![]() |
Quote:
The question comes down to what type of guarantees. Sometimes mere injury guarantees get reported at the beginning when in actuality an injury that simply makes the guy less productive wouldn't be enough to trigger them. It may be that year 4 is guaranteed for injury and year 5 has no guarantees and both years have substantial base salaries. In which case it COULD be pretty team friendly. But as presently reported, there's just not many ways to make that a very team friendly deal. In fact, it could be a cap nightmare as early as year 3 if you presume they have a relatively low year 1 hit as most do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I mean let's say they've put a $65 million year 5 base and the year 4 guarantee is partial.
Figure 40% of the guarantees are in signing bonus? So...$70 million signing bonus (14 million/yr pro-rated over 5)? So now you need to guarantee another $110 million over 4 years, right? Plus $70 million in non-guaranteed likely via a big year 5 hit and a little non-guaranteed money in year 4. And year 1 is going to probably be lower. So let's give him a $10 million base in year 1 (2024). Now you need to get another $100 million over the next 3 seasons plus another $10 million in non-guaranteed money presumptively in season 4. 10-25-35-50-65? Plus $14 million/season in pro-rated signing bonus. So cap hits: Year 1: $24 million 2: $39 million 3: $49 million 4: $64 million 5: Who cares? Now it won't be structured like this because that's just not how teams do it anymore. They like that guaranteed option bonus structure that I think has something to do with cash flow. I don't really know why they do it but they typically do. But in either event, how can you really move those numbers around much to hit a $180 million guarantee in the first 4 years and still have it be team friendly? |
Quote:
Voidable years are hinky but understandable when dealing with a player who's probably not going to be around anyway when those void years get there; they'll have aged out. But if you're the Eagles, you don't really want to have yourself in a bargaining position where you're about to take a zillion dollar dead money hit if you can't get a deal re-worked for the QB you want to keep around for another few years. Because man, that's a good way to get cornholed at the table (as Rodgers has done to GB repeatedly; Brees wasn't kind to NOLA either). I just think that's a pretty awful idea. |
Lol Lamar
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="et" dir="ltr">Side-by-side comparison of Jalen Hurts’ deal with the Eagles and the Ravens’ offer to Lamar Jackson last September (per <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AdamSchefter</a>)<br><br>TOTAL VALUE<br>JH: $255M<br>LJ: $250M<br><br>FULL GTD AT SIGNING<br>JH: $110M<br>LJ: $133M<br><br>TOTAL GTD<br>JH: $179.3M<br>LJ: $200M</p>— Sarah Ellison (@sgellison) <a href="https://twitter.com/sgellison/status/1647987432128692228?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Jackson saving Baltimore from themselves last year definitely bums me out...
|
Quote:
|
One good season and he gets that contract?
|
Quote:
Unlike Lamar, hurts has proven to be a leader He’s won big games And maybe I’m wrong but have we seen Lamar improve any aspect of his game? He’s only proven to become more injury prone and his running will regress while not really improving. Hurts has really gotten better as a passer and good chance he’ll continue to. And maybe unfair to say, but it sure felt like Lamar held out of the playoffs so he didn’t hurt his contract negotiation. Considering our guy was screaming to get back on a high ankle sprain I’m sure somebody will take Lamar because he’ll put butts in seats. Would be a fun ride while you get him. But man i wouldn’t put much faith in that team contending. |
Quote:
Made a believer out of me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That rugby play is such bullshit though
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the answer is yes. So in that case, you sign him. It's not going to be easy, but it'll be easier than the alternative. This isn't like the Giants giving Daniel Jones a deal - they are, at BEST, no closer to winning a championship and in all probability further away than they would be by moving on from Jones. The Eagles can make this work - it'll just be harder than it was when he was making 2nd rounder money. |
Quote:
If you're a team that just had an excellent season and looked markedly different with Hurts under center than you did with Minshew, you can't just say "**** it - we either get Mahomes or we just keep churning through QBs on rookie contracts..." Mahomes just isn't a reasonable standard to hold a guy to. Jalen Hurts wins the Super Bowl if literally ANY other human being in the world is playing Quarterback for the Chiefs. So...keep him. |
He's good talent. Just had to try and win against the best last game and lost. Nothing to be ashamed of.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I really don't think there is. And I don't know that there are any QBs who I'd have been reasonably confident would've kept them AS close. Maybe Josh Allen because of the way the threat of the QB run kept us a bit off balance for awhile. Maybe Burrow since he'd have similar offensive weapons to what he has but a better OL? Then again, it was Cincy's defense that really seemed to give us fits in that AFCCG. But whatever the case may be, it's a damn short list that Hurts put himself on with that performance and the season he had leading up to it. That's worth a shiny new QB contract. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why not wait for six to nine months? It's not like he'd ask for more than $50 million if he excels again in 2023. If he plays worse in 2023 they likely still keep him but offer less money. |
Word is that he was going to hold out for more, but his offensive line pushed him to sign.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just saying he will have to be better than he has been with that contract and I don't think he will. |
Quote:
|
Hey Lamar, come over here, no really I want to show you something, see it? Its a contract, you know what that is right? Its pretty good isnt it? Lots of money for a long time, yeah?
YOU COULD HAVE HAD THIS CONTRACT, WHY DID YOU NOT SIGN A CONTRACT, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? IM GONNA SEND YOU SOME UHAULS SO YOU MOVE OUT OF BALTIMORE...EHHHH in my best Kennison voice |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Eagles’ QB Jalen Hurts’ salary-cap numbers for the next four seasons after today’s $255 million extension:<br><br>2023: $6.15 million<br>2024: $13.56 million<br>2025: $21.77 million<br>2026: $31.77 million</p>— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1648101167619100683?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's only 83 million and some change? Where's the rest?
Edit: Nevermind, starts after this year, I guess. |
Those numbers don’t add up but that’s a hell of a deal for roseman. Jalen probably happy since it’s largely injury guaranteed.
I’m guessing in 2027 there’s one guaranteed bonus due. The kind of bonus that would be impossible to pay off in 1-2 years so they probably HAVE to give him a 4-5 year extension. So maybe not that different from mahomes’ contract except way more backloaded. And unlike hurts, mahomes already locked in the end of his contract. Pretty risky for the eagles because a serious injury will stick them with a gigantic bill they can’t get out of. But makes sense that Philly feels their window is now even if it “hurts” later |
I'm looking at it as if we still don't have all the details yet. This guy posted just one facet of the deal, that being the cap hit for the next four years. Probably we'll get the reset of the details they want to disseminate over the next week or so.
that's the other reason why I don't spend much time looking at contracts; they never tell you all the details. |
Quote:
Or they’re guaranteeing a huge bonus in a late year which will force them to restructure. And when they restructure they HAVE to make it an extension because it’s too steep to pay off in 2 years. I bet it’s somewhere in between. |
Quote:
|
The cap is too easily manipulated
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Mahomes deal looks amazing rn
|
Quote:
|
I'll probably see Siriani's Father In-law tomorrow or the next day at the golf course. I'll see what he has to offer on the subject.
|
Herbert is a Philip Rivers clone, don’t need him to get paid.
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">... In 2027, the Eagles can either pay $5M in an option bonus with a $46M base OR $49.655M in an option bonus with a $1.345M base. In 2028, it's either a $10M option bonus with a $41M base, or $49.6M option bonus with a $1.4M base.<br><br>The guarantees are interesting too. 👇</p>— Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) <a href="https://twitter.com/AlbertBreer/status/1650871678056923136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Spoiler!
|
Been a little conversation on the structure over in the draft forum:
https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=348492 |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.