![]() |
Quote:
most of the INT's are precisely because Mahomes ISN'T always taking what's there and forcing it downfield. Trying to force the ball downfield when the defense is specifically built to beat that is just madness, Mahomes or no. It's still football. Even when you have the best QB in the sport, it's still football. Run the ball and take the short stuff and get them out of the light boxes and dropping 7 and the deep shots will be there. It's still football. |
15 rushes won't cut it. It won't keep the defense honest. I don't know if they need to make PM do more rushes in the RPO game but the lack of a run game today really showed up.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe work on FG protections. |
Quote:
Since neither is the case, is it possible, even remotely, that someone just made a mistake/DEN just made a play? Nah, gotta be Toub hasn't been coaching protections ever in 22 years, right? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
To me, the story of the game was Toney. He led the team in receiving and I think that could become a somewhat regular occurrence if he stays healthy. He’s going to be a big part of the playoff run.
|
Quote:
|
Good read DC, Thanks.
I thought the officiating was ultimately fair. The hands to the face was weak, but so was the OPI that helped us out. that's really all I had a ton of trouble with. I'd sure as **** take that crew of Cheffers or Clete god ****ing Blakeman. God I hate ****ing dogshit officials. STs is ****ing frustrating. I'm all about Justin Watson fielding punts. He's a smart player, has sure hands back there and looked confident when he fielded them. Just catch it and run forward, to pussyfooting, no reversing field, just catch and run forward. Take what they give you, don't give anyone the opportunity to get a penalty and get the best QB that has ever played the ball. No clue WTF to think about Townsend. Obviously he biffed the snap, but it looked like after the miss Butker was explaining shit to Townsend. Do they not practice? WTF. 15 in a row is 15 in a row. DJ had like 2 picks and housed one on them when they were a playoff team and we were in the shitter and they were good. It happens. Dominance is hard. Brother****ing Cheatriot ****bag lost some and played poorly in division sometimes, and they were actively cheating. It's hard. Get the win. Move on. **** Donk Forever. |
Special teams continues to be a problem with FG, EP and punt returns. It looks to me that Butker is going to be a problem in the playoffs. Chiefs should plan on it.
|
Quote:
|
For those of you that believe the NFL is rigged and KC is the recipient of the most ****ings should be very thankful there was no call for roughing the passer on the final sack of the game against Wilson. That has been called at least once this year.
|
Quote:
There were some bad calls out way but we definitely benefited from a couple big ones. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I may be misreading the situation. |
Quote:
Wilson was not in the act of passing when contact was initiated. The "throw" did not occur until he was swung around by the defender. The defender did not land on the "passer". Correctly a non-call. Your point is well taken however. I was a little suprised there was not a flag for the Chiefs being mean. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The ease in scoring that 1st TD may have set the tone for some to ease up a bit. That leads to mistakes and mistakes lead to opponents points. You can rationalize all you want about Denver being up for this game due to a coaching change/embarrassing loss, but I see it as a disturbing trend where we take sad teams too lightly. Denver twice, Houston, Indy, and the Raiders games were fine examples.
|
The new guys
Pacheco is my favorite addition this year. Love seeing him get some receptions. Would love to see him get some of the same passes McKinnon gets, especially near the goal line. Would also love to see Pacheco get some of the passes that made Kimble Anders' career. I think Pacheco has the speed, wiggle and hate to house something like that. Toney is my second favorite addition this year. Can't wait to see what he can do after an offseason in the system. Has Cook been more involved lately? Only casual observation, but it seems like he is either playing more or doing more than even a few games ago. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But it is certainly positive that he is getting looks. Quote:
But yeah, chuck that bitch out of bounds, please? |
Quote:
We are built decently well now for efficiency. Cool, build off that. But we see time and time and time again that our speed guys are horrendous adjusting to the ball, and our size guys aren’t fast enough to stretch the field. |
Quote:
We have more a more explosive offense than last season by any statistical measure. Juju, who I wouldn't call 'explosive' is averaging 11.9 yards per catch, and Hill, who I would call explosive was at 11.1 last year. We're the number one offense in football, despite a lot of fumbles and dumb interceptions-far more than previous seasons. The only change we need to make is to clean things up. Literally. |
[QUOTE=oldman;16703001]The ease in scoring that 1st TD may have set the tone for some to ease up a bit. That leads to mistakes and mistakes lead to opponents points. You can rationalize all you want about Denver being up for this game due to a coaching change/embarrassing loss, but I see it as a disturbing trend where we take sad teams too lightly. Denver twice, Houston, Indy, and the Raiders games were fine examples.[OTE]
No that's not what happened. WE scored on the first drive and then botched the XP. After the donks kicked a FG we drove the ball down the field and then the refs blew an obvious PI in the end zone and on the next play Mahomes tried to squeeze one in and it got picked. Our D held and then Toney tried to do to much on the punt return and fumbled the ball away. That gave the donks some juice and they scored a TD and the game was on. The Chiefs didn't ease up they screwed up. Then they won the game so it's all good. |
Quote:
And the narrative that we weren’t explosive last year is also overused and exaggerated. We were dominant the second half of last year including back to back 40+ point playoff wins. We had one bad second half against cincy. You’re not gonna clean up Mvs. He just isn’t it. For crying out loud we run Watson on 75% of snaps simply for running the right routes. Thats a talent issue. Defenses can essentially wipe out two of our WRs without paying a lick of attention to them. Juju is solid but we all know he’s a possession guy. Again I applaud our move to efficiency and I know this is a rebuild year. I’m just shocked at how many are content with what our offense has become. I don’t care what the numbers say, as good as we’ve been, we are capable of way better and we can be with more talent. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can kind of see it both ways. If we had a decent RT maybe some of the longer developing explosive plays have a better chance. But do we really expect this WR group to be delivering that? I do think the one obvious area of improvement for the offense is here though. Maybe we get that with a WR upgrade, maybe OT. As long as we build in at least one of those positions next year I'll be happy. |
Look, guys, you're arguing against a fantasty.
'content'? No, realistic. We have 33 players under contract for 2023, and that includes literally not a single starting offensive tackle. There will not be money to go buy a star #1 in free agency. Nobody's saying we wouldn't like upgrades. Nobody's saying that. All I'm saying is that we're going to have to draft and develop them. Of course Cinci is more 'explosive'-they've got their high first round pick WR and elite QB on rookie deals. We don't have that anymore. And you can't just go buy one. The cap will not allow it. So yeah, I agree, this is a tiresome argument, because the cap is real, and paying Mahomes is real, and the fact that we have to field a full team is real. It's not ****ing happening. So move the **** on, already. There's nothing wrong with the offense that better execution doesn't fix. There will be turnover in the offseason, as there will be every year now. It's life with an elite QB getting paid as such. For the remainder of this season, KC will go as far as their execution level determines. The only thing that ever stops them is themselves, with fumbles, drops, INT's. Also, just in my opinion, sub-par OT play, but that's just me. No, we don't have time to run WASP. So if that's what you want, then you need better OT's. Two of 'em. And you definitely can't have THAT and also pay market price for a speedy WR1. Nobody's saying they don't want it. Some of us are saying it's not feasible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I personally don't think a shorter pass that a receiver breaks a long run counts any less than a pass that travels 40 yards in the air. We don't have ****ing time to run WASP. |
I could be wrong but I *think* the Chiefs (and their top 5 offense) are among the best this year for plays of 20+ yards.
|
Quote:
https://www.pro-football-reference.c...g_advanced.htm |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"per attempt" is just a function of throwing the ball a lot more in most cases, which is why justin fields is high |
I really think there's a lot of irrational 'want' going on here.
We remember 'WASP', and we see Burrow throwing to Chase/Higgins/Boyd and we think- MAN, I WANT THAT! But reality is, 'WASP' is a pipedream with Brown and Wylie at OT, and The Bengals have all of those guys on rookie contracts still. We're just in a different place now. You like Mahomes? Me too. But we're paying him now, and we have dogshit at RT, a mediocre LT that wants record setting money, and one good rookie DE and nothing else there. Things aren't changing other than continued growth this season. and in '23, we have zero starting OT's, one starting level DE, no starting WR's under contract-33 guys under contract total, and somewhere around $45-50m to deal with it all. We're not going to blow it all on a free agent WR-and there aren't any great ones in their prime available anyway. We're going to have to grow our own, unless it's Toney-which if he can get his hammy issues under control I'd feel real good about, honestly. |
Everyone wants the 18 offense back. It's just not gonna happen. I'd love to have a legit WR. Everyone would.
But it's just gonna have to come in the draft. And as much as this offense has been good, Mahomes has done just as much at slowing it down as others. He hasn't played as well this year despite the #'s. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The WR market will be way better than you think. If not this year then next year. We’re going go see an insane amount of huge contracts come due in the next year or two and it’s unsustainable for these teams to be able to keep all their WRs. |
And you cannot walk into next season with Mvs and Watson playing the majority of snaps. It’s clear that we’re productive in spite of these guys, not because of them, right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mvs…. Disappears most games When he does produce he disappears outside of 1-2 catches Kills too many drives with drops or not getting his feet down Kills even more drives by not adjusting to the ball Really seems to be out of sync with mahomes Having a home run threat is fine but we’re paying the guy $10m. And you can’t have an efficient offense with a guy who makes this many mistakes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Reality check is that kelce is 33 and can’t keep getting doubled and tripled. Kelces dominance hides a lot of our limitations of our WR room. We can’t approach the next few years assuming kelce keeps that up. Our offense has been outstanding and on paper unstoppable. In the second half of the season we have run into plenty of issues. I am proud of our offense. That is different from being content. For as good as we’ve been we are capable of much better. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's to the point that when I see Pat uncork one in MVS' direction, before it starts coming down, I'm chalking it up to an INC. Sadly, most of the time I'm right. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There's an emphasis on the position, and will continue to be, and some guys will work out, and some won't. But purchasing a #1 WR that is an upgrade from Juju is highly unlikely any time in the near future no matter how much some of you guys want to scream for it. It's HIGHLY UNLIKELY. And wouldn't do KC any good anyway, with dumpster fires at OT and a subpar defensive line other than Jones. Karlaftis I have high hopes for, but you really need a speed rusher opposite. Dream all you want, I'm done talking about it. You guys can all wring your hands and cry again this offseason about how we won't sniff the play-offs and all of the other teams got so much better, and then we'll go win the division again and compete for a SB anyway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even his misses many times were inches off, up to maybe a yard or two. But he's been missing MVS by as much as 10+ feet; that seems to be new this season? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.