Next year would not be the best year to do it imo its suppose to be a pretty weak class.

NO

No they are not.

I doubt it was ever even a consideration back when they put the deal together. It's an insurance policy on Smith gettng a serious injury where he wouldn't be able to play next season or for good. Negotiate a cheaper extension in the off-season or let him walk and draft someone.

LMAO

Bravo Sacc, Bravo

[QUOTE=DaneMcCloud;12536912]33 teams passed on Carr. The Chiefs had a QB and no 2nd round pick. Wilson lasted until the 3rd round because of his height.

You and the other butt****s act like choosing a QB is an exact science. There haven't been "countless" QB's the Chiefs have passed over that became HOFer's, which is basically what you and all the other morons that dissatisfied with Alex Smith, want.

Taking Sanchez or Clausen or Weeden or any number of draft choices would have meant the loss of a good player, such as Dee Ford or Eric Fisher or Mitch Morse.

Or would you rather have Garrett Grayson (cut), Brett Hundley or Sean Mannion over Marcus Peters or Morse or Conley or Steven Nelson?

THINK before you type, jackass.[/QUOTE

We haven't drafted a QB worth a shit ever and people on here think there were never any available. That is rediculus. Not saying there will be a good one this year we could get but KC a has long history of not trying. We get a cast off and hand them the job and ignore the position by never spending a high pick on a possible long term answer. It's probably the biggest reason we have not won shit. We don't have a home grown stud QB that can be relied on to win.

It's one game for goodness sake. Cut the guy a break.:rolleyes:

Truth, this is an off season question

Alex Smith possibly scrambling his brains has zero impact on if you should pay Nick Foles 10 million or not (****ing seriously? No)

You start investing better draft currency into a replacement because Alex is in his mid 30's and he's quickly going to fall off the cliff when he physically slips, which can happen any day. Nick Foles isn't the guy you want and a maybe concussion isn't why you make serious contingency plans.

If Alex Smith plays next year, you extend Foles and you overpay him. Regardless of whether Alex plays next year, the Chiefs must draft a qb in the first or second round. Even trade up if need be. Not even a question on either front.

If Alex gets hurt in a playoff hunt I'm not handing the keys to a freshman mid-season. The minute Alex hangs it up, I would rather give a young guy a shot than retread with Foles.

So whether we extend Foles or not has everything to do with what Alex Smith wants to do with his life.

IMAGINARY CONCUSSIONS FTW!!!! FOLES!!!

The LB is too far away to make a play even if the ball is thrown ahead of Hill. And even in a case where the LB is close, you can throw low so there's no chance of Hill getting hit. Theres no reason to miss that pass at all.

http://i.giphy.com/aDQ8NhxdTM8IE.gif]
Posted via Mobile Device

Nice. Thanks for posting this. I had not gone back for a second look, but felt sure then from look 1 that the underneath LB was not.. could not.. have been a factor. Was just a bad miss.

In the future, I'd like to see Conley flatten that route to run along the EZ line in response to that specific RCB/S coverage. (not that it mattered here)

Only if we think that we can trade him.