ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Texans cut Phillip Lindsay (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=340952)

DJ's left nut 11-23-2021 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15973579)
You seem stuck on this idea that if he "can't" pass block then that means the Chiefs will only bring him in for run plays, thus telegraphing the plays. That's bum**** reeruned and in no way indicative of how the Chiefs call plays.

In fairness - that IS kinda how Gore has been used.

Right at half the snaps he's been in for have been handoffs to him. That's a pretty hard 'tell'.

But as we've kicked around in the various "Chiefs are a power running team now that Patrick Mahomes is ass and the Cover 2 cannot be beaten" threads, it just doesn't take all that many times running the football to scare teams. The inverse would also be true. If you're throwing the ball even half the time Lindsay is in the backfield, that's going to be good enough to keep teams from truly selling out to beat it.

Moreover, they're just not going to dedicate much in the way of valuable practice reps trying to deal with stretch plays to Lindsay and diagnosing same.

There's no reason to worry about tells here.

Direckshun 11-23-2021 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 15973486)
I'm not convinced it will be or it won't - I'm saying I simply don't care either way.

If he isn't - bully. If he is, Andy will immediately use that against teams.

I'd agree that he often doesn't play RBs he doesn't trust in pass pro but A) We're in some weird new era where teams just don't blitz Patrick Mahomes and B) He seems to maybe have a blind spot in this regard for veteran backs.

Bottom line is that he brings a skill we don't have and he'll likely bring it cheap. If we use it - great. If we don't - well that's too bad. I don't see any reason to NOT pick him up when all it would cost us is an IR trip for McKinnon.

You know, I hadn't considered (A).

Direckshun 11-23-2021 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 15973563)
What’s CPs obsession with Has-beens?

They are cheap.

Direckshun 11-23-2021 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15973579)
You seem stuck on this idea that if he "can't" pass block then that means the Chiefs will only bring him in for run plays, thus telegraphing the plays. That's bum**** reeruned and in no way indicative of how the Chiefs call plays.

Going to go with DJLN on this one -- that is how they call plays. They sculpt the plays to what the players do well and avoid plays they don't do well.

ToxSocks 11-23-2021 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 15973608)
Going to go with DJLN on this one -- that is how they call plays. They sculpt the plays to what the players do well and avoid plays they don't do well.

What?

DJ just said they run Gore around a 50/50 split. He just told you that they'd use Lindsay similarly. That's exactly wtf i've been saying. THAT THEY AREN'T GOING TO JUST RUN HIM EVERY SNAP. WHICH MEANS THERE IS NO "TELL". DJ and I disagree there. 50/50 to me is balance, not a tell. And it's telling you that the Chiefs are as likely to throw as they are to run with Gore in.

Your initial argument is that he "can't" passblock, therefore they won't use him on passing downs, thus telegraphing plays. I told you that was dumb.

So yes, thanks for agreeing with me i guess.

Direckshun 11-23-2021 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15973618)
DJ just said they run Gore around a 50/50 split. He just told you that they'd use Lindsay similarly. That's exactly wtf i've been saying. THAT THEY AREN'T GOING TO JUST RUN HIM EVERY SNAP. WHICH MEANS THERE IS NO "TELL". DJ and I disagree there. 50/50 to me is balance, not a tell.

Disagree, I'm afraid. If they're running Gore "50%" of the time he's in, that's a tell, given his limited snaps.

Also, take it down a notch.

ToxSocks 11-23-2021 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 15973648)
Disagree, I'm afraid. If they're running Gore "50%" of the time he's in, that's a tell, given his limited snaps.

Also, take it down a notch.

It's a tell. It's a tell that they're as likely to run as they are to pass. How the **** else do you interpret equal distribution other than equally?

If you want to pose your argument as, "they're more likely to run with Gore than say, with CEH" - purely based on the volume of passing plays. Sure. Specifically because we pass at such a large clip. Even so, it's 50/50 instead of what, 60/40 with CEH? That ain't enough to swing the pendulum.

Either way, it makes no difference as these defenses aren't coming up for Gore. Or CEH. Nor would they for Lindsay. Only one team has gotten away from the "Chiefs Defense" this season. That was the Raiders and look what happened to them.

Bah, all of that is moot. The point is, your initial argument sucked. We've moved the goal posts now, and you can latch onto DJ's nuts all you want, but the point is the Chiefs can do a variety of plays with Lindsay, none of which would insinuate they're telegraphing shit.

Direckshun 11-23-2021 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15973678)
It's a tell. It's a tell that they're as likely to run as they are to pass. How the **** else do you interpret equal distribution other than equally?

Tells aren't 100% certainty, pal. Maybe you haven't played sports, but surely you've played poker.

Think of it this way.

There are a number of things you can do with a RB who can stay in to block. But you scratch out those plays when you have one that can't.

DCs know that better than anybody. And seeing Lindsay in the huddle means they can reliable scratch out the plays you know they're not going to do because the RB in question can't do them. That allows you to call a defense geared towards the smaller set of plays, and it gives you better odds on nailing the offense.

Chiefspants 11-23-2021 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 15973563)
What’s CPs obsession with Has-beens?

See Ingram, Melvin.

VAChief 11-23-2021 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 15973563)
What’s CPs obsession with Has-beens?

For complimentary pieces nothing wrong with taking a flyer on guys that might add something you don’t have, in this case speed at RB.

Tribal Warfare 11-23-2021 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 15973701)
See Ingram, Melvin.

Marcus Allen and Joe Montana

BWillie 11-23-2021 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 15973563)
What’s CPs obsession with Has-beens?

He's 27 and was good LAST year. No running backs on the Texans roster are faring much better, and they have some good ones.

suzzer99 11-23-2021 08:22 PM

Lindsey ran wild on us one game and then we shut him down after that, even with terrible Sutton defenses.

I think his spastic running style causes problems when a team isn't prepared for it. But once they adjust, he's not very dangerous.

PurpleJesus28 11-23-2021 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 15973908)
Lindsey ran wild on us one game and then we shut him down after that, even with terrible Sutton defenses.

I think his spastic running style causes problems when a team isn't prepared for it. But once they adjust, he's not very dangerous.

Didnt dirty Dan lay a hit on him and injure him ? Or was that just McCaffrey i'm thinking of.

Bump 11-23-2021 10:52 PM

he's not that old. Why did he fall off so much in production from his first 2 seasons? I don't know.

Mile High Mania 11-24-2021 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 15974129)
he's not that old. Why did he fall off so much in production from his first 2 seasons? I don't know.

Truthfully speaking, I think he overachieved in his first two seasons. Gordon was acquired in his 3rd season and that put him on the backburner in Denver, then he ends up in Houston and nothing good happens in Houston.

listopencil 11-24-2021 10:03 AM

Pros:

He's shifty as **** and he has great acceleration, body control, vision, and speed. Even though he only weighs about 17 pounds soaking wet he runs tough and will go right up the middle if the line gives him so much as a crease to exploit. He will engage and try to block defenders on pass plays. Although he looks like a change of pace scatback he can carry a larger load of plays during a game than you might expect. He's a play maker when the opportunity presents itself.

Cons:

He's not a good receiver and that hurts because short passes would be a great way to get him the ball in space, but he's just as liable to have the ball bounce off of his hands as catch it. He's not a good blocker and you can't expect him to hold up any more than about a half of a second in pass pro on a regular basis. He's most likely not going to be an asset on a passing play at all. Defenses can completely shut him down by flooding the running lanes.

listopencil 11-24-2021 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 15974304)
Truthfully speaking, I think he overachieved in his first two seasons. Gordon was acquired in his 3rd season and that put him on the backburner in Denver, then he ends up in Houston and nothing good happens in Houston.

Gordon can run and catch. The Broncos went after Gordon Junior in the draft. Made him expendable.

saphojunkie 11-24-2021 12:12 PM

Have we signed this piece of the ship yet

Mile High Mania 11-24-2021 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 15974479)
Gordon can run and catch. The Broncos went after Gordon Junior in the draft. Made him expendable.

Exactly and it makes total sense. I think Williams has better upside than Gordon, we just need someone that knows how to get creative with the offense.

Chiefspants 11-24-2021 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 15974474)
Pros:

He's shifty as **** and he has great acceleration, body control, vision, and speed. Even though he only weighs about 17 pounds soaking wet he runs tough and will go right up the middle if the line gives him so much as a crease to exploit. He will engage and try to block defenders on pass plays. Although he looks like a change of pace scatback he can carry a larger load of plays during a game than you might expect. He's a play maker when the opportunity presents itself.

Cons:

He's not a good receiver and that hurts because short passes would be a great way to get him the ball in space, but he's just as liable to have the ball bounce off of his hands as catch it. He's not a good blocker and you can't expect him to hold up any more than about a half of a second in pass pro on a regular basis. He's most likely not going to be an asset on a passing play at all. Defenses can completely shut him down by flooding the running lanes.

I'm just not seeing the benefits here for our offense, really. CEH has (for some reason) not developed into a receiver and is also a liability in pass protection.

mabbott 11-24-2021 01:42 PM

Kansas City's Pass Block Win Rate is 66% which is 5th in the NFL.

Kansas City's Run Block Win Rate is 74% which is 4th in the NFL.

I guess I'm not seeing CEH as horrible in pass protection this year. Last year, he needed work and he was a rookie.

Chiefspants 11-24-2021 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mabbott (Post 15974834)
Kansas City's Pass Block Win Rate is 66% which is 5th in the NFL.

Kansas City's Run Block Win Rate is 74% which is 4th in the NFL.

I guess I'm not seeing CEH as horrible in pass protection this year. Last year, he needed work and he was a rookie.

I'll start to believe when he's still out there on 3rd downs, which should help his pass catching, too.

mabbott 11-24-2021 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 15974849)
I'll start to believe when he's still out there on 3rd downs, which should help his pass catching, too.

I keep waiting for the coaches to mix it up a bit... it doesn't seem their style ... :-)

The Franchise 11-24-2021 03:20 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Congrats Phillip Lindsay ( <a href="https://twitter.com/I_CU_boy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@I_CU_boy</a> ) being claimed by the <a href="https://twitter.com/MiamiDolphins?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MiamiDolphins</a></p>&mdash; Mike McCartney (@MikeMcCartney7) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeMcCartney7/status/1463616122884964368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Easy 6 11-24-2021 03:26 PM

Oh No
Anyway


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.