Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5650931)

"The Guy" was me.

Originally Posted by PhilFree (Post 5649545)

He did that? I don't keep track of stuff like that but if that's true then Mecca should be the last person to be calling people names. LOL Really?

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5649545)

Ya, we went back and forth about that one quite a bit last year. Still tries to argue that Long was a bad #1 overall for the Dolphins and that its waaay to early to judge Gholston.

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5647917)

In a different role, yes. An impact in the same manner as a Brooks/Willis/Lewis type linebacker of recent NFL history. He is not a pure rush backer and shouldn't be used as such. It's a waste of his talents. To waste Curry as a simple ROLB would be ignorant at best.

If you people have such a hard on for a rush backer, make sure the Chiefs get George Selvie next year, as he's substantially better than any other ROLB prospect in this draft. Just don't piss away the opportunity to get the best player in the draft (especially at a severe position of need for the Chiefs) in order to draft some huge bust potential because you all have been curled in a fetal position in the corner of in your bedroom since DT died.

And don't even mention Sanchez. Seriously. Regardless of the fact that Cassel hasn't received a long term from the Chiefs, you know he is their guy. Add to that, McD was willing to crash an entire franchise to get the guy. He's also bigger and more athletic than Sanchez, and has proven that he can be a success in this league. He's understudied under one of the best quarterbacks to have ever played the game in Brady, knows the NFL, and throws some of the prettiest passes you'll ever see. And only has a single season of wear and tear. That's a hell of a lot more upside than Sanchez has at this point, particularly considering that Sanchez has happy feet in the pocket and has had minor injury issues already. So just stop with that "I want Sanchez" nonsense. Because that's what it is - nonsense.

And I'm sorry that Curry's internet, YouTube videos haven't provided you with enough "oohs" and "ahhs" for you to draft him with the Chiefs first pick in your mock world. I guess making the correct play time and time again, being in the right place at the right time, being fundamentally sound while being the most athletic linebacker in this draft just isn't good enough for you. I hear that there is some D-II ROLB who knock two helmets off opponents this year and it looks crazy sick on YouTube. Maybe he should be your guy.

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5648531)

Obviuosly you haven't comprehended everything I've posted on the subject. I have no problem taking Curry or Sanchez or any other player who is worth our pick but the arguments against Curry are not very sound IMO so I've refuted them. Got it?

PhilFree:arrow:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5650248)

Because anyone who doesnt agree with your enlightened sittin behind a keybord oppinion is a dips*it right? Long worked out awefully for the fins too?

Curry at OLB in 3-4. Maybe I'm dememted, but here goes... top of my head,

Mayock
Kiper
Chris Carter
Al Wallace
Len Dawson
Pro-Football weekly
Michael Smith tonight on NFL live
Schlareth (sp?)
Many draft profiles

He's faster than Brown, and Maybin and bigger.
7lbs smaller than Orakpo and more durable.

If you watch the film, most plays ran away from him. He has a lot of plays causing incompletions or plays for teammates chasing the QB across the field.

I know you know more than all those guys and they're all idiots, but I'd love to bet you that he is at least 3x the player in his 1st year Gholston was.

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5647831)

EDIT- People also use piss poor highlight videos.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5651112)

No, the arguments aganst Curry have been solid and practical.

All you have done essentially is go "La, la, la, la, la, I can't hear you".

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5651030)

I am really sick and tired of your dumbass.

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5651377)

Not reallly. I've set and watched Curry to form my own opinion. And just like my arguments yours and others are based on opinion and none of us know for sure. Alot of the anti Curry crowd just closes their eyes and recites unwritten draft rules as if they are burned into stone tablets.


PhilFree:arrow:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5651906)

I watched him play many times. And that's how I formed my opinion, thanks. The "unwritten" draft rules just REINFORCE my opinion that he's not worth the #3 pick.

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5651718)

Boo ****ing hoo.

Maybe if you weren't such a hypocritical, dogmatic asswipe you wouldn't get so out of joint.

You criticize Phil about not provide any information and he's been quite objective and rational. You on the other hand continue to spout that Cassel is dog shit and Sanchez is the only guy out there with "franchise QB" potential. I'm waiting for you to explain why you think he's better than Cassel, or is a better prospect than a guy like Aaron Curry for a team like the Chiefs who traded their second round pick for Cassel. I'll be the first guy here to back you if your argument is valid and comprehensible. I just don't think you can do it.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5652216)

You clearly have no clue.

I've never once spouted that Cassel is dogshit.

All I've ever said is that I don't think he's any more proven than Derek Anderson, and I question his arm strength and whether he can succeed without the talent that he had to throw to in NE.

So don't put word in my mouth dipshit.

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5651955)

I don't think it reinforces anything. It's your opinion based on your perceptions. Obviously we don't percieve things the same.


PhilFree:arrow:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5652249)

Eh...maybe it wasn't you. Between you, Rust, Pestilence, Hamas and SBN, it's hard to tell the difference between posts and posters. Are you guys quintuplets or something?

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5652289)

It's my opinion based on my perceptions of watching the games AND NEARLY 30 YEARS OF NFL DRAFT HISTORY.

You can't just throw away historical context. I know you'd love to, but NFL teams don't, whether you want to admit or not.