ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Travis Kelce is like a female version of Gronk (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=296715)

Saccopoo 12-14-2015 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11953223)
I thought he got hit and the ball knocked out, didn't even consider it a drop myself.

He completely whiffed on one during the game.

He's just frustrating.

You love his emotions and fire and talent, then he goes and just completely misses shit that, at this stage, he shouldn't be whiffing on.

That's what makes Whitten and Gronk the best. They don't whiff. Kelce needs to start making that happen.

beach tribe 12-14-2015 01:15 PM

When Kelce gains more maturity he will be the best TE in the league.

Mark my words.

Gronk will probably be broken by then or I revise that statement to 2nd best TE in the league.

ThaVirus 12-14-2015 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11953223)
I thought he got hit and the ball knocked out, didn't even consider it a drop myself.


This is CP.

Any pass that touches you, even if it's only a finger while a CB is draped over your back with the MLB waiting to lay a hit on you, should be caught.

beach tribe 12-14-2015 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11953279)
He completely whiffed on one during the game.

He's just frustrating.

You love his emotions and fire and talent, then he goes and just completely misses shit that, at this stage, he shouldn't be whiffing on.

That's what makes Whitten and Gronk the best. They don't whiff. Kelce needs to start making that happen.

I think his vanity will actually help him in this aspect.
I'll bet he hates embarrassing himself, and his need for attention will eventually be out weighed by fear of embarrassment/negative attention.

And I'm surprised Houston hasn't gotten all up in his ass yet.

That's one of the things I love about Houston. Dude called Berry out after coming back from cancer for not making play he thought he could have made.
Don't know how much longer he will let Kelce slide before making him his bitch.
Probably has refrained thus far because he plays offense.

O.city 12-14-2015 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11953279)
He completely whiffed on one during the game.

He's just frustrating.

You love his emotions and fire and talent, then he goes and just completely misses shit that, at this stage, he shouldn't be whiffing on.

That's what makes Whitten and Gronk the best. They don't whiff. Kelce needs to start making that happen.

Whiffed on what?

carcosa 12-14-2015 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11953197)
Holy shit, thats the pass their all up in arms about?

IIRC, that was a pretty crazy tough catch in traffic. I mean yeah, youd like to see him make it,but **** me.

I think he probably should have made the catch, but people here are waaaay too hard on Kelce overall.

Saccopoo 12-14-2015 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 11953303)
I think he probably should have made the catch, but people here are waaaay too hard on Kelce overall.

No they aren't.

He misses way to many easy things. Catches, blocks, etc. He loses focus. And that might be due to the fact that he is wanting/trying to make the big thing happen, but the first step is making sure you can actually do the big thing before trying to make the big thing happen.

I think he's got all the potential to be one of the best, if not the best. I like the guy a ton.

He just needs to pull his head out of his ass, focus on the now and then let the talent take over.

carcosa 12-14-2015 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11953314)
No they aren't.

He misses way to many easy things. Catches, blocks, etc. He loses focus. And that might be due to the fact that he is wanting/trying to make the big thing happen, but the first step is making sure you can actually do the big thing before trying to make the big thing happen.

I think he's got all the potential to be one of the best, if not the best. I like the guy a ton.

He just needs to pull his head out of his ass, focus on the now and then let the talent take over.

We got people saying they don't want to re-sign him, though. That's ridiculous. He's young and makes mistakes, but he's also one of the few actual talents on this offense.

beach tribe 12-14-2015 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 11953331)
We got people saying they don't want to re-sign him, though. That's ridiculous. He's young and makes mistakes, but he's also one of the few actual talents on this offense.

Someone said that??:facepalm:

Probably didn't want to re-sign Houston either.

Discuss Thrower 12-14-2015 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 11953331)
We got people saying they don't want to re-sign him, though. That's ridiculous. He's young and makes mistakes, but he's also one of the few actual talents on this offense.

If he wants top 3 TE money I don't think it's worth it.

Pay pass rushing OLBs, lockdown corners, WRs, defensive linemen like Bailey and Howard, and be forced to overpay for OTs because that's the market.

Tight ends are a luxury item. We saw full well how paying to keep a top 3 tight end around worked out the last time.

ThaVirus 12-14-2015 02:16 PM

Travis Kelce is like a female version of Gronk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11953376)
Tight ends are a luxury item. We saw full well how paying to keep a top 3 tight end around worked out the last time.


Our lack of playoff success over the past 23 years has little to do with Tony Gonzalez. Don't be ridiculous.

hitchief 12-14-2015 02:21 PM

dude needs to stop looking in the mirror and start looking the ball into his freaking hands.

cost us 10 points yesterday which would kill us in any playoff game. Dropped a super easy catch at what the 15 yard line on 3rd down, so we try a FG from way further out than would/should have been the case and then we miss it. Now, we may even score a td on that drive if he catchs that ball.

Then on the very next drive, he's blocking in the back while our rb is streaking down the sidelines for a td?

He could be all world but to defend his play this year is beyond homer boner. Dude has dropped too many balls, fumbled too much and to many penalties to be a top 5 te!

Discuss Thrower 12-14-2015 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11953392)
Our lack of playoff success over the past 23 years has little to do with Tony Gonzalez. Don't be ridiculous.

Still a luxury position. The offensive guys you have to pay are QBs (obviously), WRs and tackles and I'd say center. Prioritize the last three categories as you wish.

Defensive guys you pay to keep around are pass rushers, corners, and interior DL or LBs depending on alignment in that order.

ThaVirus 12-14-2015 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11953403)
Still a luxury position. The offensive guys you have to pay are QBs (obviously), WRs and tackles and I'd say center. Prioritize the last three categories as you wish.



Defensive guys you pay to keep around are pass rushers, corners, and interior DL or LBs depending on alignment in that order.


Those positions are certainly weighted more heavily but you draft who you want and make the determination as to what they're worth when the time comes.

We don't have any tackles worth a hefty contract, nor do we have any receivers commanding top dollar besides Maclin.

We do have a TE now who, depending on how much he's asking for, could be worth a nice-sized contract in a year or two.

ThaVirus 12-14-2015 02:31 PM

You shouldn't underrate the TE position so much anyway. A great all around TE can be invaluable to an offense.

Is there any more valuable non-QB offensive player than Gronk? Maybe Adrian Peterson.

I'd take Greg Olsen, Tyler Eifert or Travis Kelce over a lot of 3rd tier WRs.

Frosty 12-14-2015 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 11953369)
Someone said that??:facepalm:

Probably didn't want to re-sign Houston either.

Probably one of the Alex cling-ons. They think Kelce is making their boo look bad.

Just Passin' By 12-14-2015 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11953403)
Still a luxury position. The offensive guys you have to pay are QBs (obviously), WRs and tackles and I'd say center. Prioritize the last three categories as you wish.

Defensive guys you pay to keep around are pass rushers, corners, and interior DL or LBs depending on alignment in that order.

I'm not sure what you're basing that on.

Amnorix 12-14-2015 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11953403)
Still a luxury position. The offensive guys you have to pay are QBs (obviously), WRs and tackles and I'd say center. Prioritize the last three categories as you wish.

Defensive guys you pay to keep around are pass rushers, corners, and interior DL or LBs depending on alignment in that order.


You're insane if you value WR over TE. Seriously. WRs are the ultimate shiny hood ornament.

GloryDayz 12-14-2015 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11952941)
Well,that settles it. Kelce is going to go off the next few weeks.

**** the haters.

Let's hope so...

Sorter 12-14-2015 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 11953674)
You're insane if you value WR over TE. Seriously. WRs are the ultimate shiny hood ornament.

I think (like with most teams) it depends on what you believe in and what you have on your roster.

Vietnam58 12-15-2015 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 11953674)
You're insane if you value WR over TE. Seriously. WRs are the ultimate shiny hood ornament.

you sure about that. . did you watch the Giants game tonight?. .

People been Chiefs fans so long they think wide receiver is an obsolete position. . haha

TigeRRUppeRRcut 12-15-2015 02:56 AM

He catches 3/4 of his targets and has amazing YAC. Blocking effort is awesome. He either cleans up his mistakes or he moves his contract down to lower end tier 1 level. It's that simple.

notorious 12-15-2015 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnam58 (Post 11954893)
you sure about that. . did you watch the Giants game tonight?. .

People been Chiefs fans so long they think wide receiver is an obsolete position. . haha

He is a New England fan. :facepalm:

ThaVirus 12-15-2015 10:41 AM

Contracts tell you everything you need to know about the value of certain positions. WR>TE.

Of course a New England fan would argue for the merits of having a TE over a WR..

Good question for Asterix: would you take 2015 Gronk or 2005 Randy Moss?

OctoberFart 12-15-2015 10:42 AM

Who is the idiot that says he is like Gronk? The only thing that is like Gronk is the position he plays, uni number and skin color.

Chiefnj2 12-15-2015 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11953376)
We saw full well how paying to keep a top 3 tight end around worked out the last time.

And Calvin Johnson hasn't worked out too well for the Lions.

Have the last Super Bowl winners had an elite WR? Pats, Seahawks, Ravens, Giants ?

Kman34 12-15-2015 11:23 AM

Keith Cash says hi to this thread..

Amnorix 12-15-2015 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11955300)
Contracts tell you everything you need to know about the value of certain positions. WR>TE.

Of course a New England fan would argue for the merits of having a TE over a WR..

Good question for Asterix: would you take 2015 Gronk or 2005 Randy Moss?


So let's start with this -- assuming he is healthy (which isn't always the case of course), there is NO WR in the NFL I would take right now over Gronk for a single "must have it" game. Not Antonio Brown, or Megatron, or LBJ, or anyone else.

The reason is simple -- Gronk is not only a dominant receiver, he is also a dominant blocker when at his best. He's also the greatest receiving red zone threat in NFL history.

And i have simple proof for that one -- he has the highest TDs per games played of any receiver since WWII.

Quote:

1. Gronkowski’s average of 0.83 touchdown catches per game is the best by any player since Packers Hall of Fame receiver Don Hutson tore up under-manned NFL defenses during World War II (0.85 TDs per game).

Athletic phenom wide receiver Randy Moss is a distant No. 3 on the list. He averaged 0.72 TDs per game.
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/p...off_the_charts



2005 Moss versus 2015 Gronk? Perhaps the most dominant WR ever versus the most dominant TE ever? Hell, give me either one, I'll be happy.

ThaVirus 12-15-2015 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 11955424)
So let's start with this -- assuming he is healthy (which isn't always the case of course), there is NO WR in the NFL I would take right now over Gronk for a single "must have it" game. Not Antonio Brown, or Megatron, or LBJ, or anyone else.



The reason is simple -- Gronk is not only a dominant receiver, he is also a dominant blocker when at his best. He's also the greatest receiving red zone threat in NFL history.



And i have simple proof for that one -- he has the highest TDs per games played of any receiver since WWII.







http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/p...off_the_charts







2005 Moss versus 2015 Gronk? Perhaps the most dominant WR ever versus the most dominant TE ever? Hell, give me either one, I'll be happy.


Gronk has played his entire career with a HOF QB. That's not exactly a fair comparison..

What kind of numbers would Moss have put up had he not wasted so much of his prime years in Oakland?

ThaVirus 12-15-2015 11:57 AM

It's extremely hard to judge a WR/TEs true ability when he's playing with a HOF QB.

ThaVirus 12-15-2015 11:59 AM

Antonio Brown put up average numbers when Roethlisberger was out for a few games.

Look at Demaryius now without Peyton.

Amnorix 12-15-2015 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11955488)
Gronk has played his entire career with a HOF QB. That's not exactly a fair comparison..

What kind of numbers would Moss have put up had he not wasted so much of his prime years in Oakland?


:shrug: Jerry Rice had HOF QBs. Moss had excellent QBs by and large, including the exact same QB GRonk has, for a portion of his career. He only had two years in Oakland, but yes, obviously, take those away and his TD ratio is likely higher.

I'll say it again, give me either one and I'm happy.

Amnorix 12-15-2015 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11955493)
It's extremely hard to judge a WR/TEs true ability when he's playing with a HOF QB.


:shrug: That goes both ways. Brady without any WR threats wasn't that nifty in 2005, or after Gronk was hurt all the times he ended the season hurt.

Man I'd love to have that 2011 Giants SB game to try with Gronk healthy. Argh. Oh well.

ThaVirus 12-15-2015 12:34 PM

Moss had two full seasons with Brady at QB and scored 36 TDs. That's averaging more than a TD per game.

Imagine a rookie Randy Moss with prime Tom Brady.. He certainly would have put up better numbers than Gronk and never dealt with injury issues like he does.

I'll take Moss over Gronk all day everyday.

I recognize the fact that Gronk can block well but I'd rather have the defense focus attention away from the center of the field. I think it'd open up a lot more opportunities for my offense.

Prime Moss/Rice/Calvin Johnson > prime Gronk/Gonzalez/Gates IMO.

TLO 12-15-2015 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 11955413)
Keith Cash says hi to this thread..

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/197/4...42e01e77_b.jpg

Mother****erJones 12-15-2015 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 11954982)
He catches 3/4 of his targets and has amazing YAC. Blocking effort is awesome. He either cleans up his mistakes or he moves his contract down to lower end tier 1 level. It's that simple.

It's not that simple. He's gona get paid and paid a lot his second contract.

beach tribe 12-15-2015 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnam58 (Post 11954893)
you sure about that. . did you watch the Giants game tonight?. .

People been Chiefs fans so long they think wide receiver is an obsolete position. . haha

He's a Pats fan..

And seriously though these aren't you fathers TEs. They put up WR #s now and should be valued close to the same.

Vietnam58 12-15-2015 07:19 PM

So do you take Gronk or Beckham if you're a GM?

Vietnam58 12-15-2015 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 11955838)
He's a Pats fan..

And seriously though these aren't you fathers TEs. They put up WR #s now and should be valued close to the same.

I agree but hes stating it like WR is a useless position. . Im a huge fan of the TE position. . but i still see the value in having a top WR. .

and as a pats fan he should realize how important someone like eldeman is or maybe a better example would be David Tyree ;)

Sandy Vagina 12-15-2015 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnam58 (Post 11956347)
So do you take Gronk or Beckham if you're a GM?

GM of which team?

ThaVirus 12-15-2015 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnam58 (Post 11956347)
So do you take Gronk or Beckham if you're a GM?


I think that's a fair question.

Beckham just set the record for most receiving catches, yards and TDs (IIRC) of any WR in his first 25 games. He's pretty incredible.

Gronk probably has a bit more sway on the outcome of a game but he's also got injury concerns and the aforementioned HOF QB issue. I'd really like to see how he does without Brady.

Amnorix 12-15-2015 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnam58 (Post 11956351)
I agree but hes stating it like WR is a useless position. . Im a huge fan of the TE position. . but i still see the value in having a top WR. .

and as a pats fan he should realize how important someone like eldeman is or maybe a better example would be David Tyree ;)


Never said WRs are useless. I think they are something of an unnecessary luxury.

Frosty 12-16-2015 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnam58 (Post 11956347)
So do you take Gronk or Beckham if you're a GM?

If I have Alex Smith as a QB, I take Gronk. I take Beckham if I have Big Ben, Manning, Bortles, Stafford, Ryan, etc.

Baby Lee 12-16-2015 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vietnam58 (Post 11956347)
So do you take Gronk or Beckham if you're a GM?

Was Moose or Michael more important to the Cowboy's dynasty with Aikman? [Emmitt and the OL are separate questions]

OctoberFart 12-16-2015 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11957377)
Was Moose or Michael more important to the Cowboy's dynasty with Aikman? [Emmitt and the OL are separate questions]

A FB or a WR? Do you really have to ask which is more important.

PizzaDoughz 12-16-2015 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 11956581)
Never said WRs are useless. I think they are something of an unnecessary luxury.

And yet whenever Brady or any other elite QB has a bad/off game, what usually gets the blame from Pats fans? "Brady lost all his weapons, bad o-line," etc. Fans can never make up there mind when it comes to the value top WRs and TEs provide.

WRs are definitely not an "unnecessary luxury," as you see top QB numbers/stats dip all the time when they don't have great receiving talent whether it's by injury or the lack of offensive weapons.

ThaVirus 12-16-2015 11:59 AM

Brady looks like dogshit without Edelman and Gronk

Sandy Vagina 12-16-2015 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OctoberFart (Post 11957573)
A FB or a WR? Do you really have to ask which is more important.

He must have meant Jay Novacek...

ChiefAshhole1056 12-16-2015 02:16 PM

Gronk (64) already has 5 more TDs than Witten (59)in their careers. Witten is considered by many to be a future H.O.Fer.

If both retired today, which one deserves it more? Witten is top 10 all-time in catches, but doesn't have any postseason success.

Discuss Thrower 12-16-2015 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefAshhole1056 (Post 11958021)
Gronk (64) already has 5 more TDs than Witten (59)in their careers. Witten is considered by many to be a future H.O.Fer.

If both retired today, which one deserves it more? Witten is top 10 all-time in catches, but doesn't have any postseason success.

Brady has been a better QB than Romo and has demonstrated an ability to get production out of JAG players, so the edge goes to Witten in that aspect. Beside that, it's too early to compare Gronk with Witten given the age disparity.

Witten's comparison is Heath Miller. Gronk's current comp is Jimmy Graham? Maybe?

PizzaDoughz 12-16-2015 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11958111)
Brady has been a better QB than Romo and has demonstrated an ability to get production out of JAG players, so the edge goes to Witten in that aspect. Beside that, it's too early to compare Gronk with Witten given the age disparity.

Witten's comparison is Heath Miller. Gronk's current comp is Jimmy Graham? Maybe?

Sure he gets production from the "JAGs," but it's not like he's had the GOAT TE level production before from a TE so this is just ridiculous. There's no point in this hypothetical because Gronk isn't going to retire today so what's the point? Besides Gronkowski is a much much better player and it's not even close, and there's the whole ring argument too, in which Gronk contributed greatly to achieve.

Deberg_1990 01-03-2016 07:38 PM

That penalty on the FG kick could have cost us the game.

Bench his ass on the FG team!!
Posted via Mobile Device

Bwana 01-03-2016 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 11996875)
That penalty on the FG kick could have cost us the game.

Bench his ass on the FG team!!
Posted via Mobile Device

He has a strong upside but he seems to have at least one bonehead move every game.

Mr. Laz 01-03-2016 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bwana (Post 11996883)
He has a strong upside but he seems to have at least one bonehead move every game.

I believe it was last week that he ran a slant and scored a touchdown.

It was a nice play, nice catch.


But .... he went down to make the catch and then roll over. He immediately flip the ball into the air and started celebrating. He's lucking the refs didn't say that it was incomplete because he didn't maintain possession through the ground.

He just can't seem to help himself, he's an idiot.

An athletic,physical,talented ..... idiot.

BossChief 01-03-2016 08:36 PM

He was at the table next to us at Q39...but he was leaving as we got here.

O.city 01-03-2016 08:37 PM

It was a ticky tack call

GloryDayz 01-03-2016 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11997118)
I believe it was last week that he ran a slant and scored a touchdown.

It was a nice play, nice catch.


But .... he went down to make the catch and then roll over. He immediately flip the ball into the air and started celebrating. He's lucking the refs didn't say that it was incomplete because he didn't maintain possession through the ground.

He just can't seem to help himself, he's an idiot.

An athletic,physical,talented ..... idiot.

He is good, and we need his good plays, but his self-aggrandizing side has to be factored-in when he's on the field.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.