ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs get a 3rd, a 5th, and 2 6ths as compensation picks... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306193)

BossChief 02-24-2017 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 12756081)
They need to get a stupid team to give them a first in 2018, and now they have excess capital.

Best possible scenario is for them to get a team with a dumbass GM to take their late first and a fourth for a third and a future first.

Or move up for a blue chipper.

But, yeah it sure would be nice to get one of the QBs coming out next year, too. An extra first sure would be nice.

I like Mahomes, but he's gonna turn it over a bunch early if he's not reeled in.

BryanBusby 02-24-2017 11:35 PM

I like Mahomes a lot, but unfortunately I think a team in the top 10 will too.

Hog's Gone Fishin 02-24-2017 11:36 PM

Didn't realize it but I read last week on KCchiefs.com that Fisher and Swartz played every offensive play last season , Morse only missed 3 plays and as well was the only OLman to not give up a sack

BossChief 02-24-2017 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12756090)
I like Mahomes a lot, but unfortunately I think a team in the top 10 will too.

I doubt it.

He seems to be firmly the 4th QB in this class and he's a project.

Kids got a live arm and a lot of the other tools you look for in a QB, as well.

He needs lots of mechanical work and needs to protect the ball better.

Other than that, I really like the kid.

Nickhead 02-24-2017 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 12756092)
Didn't realize it but I read last week on KCchiefs.com that Fisher and Swartz played every offensive play last season , Morse only missed 3 plays and as well was the only OLman to not give up a sack

buh ebery1 sayas morse sux :D

BryanBusby 02-24-2017 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12756094)
I doubt it.

He seems to be firmly the 4th QB in this class and he's a project.

Kids got a live arm and a lot of the other tools you look for in a QB, as well.

He needs lots of mechanical work and needs to protect the ball better.

Other than that, I really like the kid.

None of these dudes are really a finished product. He's gonna pop up with off the chart measures and teams are gonna go gay over him.

mdchiefsfan 02-24-2017 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12755594)
Somebody get this man's resume to One Arrowhead Drive.

ROFL

I would use the picks to draft players in the first, second, TWICE in the third, 4th, TWICE in the fifth, and 3 TIMES in the sixth round!!

Hog's Gone Fishin 02-25-2017 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12756099)
ROFL

I would use the picks to draft players in the first, second, TWICE in the third, 4th, TWICE in the fifth, and 3 TIMES in the sixth round!!

THIS ! All day long. Dorsey will nail at least 3 starters

Urc Burry 02-25-2017 12:13 AM

Another thing that has gone under the radar. We signed Foles for under 2 mil. He was cut so he didn't count against this years comp picks. And if he walks we will get another pick for him. Assuming he gets Chase Daniel money? It will be at least a 5th

kccrow 02-25-2017 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12756099)
ROFL

I would use the picks to draft players in the first, second, TWICE in the third, 4th, TWICE in the fifth, and 3 TIMES in the sixth round!!

You can't. Chiefs lost their original 6th due to the tampering charge with Maclin.

BryanBusby 02-25-2017 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry (Post 12756118)
Another thing that has gone under the radar. We signed Foles for under 2 mil. He was cut so he didn't count against this years comp picks. And if he walks we will get another pick for him. Assuming he gets Chase Daniel money? It will be at least a 5th

I'm not sure about Foles. That's actually a good question.

BigRock 02-25-2017 02:58 AM

Unless they changed it, a team declining a contract option on a player hasn't been considered a cut/release of that player in terms of compensatory picks. So if the Chiefs decline Foles' option, he should net them a pick. At least in theory. As with any discussion of comp picks, it all depends on other signings.

alanm 02-25-2017 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerok (Post 12755592)
I would use all the picks to draft really good players, or trade up for even better players, or trade down for more, not so good but still pretty good players.

**** Dorsey. Put this guy in charge. :D

Red Dawg 02-25-2017 06:58 AM

We should use the picks to draft HOF players.

bevischief 02-25-2017 07:13 AM

Need more midget kickers...

RunKC 02-25-2017 08:34 AM

Daniel Jeremiah

This draft is so deep. I have about 70 guys worthy of a top 50 spot. The 2nd/3rd round is going to produce a lot of future pro bowlers.

Welp. Dorsey might not move that 3rd rd comp..

Pasta Little Brioni 02-25-2017 09:43 AM

We are gonna own this division for a loooooong time....now get that QB to own the league

kcchiefsus 02-25-2017 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12756210)
Daniel Jeremiah

This draft is so deep. I have about 70 guys worthy of a top 50 spot. The 2nd/3rd round is going to produce a lot of future pro bowlers.

Welp. Dorsey might not move that 3rd rd comp..

No, he'll just draft another Keivarae Russell.

Chief Roundup 02-25-2017 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 12756273)
No, he'll just draft another Keivarae Russell.

Or Kelce or Nelson.

Hoover 02-25-2017 10:34 AM

Well we also got Raunchy-Nachos with a late round comp pick two years ago

Mother****erJones 02-25-2017 10:35 AM

Teams know KC is going to look hard at QBs. They'll leap frog us like usual to get one.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12756302)
Teams know KC is going to look hard at QBs. They'll leap frog us like usual to get one.

Give Dorsey a chance to play hardball.

BryanBusby 02-25-2017 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12756302)
Teams know KC is going to look hard at QBs. They'll leap frog us like usual to get one.

I think that's kinda why they are sucking Tinyhands micropenis to the media. They are trying to sell that they aren't shopping, although it probably isn't going to work.

mdchiefsfan 02-25-2017 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12756122)
You can't. Chiefs lost their original 6th due to the tampering charge with Maclin.

Well, ****! There goes my resume!!

O.city 02-25-2017 11:21 AM

They need to move some picks foe higher picks next year, or move up this year.

I don't think 10 picks would even make the roster this year

mdchiefsfan 02-25-2017 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12756210)
Daniel Jeremiah

This draft is so deep. I have about 70 guys worthy of a top 50 spot. The 2nd/3rd round is going to produce a lot of future pro bowlers.

Welp. Dorsey might not move that 3rd rd comp..

Or that 3rd round pick just increased in value to a team looking to trade back.

Hoover 02-25-2017 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12756367)
They need to move some picks foe higher picks next year, or move up this year.

I don't think 10 picks would even make the roster this year

Possible but unlikely

1 QB
1 RB
1 TE
1 OG
1 WR
1 DL
2 LB
1 CB
1 Safety

That about all the space on the roster there is.

RunKC 02-25-2017 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12756367)
They need to move some picks foe higher picks next year, or move up this year.

I don't think 10 picks would even make the roster this year

IM down with that as long as we get our QB. I think Dorsey got some great value in almost every draft pick.

He truly knows where to find talent

Direckshun 02-25-2017 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12755665)
Making the mistake was really bad, but finding Terrance Mitchell made up for it.

Every GM has bad misses.

First of all, you're completely right on the first comment and hilariously wrong on the second.

Every GM makes errors, but drafting a in the THIRD who couldn't make it to Week 2 on the 53?

That is not a run-of-the-mill miss. That's a colossal **** up.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12755972)
I wonder if the mod that put that signature on my account will get banned?

It's too large according to board rule

Wait until the sig nazi(bob dole) sees it


Not to mention altering a user's account without permission.


I imagine it was the same piece of shit mod who removed my ability to report violations.


douchebags running the asylum nowadays

CP censorship, selective favoritism, highly subjective TOS

Place is going to shit REAL fast. The $100 I was going to give to this place for 2017 -> going towards a new sand wedge

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 12756053)
It was totally worth it IMO.

What are we at in total compensatory picks under Dorsey, its now up to 8 or 9 draft picks, which is amazing.

Its going to be a fun draft. Plenty of ammo to move around. Real needs are at ILB and Saftey if we can't ink Berry. Positions with the most active roster space is QB and LB.


Pretty easy to grab an interior linemen with one of those 3rds.

Dorsey is good at this buy low, sell high game.

stumppy 02-25-2017 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756468)
CP censorship, selective favoritism, highly subjective TOS

Place is going to shit REAL fast. The $100 I was going to give to this place for 2017 -> going towards a new sand wedge

A while back it was $5O.

mdstu 02-25-2017 12:52 PM

It's easy to be generous with imaginary money.

RunKC 02-25-2017 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12756465)
First of all, you're completely right on the first comment and hilariously wrong on the second.

Every GM makes errors, but drafting a in the THIRD who couldn't make it to Week 2 on the 53?

That is not a run-of-the-mill miss. That's a colossal **** up.

Plenty of teams miss 3rd rd picks. It was absolutely a bad mistake, but I would consider a colossal mistake being a 1st or 2nd rd miss.

Why does it matter if a 3rd rd pick like KeiVarae Russell is cut so early or if another 3rd rd pick is on the roster lingering forever and also doing nothing?
3rd rd is when gambles start to be made in the draft.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12756470)
A while back it was $5O.

$50 twice a year = ?

How much do you donate? Freeloading scum

mdstu 02-25-2017 01:02 PM

$50 imaginary money+$50 imaginary money=nothing

mdchiefsfan 02-25-2017 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756468)
CP censorship, selective favoritism, highly subjective TOS

Place is going to shit REAL fast. The $100 I was going to give to this place for 2017 -> going towards a new sand wedge

Nice passive aggressive threat. :thumb:

No one needed to know about your donation, yet you had to mention that your pulling it. That'll show them!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756479)
$50 twice a year = ?

How much do you donate? Freeloading scum

You don't know shit about anyone's personal lives. Donating does nothing for your status here, nor should it. Also, if you are do so because you think it does, then your a moran! If you had to pay to participate, this place would go to hell quite fast.

Stay on topic, or shut the **** up.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12756507)

You don't know shit about anyone's personal lives. Donating does nothing for your status here, nor should it. Also, if you are do so because you think it does, then your a moran!

Wonderful use of the English language.

Btw, wow do you plan on keeping the lights on in this place? You ever come around on game day when the server struggles to handle the volume?

stumppy 02-25-2017 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756479)
$50 twice a year = ?

How much do you donate? Freeloading scum

Damn, six months to save up $5O ???? Things must be tight around Dipshitville.

stumppy 02-25-2017 01:33 PM

:clap:
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12756507)
Nice passive aggressive threat. :thumb:

No one needed to know about your donation, yet you had to mention that your pulling it. That'll show them!!


He does it quite regularly.

Had to FYP.

Stay on topic, or shut the **** up BITCH.


Nickhead 02-25-2017 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756516)
Wonderful use of the English language.

Btw, wow do you plan on keeping the lights on in this place? You ever come around on game day when the server struggles to handle the volume?

maybe you should start your own chiefs board. then you could dictate all the rules and regs you want.

i don't see any threads from management begging for donations. maybe you should let them determine how important the donations are.

and maybe you should SIMPLY SHUT THE **** UP ABOUT YOUR DONATIONS as showing you 'care'.

nice way to use proper grammar too ROFL

stumppy 02-25-2017 01:36 PM

Back on topic.
Thats quite a bit of ammo for the draft. Talk about going hunting loaded for bear. Well, at least loaded.

Nickhead 02-25-2017 01:39 PM

my only problem is this. everyone keeps saying trade up. but i do not see KC as having any ammunition to do so. and in not doing so all potential 'good' qb's may be gone already.

so my question is this: with the capital the chiefs have. how far could they move up in the first round. future picks for other teams from the chiefs will be low round picks the next two years or so.

Chiefshrink 02-25-2017 01:41 PM

Stop with the trading up for a QB talk already. This is a very weak yr for QBs in the draft.

In58men 02-25-2017 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 12756540)
Stop with the trading up for a QB talk already. This is a very weak yr for QBs in the draft.

Great year for fullbacks, I'm psyched.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756468)
CP censorship, selective favoritism, highly subjective TOS

Place is going to shit REAL fast. The $100 I was going to give to this place for 2017 -> going towards a new sand wedge

You sound very unhappy here. Perhaps you should leave.

stumppy 02-25-2017 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 12756540)
Stop with the trading up for a QB talk already. This is a very weak yr for QBs in the draft.

I'm just hoping Dorsey and Reid see something in one of them that makes them think he's worth it. Pretty sure they are not going to overpay for a QB just for the sake of drafting one in the first couple rounds. Given Dorsey's draft history if he does trade up to grab on in the first couple rounds he's seen a future with that pick.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 01:47 PM

Show of hands:

Who would rather see Talking Can return and Tigger shown the door?

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12756547)
I'm just hoping Dorsey and Reid see something in one of them that makes them think he's worth it. Pretty sure they are not going to overpay for a QB just for the sake of drafting one in the first couple rounds. Given Dorsey's draft history if he does trade up to grab on in the first couple rounds he's seen a future with that pick.

Every year is a "weak year" for QB's in the draft when it comes to Chiefsshrink.

QB's are not his best subject.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12756527)
maybe you should start your own chiefs board. then you could dictate all the rules and regs you want.

i don't see any threads from management begging for donations. maybe you should let them determine how important the donations are.

and maybe you should SIMPLY SHUT THE **** UP ABOUT YOUR DONATIONS as showing you 'care'.

nice way to use proper grammar too ROFL

You ever run/host a server?

Nickhead 02-25-2017 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756555)
You ever run/host a server?

oh tell us wise one, how your 100 dollar donations a year keep this place afloat?

if i ran this place i would refuse your money just on your douchebaggeryness alone :D

if i ran this place you would already have a message in your inbox to stop talking about donations before you get booted.

Bewbies 02-25-2017 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 12756540)
Stop with the trading up for a QB talk already. This is a very weak yr for QBs in the draft.

This should be Chiefsplanet sub headline.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12756564)
oh tell us wise one, how your 100 dollar donations a year keep this place afloat?

if i ran this place i would refuse your money just on your douchebaggeryness alone :D

if i ran this place you would already have a message in your inbox to stop talking about donations before you get booted.

Leave it to useless Aussies to come onto an American forum and tell people how things should be done. ROFL

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 02:16 PM

Back on topic:

RB, OG, ILB, DB with our first 4 picks

SAUTO 02-25-2017 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756468)
CP censorship, selective favoritism, highly subjective TOS

Place is going to shit REAL fast. The $100 I was going to give to this place for 2017 -> going towards a new sand wedge

ROFL

Nickhead 02-25-2017 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756570)
Leave it to useless Aussies to come onto an American forum and tell people how things should be done. ROFL

https://media1.giphy.com/media/v0XH7Ti3uEmuA/200_s.gif

http://17663-presscdn-0-49.pagely.ne...28c079d373.jpg

not to mention i simply gave you perspective from our point of view when you try to throw around who should stay, go, what the rules are/should be, whinge at any chance you can because you don't like someone or some thing posted. you don't like that so much now do ya ROFL

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756571)
Back on topic:

RB, OG, ILB, DB with our first 4 picks

Nope.

Demonpenz 02-25-2017 03:02 PM

Lots of Jags

mdchiefsfan 02-25-2017 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756516)
Wonderful use of the English language.

Btw, wow do you plan on keeping the lights on in this place? You ever come around on game day when the server struggles to handle the volume?

Shows how long you've been around, dipshit.

If you're going to come into a place and swing your dick around, like your donations give you some sort of leeway, you may want to learn some of the history:

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=207343

mdchiefsfan 02-25-2017 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 12756541)
Great year for fullbacks, I'm psyched.

ROFL

mdchiefsfan 02-25-2017 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12756531)
Back on topic.
Thats quite a bit of ammo for the draft. Talk about going hunting loaded for bear. Well, at least loaded.

Especially having so much in, what is being referred to, as a deep draft. That only strengthens our position. I'm intrigued to see where we go. It has to happen some time, right!?

stumppy 02-25-2017 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12756780)
Especially having so much in, what is being referred to, as a deep draft. That only strengthens our position. I'm intrigued to see where we go. It has to happen some time, right!?

Can't get here soon enough. This is going to be a long two months.

mdchiefsfan 02-25-2017 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stumppy (Post 12756799)
Can't get here soon enough. This is going to be a long two months.

I can't recall who mentioned it (and I'm too lazy to dig back to find out), but they said that they doubted we'd have space on the roster for 10 new players. It's a very valid point that I hadn't thought of before. Kudos to that person.

The depth on this team is pretty solid. That fact makes the value of their draft picks decrease (in the purest sense of what a draft pick represents), while the value of the player, whom they feel will push them over the top, increases.

That shift in value enables them to go after the guy they want vs. the guys left available when they pick.

Or I could just be falling for it, much like every year, and we will take Tigger's preferred first 4 picks:

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756571)
Back on topic:

RB, OG, ILB, DB with our first 4 picks

It is very Chiefs-like, I must say.

Chief Roundup 02-25-2017 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756571)
Back on topic:

RB, OG, ILB, DB with our first 4 picks

Wrong

QB, ILB, DB, OL/RB

mdchiefsfan 02-26-2017 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12757011)
Wrong

QB, ILB, DB, OL/RB

I wouldn't even place RB in the top 5 rounds. History has shown quality for the position can be found later, or even not drafted. RB should never be on anyone's "first four" list, that knows anything about football.

Nickhead 02-26-2017 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12757279)
I wouldn't even place RB in the top 5 rounds. History has shown quality for the position can be found later, or even not drafted. RB should never be on anyone's "first four" list, that knows anything about football.

without having looked at stats, did any lower round draft pick produce more than zeke?

SAGA45 02-26-2017 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12755691)
Use the 1st and 2 3s to move up and get the QB you want

Not in this draft...not for this QB class.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-26-2017 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 12757316)
Not in this draft...not for this QB class.

Yes in this draft class. There's not one top rated prospect who wouldn't be an immediate upgrade over the Chiefs current, pathetic situation.

-King- 02-26-2017 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12757279)
I wouldn't even place RB in the top 5 rounds. History has shown quality for the position can be found later, or even not drafted. RB should never be on anyone's "first four" list, that knows anything about football.

Ezekiel Elliot
Posted via Mobile Device

mdchiefsfan 02-26-2017 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12757344)
Ezekiel Elliot
Posted via Mobile Device

He is the exception, not the rule.

SAGA45 02-26-2017 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12757339)
There's not one top rated prospect who wouldn't be an immediate upgrade ...

Not at quarterback....and damn sure not for a 1st and two 3rd round picks

RealSNR 02-26-2017 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 12757400)
Not at quarterback....and damn sure not for a 1st and two 3rd round picks

Guess who's going to trade us picks to move up and grab a QB in a good class.

NOBODY.

Take what you got. If you like a guy REGARDLESS OF HIS SURROUNDING TALENT CLASS, then GO ****ING GET HIM

It's not ****ing hard.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-26-2017 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12757435)
Guess who's going to trade us picks to move up and grab a QB in a good class.

NOBODY.

Take what you got. If you like a guy REGARDLESS OF HIS SURROUNDING TALENT CLASS, then GO ****ING GET HIM

It's not ****ing hard.

Look no further than his avatar. It tells the tale.

Of sadness.

Chief Roundup 02-26-2017 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12757279)
I wouldn't even place RB in the top 5 rounds. History has shown quality for the position can be found later, or even not drafted. RB should never be on anyone's "first four" list, that knows anything about football.

Well it is obvious you don't know shit if that is how you believe. You need to go look at the last couple of drafts.
That list is about about our needs. We need to improve the play we are getting from the RB position and guys like Spiller is not the answer and you will not get one of the better RB as an UDFA. Rounds 5 through 7 generally don't make most teams rosters. They might make practice squads but we need a producer not a player that is just good enough for the practice squad.

Chief Roundup 02-26-2017 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 12757316)
Not in this draft...not for this QB class.

It is odd how it is like this EVERY ****ing year.

Has there ever been a draft class that was good enough?

SAGA45 02-26-2017 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12757654)
It is odd how it is like this EVERY ****ing year.

Has there ever been a draft class that was good enough?

2018 QB class is looking great in terms of talent AND depth and that's just seniors. A couple of underclassmen could make it phenomenal. Hell, a team picking at 32 could land a QBOTF next year.

mdchiefsfan 02-26-2017 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 12757800)
2018 QB class is looking great in terms of talent AND depth and that's just seniors. A couple of underclassmen could make it phenomenal. Hell, a team picking at 32 could land a QBOTF next year.

I'll bet you, this time next year, 2019's class will be killer too!

mdchiefsfan 02-26-2017 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 12757648)
Well it is obvious you don't know shit if that is how you believe. You need to go look at the last couple of drafts.
That list is about about our needs. We need to improve the play we are getting from the RB position and guys like Spiller is not the answer and you will not get one of the better RB as an UDFA. Rounds 5 through 7 generally don't make most teams rosters. They might make practice squads but we need a producer not a player that is just good enough for the practice squad.

Ok. Maybe 5th is a bit extreme. I'll concede on that stance, but I don't feel it should be as dire as some are making it out to be. I think we can find a solid player later in the draft to fill our RB needs.

Direckshun 02-26-2017 03:03 PM

I took a couple minutes to do something incredibly unscientific but nonetheless illustrative of how talented John Dorsey is as a GM.

I valued this year's 3rd round compensatory picks as 5 points, 4th rounders as 4 points, 5th rounders as 3, 6th rounders as 2, and 7th rounders as 1.

Cleveland gets a better haul than we do, but other than arguably Seattle's, we had the best haul in comp picks this year. I'd love to extrapolate this to the four years Dorsey's been here. Maybe later.

Cleveland (16 points) -- 3rd, 4th, 4th, 5th
Kansas City (12) -- 3rd, 5th, 6th, 6th
Miami (11) -- 3rd, 5th, 5th
Cincinnati (10) -- 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th
Denver (10) -- 3rd, 5th, 7th, 7th
Seattle (10) -- 3rd, 3rd
L.A. Rams (9) -- 3rd, 4th
N.Y. Jets (5) -- 3rd
Pittsburgh (5) -- 3rd
Baltimore (5) -- 3rd
Carolina (5) -- 3rd
Indianapolis (4) -- 4th
San Francisco (4) -- 4th
New England (3) -- 5th
Green Bay (3) -- 5th
Arizona (3) -- 5th

Hoover 02-26-2017 03:16 PM

2nd time since he's been here we have got 4 comp picks


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.