ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   How Many Yards Will Deshaun Foster Rush for Sunday (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=98862)

htismaqe 09-18-2004 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazarus
browning should be a LDE permanently ... but i'll settle for RDE as long as he's on the outside. Browning on 1st and 2nd ... Allen on 3rd down.



i want major beef at Defensive Tackle



Sims and ??? (resign Downing?)

Savaii and dalton
I want Downing back, personally. That would allow us to put Browning outside full-time.

go bo 09-18-2004 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazarus
it would be a double standard if i was doing what i think your implying


i ASSume your talking about a larry johnson/Foster comparison?



i think you have me confuse with someone else again (apparently like the McCardell deal)


my complaint about Johnson is AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN primarily a complaint about picking a RB, when we didn't need a running back.


we should of pick a defensive player


i didn't say Larry johnson was a bust ... i have said that we may have the best group of running backs in the league. I told you that before.


i dont see a double standard here... i see you getting me confused with someone else's comments about larry johnson.

i think lots of people do that same around here

lazarus = negative ... so revisionists history sooner or later everybody remembers that it was me that said whatever negative comment was made.

i've made no decision about larry johnson's talent ... but i have made a decision that the chiefs picking larry johnson was a bad fuggin pick.


being redundant here to try and get my point across... and see if someone can actually remember it.


larry johnson = possible good RB

chiefs using 1st RD pick on a RB in the 2003 draft = crappy


any questions??
eh, what's that sonny? :shrug:

go bo 09-18-2004 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
I really want to see Browning on the outside with Siavii starting next to Sims.

The future is NOW!
junior is one of my favorite players, but i still worry that he's not ready for extended playing time...

he's still pretty raw...

go bo 09-18-2004 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
I want Downing back, personally. That would allow us to put Browning outside full-time.
yeah, i was really surprised that they let downing go...

he apparently had a good tc and preseason...

Gaz 09-18-2004 01:28 PM
Signifying?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazarus
...lazarus = negative ...

The rest of the post was just sound and fury.

xoxo~
Gaz
Saved the important bit.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-18-2004 02:29 PM
If we lose this game, we aren't where we need to be and should be concerned. This team is supposed to be a prime Super Bowl contender and we shouldn't be struggling, especially on defense. We've had 3 years to build, time to start doing something early and often.



Sincerely,

Capn' Obvious

Hammock Parties 09-18-2004 04:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Special Ed
If we lose this game, we aren't where we need to be and should be concerned. This team is supposed to be a prime Super Bowl contender and we shouldn't be struggling, especially on defense. We've had 3 years to build, time to start doing something early and often.



Sincerely,

Capn' Obvious
I just like to watch the Chiefs. :shrug:

Mr. Laz 09-18-2004 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaz
Signifying?
-----------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by lazarus
...lazarus = negative ...
-----------------------------------------------------

The rest of the post was just sound and fury.

xoxo~
Gaz
Saved the important bit.
still seeing what you want to see and just ignoring the rest...





thanks for (re)proving my point

Bowser 09-18-2004 05:11 PM
What's this? A Laz/Gaz pissing contest?

Break out the Tequilla Rose!!!

Logical 09-18-2004 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakesthecat
I'd have rather seen Davis too.
Sure Foster has break away speed but he's running into, what better be, a buzz saw. I'd like to think Gunther and the boys were in particularly pissed off mood this week in practice.
....
ROFLROFLROFLHow many times have we heard this sort of statement. Denver was running into a buzz saw because of the game where Portis kicked our azz and displayed the belt to prove it. Yeah man, Gunther and the boys really kicked em.ROFL

patteeu 09-18-2004 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
I really want to see Browning on the outside with Siavii starting next to Sims.

The future is NOW!
Siavii might have a career game Sunday too, although after getting a sack last week maybe I'm being too optimistic here. ;)

the Talking Can 09-19-2004 01:48 PM
Fostor now has the longest run in Panthers franchise history.

Anyone who thought he wouldn't run wild against us was crazy.

There isn't a RB in the league that couldn't run for 100 yards againsat us. Not one.

teedubya 09-19-2004 01:54 PM
i figured at least 175... looks like I wasnt too far off.

Demonpenz 09-19-2004 04:27 PM
I had him down for 150

NaptownChief 09-19-2004 04:46 PM
I was one of the 5 that nailed it with the 150-200 vote. That was one of the easier questions to ace.

A lot like who is smarter, Carl Peterson or a bag of hammers? Bag of hammers in a blowout.

htismaqe 09-19-2004 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can
Fostor now has the longest run in Panthers franchise history.

Anyone who thought he wouldn't run wild against us was crazy.

There isn't a RB in the league that couldn't run for 100 yards againsat us. Not one.
I had him down for 100-150. I was hoping for more like 85. I expected him to get 5 or so ypc, and a few 10-15 yarders thrown in there. And that's exactly what the defense held him too, until the long run. They were winded. You just can't expect these guys to be on the field that long.

I can't explain enough how HORRIBLE our offense was today.

the Talking Can 09-19-2004 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
I had him down for 100-150. I was hoping for more like 85. I expected him to get 5 or so ypc, and a few 10-15 yarders thrown in there. And that's exactly what the defense held him too, until the long run. They were winded. You just can't expect these guys to be on the field that long.

I can't explain enough how HORRIBLE our offense was today.
so thow out the 70 yard run and criticise the offense...that makes sense

Fostor did what every back does to our sorry defense....set records....other defenses play for 4 quarters, why can't ours?

I'm tired of all the excuses we make for this defense.

ptlyon 09-20-2004 06:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlyon
Cool. I was waiting for this.

165
I only missed by 9. Do I win?

patteeu 09-20-2004 07:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can
so thow out the 70 yard run and criticise the offense...that makes sense

Fostor did what every back does to our sorry defense....set records....other defenses play for 4 quarters, why can't ours?

I'm tired of all the excuses we make for this defense.
I agree with htismaqe on this. Most of the Chiefs' salary cap eggs are in their offensive basket. They should be able to count on that offense to protect the defense a little bit. Foster didn't do anything in the first half. The defense made stops and took the ball away. The offense did little in the first half and didn't return to the field in the second half. They didn't score to give the defense margin for error. They didn't possess the ball to give the defense a breather. And they didn't win the field position battle to give the defense a long field to defend.

The defense certainly has problems, but they were expected. Those problems wouldn't be deal breakers if the offense were doing what it was expected to do.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.