ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Grade the Marcus Peters situation (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=314130)

RINGLEADER 02-26-2018 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13439621)
In football sense, I would of taken the gamble. Teams miss out on a big CB in the draft or they lose a starter in camp.

IMO at worst, they were getting a later on 3rd round comp. I don't think the trade moved the needle to feel pressed to do this today.

I can't help but think this is happening now because fat **** Chiefs fans, that haven't seen their own dicks since Montana, sent emails to Clark because his knee made contact with grass.

I have to hope that there was something much worse because if this is the reason then Clark Hunt is a bigger idiot then I thought.

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 13439661)
I have to hope that there was something much worse because if this is the reason then Clark Hunt is a bigger idiot then I thought.

He's to busy dealing with legal problems to make smart decisions.

carcosa 02-26-2018 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 13439651)
What would've been the problem with holding on to him until draft day or after....even into training camp.

A team misses out on a draft target, injuries, etc. and who knows what you get.

Trading him this early makes absolutely no ****ing sense.

Only makes sense if it's purely a PR move handed down from the dipshit owner.

Clark's only qualification for running a football team is that his daddy was rich. This whole country ****ing sucks

threebag 02-26-2018 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carcosa (Post 13439658)
talent on the field would seem to be the most important thing when it comes to winning football games, which I believe is an NFL team's primary objective

You don't think his quality off-field traits wouldn't ooze over to the field? Ya feel me?

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 13439668)
You don't think his quality off-field traits wouldn't ooze over to the field? Ya feel me?

So far they've oozed into him having a HOF start to his career.

threebag 02-26-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439675)
So far they've oozed into him having a HOF start to his career.

So you don't think he brings any toxicity with him? You're right it seems all about him. **** him it's a team sport. I'm fittin to get loaded.

RINGLEADER 02-26-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439639)
Why? Peters has no leverage here. The Chiefs don't have to do anything. Peters is under contract.

Oddly, yours may actually be the stupidest comment in this thread.

The only leverage he had was to not show up until he got a deal that paid him $20+ mil a year. Which I could see him doing. Maybe he already told the Chiefs that’s what awaited them which they’d have to disclose and could be the reason we’re getting a 2nd and a 4th for him.

Still a dumb trade.

Rasputin 02-26-2018 02:40 PM

It's not like corner backs grow on trees that's the problem. You find one you keep him so teams don't ****ing pass and make ass out of the secondary.

Now without a first round pick we have to take chances on other risk/reward corner back and hope we hit.

Mother****erJones 02-26-2018 02:41 PM

I’ll post this in the Peters thread to and I came up with this today. Mahomes needs to be the new leader in this locker room and maybe this was part of it. Move Peters so he can influence nor challenge him. Mahomes needs to be the alpha

threebag 02-26-2018 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 13439687)
Now without a first round pick.

That's the stinger. Peters ****ed us right there in the feels.

RINGLEADER 02-26-2018 02:43 PM

Have we heard from other Chiefs players yet?

Bewbies 02-26-2018 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 13439701)
Have we heard from other Chiefs players yet?

Silence.

Fish 02-26-2018 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 13439684)
The only leverage he had was to not show up until he got a deal that paid him $20+ mil a year. Which I could see him doing. Maybe he already told the Chiefs that’s what awaited them which they’d have to disclose and could be the reason we’re getting a 2nd and a 4th for him.

Still a dumb trade.

Call his bluff then. He'd be destroying his own career. Shop him now, and when they only had two shitty offers, tell Peters "Sorry we tried, now get back to work. We'll try again after next season." You really think Peters would hold out after little to no interest from other teams?

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439639)
Why? Peters has no leverage here. The Chiefs don't have to do anything. Peters is under contract.

Oddly, yours may actually be the stupidest comment in this thread.

Yeah, sure, let's just ignore the fact that the guy was booted from his college team, played out of control last season, fought with his mom, called her a **** and quit on the team.

All perfectly acceptable behavior.

:facepalm:

And thanks for the response as to why many, many other teams that could have used his services, that could possibly put the team over the top and in the Super Bowl, passed.

Butt****.

Hoover 02-26-2018 02:46 PM

I don't even know how to vote.

I'd prefer he be a decent human being that would mature with age. I seriously enjoyed watching him on the field. I didn't mind seeing his frustration. i get that. But I'm a fan, I have no clue what he's like to work with.

Would I have liked to get more compensation? Sure. Of course. Its really a punch in the gut to go from thinking we are going to have Peters, Fuller, and Berry in the backfield to Fuller, Berry and bunch of question marks.

Still I'll say this. For years we have bitched and moaned about being a team that is too set in its ways. Playing things way too conservatiely. Now we have GM in Veach who is very agressive. Making moves early and often. Some huge victories (Smith) others dampen your spirits (Peters). Still I think if we really want to see this team in the Super Bowl you have to get young and stay focused. I think Peters was a focus issue. Think about it, you are trying to build a super bowl contenders in year 2 or 3 of the Mahomes era. But yeah that pro-bowl ball hawking 25 year old CB should be part of path there but you can't trust him. Can't trust him to keep his head on straight, can't trust him to even be an option for the team when you are ready to compete.

In short I get it, I just don't like it.

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 13439708)
Call his bluff then. He'd be destroying his own career. Shop him now, and when they only had two shitty offers, tell Peters "Sorry we tried, now get back to work. We'll try again after next season." You really think Peters would hold out after little to no interest from other teams?

What? The guy clearly hasn't changed since his college days so why give him a 4th year to change his behavior?

Rasputin 02-26-2018 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 13439691)
I’ll post this in the Peters thread to and I came up with this today. Mahomes needs to be the new leader in this locker room and maybe this was part of it. Move Peters so he can influence nor challenge him. Mahomes needs to be the alpha

No this is actually detrimental to Tyreek Hill and Patrick Mahomes II because at camp it's competition and that's how they get better so Tyreek won't be challenged near as much in practice. That's going bite us.

Fish 02-26-2018 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439721)
What? The guy clearly hasn't changed since his college days so why give him a 4th year to change his behavior?

I don't ****ing care as long as he's hauling in INTs and shutting down half the field. It's a football team, not an ethics committee.

Mother****erJones 02-26-2018 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 13439725)
No this is actually detrimental to Tyreek Hill and Patrick Mahomes II because at camp it's competition and that's how they get better so Tyreek won't be challenged near as much in practice. That's going bite us.

They still will have to go at Kendall Fuller and whomever we bring in FA (Amerson and maybe a guy like Fuller) plus the draft

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 13439731)
I don't ****ing care as long as he's hauling in INTs and shutting down half the field. It's a football team, not an ethics committee.

Of course you don't care because you don't have to micromanage him 365 days a year.

This is the same kind of attitude I get from a lot of my friends. They'd sign ISIS members if it meant a Super Bowl.

That's just silly.

BlackHelicopters 02-26-2018 02:50 PM

F- is too generous.

notorious 02-26-2018 02:51 PM

Only thing worse is cutting him. That why I graded D.

Fish 02-26-2018 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439737)
Of course you don't care because you don't have to micromanage him 365 days a year.

This is the same kind of attitude I get from a lot of my friends. They'd sign ISIS members if it meant a Super Bowl.

That's just silly.

It's hardly unreasonable to expect the team to manage a star player with a bad attitude when he's posting up NFL leading stats 3 years running. It's part of their job. You don't build a winning NFL team full of all nice guys.

notorious 02-26-2018 02:57 PM

This is so bad it hurts. It’s probably going to be a LATE 2nd pick at that......

Mecca 02-26-2018 02:58 PM

This is my view, I waited so long for this team to draft a QB I have to stick this out but if this was still Alex Smith I doubt I'd even watch next season.

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 13439750)
It's hardly unreasonable to expect the team to manage a star player with a bad attitude when he's posting up NFL leading stats 3 years running. It's part of their job. You don't build a winning NFL team full of all nice guys.

I think there's a huge difference between being aloof or quiet or even a bit angry as opposed to constant meltdowns and distractions.

Peters has been a distraction since college, which is why he's been essentially booted from both teams that initially thought he'd be easier to manage.

Clearly, he brought this upon himself.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439714)
Yeah, sure, let's just ignore the fact that the guy was booted from his college team, played out of control last season, fought with his mom, called her a **** and quit on the team.

All perfectly acceptable behavior.

:facepalm:

And thanks for the response as to why many, many other teams that could have used his services, that could possibly put the team over the top and in the Super Bowl, passed.

Butt****.

You continue with the name calling for no apparent reason. I certainly didn't suggest that was "perfectly acceptable behavior", so I'm not sure why you'd make such a statement; literally no reason for you to lie here.

Perhaps other teams WOULD come calling when their other options didn't turn out the way they hoped they would.

threebag 02-26-2018 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 13439725)
No this is actually detrimental to Tyreek Hill and Patrick Mahomes II because at camp it's competition and that's how they get better so Tyreek won't be challenged near as much in practice. That's going bite us.

Yeah, I don't buy this. I think this is going to addition by subtraction.

threebag 02-26-2018 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439769)
This is my view, I waited so long for this team to draft a QB I have to stick this out but if this was still Alex Smith I doubt I'd even watch next season.



Leave now then because that's just dumb

rocknrolla 02-26-2018 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 13439651)
What would've been the problem with holding on to him until draft day or after....even into training camp.

A team misses out on a draft target, injuries, etc. and who knows what you get.

Trading him this early makes absolutely no ****ing sense.

My thought's exactly, there has to be more to the story. Hopefully someday we will hear it.

TEX 02-26-2018 03:07 PM

Forgot a CHunt role..

Chiefnj2 02-26-2018 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439770)

Clearly, he brought this upon himself.

You act like this is a bad result for Peters. He makes out like a bandit.

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 13439775)
Perhaps other teams WOULD come calling when their other options didn't turn out the way they hoped they would.

Um, no

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 13439808)
You act like this is a bad result for Peters. He makes out like a bandit.

How so? To be traded for a 4th round pick?

No contract extension?

No long term stability?

No "Generational" money?

I'd say Peters ****ed himself. And the sad thing is, he probably hasn't learned a damn thing.

Fish 02-26-2018 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439770)
I think there's a huge difference between being aloof or quiet or even a bit angry as opposed to constant meltdowns and distractions.

Peters has been a distraction since college, which is why he's been essentially booted from both teams that initially thought he'd be easier to manage.

Clearly, he brought this upon himself.

Brought this upon himself? What do you mean? You think Peters is upset at this outcome? Dude just made the Chiefs look like fools, and put himself in a pretty nice situation. Peters got exactly what he wanted. He won. Chiefs lost.

BryanBusby 02-26-2018 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439828)
How so? To be traded for a 4th round pick?

No contract extension?

No long term stability?

No "Generational" money?

I'd say Peters ****ed himself. And the sad thing is, he probably hasn't learned a damn thing.

What Peters did here will have no bearing on what he could potentially earn in LA.

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13439837)
What Peters did here will have no bearing on what he could potentially earn in LA.

Pattern of behavior.

Booted off his college team, booted off his professional team.

Why would anyone believe that his third team would be any different?

DaneMcCloud 02-26-2018 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 13439835)
Brought this upon himself? What do you mean? You think Peters is upset at this outcome? Dude just made the Chiefs look like fools, and put himself in a pretty nice situation. Peters got exactly what he wanted. He won. Chiefs lost.

Agree to disagree.

Shoes 02-26-2018 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 13439716)
I don't even know how to vote.

I'd prefer he be a decent human being that would mature with age. I seriously enjoyed watching him on the field. I didn't mind seeing his frustration. i get that. But I'm a fan, I have no clue what he's like to work with.

Would I have liked to get more compensation? Sure. Of course. Its really a punch in the gut to go from thinking we are going to have Peters, Fuller, and Berry in the backfield to Fuller, Berry and bunch of question marks.

Still I'll say this. For years we have bitched and moaned about being a team that is too set in its ways. Playing things way too conservatiely. Now we have GM in Veach who is very agressive. Making moves early and often. Some huge victories (Smith) others dampen your spirits (Peters). Still I think if we really want to see this team in the Super Bowl you have to get young and stay focused. I think Peters was a focus issue. Think about it, you are trying to build a super bowl contenders in year 2 or 3 of the Mahomes era. But yeah that pro-bowl ball hawking 25 year old CB should be part of path there but you can't trust him. Can't trust him to keep his head on straight, can't trust him to even be an option for the team when you are ready to compete.

In short I get it, I just don't like it.

Wow a reasonable level headed take- rare sight.

BryanBusby 02-26-2018 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439840)
Pattern of behavior.

Booted off his college team, booted off his professional team.

Why would anyone believe that his third team would be any different?

They feel otherwise because they traded for him and if he assembles into their lockerroom and plays like he should, he's about to be the richest CB in the NFL.

Mother****erJones 02-26-2018 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439828)
How so? To be traded for a 4th round pick?

No contract extension?

No long term stability?

No "Generational" money?

I'd say Peters ****ed himself. And the sad thing is, he probably hasn't learned a damn thing.

I guarantee you he loves this. He’s back in Cali and in LA. Not too far from Oakland.

Ming the Merciless 02-26-2018 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 13439316)
F but I’ll say that Veach probably did the best he could under the circumstances

I really am not sure about this

why not let him play for his life one more season????? If he keeps NOT tackling and taking every other snap off, and being an idiot....then his own value drops...we still get nothing...

at least if we kept him one more year MAYBE he ****ign tries hard to finish strong and get paid...

I dont understand how people see this as the best we can do...but mayube I am wrong and just blinded by emotion right now

set me straight ya'll

the worst 2nd round pick two drafts from now?????

i guess at least that is SOMETHING...

i dunno

DaNewGuy 02-26-2018 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 13439877)
I really am not sure about this

why not let him play for his life one more season????? If he keeps NOT tackling and taking every other snap off, and being an idiot....then his own value drops...we still get nothing...

at least if we kept him one more year MAYBE he ****ign tries hard to finish strong and get paid...

I dont understand how people see this as the best we can do...but mayube I am wrong and just blinded by emotion right now

set me straight ya'll

the worst 2nd round pick two drafts from now?????

i guess at least that is SOMETHING...

i dunno

We should draft a pass rusher from the sun belt with it

DaNewGuy 02-26-2018 03:40 PM

If Albert Wilson goes away next I'm on suicide watch

Buehler445 02-26-2018 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13439617)
That's because you haven't personally dealt with him on a daily basis for the last 3 years.

You, like so many others, are looking at this situation as if it was in a vacuum.

It's not.

Having dealt with insufferable ****s as peers and subordinates I gotta roll with Dane on this one.

Sometimes addition by subtraction is a real thing.

It just ****ing sucks because he is so productive.

All that being said, I’ve dealt with the insufferable ****s in my workplaces for far far less money than these guys are, but that doesn’t make the situation any less untenable.

lawrenceRaider 02-26-2018 03:43 PM

That's a Grade A trade Chiefs fan. For the rest of the division!

Shoes 02-26-2018 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaNewGuy (Post 13439887)
If Albert Wilson goes away next I'm on suicide watch

Albert Wilson sucks

Chiefnj2 02-26-2018 03:48 PM

I heard Peters is so happy he's going to sing the National Anthem at the first Rams home game.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-26-2018 03:52 PM

Veach gets a C-. Everyone else involved gets an F, including CHunt.

DaFace 02-26-2018 03:55 PM

Interesting that Dorsey is getting higher ratings than Veach with this. Seems to me that he's as much to blame as anyone, while Veach just inherited the mess.

DaNewGuy 02-26-2018 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoes (Post 13439928)
Albert Wilson sucks

No u do

JakeF 02-26-2018 04:00 PM

Apparently we are going to rebuild and start a rookie QB at the same time.

Pitt Gorilla 02-26-2018 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 13439997)
Apparently we are going to rebuild and start a rookie QB at the same time.

I love the move to go young. This trade is terrible.

crayzkirk 02-26-2018 04:25 PM

I voted C for everything...

Because 'C'hiefs...?

Not sure why I should be upset. It's just a game. Everything is just a C to me now. The Royals are a C, don't care about basketball, soccer, hockey, etc.

Whatever, I just don't care anymore... C for Clark... they took a chance on a player that had major issues, from tantrums on the field, humping the coach's leg, yelling at the coaches, getting burned and whining to the referees. He was getting worse each year and finding another team that would take him probably wasn't easy.

Thank you Clark, Andy and Company.

NJChiefsFan 02-26-2018 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439479)
You'd think but apparently we had to do this now just cause.

Had to happen now. Not before the storm or after. During. We also agreed to protect the league from finding out how little we would take which I'd assume is wise in negotiations...

Least amount of blame here goes to veach. Only one I didn't give a d or lower. My grade for Brett would drop if he wasn't being forced to trade him now. With reports the locker room wasn't all against him it seems there was time but who knows. Maybe Peters was that nuts at this point. Maybe Clark or Andy gave him no choice. I'm giving Brett the benefit of the doubt but nothing about this from the timing to waiting until Peters rotted out completely looks good.

Again, anyway way you slice it, whether kc holds some responsibility or none, this is a major blow to our roster with little compensation to fix it. Resources meant to go elsewhere will now go here. The roof will continue to leak because we need to buy a new water system we just sold for scraps.

jd1020 02-26-2018 04:51 PM

I gave everyone an F and Peters a C.

Dorsey gets a F because he drafted him and he apparently didn't know about a salary cap when handing out contracts.

Reid gets a F because it's his ****ing job to work with a player that produces on the field but doesn't read from your bible and he dumped him.

Veach gets a F because did you really have to throw in a ****ing pick as well?

Peters gets a C because we all knew when he was drafted he didn't want to be in KC his whole career and he would leave when he controlled the situation, but he still put up a historic start to a career for the Chiefs.

kcxiv 02-26-2018 05:00 PM

I am starting to really hate Andy Reid as the coach of this football team.

Best22 02-26-2018 05:26 PM

If Peters wasn't a problem player, then KC would have gotten more in compensation for him

He is clearly a problem

Sassy Squatch 02-26-2018 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Best22 (Post 13440299)
If Peters wasn't a problem player, then KC would have gotten more in compensation for him

He is clearly a problem

We'd be talking about an extension that makes him the highest paid CB in the NFL.

Dave Lane 02-26-2018 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13439769)
This is my view, I waited so long for this team to draft a QB I have to stick this out but if this was still Alex Smith I doubt I'd even watch next season.

I'm pretty much here. If Alice was still QB I'd not spend another moment of time watching rebuild 12.0 take place.

Dave Lane 02-26-2018 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 13439972)
Interesting that Dorsey is getting higher ratings than Veach with this. Seems to me that he's as much to blame as anyone, while Veach just inherited the mess.

Well, we are discussing the trade, and Dorsey didn't sign off or negotiate this.

Rain Man 02-26-2018 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 13439972)
Interesting that Dorsey is getting higher ratings than Veach with this. Seems to me that he's as much to blame as anyone, while Veach just inherited the mess.

I don't blame Veach. Only a mouth breathing moron would make this move without being forced, and his other moves indicate that's not the case.

Easy 6 02-26-2018 07:00 PM

Straight A across the board, except for Peters who gets an F-

Teams in liberal bastion cities who desperately need secondary talent like San Francisco and Seattle said NO WAY! But yeah this is all some kind of conservative railroad job LMAO

Iconic 02-26-2018 07:05 PM

Clark Hunt - F

He pretty much pounded the table for this to happen and that's why we got such shitty return. We were desperate to get rid of the guy.

Leave it to Hunt to want a potential future HOFer off the team because it hurts his image. Go Chiefs!

staylor26 02-26-2018 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 13440573)
Clark Hunt - F

He pretty much pounded the table for this to happen and that's why we got such shitty return. We were desperate to get rid of the guy.

Leave it to Hunt to want a potential future HOFer off the team because it hurts his image. Go Chiefs!

Then why was there only one team seriously interested?

Use your head man. That’s why we got a shitty return. A potential future HOFer and there’s only one team interested.

Easy 6 02-26-2018 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13440579)
Then why was there only one team seriously interested?

Use your head man. That’s why we got a shitty return. A potential future HOFer and there’s only one team interested.

Theres no point in talking to some of these guys about it, even some guys who are otherwise quite sharp

They can scream racism this and conservative that til the cows come home, yet every one of them is steadfastly avoiding the question you and everyone else has raised... why did NO ONE want this ****ing guy?!!

Iconic 02-26-2018 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13440579)
Then why was there only one team seriously interested?

Use your head man. That’s why we got a shitty return. A potential future HOFer and there’s only one team interested.

That's not the point lol. If you have an asset you're selling and the market didn't materialize for whatever reason why would you keep shopping it even after 3 weeks of no one biting? You look desperate and you lose essentially all leverage. This is why the Chiefs got a shitty return, because Clark made it clear we had to move him regardless.

You don't think if we keep him for another year and he cleans up his act with Berry back he doesn't garner a better market? Absolutely he does.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.