Dallas even follows that microscopic sports program

TCU replaced Missouri and A&M with a much more successful football program than both those schools.

However you have to know your place if you're TCU when it takes schools with a much bigger brand like Nebraska to leave before you even get a seat at the table.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 10:25 AM

But the point Bambs is that TCU had to take whatever we gave them. A half membership is worth $13m this year alone. What were they gonna do, turn that down to take $3m? To not be able to play Texas and Baylor and OU and Tech? What effing leverage did those little turds have?

Bambi 03-26-2015 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404424)
But the point Bambs is that TCU had to take whatever we gave them. A half membership is worth $13m this year alone. What were they gonna do, turn that down to take $3m? To not be able to play Texas and Baylor and OU and Tech? What effing leverage did those little turds have?

That's true. It feels nice to not be owned by anyone.

But if I'm a TCU fan what choice do I have?

kcchiefsus 03-26-2015 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404452)
That's true. It feels nice to not be owned by anyone.

But if I'm a TCU fan what choice do I have?

You and PB should get it over with finally and **** each other or suck each other dicks or something.

Imon Yourside 03-26-2015 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404305)
It'd be hilarious if Mizzou could ever just win their league

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/btHFguYFgJ0?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

KC native 03-26-2015 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404424)
But the point Bambs is that TCU had to take whatever we gave them. A half membership is worth $13m this year alone. What were they gonna do, turn that down to take $3m? To not be able to play Texas and Baylor and OU and Tech? What effing leverage did those little turds have?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404452)
That's true. It feels nice to not be owned by anyone.

But if I'm a TCU fan what choice do I have?

LMAO

We played Baylor, OU, and Tech as their out of conference games regularly before joining the Big 12. Don't let that get in your way.

How much does it piss you off that we're better than you in every way except for early NCAA tournament exits?

Bambi 03-26-2015 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11404628)
LMAO

We played Baylor, OU, and Tech as their out of conference games regularly before joining the Big 12. Don't let that get in your way.

How much does it piss you off that we're better than you in every way except for early NCAA tournament exits?

"better than you"?

lol, what are you 12?

Bambi 03-26-2015 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 11404187)
Sure.

Thanks for keeping KU Football at the top of the forum and most importantly, #1 in your heart. I never have trouble finding it....unlike the TCU thread.

It's KU. Other than the Chiefs it's the most popular program on CP.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-26-2015 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404765)
It's KU. Other than the Chiefs it's the most popular program on CP.

I agree.

KC native 03-26-2015 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404763)
"better than you"?

lol, what are you 12?

Yes, better than you.

I don't have to lie about the TCU program or other programs to make my arguments like you do.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404399)
TCU replaced Missouri and A&M with a much more successful football program than both those schools.

However you have to know your place if you're TCU when it takes schools with a much bigger brand like Nebraska to leave before you even get a seat at the table.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404424)
But the point Bambs is that TCU had to take whatever we gave them. A half membership is worth $13m this year alone. What were they gonna do, turn that down to take $3m? To not be able to play Texas and Baylor and OU and Tech? What effing leverage did those little turds have?

It is an interesting point. The Big 12 brought in a school with fewer than 10k students and is going to hand 10% of its payouts to them. TCU, by far the smallest school involved in major conference realignment, is milking the conference for all it's worth...so they must have had quite a bit of leverage.

Outgoing schools had 150,000 total students. Incoming schools had 30,000. Pretty sweet deal for those two schools if you ask me.

Bambi 03-26-2015 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11404780)
Yes, better than you.

I don't have to lie about the TCU program or other programs to make my arguments like you do.

You don't have any championships. What are you better in?

Bambi 03-26-2015 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11404794)
It is an interesting point. The Big 12 brought in a school with fewer than 10k students and is going to hand 10% of its payouts to them. TCU, by far the smallest school involved in major conference realignment, is milking the conference for all it's worth...so they must have had quite a bit of leverage.

Outgoing schools had 150,000 total students. Incoming schools had 30,000. Pretty sweet deal for those two schools if you ask me.

Conferences have always shifted since college sports began.

Schools of consequence are never the ones that move though.

To the Big 12 the schools that left are no different than the schools that joined. All involved in "realignment" are simply here to facilitate games for the blue-bloods.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404814)
Conferences have always shifted since college sports began.

Schools of consequence are never the ones that move though.

To the Big 12 the schools that left are no different than the schools that joined. All involved in "realignment" are simply here to facilitate games for the blue-bloods.

What schools won the last two national championships in basketball? It seems like they both just moved conferences.

The Big 12 has 2 football national championships ever. Nebraska had 3 in the past 20 seasons when they left.

Bambi 03-26-2015 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11404836)
What schools won the last two national championships in basketball? It seems like they both just moved conferences.

The Big 12 has 2 football national championships ever. Nebraska had 3 in the past 20 seasons when they left.

Not sure what your point is.

Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas all won National Championships while members of the Big 12.

Those are the blue-bloods I'm referring to.

In reference to your basketball point. Both UConn and Louisville left the Big East because that conference does not have full participation in football. Both UConn and Louisville desire to play football in Division 1.

They had no problem winning the Big East. Teams like TAMU, Nebraska, Missouri, etc. could never win their own league so they left. They still can't win their league. Like I said, fodder.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11404794)
It is an interesting point. The Big 12 brought in a school with fewer than 10k students and is going to hand 10% of its payouts to them. TCU, by far the smallest school involved in major conference realignment, is milking the conference for all it's worth...so they must have had quite a bit of leverage.

Outgoing schools had 150,000 total students. Incoming schools had 30,000. Pretty sweet deal for those two schools if you ask me.

It's really that way for nearly all refugee schools. TCU should never have been given a full cut, and likewise neither should Mizzou. (After all we know Mizzou was willing to take a partial share for the BIG which the Cornfuggers snagged from them).


If MU and ATM had a choice it was: stay or go SEC. Both were so incredibly stricken by their victimhood they had to go. So why cut them in fully?

KC native 03-26-2015 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11404808)
You don't have any championships. What are you better in?

This is incorrect.

KC native 03-26-2015 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11404954)
It's really that way for nearly all refugee schools. TCU should never have been given a full cut, and likewise neither should Mizzou. (After all we know Mizzou was willing to take a partial share for the BIG which the Cornfuggers snagged from them).


If MU and ATM had a choice it was: stay or go SEC. Both were so incredibly stricken by their victimhood they had to go. So why cut them in fully?

LMAO

Do you honestly think TCU would have settled for not getting a full cut in perpetuity?

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 02:58 PM

Versus staying in the dead Big East for $3m? Ummmmm.......yeah. Yeah I do. They had no options.

Bambi 03-26-2015 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405010)
This is incorrect.

What's incorrect about that statement?

What titles have you won?

KC native 03-26-2015 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11405034)
What's incorrect about that statement?

What titles have you won?

Google it yourself.

KC native 03-26-2015 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11405033)
Versus staying in the dead Big East for $3m? Ummmmm.......yeah. Yeah I do. They had no options.

That's because you're a ****ing moron.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 03:00 PM

Weren't they just one of the One True Champions of the Big 12?

Saul Good 03-26-2015 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11405033)
Versus staying in the dead Big East for $3m? Ummmmm.......yeah. Yeah I do. They had no options.

Then the Big 12 is dumber than I thought...and that's saying something.

Bambi 03-26-2015 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405040)
Google it yourself.

Not finding anything.

KC native 03-26-2015 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11405046)
Then the Big 12 is dumber than I thought...and that's saying something.

Prison bitch has no clue of what he's talking about.

TCU's AD is one of the best in the country and has elevated all of TCU's programs during his tenure.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 03:03 PM

Apparently Nitwit is sitting on some very explosive information about TCUs options in realignment. I'm dying to hear what their options were. I hear everyone was after them (blurts out laughing)


He will tell us the real scoop any minute now.

KC native 03-26-2015 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11405050)
Not finding anything.

That's because you're a ****ing lying moron.

Bambi 03-26-2015 03:04 PM

Actually I found this. Although this isn't recognized by the NCAA as a National Championship it appears TCU beat something called Carnegie Tech.

http://images.rarenewspapers.com/eba...1/image036.jpg

KC native 03-26-2015 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11405054)
Apparently Nitwit is sitting on some very explosive information about TCUs options in realignment. I'm dying to hear what their options were. I hear everyone was after them (blurts out laughing)


He will tell us the real scoop any minute now.

Sorry that you're stuck with whoever ku's shitty AD is, but Chris Del Conte has consistently improved TCU's conference associations during his time at TCU.

Maybe if you guys didn't have such a dumb**** (or multiple dumb****s, I don't know or care) as and AD then you guys might actually see improvement in your programs.

Bambi 03-26-2015 03:07 PM

Carnegie actually held the lead against the TCU Texans into the 2nd half but ended up losing giving the Texans a 15-8 victory.

It would be 20 years before TCU saw another bowl victory.

Congrats. A true blue-blood.

KC native 03-26-2015 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 11405063)
Carnegie actually held the lead against the TCU Texans into the 2nd half but ended up losing giving the Texans a 15-8 victory.

It would be 20 years before TCU saw another bowl victory.

Congrats. A true blue-blood.

Please point out where I said we were a blue-blood.

You are one dumb ****er.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405053)
Prison bitch has no clue of what he's talking about.

TCU's AD is one of the best in the country and has elevated all of TCU's programs during his tenure.

I asked you a specific question: what were TCUs other options? Just tell us, or admit you don't actually know of any.

KC native 03-26-2015 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11405077)
I asked you a specific question: what were TCUs other options? Just tell us, or admit you don't actually know of any.

It doesn't matter what our other options were. The opportunity for the Big 12 opened up and our AD made it happen.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 03:27 PM

It matters entirely to the point I was making. Which your comment indicates you're now conceding.

KC native 03-26-2015 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11405092)
It matters entirely to the point I was making. Which your comment indicates you're now conceding.

No, it doesn't.

The opportunity to join a conference where our historic rivals were located and our AD made it happen.

Don't be mad because your school does nothing to elevate the profile of the Big 12 (well other than being a laughingstock due to their consistent early NCAA tournament exits) and TCU has made the Big 12 relevant in the discussion about the football championship.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-26-2015 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405096)
No, it doesn't.

The opportunity to join a conference where our historic rivals were located and our AD made it happen.

Don't be mad because your school does nothing to elevate the profile of the Big 12 (well other than being a laughingstock due to their consistent early NCAA tournament exits) and TCU has made the Big 12 relevant in the discussion about the football championship.

*NCAABB*

KU was in the National Championship game 3 years ago.

Where was TCU 3 years ago...?

KC native 03-26-2015 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 11405108)
*NCAABB*

KU was in the National Championship game 3 years ago.

Where was TCU 3 years ago...?

This is the football thread.

But to answer your question, not winning the national championship. Just like ku.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-26-2015 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405114)
This is the football thread.

But to answer your question, not winning the national championship. Just like ku.

Then why did you bring up Basketball?

Fansy the Famous Bard 03-26-2015 03:50 PM

Holy angry trolls, batman.

KC native 03-26-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 11405115)
Then why did you bring up Basketball?

Because it's the only thing you can claim.

Bambi 03-26-2015 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405076)
Please point out where I said we were a blue-blood.

You are one dumb ****er.

I asked what championships you've won and you have yet to tell me.

I went looking for myself and only found one that isn't recognized by the NCAA.

I suppose the case can be considered closed.

Verdict: TCU is a non-factor in collegiate sport.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 04:10 PM

The Big 12 was bleeding teams and was forced to take whatever was available, yet here Bitch sits calling out TCU for not having options.

It's like a husband telling his wife that nobody else would marry her because she's so fat and ugly. Even if it's true, the joke's on him.

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405096)
No, it doesn't.

The opportunity to join a conference where our historic rivals were located and our AD made it happen.

Don't be mad because your school does nothing to elevate the profile of the Big 12 (well other than being a laughingstock due to their consistent early NCAA tournament exits) and TCU has made the Big 12 relevant in the discussion about the football championship.


As long as you keep agreeing with me you had zero options, that's good by me.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11405180)
As long as you keep agreeing with me you had zero options, that's good by me.

This is the stupidest argument I've ever heard. They had several options. The Big 12 was the best option as evidenced by the fact that they took it. The same holds true for the Big 12 having other options than TCU and West Virginia.

Funny thing, though. Those schools bettered their positions and get 20% of the conference revenue in the future. The Big 12 just got fleeced. It worked out well for the welfare queens in the short term, but Texas and Oklahoma won't let that situation stand forever.

Saul Good 03-26-2015 04:40 PM

Running 40yard dashes for pro day outside in cold, windy conditions. #ghettofacilities

https://mobile.twitter.com/HerbieTeo...69479161872384

Prison Bitch 03-26-2015 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11405189)
This is the stupidest argument I've ever heard. They had several options. The Big 12 was the best option as evidenced by the fact that they took it. The same holds true for the Big 12 having other options than TCU and West Virginia.

Funny thing, though. Those schools bettered their positions and get 20% of the conference revenue in the future. The Big 12 just got fleeced. It worked out well for the welfare queens in the short term, but Texas and Oklahoma won't let that situation stand forever.

Don't take this the wrong way but (a) why are you on this thread and (b) are you mentally reeruned?

Saul Good 03-26-2015 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 11405238)
Don't take this the wrong way but (a) why are you on this thread and (b) are you mentally reeruned?

I forgot that you never post in Mizzou threads. Sorry about that. You can go back to reading the Onion for your news.

Buehler445 03-26-2015 07:42 PM

Can you guys go back to the conference reallignment thread with this shit?

Saul Good 03-26-2015 07:50 PM

I'll keep the shit talking over there. Sorry

Lzen 03-26-2015 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11405096)
No, it doesn't.

The opportunity to join a conference where our historic rivals were located and our AD made it happen.

Don't be mad because your school does nothing to elevate the profile of the Big 12 (well other than being a laughingstock due to their consistent early NCAA tournament exits) and TCU has made the Big 12 relevant in the discussion about the football championship.

This is quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said here. And that's saying something.

Bambi 03-27-2015 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11405199)
Running 40yard dashes for pro day outside in cold, windy conditions. #ghettofacilities

https://mobile.twitter.com/HerbieTeo...69479161872384

God you're ****ing stupid.

Bambi 04-07-2015 09:51 AM

Najee Harris was at practice for the 2nd time in 4 months yesterday.

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...-Harris-165648

Reerun_KC 04-07-2015 09:54 AM

Looking forward to my son and I taking in a game and the campus this fall.

KC native 04-07-2015 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 11423256)
Looking forward to my son and I taking in a game and the campus this fall.

Why?

Reerun_KC 04-07-2015 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 11423268)
Why?

1) because we want to

2) because it eats at your soul that I don't really care about your opinions.

KC native 04-07-2015 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 11423278)
1) because we want to

2) because it eats at your soul that I don't really care about your opinions.

I was curious as to what you were looking forward to. watching a shitty football team get stomped in a shitty stadium? Doesn't sound like something to look forward to for me.

I had no opinion on your choice to waste your time.

Prison Bitch 04-07-2015 11:21 AM

The better question is why anyone would follow TCU since they won't ever win a title in anything. Worse, their best chance is in an unfair football system that recently laughed at them, spit in their face and told them to eat shit.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.