Little trade value dipshit. Not zero. Like Murray type value at least. He’s 6-7 280 and has freakish length. He’s been played out of position. If Daly can’t get anything out of him he’s going to get more looks. Other teams liked him coming out. Maybe he would only get a conditional pick in return but he is also on his rookie contract

Agree this should have been in it's own thread from the beginning.

Hate any idea of trading for Clark for more than a single 2nd round pick, and even then it would piss me off that the Chiefs were willing to pay Clark and waste draft capital on him when they very well could have just kept Justin Houston. Stupid.

I dunno, but if IIRC there was no place he'd rather be than right here right nooooowwwwww!!

LMAO

Thank you.

I myself might be willing to offer also a lower pick but nothing more and not giving that dumbass the same contract D. Lawrence got.

Well the reports are that Clark would receive a very similar contract to Lawrence. Hopefully Veach plays it safe and just goes into the draft with what he has.

my point still stands. And it concerns more than you and me.

It’s not that you respond to all my posts. It’s when you respond it’s only to deride, disparage and talk shit about me. Go look, 99% of the time. It’s easily searchable. That’s against the TOS. Yet, your a mod. So there are different rules for you. If anyone else did what you are doing. They get a warning, then a ban if you kept it up.

You need to follow the same TOS as everyone. And if you won’t, other mods need to tell you to back the **** off.

What does Dindu Nuffins think of this trade?

All I said was "he's not wrong"...I guess I could delete my post quoting you and quote his with a response.

Would that make you feel better?

I'm with ya there, mega threads are lame. I know they do mega threads on certain other sites to prevent people talking about certain things and if they do it's buried in a mega thread for very limited visibility. That's not the case here, but that's what some huge sites use them for.

Mr. patteeu's statement on the subject coincides with my sentiments, exactly.

FAX

And FTR BRC I've done nothing close to ban worthy. Calling you an idiot once a week (at the most) isn't ban worthy. Not even close.

Damn, dude ...

Not all of us are from Iowania.

FAX

but, on a side note.... you’d be really good shape and flexible to pull that off.

No thanks. I'd rather keep the picks we have and utilize it anyways.

this is where I'm at, I think.

This is happening. Prepare thy anus.

**** megathreads.

**** the Seahawks.

**** Peter King.

**** Dindu Nuffins.

**** Vince Agnew.

Have we traded for this piece of shit yet?

If we have to give up a 1 for what would amount to the equivalent of the guy we just traded and the guy we cut, then this would be a stupid ****ing trade.

only a 3rd round pick. no more, no less.

eff it. wait til after the draft. keep all this years pics.

hide yo kids, hide yo wife.

This is the peak season for misinformation everyone; please react accordingly...

Pass, unless all we risk is a single second round pick and maybe a late round pick. The Ford trade set this market. No reason to miss out on a decent corner or miss a trade up for one of the top 15 picks.

I'd do it.

This is our window, guys. We're in it.

The fact is getting a rookie defender at pick 29 and expecting them to perform in their debut season on a team that is superbowl favourites is asking a lot. Clark is a 25 year old double digit sack artist who also has playoff experience with the potential to get better under the guidance of our new coaching staff. He got exactly the same amount of sacks as Ford last year yes, but he's also two years younger, is better against the run and has a much better injury record. So with this in mind surely yall can see that paying a guy like Clark over Dee makes much more sense?

If they are going to trade multiple premium picks, then they should give up both of next years 2s or a 2 and 3 next year. Maybe a 3 this year and a 2 next year. If Clark is a win now move, then we need to keep as many picks in this years draft as possible to further bolster this roster to win now.

It’s crazy, but if Clowney was the guy they were rumored to be in the works to trade for, I wouldn’t mind the compensation talk as much. I think Clark is overrated and won’t be as good in KC after getting a payday. That’s not even talking about the liability he is off the field. I think Clowney would be elite in this defense.

Good point ...

FAX

I'd support it for a pair of 2nd's. This year and next.

Absolutely. Over HALF of 2nd rounders turn out to be absolute dog Shit.

I guess that would depend on the contract demands.

If the deal is similar to Dee Fords, I could live with it. If it’s like Demarcus Lawrence...I’d pause.

<iframe src="https://overthecap.com/contract-embed/2973/" width="600" height="336" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

That kind of trade and compensation would need to be for a “sure thing” not a guy that has as many question marks as Clark does.

Alright, you mega-thread douchebags: This definitely deserved it's own thread.

In this case, "piece of shit" is perfectly applicable and non-offensive.

And another thing for the thread bitchers:

Stop having new threads from the lounge sent automatically to your ****ing Inbox. Scroll the front page, choose what you want to read, bypass the things you DON'T want to read, and shut the **** up about starting new threads.

Don't pretend you don't have time in the day to look at the front and second page. Every one of you practically ****ing LIVE here.

Tired of this bullshit.

Unsubscribed!

frank clark rumors & ryan's draft board
https://youtu.be/vePDmIR90lk

LMAO

WTF???? LMAO

thanks for your support. I’ll be passing around the collection plate later. Sermon this week is on arrogance and righteous.

Hugs, not drugs.

If I have to step in that room, I'm slamming a speedball first.

It is what it is.

LMAO
ROFL

The Chiefs are invoking the spirit of Carl Peterson?

Some national guy was on with Carrington saying that it would take our first and one of our 2nds to get him. **** that shit. Give up a 1st, 2nd, and huge contract for a guy with domestic violence issues. His contract would probably mean no Tyreek Hill extension.

If we trade for him, it is what it is. I have no control over it.

And that, Mr. Bump, is the kind of ambivalence that gave us Instant Gluten Free Grits.

FAX

Yes Albert Breer who I’ve been saying

Absolutely nothing.

Rotoworld reporting that SEA wants the #3 pick for Clark? Wha!? Who the **** is this guy? Hadn't heard of him until a couple weeks ago lol

Clark is viewed around the league as a significantly better player than Ford is. It's an upgrade and probably does take a 1 to make it happen.

This isn’t entirely accurate. The Jets are interested in Clark. Seattle wants a first. The Jets first is the 3rd pick. The Jets don’t have a second.

So yes, they want the 3rd pick in the draft, but no one on the planet thinks they’ll get it.

I really won't like trading a first. We can move up and draft a quality starter, and use the $20m for something better. If we can't find ways to spend it this offseason, then frontload the hell out of an extension. If not tyreek, then Chris jones. Frankly, I'd rather use a second rounder to trade up considering the talent in this draft.

And we've gone from a possible trade for this piece of shit, to Hank Hill, to slamming arm heroin, to resignation over the possible trade, to Instant Gluten Free Grits.

The circle is complete. I love this place.

We're not the Rams defense. We didn't sign Aqib Talib, and as good as Chris Jones is, he's not Aaron Donald.

We trade for Frank Clark and where does that put our defense? How many rankings does that improve us? Do we crack top 20? I doubt it.

I'd just rather take the mulligan on defense and improve it towards the future instead of ****ing around with it and having next to nothing for Pat's entire career.

20 guys have 1st round grades so what is this talent you are speaking of...

I'm REALLY not excited about giving up draft picks just to be able to pay someone $20 million. F that.

Agreed plenty of talent you can get with a five year option and lot cheaper with no DV issues.
They'll be more veterans/ talent released after the draft.
Pay your own draft your own

Same here.

It's fine to say that in theory, but it's not Madden. There's a better chance picking where the Chiefs pick that at best they end up with solid starters and scrubs than a star.

Good. We need several solid starters more than we need a star, IMO.

If we walk out of the draft with 3 starters, I'll impregnate someone. Maybe even myself.

FAX

ROFL

In......well, not in FAX, but you know what I mean

I meant at 29...

If you value pass rusher as the top need, I'd move 29 for Clark, he's better than anything you can draft there and he's 25.

Then if you can draft well in 2 and 3 it works out.

I can see #29 for him. He's a sure thing so to speak. The bust factor risk has been eliminated. The money is the big thing and they probably figured out how to pay Ford the tag price if they couldn't work a trade so that's taken care of. It does say "win now". Adding free agent help to all 3 levels of the defense and drafting for replacements for the short term contracts makes sense on paper for winning now and the future.

What FAX said. Solid starters are where we're at and what we need right now. I'll take solid starters, this defensive coaching staff and Mahomes over any other arrangement in the NFL right now.

Our inability to put the brakes on a shoot-out was the only thing that kept us from going undefeated last year. Our defense was THAT ****ing shitty. And we were THAT close to winning it all.

If I'm Mahomes, my prime concern is keeping the opponent under 21 at best, under 31 at worst, so I can go out, rock my 4 to 5 TD's a game, and go home a winner.

Just reading the first several posts and some of you guys are ridiculous. So what if this was discussed in the FA mega thread. Some people don't have the time to hang around looking through mega threads every day. It's the offseason. BRC can start this thread if he wants. If you don't like it, don't read it and don't post in it.

<br />
<br />
It's not looking through mega threads. It's not buried. It's on the last page and it's the topic du jour in that thread.

Meh, I don't even go in there so I wouldn't have seen that. I prefer it to be separate news. So what? It's not hurting anything to have a thread just for this.

now we have three separate conversations going on about it lol

It hurt me a lot. DO YOU SEE THIS TERRIBLE BRUISE AND SWELLING ON MY ARM?!?!? That's from this thread.

It's easy to follow megathreads if you read every post. Many people don't. And when you dip into a megathread, you're as likely to find the overdone, board-wide argument of the moment raging (e.g. Alex Smith) as you are to pick up on the latest news.

Here's a basic truth about message boards. Threads are more likely to remain on topic in the first few dozen posts than they are later in their life when hundreds of posts have accumulated. Megathreads drift all over the place, especially when they're based on a broad topic instead of a specific one to begin with.

If there was ever a year to stay put, its this one. Picking at the bottom. Deep defensive draft. Why couldn't we get 3 defensive starters?


We get this guy for a 2nd, sure why not. Spend some money on the guy. Otherwise, stay put and take your 3 defensive starters.

Megathreads suck dick all day for several reasons, the most annoying being that they go off course to the tune of two to three or more pages, so you have to plow through a bunch of bullshit to find what you are looking for.

If you get a thread link in your email and feel the need to exclaim "OMG why am I getting this don't we already have a thread for this"(?!?!?!?!), you might want to re-think your priorities in life.

Or go fist yourself.

I'm good with either option.

Or ignore the email?

Walk the **** on?

Get a life?

Interesting discussion about Mr. Clark going on in here.

LMAO
ROFLROFL

Not all first round guys will wind up in the top 25. And I am not opposed to trading up.

Keep in mind.... We are not only trading a first rounder and potentially something else. We are also trading away the $20m that could be spent elsewhere.

I'd rather have the picks and $20m monopoly money. I'll be very disappointed if we lose our first rounder.

Or go impregnate yourself, with arm heroin.

I'm fine with any of the above.

Except **** paying this POS $20m AND giving up a premium draft pick.

"megathreads suck ass they get off topic" This thread is over half of the replies bitching about megathreads