![]() |
Quote:
Odd how that works out... |
It's the same situation with Thornhill at safety.
You drafted Cook and let him have a year of dipping his toe in. Well, now it's time to insert him at safety next to Reid and roll forward. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I wouldn't extend Gay. I love his energy, and his speed flashes from time to time, but you can't pay everyone and it's one of the more replaceable positions. I don't think we'd miss him some crazy amount. Get Chenal in there and let's roll. Especially after Roquan's new deal - not that Gay gets anywhere near that, but I'm sure it's bumped up the off-ball LB price tag. No thanks.
|
Quote:
But I digress... |
Quote:
I don't think he was meant to be the 3rd safety here for long. |
In short we're gonna be very high in rookie snaps again next year.
|
Quote:
It’s Watson. Justin Watson is doing everything that Skyy fits, which is some of the same things Juju does. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You guys think Skyy is going to be running those deep posts and such?
I don't see it, would be nice though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm hoping they will use Juju in the same manner as Watkins. |
Quote:
If he doesn't get traded, he's probably still here next year. |
Quote:
Watson's fungible as shit, as is the role he plays. If your plan for our 2nd round pick is to have him be that, then you're all but conceding that Moore was a bad pick in the 2nd round. And Moore simply isn't that kind of player anyway. He wasn't in college when he was running 80% of his routes underneath. He's a stick/hitch guy. In college he was EXACTLY what JJSS has been this year and he's given no indication that he should be relied on as MORE than that, if he should be relied on as that at all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Average depth of target is 7 yards, fellas. Among guys with his volume, there are like 3 dudes who are running shorter routes than he is. Ignore this idea that he's a Z receiver here - he isn't. he's being used in an extremely specific capacity and it's exactly the role Moore was used in with success in college. JJSS isn't being used downfield. Moore has never been a downfield receiver either and his toolbox doesn't indicate he should be. The role JuJu is being used in is Moore's natural fit. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's about it, which is a decent slot but those guys are available every year in FA for not much $$$. |
Quote:
Tbh, prob not much of a market of CEH. |
Quote:
As of now, I think the whole WR room other than Toney is easily replaceable. Toney is the only one who has a truly unique skill set and talent/potential. |
Quote:
Quote:
We’re killing teams in the flat and middle intermediate and they can’t stop it. Quote:
Quote:
|
If you can't replace Juju with Skyy in year 2, what exactly did you draft him in the 2nd round for?
|
Quote:
If you listen to the pod in the OP, Veach was a big fan of Watson at the senior bowl. Didn’t get him, so he brought him in last February before FA. Nate himself said it was their best sneaky acquisition that helped them win the division. Watson was signed to a futures deal guys. Expectations were low. They didn’t expect him to be this good. As Nate pointed out, Watson cooked JC Jackson in the 2nd game of the year. He’s done a nice job. Patrick was even surprised with how fast Watson was in the off-season. Skyy isn’t getting Watson’s snaps |
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, Skyy beat alot of north dakota state CB's on the outside, he's not likely doing that in the NFL. So the 2nd round WR we drafted is behind the future's pick FA we signed. That's not the most ideal situation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And if Watson is your goal for him, that's a bad pick in the 4th round, let alone the 2nd. |
Quote:
You don't draft a 5th option in the second round. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So which is it, Run? Was Moore a good pick or should he be replacing Justin Watson next year? Because it can't be both. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think that proves the whole “Andy countering cover 2 with bigger intermediate weapons and McKinnon” theory. But yes I agree that Skyy should have done more this year, but Watson proved his value this year. Beating JC Jackson in week 2 for a TD really upped his value and earned trust from Patrick. Need to see what Skyy does next season though. |
Quote:
We shouldn't be paying that for a wealthier Jarvis Landry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think his agent takes the call from anyone offering less. |
Quote:
JMO |
Quote:
Taking a 1 year deal to better position yourself in the FA market isn't evidence that he'll take a sweetheart deal to stay. It's quite the opposite. |
Quote:
He’s playing it absolutely right with his comments. He should say he loves it here and wants to stay. Badmouthing the Chiefs and Reid hasn’t worked out too well for other guys. Sounds like he made a really good decision last offseason. I hope similar players see that and follow his lead. |
Quote:
|
MVS + CEH + 5th = Hopkins?
|
Quote:
I'm pro JJSS if it's reasonable, but damn. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Tailreceiver? Halfreciever? |
Quote:
The market overadjusted, and you're already seeing actions occur to adjust it back (The AJ Brown trade being one such action) I'm not saying Spotrac is a soothsayer, but I am saying that usually they provide a pretty solid jumping off point. |
Here's the thing though, as much as everyone jumps for joy with the "the cap is rising" stuff, they fail to mention that player salaries do as well.
|
Quote:
It's why I caution folks against using the 'available cap space' approach. Look at where we are relative to the league. And then look at where we are in terms of players under contract for next season. Because the cap going up by 15% means that every agent in the world is gonna start with 2022PlayerX+15% as his opening salvo. Those guys do this for a living - they ain't stupid. If we have $40 million in cap space and there are 20 teams in the league who have more than that (or around that and 5 more players under contract than we do), then we're still not going to be in a position to be major players in the FA market. The only ENORMOUS advantage we have over everyone else when it comes to the rising cap is that our All-Universe Quarterback is under contract for a decade at figures that would be nearly manageable under the present cap figures. The surplus value built into his deal is going to be so absurd as to almost require that we go back to the table with him at some point in the next 3-5 years like we did with Kelce this year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Best sneaky acquisition" lmao, stfu. |
Quote:
|
Still not crazy about either guy. We will be spending $25m - $30m on a slow guy who is more of a possession WR and a fast guy who can’t do much else. I don’t want to hear that we can’t afford a WR1. Pay the money for a WR1. Use the draft to fill in everybody else. I’m good with skyy, Toney, Watson and a relentless focus on finding good WRs in the draft. I like juju but I can’t fathom resigning the guy for big money in a wr room that lacks a wr1.
|
I don’t see a problem with Juju getting $15-18 million on a 3 year deal. It benefits both parties.
Year 1-low cap hit Year 2-medium high cap hit Year 3-high cap hit/can cut and save money Chris Jones and Orlando Brown Jr extensions push immediate cap hit money out. The problem is wanting to trade for Brian Burns and blow $30 million a year on him. |
Quote:
It's not easy to ask a competitive person to give you some of his money to go sign players. But it's pretty easy to prevent that same competitive person from asking you for MORE money if it prevents you from signing players. In that sense, just having numbers in black ink should work to the Chiefs advantage. But they have to sate Mahomes in the process. They could give him a raise, yeah. But I think he'd probably be just as content if they tell him "Yeah Pat - we hear you, but we can finish DE1s deal at X dollars and WR2s deal at Y dollars and we kinda need Z dollars to make that happen..." And because he's a psychopath, the former's probably just as good as the latter to him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There are alot who can do what JJSS can do at a fraction of that cost. But carry on. |
Quote:
21 YPC is nothing to sneeze at. |
Quote:
No reason to think he doesn’t continue to do so. Pat gonna be the first NFL billionaire. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
People can point to that, but the data does not prove it right. |
Quote:
It would be mostly unprecedented. But the dude has a chance to build a superpower and keep a few guys he really likes. Would he sacrifice a few million to get him a stud of a weapon? Dude is so competitive and loves his teammates so much I can’t help but wonder if it’s actually in the cards |
Quote:
He and Jones’ agent were at the Lot J tailgate. Quality spread, good party. |
Quote:
CHunt doesn’t seem to have that problem. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You people are lame AF, so it sounds unBelizeable. |
Quote:
I mean hell, Pringle had 600 yards and 6 TD's last year. They did find it, the data shows they did. The data shows Sammy Watkins didn't even do that in his tenure here. |
It’s gonna come down to money. It always does. If Juju can accept a $14-15 million avg contract that has incentives to get to $20 million then I’m game.
Bc if he hits those incentives, it means he’s balling in the playoffs and leading us to a SB like Sammy did in 2019. |
You don't find "hidden gems' late in the draft very often. Its mostly luck.
If you want a legitimate WR or a legitimate DE or a legitimate insert position, you are gonna have to draft them early. We just did that with a WR last year and now we don't want to play him. Seems like the formula for success. |
Quote:
|
We should definitely pass final judgement on a player based on his rookie season.
Sounds like a good gameplan |
Quote:
You're right, you shouldn't judge him. |
Quote:
We could very well bring him back for vet minimum and replace JJSS’ production with him, Skyy, and a draftee. |
Deiter today said he practiced it two years ago.
|
Quote:
https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/pat...-through-years |
Quote:
It would be cool if he did take less than fair market value, but I don't care if he wants to be paid what he's worth because he's worth every single cent. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.