ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs sign Bennie Logan (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306573)

staylor26 03-13-2017 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12781316)
ROFL your mauling of Dane and his son in '16 was impressive.

Speaking of ****ing cucks...

Hammock Parties 03-13-2017 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12781314)
If that were the case, why would I be back knowing Alex is still our ****ing QB?

You guys have some really flawed logic here.

You're back to pimp rotational JAGs like Bennie Logan.

The siren call of another Chiefs season is too much for you to resist.

TomBarndtsTwin 03-13-2017 02:36 PM

I see were attempting to de-rail another thread here and turn it into more anti-Alex bullshit.

Yea.

This board definitely needs more of this . . . .

Hammock Parties 03-13-2017 02:36 PM

Sorry, I'm trolling. Hard.

I'll stop now.

ToxSocks 03-13-2017 02:43 PM

Im not surprised by the Poe developments.

I had a very strong feeling that this would be Aubrayo Franklin part II.

Poe is a $5-6 million a year player.

Coochie liquor 03-13-2017 02:43 PM

Can he throw a td in the end zone?

Hoover 03-13-2017 02:48 PM

http://prod.static.eagles.clubs.nfl....an-sweater.jpg

Bennie will be the best Defensive Lineman we have ever had from LSU.

Hoover 03-13-2017 02:51 PM

Jeff Kerr @JeffKerr247
Eagles allowed just 90.7 rush yards in 12 full games Bennie Logan played in 2016. 141.0 in games he failed to finish/sat out with injury.
11:06 AM - 30 Jan 2017

staylor26 03-13-2017 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 12781347)
Jeff Kerr @JeffKerr247
Eagles allowed just 90.7 rush yards in 12 full games Bennie Logan played in 2016. 141.0 in games he failed to finish/sat out with injury.
11:06 AM - 30 Jan 2017

See what happens when you cherry pick stats Clay?

Hammock Parties 03-13-2017 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12781359)
See what happens when you cherry pick stats Clay?

So now we're back to looking at him as a 4-3 DT?

He played 14 run snaps per game last year.

Rotational player if this is the angle you're taking.

Otherwise, you have to admit signing the starting NT from 2015's worst run defense isn't a positive.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-13-2017 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spider2YBanana (Post 12781283)
The 84th best interior DL in football.

Certainly sounds like he will take Jaye Howard's job any day now.

I would be shocked if the Chiefs 2017 opening day lineup is not Bailey-Howard-Jones.

...in a 4 3 defense. PFF sucks.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-13-2017 03:05 PM

Anything to get those turds Reyes and Roaches Nachos off the field

Hammock Parties 03-13-2017 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12781370)
Anything to get those turds Reyes and Roaches Nachos off the field

This is where the upgrade lies in my mind. Especially Roches, who got pushed around in the run game.

O.city 03-13-2017 03:09 PM

Not much difference in 34 and 43 these days anyway. Teams are in different front about 75 percent of the time.

DJ's left nut 03-13-2017 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spider2YBanana (Post 12781371)
This is where the upgrade lies in my mind. Especially Roches, who got pushed around in the run game.

He's actually a pretty nice complementary player for Nacho.

Because yeah, Nunez-Roches struggled like hell to anchor in the run game. Honestly, I just don't know that he has the 'want to' to be a plus run player. I can't say that I blame him, it's thankless as **** and he gets quite a bit of love for his splash plays in the passing game.

rtmike 03-13-2017 03:14 PM

As long as he's taking up double teams for most of any given play, great signing.

RunKC 03-13-2017 03:14 PM

Quote:

9. Bennie Logan, NT
Logan is a true nose tackle, effectively limiting him to being a two-down player, which in today’s NFL has never been less valuable in terms of contract dollars. He has the ability though to make a major impact on those two downs if a team is willing to embrace the type of player he is. This past season he was a poor fit for Philadelphia’s new, aggressive, one-gap defensive front, but the year before he notched 45 defensive stops, fourth in the league among all interior defenders despite playing just 597 snaps in total. Only Damon Harrison had a better run-stop percentage than Logan’s 14.8 percent, a figure that would also have been second to Harrison this season. Embrace the two-gapping, run-stuffing ability and you could transform your run defense for pennies on the dollar.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro...rprise-upside/

Better run stuffer than anyone on the roster. He's got a lot of value here.

staylor26 03-13-2017 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12781378)
Not much difference in 34 and 43 these days anyway. Teams are in different front about 75 percent of the time.

There is in the context of the conversation we're having. We're talking about scheme fit for a 2 down NT that clearly had more success in the 3-4.

Easy 6 03-13-2017 03:18 PM

Its apparent that as a run stuffer, he certainly rises above the "jag" word being thrown around by some

Theres no good reason to poo-poo this signing, he very much fills a desperate need

pugsnotdrugs19 03-13-2017 03:21 PM

There has been numerous players who had really poor PFF grades that came and played in this defensive regime and played really good football.

They've earned my trust on these types of deals, plain and simple. I think Logan, starter or not, is a nice addition in that DL room and presumably helps our biggest defensive weakness last year.

ToxSocks 03-13-2017 03:27 PM

He's going to be a rotational depth guy with the potential for more. If he pans out and returns to form, great. If he doesn't, then we know the scheme wasn't the issue and he'll be released/not-resigned.

Low risk, high upside signing.

Lets not read into it anymore than what it really is. His contract pretty much dictates what he is.

scho63 03-13-2017 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 12781170)
Bennie and the Chiefs.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/y-lOIKP5l3w/hqdefault.jpg

SAUTO 03-13-2017 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spider2YBanana (Post 12781325)
Sorry, I'm trolling. Hard.

I'll stop now.

At least you realize it now and stop before we have to tell you, thanks. Next time try to not start

JohnnyHammersticks 03-13-2017 04:44 PM

Cheaper than Poe was. Better than Poe is (now). Sign me up.

Did you see our run defense last year?

I didn't either.

staylor26 03-13-2017 04:53 PM

Some 2015 highlights:

https://youtu.be/4UpKJUS1asg

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-13-2017 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spider2YBanana (Post 12781311)
You peaced out after Alex showed his true colors against the Steelers, and you realized this team was a cuck-in-waiting.

Bold strategy, cotton, let's see if it pays off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12781314)
If that were the case, why would I be back knowing Alex is still our ****ing QB?

You guys have some really flawed logic here.

Somebody throw that damn troll a free taco bell coupon so he shuts the hell up

RunKC 03-13-2017 06:02 PM

Cox with Logan 6.5 sacks. Cox 3 games without Logan 0 sacks.

Run defense W/Logan: 92 ypg
Run defense w/o Logan: 141 ypg

woah

staylor26 03-13-2017 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12781643)
Cox with Logan 6.5 sacks. Cox 3 games without Logan 0 sacks.

Run defense W/Logan: 92 ypg
Run defense w/o Logan: 141 ypg

woah

JAG

Chief Northman 03-13-2017 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12781648)
JAG

Heh.

O.city 03-13-2017 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12781389)
There is in the context of the conversation we're having. We're talking about scheme fit for a 2 down NT that clearly had more success in the 3-4.

Not necessarily. I mean, the chiefs were in a traditional 34 set with a 0 tech this year, what, like 5 percent of the time?

Maybe it was because of personel and Logan helps that though

Chief Northman 03-13-2017 06:34 PM

1 year, $8 million for Logan per ESPN

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...-one-year-deal

pugsnotdrugs19 03-13-2017 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12781699)
1 year, $8 million for Logan per ESPN

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...-one-year-deal

Uhhh? That has to be an up to $8M. Wouldn't it be an $8M cap hit then?

We can't afford that right now.

Chief Northman 03-13-2017 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12781708)
Uhhh? That has to be an up to $8M. Wouldn't it be an $8M cap hit then?

We can't afford that right now.

Don't shoot the messenger. Details unclear at this point. ESPN report is all I've seen thus far.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-13-2017 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12781714)
Don't shoot the messenger. Details unclear at this point. ESPN report is all I've seen thus far.

Oh no nothing personal. Just very confused.

This means more moves have to be made. Restructures and/or cuts soon.

Chief Northman 03-13-2017 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12781721)
Oh no nothing personal. Just very confused.

This means more moves have to be made. Restructures and/or cuts soon.

Oh I took nothing personal - that number is puzzling. I am sure the answers will manifest shortly.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-13-2017 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12781730)
Oh I took nothing personal - that number is puzzling. I am sure the answers will manifest shortly.

I would guess it's half incentives but :shrug:

Mother****erJones 03-13-2017 06:58 PM

Under the radar signing. We'll see how it works out. Still wishing for Hightower although we won't.

RunKC 03-13-2017 07:04 PM

Watching Seth Keysor's breakdown and Logan is doing a far better job against the Steelers once than Poe did either time we played them.

I think being a good NT comes from pad level and lower power. Logan is 6'2" and just gets under OL and bull rushes them into the QB like Justin Houston.

Man it's gonna be fun seeing this front 7.

Hog's Gone Fishin 03-13-2017 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12781737)
I would guess it's half incentives but :shrug:

what kind of incentives do you give a friggin NT.

You draw 67 double teams and you get 1 mil ?

Red Dawg 03-13-2017 07:17 PM

Gates approves of this signing.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-13-2017 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 12781775)
what kind of incentives do you give a friggin NT.

You draw 67 double teams and you get 1 mil ?

You can give incentives for starts, accolades, stats, all kinds of sh*t.

DJ's left nut 03-13-2017 07:32 PM

Holy ****.

$8 million? That better be BS.

Because if not, this team is showing a startling tendency towards paying market prices for the easiest positions on the field to fill in the draft.

Guard, box safety and 0 tech. Those are not high-skilled, high degree of difficulty positions. Those are positions you fill in the draft and surround with premier talent at higher priority positions to ensure they don't cripple you.

The positional value of where they've chosen to spend money this off-season is incredibly puzzling.

Tribal Warfare 03-13-2017 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12781777)
Gates approves of this signing.

Arthur Bryant is busting a move out of jubilation

pugsnotdrugs19 03-13-2017 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12781791)
Holy ****.

$8 million? That better be BS.

Because if not, this team is showing a startling tendency towards paying market prices for the easiest positions on the field to fill in the draft.

Guard, box safety and 0 tech. Those are not high-skilled, high degree of difficulty positions. Those are positions you fill in the draft and surround with premier talent at higher priority positions to ensure they don't cripple you.

The positional value of where they've chosen to spend money this off-season is incredibly puzzling.

Unfortunately...

What all do you consider to be the premiere positions? I think it's scheme dependent, but in KC's case.

I would say obviously QB, edge rusher, and CB seem to be the positions that every team needs to be good at in terms of talent.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-13-2017 07:41 PM

Ever body is getting big money. It's all relative.

mcaj22 03-13-2017 07:43 PM

8 million is more than Bailey, Jones or Howard will make this season lol

Pasta Little Brioni 03-13-2017 07:44 PM

Bet it's incentive loaded

TimBone 03-13-2017 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12781791)
Holy ****.

$8 million? That better be BS.

Because if not, this team is showing a startling tendency towards paying market prices for the easiest positions on the field to fill in the draft.

Guard, box safety and 0 tech. Those are not high-skilled, high degree of difficulty positions. Those are positions you fill in the draft and surround with premier talent at higher priority positions to ensure they don't cripple you.

The positional value of where they've chosen to spend money this off-season is incredibly puzzling.

I thought quality zero techs in the 3-4 were super important and tough to find? I thought that's why Poe was so important when he was playing well?

Pasta Little Brioni 03-13-2017 08:11 PM

Good ones are. We just play soool much of that lameass 2-3-6 that teams exploit it and gash us with the run.

staylor26 03-13-2017 08:13 PM

Bennie Logan is a better run stuffer than Poe. We would all probably be okay with brining Poe back on this deal. It's a one year deal. Who gives a shit?

Red Dawg 03-13-2017 08:18 PM

Players take pay cuts to play for teams that may actually get them a ring. We don't have a QB that media and players believe can do that. Why do you think the Donkeys are now having FA trouble and the Pats aren't. One of them lost their HOF QB.

Direckshun 03-13-2017 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12781847)
I thought auality zero techs in the 3-4 were super important and tough to find? I thought that's why Poe was so important when he was playing well?

All three positions in the 3-4 are important and critical. Especially with all the dime we play.

TimBone 03-13-2017 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12781861)
Players take pay cuts to play for teams that may actually get them a ring. We don't have a QB that media and players believe can do that. Why do you think the Donkeys are now having FA trouble and the Pats aren't. One of them lost their HOF QB.

Tuck, my man. Do you have to find a way to bitch about Smith in every thread?

TimBone 03-13-2017 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 12781862)
All three positions in the 3-4 are important and critical. Especially with all the dime we play.

Makes sense. It was just odd to hear DJ down play the position.

Bootlegged 03-13-2017 08:29 PM

Realities of new salary cap.

Low end paid like mid-tier.

Mid-tier paid like superstar.

Superstar paid like HOF.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-13-2017 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12781864)
Tuck, my man. Do you have to find a way to bitch about Smith in every thread?

He did take a nice shot at Horsey though too...

DJ's left nut 03-13-2017 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12781847)
I thought quality zero techs in the 3-4 were super important and tough to find? I thought that's why Poe was so important when he was playing well?

Impact, 3-down zeros are exceptionally valuable and hard to find.

Big bodied run-stuffers that will play maybe 50% of our defensive snaps? Not so much.

We aren't looking at using Logan as a gap-splitting presence. He's going to be told to just stand there and occupy space. No, that's not tough to find.

It's like peak DJ vs. Joe Mays. DJ makes is position valuable because how well he's able to play it. But if you don't have an elite guy there, it doesn't make sense to spend a bunch of money on a limited player at a less critical position.

O.city 03-13-2017 08:48 PM

IIRC, we didn't use a 0 tech very often this year. They were in that goofy 2 DL, 15 DB stuff a lot.

Direckshun 03-13-2017 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12781909)
Impact, 3-down zeros are exceptionally valuable and hard to find.

Big bodied run-stuffers that will play maybe 50% of our defensive snaps? Not so much.

We aren't looking at using Logan as a gap-splitting presence. He's going to be told to just stand there and occupy space. No, that's not tough to find.

Seemed to make an indisputably huge impact in Philly...

NJChiefsFan 03-13-2017 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12781853)
Bennie Logan is a better run stuffer than Poe. We would all probably be okay with brining Poe back on this deal. It's a one year deal. Who gives a shit?

Which poe are we talking about? 8 million is a lot for a guy when we are in a tight position. I like the signing but that price is a bit steep. The "cap is a myth" comments are in themselves becoming a myth.

This isn't directed at you but for a team wanting to stay flexible and not pay for positions we kind of are. I'm a big Dorsey guy but not over the moon about these contacts. I understand why he made them but not sure they will hold value. Berry was a tough one though. Intangibles can be overblown but his are legit. Especially with she maybe not being around.

Of course we aren't even sure about the actual numbers yet on this one. I guess Dorsey believes it won't constrain us against the cap this year.

BossChief 03-13-2017 10:10 PM

I'm gonna puke if they give Alex Smith an extension.

There's gotta be something to this...KC doesn't have the $ to make this deal.

The kid is a perfect fit for us and will definetly help the defense in its weakest part...but 8m for 1 year?

Where's that money coming from?

Sassy Squatch 03-13-2017 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12782045)
I'm gonna puke if they give Alex Smith an extension.

I'm getting to the point where I hope they give him a 5+ year extension just to see the shit lords of this forum squeal in anger. It would be amazing.

mcaj22 03-13-2017 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12782045)
I'm gonna puke if they give Alex Smith an extension.

I am going to be so mad if they add on another 2 years just to move some money around for the present

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-13-2017 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12782050)
I am going to be so mad if they add on another 2 years just to move some money around for the present

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...c9cbced75f.jpg
32 years young!

Black Bob 03-13-2017 10:25 PM

Good signing. Still hope we sign Poe.

T-post Tom 03-13-2017 10:29 PM

Good signing. Add some speed/youth to the LB corp and secondary via the draft and the defense is looking pretty good.

TimBone 03-13-2017 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Bob (Post 12782071)
Good signing. Still hope we sign Poe.

Chiefs gotta be flat broke now. Can't afford nothing else.

RealSNR 03-13-2017 10:39 PM

Dorsey used to make a killing on deals. His Jamaal Charles extension, Sean Smith deal, Hussain Abdullah 2-year contract + extension, Tyvon Branch's piddle shit deal, Mike DeVito had a pretty decent contract for us... we're probably not paying Travis Kelce as much as we could for being a top 3 TE in the NFL. Those are all awesome deals. But not we've put out some extensions and offers that really aren't what we should be getting.

It's kind of jaw-dropping how Dorsey has gotten kinda fleeced recently.

TimBone 03-13-2017 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12782068)
32 years young!

Gross, man.

Also, not surprised that you have topless photos of Alex Smith on your computer.

RealSNR 03-13-2017 10:43 PM

Alex Smith is a fat ****ing pig. He needs to lose some weight.

He probably downs a tube of cookie dough to make himself feel better every time he comes up short of expectations.

Miles 03-13-2017 10:43 PM

Wouldn't surprise me if the 8M number has some decent portion as incentives.

BossChief 03-13-2017 11:16 PM

http://overthecap.com/2017-contract-...-bennie-logan/

Interesting read.

Prior to last season, OTC predicted that Bennie Logan would get a 4 year, 27m deal this offseason.

The article shows a bunch of data showing what Bennie brings to the table.

This could be a pretty underrated signing

RippedmyFlesh 03-13-2017 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12782080)
Gross, man.

Also, not surprised that you have topless photos of Alex Smith on your computer.

:Lin: tell him to keep his gay porn in the pictures thread

staylor26 03-13-2017 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12782079)
Dorsey used to make a killing on deals. His Jamaal Charles extension, Sean Smith deal, Hussain Abdullah 2-year contract + extension, Tyvon Branch's piddle shit deal, Mike DeVito had a pretty decent contract for us... we're probably not paying Travis Kelce as much as we could for being a top 3 TE in the NFL. Those are all awesome deals. But not we've put out some extensions and offers that really aren't what we should be getting.

It's kind of jaw-dropping how Dorsey has gotten kinda fleeced recently.

It's the market dude. You're overpaying no matter who it is. At least Dorsey doesn't get cheap with good players, and end up overpaying for guys like Stephenson and Watson (ala Elway).

The Bad Guy 03-13-2017 11:37 PM

I don't think Dorsey has gotten fleeced at all. The Hali deal was terrible, but he signed Schwartz last year to an incredible deal. Many thought Jaye Howard was a great value signing. Locked up West/Ware for peanuts. Even Sorensen's deal is a good one.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 03-14-2017 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 12782080)
Gross, man.

Also, not surprised that you have topless photos of Alex Smith on your computer.

Incognito mode on my Chrome, bro.

New World Order 03-14-2017 02:09 AM

Does Alex have a restraining order against Tiger?

Nickhead 03-14-2017 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12781861)
Players take pay cuts to play for teams that may actually get them a ring. We don't have a QB that media and players believe can do that. Why do you think the Donkeys are now having FA trouble and the Pats aren't. One of them lost their HOF QB.

didn't brady refuse a certain raise to ensure he had good weapons around him? not talking about incentives if they win the super bowl, but flat out gave money back to spread elsewhere? :D

mcaj22 03-14-2017 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12782181)
didn't brady refuse a certain raise to ensure he had good weapons around him? not talking about incentives if they win the super bowl, but flat out gave money back to spread elsewhere? :D

they got Ealy, Dwayne Allen, Cooks and Gilmore for what the Jets are paying 1 Mo Wilkerson in salary this year

LoneWolf 03-14-2017 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 12782220)
they got Ealy, Dwayne Allen, Cooks and Gilmore for what the Jets are paying 1 Mo Wilkerson in salary this year

Gilmore is the only one of those four that New England signed to a new contract so I'm not sure how this fits into the discussion about players taking less money to play with Brady.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.