ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Nate Taylor with a lot of middle-to-big-sized news yesterday. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=346938)

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728414)
Why wouldn't you want to plug Moore in there? Whats the issue with it?

Cut MVS, sign Watson to let him do the deep stuff that MVS does if you want.

There you go, cheap WR room.

Because the same folks that refuse to concede that Moore was a staggering disappointment this year are scared to actually rely on him next year.

Odd how that works out...

O.city 01-11-2023 11:12 AM

It's the same situation with Thornhill at safety.

You drafted Cook and let him have a year of dipping his toe in.

Well, now it's time to insert him at safety next to Reid and roll forward.

Mecca 01-11-2023 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728417)
It's the same situation with Thornhill at safety.

You drafted Cook and let him have a year of dipping his toe in.

Well, now it's time to insert him at safety next to Reid and roll forward.

Even if you do that, you still have to invest again with how often 3 safeties are out there.

O.city 01-11-2023 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728416)
Because the same folks that refuse to concede that Moore was a staggering disappointment this year are scared to actually rely on him next year.

Odd how that works out...

Next time they yell at me for wanting to trade draft picks.....I'm gonna yell back.

O.city 01-11-2023 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 16728421)
Even if you do that, you still have to invest again with how often 3 safeties are out there.

Go find a 3rd safety on the scrap heap. Doesn't seem like a real difficult spot to fill.

CupidStunt 01-11-2023 11:16 AM

I wouldn't extend Gay. I love his energy, and his speed flashes from time to time, but you can't pay everyone and it's one of the more replaceable positions. I don't think we'd miss him some crazy amount. Get Chenal in there and let's roll. Especially after Roquan's new deal - not that Gay gets anywhere near that, but I'm sure it's bumped up the off-ball LB price tag. No thanks.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728427)
Go find a 3rd safety on the scrap heap. Doesn't seem like a real difficult spot to fill.

And that, friends, is why you don't use a 2nd round pick on one.

But I digress...

O.city 01-11-2023 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728437)
And that, friends, is why you don't use a 2nd round pick on one.

But I digress...

Eh, if he steps in and replaces Thornhill as the starter, it is what it is. I get it alteast.

I don't think he was meant to be the 3rd safety here for long.

Mecca 01-11-2023 11:22 AM

In short we're gonna be very high in rookie snaps again next year.

RunKC 01-11-2023 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728405)
Nobody was expecting Watson to replace Ward. They were expecting McDuffie to do it and he did.

So now we're not talking about Powell or Chesson here - we're talking about Skyy Moore.

That's your backfill. You know more about him now than you knew about McDuffie when he took the field.

It's big boy pants time for Skyy. And JJSS is such a limited player who runs such basic routes, I see no reason why we couldn't put Moore in that role and get strong production if he's an NFL caliber receiver.

People keep bringing up Juju as the role that Skyy fits but I don’t think that’s the correct comparison.

It’s Watson. Justin Watson is doing everything that Skyy fits, which is some of the same things Juju does.

Mecca 01-11-2023 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728445)
People keep bringing up Juju as the role that Skyy fits but I don’t think that’s the correct comparison.

It’s Watson. Justin Watson is doing everything that Skyy fits, which is some of the same things Juju does.

Other than Watson has this real problem holding on to the ball.

O.city 01-11-2023 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728445)
People keep bringing up Juju as the role that Skyy fits but I don’t think that’s the correct comparison.

It’s Watson. Justin Watson is doing everything that Skyy fits, which is some of the same things Juju does.

When JJSS was out, Moore's snaps were the highest, IIRC

O.city 01-11-2023 11:27 AM

You guys think Skyy is going to be running those deep posts and such?

I don't see it, would be nice though.

LoneWolf 01-11-2023 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16728282)
What's he going to do for them that Perine doesn't do better already?

Have a neatly trimmed beard.

Pushead2 01-11-2023 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16728128)
Last 3 games JJSS has had a total of 7 catches and 9 targets. He has disappeared for whatever reason

To be fair, Watkins' performance in the few games before the SB run were not any better, but playoff time came & his numbers jumped / was clutch.

I'm hoping they will use Juju in the same manner as Watkins.

Wisconsin_Chief 01-11-2023 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16728285)
What do we get from him that we can't get from a Ronald Jones type as a #3 RB? Jones is getting paid about half of what CEH is too.

Not disagreeing, and I don't really care if he's on the roster or not, but I highly doubt they cut him to save ~$1 million against the cap and then they have to replace him too.

If he doesn't get traded, he's probably still here next year.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728445)
People keep bringing up Juju as the role that Skyy fits but I don’t think that’s the correct comparison.

It’s Watson. Justin Watson is doing everything that Skyy fits, which is some of the same things Juju does.

Watson's getting 30 routes a game - THAT'S the guy you want Moore to be next season?

Watson's fungible as shit, as is the role he plays. If your plan for our 2nd round pick is to have him be that, then you're all but conceding that Moore was a bad pick in the 2nd round.

And Moore simply isn't that kind of player anyway. He wasn't in college when he was running 80% of his routes underneath. He's a stick/hitch guy. In college he was EXACTLY what JJSS has been this year and he's given no indication that he should be relied on as MORE than that, if he should be relied on as that at all.

dirk digler 01-11-2023 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pushead2 (Post 16728465)
To be fair, Watkins' performance in the few games before the SB run were not any better, but playoff time came & his numbers jumped / was clutch.

I'm hoping they will use Juju in the same manner as Watkins.

Hope you are right as we need to get some production out of our WR's. Hoping with Toney and we get Mecole back we will throw shit at teams they haven't seen.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728449)
When JJSS was out, Moore's snaps were the highest, IIRC

It just cannot be said enough - JJSS is being used as a glorified TE.

Average depth of target is 7 yards, fellas. Among guys with his volume, there are like 3 dudes who are running shorter routes than he is.

Ignore this idea that he's a Z receiver here - he isn't. he's being used in an extremely specific capacity and it's exactly the role Moore was used in with success in college.

JJSS isn't being used downfield. Moore has never been a downfield receiver either and his toolbox doesn't indicate he should be.

The role JuJu is being used in is Moore's natural fit.

RunKC 01-11-2023 12:13 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728449)
When JJSS was out, Moore's snaps were the highest, IIRC

Nope. It was Watson

MahomesMagic 01-11-2023 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728445)
People keep bringing up Juju as the role that Skyy fits but I don’t think that’s the correct comparison.

It’s Watson. Justin Watson is doing everything that Skyy fits, which is some of the same things Juju does.

What Skyy does well is get open quickly the first 5 yards.

That's about it, which is a decent slot but those guys are available every year in FA for not much $$$.

Reroka 01-11-2023 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 16728086)
This interview had a lot of nuggets in it. Some small, some medium sized, maybe one huge.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TobzUNVtMv8" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • "snowglobe" was put together roughly a year ago, and can neither confirm or deny it was a dunk on the Raiders circling the stadium a couple years back
  • like the Ferrari plays, "snowglobe" was almost certainly a Mahomes concept before Reid/Bienemy refined it
  • Frank Clark is perfectly fine
  • the Chiefs want to re-sign JuJu Smith-Schuster
  • Brett Veach has been a Justin Watson fan for several years, seems likely he'll re-sign him
  • the Chiefs will draft a WR this year at some point
  • the Chiefs could very well make an offer to Willie Gay this offseason, but Gay may choose to play out the remainder of his contract anyway
  • highly indicated the Chiefs will probably make an offer to L'Jarius Sneed
  • probably the biggest news: the Chiefs are going to shop Clyde Edwards-Helaire all offseason and preseason


Tbh, prob not much of a market of CEH.

-King- 01-11-2023 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16728128)
Last 3 games JJSS has had a total of 7 catches and 9 targets. He has disappeared for whatever reason

Both of our top two WRs disappear for large stretches honestly. MVS had 9 catches the last 5 games.

As of now, I think the whole WR room other than Toney is easily replaceable. Toney is the only one who has a truly unique skill set and talent/potential.

RunKC 01-11-2023 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728503)
It just cannot be said enough - JJSS is being used as a glorified TE.

He is. And that’s why I don’t think Moore can be compared to his role as much as Watson.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728503)
Average depth of target is 7 yards, fellas. Among guys with his volume, there are like 3 dudes who are running shorter routes than he is.

Ignore this idea that he's a Z receiver here - he isn't. he's being used in an extremely specific capacity and it's exactly the role Moore was used in with success in college.

Again I think this was by design. Teams are deploying the Fangio cover 2 to cut off the deep ball and Andy has countered with this plan using Kelce/Juju/Gray/Fortson/Bell as well as utilizing McKinnon in the flat and it has worked beautifully.

We’re killing teams in the flat and middle intermediate and they can’t stop it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728503)
JJSS isn't being used downfield. Moore has never been a downfield receiver either and his toolbox doesn't indicate he should be.

This is bizarre. Moore’s college tape shows him on the outside catching along passes as a vertical receiver.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728503)
The role JuJu is being used in is Moore's natural fit.

Some things yes. But I think Watson is his ideal role.

-King- 01-11-2023 01:01 PM

If you can't replace Juju with Skyy in year 2, what exactly did you draft him in the 2nd round for?

RunKC 01-11-2023 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16728588)
If you can't replace Juju with Skyy in year 2, what exactly did you draft him in the 2nd round for?

To play Justin Watson’s role, which is the 3rd most snaps at WR this year.

If you listen to the pod in the OP, Veach was a big fan of Watson at the senior bowl. Didn’t get him, so he brought him in last February before FA.

Nate himself said it was their best sneaky acquisition that helped them win the division.

Watson was signed to a futures deal guys. Expectations were low. They didn’t expect him to be this good. As Nate pointed out, Watson cooked JC Jackson in the 2nd game of the year. He’s done a nice job. Patrick was even surprised with how fast Watson was in the off-season.

Skyy isn’t getting Watson’s snaps

O.city 01-11-2023 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728529)
Nope. It was Watson

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728581)
He is. And that’s why I don’t think Moore can be compared to his role as much as Watson.



Again I think this was by design. Teams are deploying the Fangio cover 2 to cut off the deep ball and Andy has countered with this plan using Kelce/Juju/Gray/Fortson/Bell as well as utilizing McKinnon in the flat and it has worked beautifully.

We’re killing teams in the flat and middle intermediate and they can’t stop it.



This is bizarre. Moore’s college tape shows him on the outside catching along passes as a vertical receiver.



Some things yes. But I think Watson is his ideal role.

So Watsons snaps went up when JJSS went down (along with Hardman) and it was during that time that Moore got the most snaps of the year, then as they came back his went down.

Yes, Skyy beat alot of north dakota state CB's on the outside, he's not likely doing that in the NFL.

So the 2nd round WR we drafted is behind the future's pick FA we signed. That's not the most ideal situation.

OKchiefs 01-11-2023 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728652)
So Watsons snaps went up when JJSS went down (along with Hardman) and it was during that time that Moore got the most snaps of the year, then as they came back his went down.

Yes, Skyy beat alot of north dakota state CB's on the outside, he's not likely doing that in the NFL.

So the 2nd round WR we drafted is behind the future's pick FA we signed. That's not the most ideal situation.

Maybe I’m wrong, but it sure seems like KC keeps drafting slot/gadget guys in the 2nd round (Hardman/Moore) instead of trying to find an X type receiver for the first time ever in the Reid era.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728581)
This is bizarre. Moore’s college tape shows him on the outside catching along passes as a vertical receiver.

Some things yes. But I think Watson is his ideal role.

Look at the numbers. He was used overwhelmingly as an underneath receiver. Highlights lie - the stats don't.

And if Watson is your goal for him, that's a bad pick in the 4th round, let alone the 2nd.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728609)
To play Justin Watson’s role, which is the 3rd most snaps at WR this year.

If you listen to the pod in the OP, Veach was a big fan of Watson at the senior bowl. Didn’t get him, so he brought him in last February before FA.

3rd among WRs means 4th among targets and 5th if Hardman is healthy.

You don't draft a 5th option in the second round.

OKchiefs 01-11-2023 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728689)
3rd among WRs means 4th among targets and 5th if Hardman is healthy.

You don't draft a 5th option in the second round.

Brett Veach clearly does

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 16728695)
Brett Veach clearly does

Only if he missed on the pick.

So which is it, Run?

Was Moore a good pick or should he be replacing Justin Watson next year?

Because it can't be both.

Red Dawg 01-11-2023 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728358)
Looking at the WR free agent market this offseason....why would JJSS sign for less here? It's a barren wasteland.

He strikes me as a guy not totally driven by money. He likes it here and he likes winning. Playing with Mahomes he will take a fair deal and stay. That's the way he sounds when he's been asked. I am sure he's aware that we won't blow the top of the market on him. We already put that out there with Hill getting traded.

RunKC 01-11-2023 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728689)
3rd among WRs means 4th among targets and 5th if Hardman is healthy.

You don't draft a 5th option in the second round.

I just looked and there’s another target you didn’t mention. Noah Gray. 597 snaps this year. More than Watson and 4th behind Kelce, Juju and MVS.

I think that proves the whole “Andy countering cover 2 with bigger intermediate weapons and McKinnon” theory.

But yes I agree that Skyy should have done more this year, but Watson proved his value this year. Beating JC Jackson in week 2 for a TD really upped his value and earned trust from Patrick.

Need to see what Skyy does next season though.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16728705)
He strikes me as a guy not totally driven by money. He likes it here and he likes winning. Playing with Mahomes he will take a fair deal and stay. That's the way he sounds when he's been asked. I am sure he's aware that we won't blow the top of the market on him. We already put that out there with Hill getting traded.

A 'fair deal' still meets or exceeds Christian Kirk's contract.

We shouldn't be paying that for a wealthier Jarvis Landry.

ToxSocks 01-11-2023 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728709)
A 'fair deal' still meets or exceeds Christian Kirk's contract.

We shouldn't be paying that for a wealthier Jarvis Landry.

You really think someone is gonna offer him a Christian Kirk contract?

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16728710)
You really think someone is gonna offer him a Christian Kirk contract?

I think he'll end up getting a BETTER offer than Kirk got.

I don't think his agent takes the call from anyone offering less.

RunKC 01-11-2023 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728709)
A 'fair deal' still meets or exceeds Christian Kirk's contract.

We shouldn't be paying that for a wealthier Jarvis Landry.

Juju turned down a $14 million contract with Baltimore to come here. I think he would do a team friendly deal.

JMO

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728715)
Juju turned down a $14 million contract with Baltimore to come here. I think he would do a team friendly deal.

JMO

Because he felt KC set him up better to rehab his value and become a more attractive FA target.

Taking a 1 year deal to better position yourself in the FA market isn't evidence that he'll take a sweetheart deal to stay. It's quite the opposite.

smithandrew051 01-11-2023 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728721)
Because he felt KC set him up better to rehab his value and become a more attractive FA target.

Taking a 1 year deal to better position yourself in the FA market isn't evidence that he'll take a sweetheart deal to stay. It's quite the opposite.

Plus, I wouldn’t take much away from any of his public statements.

He’s playing it absolutely right with his comments. He should say he loves it here and wants to stay. Badmouthing the Chiefs and Reid hasn’t worked out too well for other guys.

Sounds like he made a really good decision last offseason. I hope similar players see that and follow his lead.

raybec 4 01-11-2023 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728715)
Juju turned down a $14 million contract with Baltimore to come here. I think he would do a team friendly deal.

JMO

He had to know that Baltimore is not the place a wide receiver goes to maximize future earnings.

Dante84 01-11-2023 02:53 PM

MVS + CEH + 5th = Hopkins?

O.city 01-11-2023 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728713)
I think he'll end up getting a BETTER offer than Kirk got.

I don't think his agent takes the call from anyone offering less.

Man......nah, no thanks on that.

I'm pro JJSS if it's reasonable, but damn.

ToxSocks 01-11-2023 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728713)
I think he'll end up getting a BETTER offer than Kirk got.

I don't think his agent takes the call from anyone offering less.

Maaan, i just don't see it.

kcgreene 01-11-2023 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728806)
Man......nah, no thanks on that.

I'm pro JJSS if it's reasonable, but damn.

If I remember correct, Spotrac has JJSS Calculated Market Value at $14.6M AAV, and Kirk is getting $18M AAV... so it's not far off.

Rain Man 01-11-2023 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 16728739)
He had to know that Baltimore is not the place a wide receiver goes to maximize future earnings.

I think Baltimore even calls the position "Wide Blocker" now.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcgreene (Post 16728815)
If I remember correct, Spotrac has JJSS Calculated Market Value at $14.6M AAV, and Kirk is getting $18M AAV... so it's not far off.

Wanna bet that Spotrac didn't have Kirk's AAV any higher than $14.6 million heading into LAST offseason?

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 16728825)
I think Baltimore even calls the position "Wide Blocker" now.

So would McKinnon be listed under 'tight receiver' under a similar naming scheme?

Tailreceiver? Halfreciever?

kcgreene 01-11-2023 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728827)
Wanna bet that Spotrac didn't have Kirk's AAV any higher than $14.6 million heading into LAST offseason?

No argument there, but I don't think that the Jags making a move that made sense to literally nobody in the footaball world is anything that anyone could account for, nor something that will happen 2 years back to back.

The market overadjusted, and you're already seeing actions occur to adjust it back (The AJ Brown trade being one such action)

I'm not saying Spotrac is a soothsayer, but I am saying that usually they provide a pretty solid jumping off point.

O.city 01-11-2023 03:33 PM

Here's the thing though, as much as everyone jumps for joy with the "the cap is rising" stuff, they fail to mention that player salaries do as well.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728843)
Here's the thing though, as much as everyone jumps for joy with the "the cap is rising" stuff, they fail to mention that player salaries do as well.

Yup.

It's why I caution folks against using the 'available cap space' approach.

Look at where we are relative to the league. And then look at where we are in terms of players under contract for next season.

Because the cap going up by 15% means that every agent in the world is gonna start with 2022PlayerX+15% as his opening salvo.

Those guys do this for a living - they ain't stupid.

If we have $40 million in cap space and there are 20 teams in the league who have more than that (or around that and 5 more players under contract than we do), then we're still not going to be in a position to be major players in the FA market.

The only ENORMOUS advantage we have over everyone else when it comes to the rising cap is that our All-Universe Quarterback is under contract for a decade at figures that would be nearly manageable under the present cap figures.

The surplus value built into his deal is going to be so absurd as to almost require that we go back to the table with him at some point in the next 3-5 years like we did with Kelce this year.

O.city 01-11-2023 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728855)
Yup.

It's why I caution folks against using the 'available cap space' approach.

Look at where we are relative to the league. And then look at where we are in terms of players under contract for next season.

Because the cap going up by 15% means that every agent in the world is gonna start with 2022PlayerX+15% as his opening salvo.

Those guys do this for a living - they ain't stupid.

If we have $40 million in cap space and there are 20 teams in the league who have more than that (or around that and 5 more players under contract than we do), then we're still not going to be in a position to be major players in the FA market.

The only ENORMOUS advantage we have over everyone else when it comes to the rising cap is that our All-Universe Quarterback is under contract for a decade at figures that would be nearly manageable under the present cap figures.

The surplus value built into his deal is going to be so absurd as to almost require that we go back to the table with him at some point in the next 3-5 years like we did with Kelce this year.

I'm guessing they tear up his deal and do a new one in 3 or 4 years, right? YOu pretty much have to.

dlphg9 01-11-2023 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728609)
To play Justin Watson’s role, which is the 3rd most snaps at WR this year.

If you listen to the pod in the OP, Veach was a big fan of Watson at the senior bowl. Didn’t get him, so he brought him in last February before FA.

Nate himself said it was their best sneaky acquisition that helped them win the division.

Watson was signed to a futures deal guys. Expectations were low. They didn’t expect him to be this good. As Nate pointed out, Watson cooked JC Jackson in the 2nd game of the year. He’s done a nice job. Patrick was even surprised with how fast Watson was in the off-season.

Skyy isn’t getting Watson’s snaps

Watson only has the 3rd most snaps, because Hardman's been out, JJSS missed some time, and Toney got injured. Watson had 108 snaps through the first 8 games of the season. That's 14 snaps a game. Hardman got hurt and for some reason Watson started playing a ton and still did jack shit.

"Best sneaky acquisition" lmao, stfu.

ToxSocks 01-11-2023 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 16728764)
MVS + CEH + 5th = Hopkins?

What is everyone's deal with MVS? Sheesh.

chiefzilla1501 01-11-2023 03:42 PM

Still not crazy about either guy. We will be spending $25m - $30m on a slow guy who is more of a possession WR and a fast guy who can’t do much else. I don’t want to hear that we can’t afford a WR1. Pay the money for a WR1. Use the draft to fill in everybody else. I’m good with skyy, Toney, Watson and a relentless focus on finding good WRs in the draft. I like juju but I can’t fathom resigning the guy for big money in a wr room that lacks a wr1.

RunKC 01-11-2023 03:42 PM

I don’t see a problem with Juju getting $15-18 million on a 3 year deal. It benefits both parties.

Year 1-low cap hit
Year 2-medium high cap hit
Year 3-high cap hit/can cut and save money

Chris Jones and Orlando Brown Jr extensions push immediate cap hit money out. The problem is wanting to trade for Brian Burns and blow $30 million a year on him.

DJ's left nut 01-11-2023 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728865)
I'm guessing they tear up his deal and do a new one in 3 or 4 years, right? YOu pretty much have to.

One thing they could probably do is appeal to his competitive nature.

It's not easy to ask a competitive person to give you some of his money to go sign players. But it's pretty easy to prevent that same competitive person from asking you for MORE money if it prevents you from signing players.

In that sense, just having numbers in black ink should work to the Chiefs advantage.

But they have to sate Mahomes in the process. They could give him a raise, yeah. But I think he'd probably be just as content if they tell him "Yeah Pat - we hear you, but we can finish DE1s deal at X dollars and WR2s deal at Y dollars and we kinda need Z dollars to make that happen..."

And because he's a psychopath, the former's probably just as good as the latter to him.

chiefzilla1501 01-11-2023 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 16728868)
Watson only has the 3rd most snaps, because Hardman's been out, JJSS missed some time, and Toney got injured. Watson had 108 snaps through the first 8 games of the season. That's 14 snaps a game. Hardman got hurt and for some reason Watson started playing a ton and still did jack shit.

"Best sneaky acquisition" lmao, stfu.

Yeah, the number of snaps he gets is a knock on a wr room not a compliment to his value. That being said I love the guy on the bottom of the rotation for cheap.

O.city 01-11-2023 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728875)
I don’t see a problem with Juju getting $15-18 million on a 3 year deal. It benefits both parties.

Year 1-low cap hit
Year 2-medium high cap hit
Year 3-high cap hit/can cut and save money

Chris Jones and Orlando Brown Jr extensions push immediate cap hit money out. The problem is wanting to trade for Brian Burns and blow $30 million a year on him.

There are very few people who can do what Brian Burns can do.

There are alot who can do what JJSS can do at a fraction of that cost. But carry on.

Skyy God 01-11-2023 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 16728868)
Watson only has the 3rd most snaps, because Hardman's been out, JJSS missed some time, and Toney got injured. Watson had 108 snaps through the first 8 games of the season. That's 14 snaps a game. Hardman got hurt and for some reason Watson started playing a ton and still did jack shit.

"Best sneaky acquisition" lmao, stfu.

For a WR5, vet minimum guy, he’s been a killer FA acquisition.

21 YPC is nothing to sneeze at.

Skyy God 01-11-2023 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16728880)
One thing they could probably do is appeal to his competitive nature.

It's not easy to ask a competitive person to give you some of his money to go sign players. But it's pretty easy to prevent that same competitive person from asking you for MORE money if it prevents you from signing players.

In that sense, just having numbers in black ink should work to the Chiefs advantage.

But they have to sate Mahomes in the process. They could give him a raise, yeah. But I think he'd probably be just as content if they tell him "Yeah Pat - we hear you, but we can finish DE1s deal at X dollars and WR2s deal at Y dollars and we kinda need Z dollars to make that happen..."

And because he's a psychopath, the former's probably just as good as the latter to him.

Chris Jones’ dad told me before the Titans AFCCG that Mahomes would take less than fair market value so the Chiefs could retain him. Dude asked whether I was a reporter, lol.

No reason to think he doesn’t continue to do so. Pat gonna be the first NFL billionaire.

raybec 4 01-11-2023 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16728897)
Chris Jones’ dad told me before the Titans AFCCG that Mahomes would take less than fair market value so the Chiefs could retain him. Dude asked whether I was a reporter, lol.

No reason to think he doesn’t continue to do so. Pat gonna be the first NFL billionaire.

C'mon man.....that didn't ****ing happen.

Pablo 01-11-2023 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 16728902)
C'mon man.....that didn't ****ing happen.

I don’t Belize it either

RunKC 01-11-2023 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728888)
There are very few people who can do what Brian Burns can do.

There are alot who can do what JJSS can do at a fraction of that cost. But carry on.

We’ve tried to find that guy for awhile but haven’t. Jehu Chesson, Demarcus Robinson, Byron Pringle, Cornell Powell. And now apparently Skyy Moore.

People can point to that, but the data does not prove it right.

chiefzilla1501 01-11-2023 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16728897)
Chris Jones’ dad told me before the Titans AFCCG that Mahomes would take less than fair market value so the Chiefs could retain him. Dude asked whether I was a reporter, lol.

No reason to think he doesn’t continue to do so. Pat gonna be the first NFL billionaire.

First, nobody should expect pat to do this. And good chance it’s wishful thinking. But man that would be a hell of a thing if mahomes decided to do this for us. He has such a unique contract that he can actually do it since each year is loaded with roster bonuses.

It would be mostly unprecedented. But the dude has a chance to build a superpower and keep a few guys he really likes. Would he sacrifice a few million to get him a stud of a weapon? Dude is so competitive and loves his teammates so much I can’t help but wonder if it’s actually in the cards

Skyy God 01-11-2023 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 16728902)
C'mon man.....that didn't ****ing happen.

It absolutely happened. I was off by one slot on where Jones was drafted and he corrected me. Was within $1-2M of his son’s guaranteed contract number.

He and Jones’ agent were at the Lot J tailgate. Quality spread, good party.

Skyy God 01-11-2023 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16728909)
First, nobody should expect pat to do this. And good chance it’s wishful thinking. But man that would be a hell of a thing if mahomes decided to do this for us. He has such a unique contract that he can actually do it since each year is loaded with roster bonuses.

It would be mostly unprecedented. But the dude has a chance to build a superpower and keep a few guys he really likes. Would he sacrifice a few million to get him a stud of a weapon? Dude is so competitive and loves his teammates so much I can’t help but wonder if it’s actually in the cards

TB12 took less, but the Pats tended to not spend up to the cap.

CHunt doesn’t seem to have that problem.

ToxSocks 01-11-2023 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16728910)
It absolutely happened. I was off by one slot on where Jones was drafted and he corrected me. Was within $1-2M of his son’s guaranteed contract number.

He and Jones’ agent were at the Lot J tailgate. Quality spread, good party.

No one Belize you.

chiefzilla1501 01-11-2023 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728908)
We’ve tried to find that guy for awhile but haven’t. Jehu Chesson, Demarcus Robinson, Byron Pringle, Cornell Powell. And now apparently Skyy Moore.

People can point to that, but the data does not prove it right.

I’m mostly with you. I think we’ve proven we’re not very good at finding hidden WR1 gems. But jjss doesn’t solve that. He’s a possession WR with a huge target share on an offense that opens him up for short stuff. We’ve brought in lots of speed guys, but we haven’t tried as much with possession guys.

Skyy God 01-11-2023 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16728914)
No one Belize you.

I get it.

You people are lame AF, so it sounds unBelizeable.

O.city 01-11-2023 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728908)
We’ve tried to find that guy for awhile but haven’t. Jehu Chesson, Demarcus Robinson, Byron Pringle, Cornell Powell. And now apparently Skyy Moore.

People can point to that, but the data does not prove it right.

So because they haven't been able to find one in UDFA and the ass end of hte draft, they need to pay JJSS 18 mil a year to do it?

I mean hell, Pringle had 600 yards and 6 TD's last year. They did find it, the data shows they did.

The data shows Sammy Watkins didn't even do that in his tenure here.

RunKC 01-11-2023 04:06 PM

It’s gonna come down to money. It always does. If Juju can accept a $14-15 million avg contract that has incentives to get to $20 million then I’m game.

Bc if he hits those incentives, it means he’s balling in the playoffs and leading us to a SB like Sammy did in 2019.

O.city 01-11-2023 04:08 PM

You don't find "hidden gems' late in the draft very often. Its mostly luck.

If you want a legitimate WR or a legitimate DE or a legitimate insert position, you are gonna have to draft them early.

We just did that with a WR last year and now we don't want to play him. Seems like the formula for success.

chiefzilla1501 01-11-2023 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16728913)
TB12 took less, but the Pats tended to not spend up to the cap.

CHunt doesn’t seem to have that problem.

Is this actually true? I know he signed market rate deals which is essentially a discount. But did he actually give back money that was in his contract?

RunKC 01-11-2023 04:12 PM

We should definitely pass final judgement on a player based on his rookie season.

Sounds like a good gameplan

O.city 01-11-2023 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16728931)
We should definitely pass final judgement on a player based on his rookie season.

Sounds like a good gameplan

I'm the one that wants to insert him into the offense next year and play. You're the one that wants to sign JJSS to suck up his snaps.

You're right, you shouldn't judge him.

Skyy God 01-11-2023 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 16728922)
So because they haven't been able to find one in UDFA and the ass end of hte draft, they need to pay JJSS 18 mil a year to do it?

I mean hell, Pringle had 600 yards and 6 TD's last year. They did find it, the data shows they did.

The data shows Sammy Watkins didn't even do that in his tenure here.

Pringle had a down year and is a FA.

We could very well bring him back for vet minimum and replace JJSS’ production with him, Skyy, and a draftee.

Lprechaun 01-11-2023 04:14 PM

Deiter today said he practiced it two years ago.

Skyy God 01-11-2023 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16728930)
Is this actually true? I know he signed market rate deals which is essentially a discount. But did he actually give back money that was in his contract?

Brady took team friendly, below market deals.

https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/pat...-through-years

-King- 01-11-2023 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 16728897)
Chris Jones’ dad told me before the Titans AFCCG that Mahomes would take less than fair market value so the Chiefs could retain him. Dude asked whether I was a reporter, lol.

No reason to think he doesn’t continue to do so. Pat gonna be the first NFL billionaire.

Honestly, Pats contract doesn't matter to me. If he wants to be the highest paid ever when his contract comes up, then I'd run to the table to do the deal. If he wants to take a discount, I'd run to the table to do the deal.

It would be cool if he did take less than fair market value, but I don't care if he wants to be paid what he's worth because he's worth every single cent.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.