ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Earl Thomas a longshot to be a Chief (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=317638)

The Franchise 09-25-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13761913)
You've got 4 years of cheap ass QB play.

Lets do this.

And this is why I'm all for it. Not only that....but you can extend Hill so that his cap hits don't get huge until after Watkins is gone. You can extend Thomas so that his cap hits aren't huge until Berry's contract is ready to be voided. Shit can be managed so that we can bring Thomas in and still keep the guys that we want to.

New World Order 09-25-2018 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13761906)
Do it.

Just come on. Please. I need this today. Do it.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FPoliSwP94A" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

oldman 09-25-2018 11:01 AM

I don't think we cut Houston next year. Dee Ford is the one that needs to be replaced. Cutting Houston would mean you extend/franchise Ford and that is a terrible move. I think we need to use O'Daniel more. I agree that Ragland was a stopgap and look for Niemann to take his place before the end of the season.

Strongside 09-25-2018 11:02 AM

Man. There is a LOT of chatter about this in the Twitterverse right now. When that's the case, there's almost ALWAYS something to it.

Hope this ****ing happens.

O.city 09-25-2018 11:03 AM

Ford has been kicking ass this year.

carcosa 09-25-2018 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13761924)
Man. There is a LOT of chatter about this in the Twitterverse right now. When that's the case, there's almost ALWAYS something to it.

Hope this ****ing happens.

I am praying to EVERY god I can think of!!!

The Franchise 09-25-2018 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13761927)
Ford has been kicking ass this year.

Too bad he's ****ing hurt again.

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13761913)
You've got 4 years of cheap ass QB play.

Lets do this.

Yup.

Get it done Veach. Effectively flipping Marcus Peters for Earl Thomas (and whoever that 4th round pick was) looks a lot more palatable.

New World Order 09-25-2018 11:05 AM

We have tons of good players on rookie deals.

Get the deal done, now!

TambaBerry 09-25-2018 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13761924)
Man. There is a LOT of chatter about this in the Twitterverse right now. When that's the case, there's almost ALWAYS something to it.

Hope this ****ing happens.

can you post some links or something?

BigRedChief 09-25-2018 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13761924)
Man. There is a LOT of chatter about this in the Twitterverse right now. When that's the case, there's almost ALWAYS something to it.

Hope this ****ing happens.

Obviously its a position of dire need. But, last I heard it was a 1st rounder for 13 games. 12 in reality because he would need to get up to speed on the play calls? Seems steep to me without any guarantees of playing for us next year.

O.city 09-25-2018 11:07 AM

Yeah, lets see it.

The Franchise 09-25-2018 11:10 AM

Twitter nobodies....but here you go.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sounding like Earl Thomas to the Chiefs....Reports that Thomas landed in Kansas City for physical....</p>&mdash; Darnell (@Dar007) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dar007/status/1044383567206264832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hearing <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> will trade a 2nd and a 3rd for Earl Thomas.</p>&mdash; Judge Reid (@GothamSirens2) <a href="https://twitter.com/GothamSirens2/status/1044627334022791168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RapSheet</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> made a deal with <a href="https://twitter.com/Earl_Thomas?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Earl_Thomas</a>. Chiefs trade their 2nd and 3rd round picks. Chiefs are giving Earl a 4 year 55 million dollar extension. They are expected to restructure <a href="https://twitter.com/JHouston50?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JHouston50</a> contract to make it happen. Will have 3 million in cap space left</p>&mdash; Judge Reid (@GothamSirens2) <a href="https://twitter.com/GothamSirens2/status/1044630232165228544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Franchise 09-25-2018 11:11 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Earl Thomas as the high safety and Eric Berry as the down safety. Oh my. I hope this happens. <a href="https://t.co/EIhpChKwlR">https://t.co/EIhpChKwlR</a></p>&mdash; Geoff Schwartz (@geoffschwartz) <a href="https://twitter.com/geoffschwartz/status/1043875728524226561?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 23, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

BigRedChief 09-25-2018 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TambaBerry (Post 13761937)
can you post some links or something?

Its all speculation. No reputable NFL reporter is posting anything


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RapSheet</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> made a deal with <a href="https://twitter.com/Earl_Thomas?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Earl_Thomas</a>. Chiefs trade their 2nd and 3rd round picks. Chiefs are giving Earl a 4 year 55 million dollar extension. They are expected to restructure <a href="https://twitter.com/JHouston50?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JHouston50</a> contract to make it happen. Will have 3 million in cap space left</p>&mdash; Judge Reid (@GothamSirens2) <a href="https://twitter.com/GothamSirens2/status/1044630232165228544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

carcosa 09-25-2018 11:12 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/Earl_Thomas?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Earl_Thomas</a> Was that you at MCI?!?!?!?!</p>&mdash; Jordan Thaller (@JordanThaller) <a href="https://twitter.com/JordanThaller/status/1044386137446526978?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/kent_swanson?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@kent_swanson</a> there’s people who think they saw earl Thomas at KCI... and a report saying he started following the chiefs and some of their players. Have you heard anything else since Reid’s conference?</p>&mdash; Daulton Baker (@Dbaker_70) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dbaker_70/status/1044408845345452032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Earl Thomas is at KCI. Let&#39;s ****ing go!!!</p>&mdash; IG: THEDONRICARDO (@TheDonRicardo) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheDonRicardo/status/1044369749302489089?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RapSheet</a> Hearing talk that Earl Thomas is now at KC airport. Any truth??</p>&mdash; DONKEY MUSCLE (@mistashoesta) <a href="https://twitter.com/mistashoesta/status/1044423444920582144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

suzzer99 09-25-2018 11:13 AM

Where is ChiefsInsider when you need him?

mnchiefsguy 09-25-2018 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Pest (Post 13761949)
Twitter nobodies....but here you go.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sounding like Earl Thomas to the Chiefs....Reports that Thomas landed in Kansas City for physical....</p>&mdash; Darnell (@Dar007) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dar007/status/1044383567206264832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hearing <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> will trade a 2nd and a 3rd for Earl Thomas.</p>&mdash; Judge Reid (@GothamSirens2) <a href="https://twitter.com/GothamSirens2/status/1044627334022791168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RapSheet</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> made a deal with <a href="https://twitter.com/Earl_Thomas?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Earl_Thomas</a>. Chiefs trade their 2nd and 3rd round picks. Chiefs are giving Earl a 4 year 55 million dollar extension. They are expected to restructure <a href="https://twitter.com/JHouston50?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JHouston50</a> contract to make it happen. Will have 3 million in cap space left</p>&mdash; Judge Reid (@GothamSirens2) <a href="https://twitter.com/GothamSirens2/status/1044630232165228544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Have no idea who this Judge Reid dude is, but I pray to God he is right!

TambaBerry 09-25-2018 11:16 AM

i get that its all nobodies, it just always makes me laugh when people get on twitter and try to act like they know something.

BlackOp 09-25-2018 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Pest (Post 13761801)
Houston is 50/50 to return next season. We have $41 million in cap space BEFORE we cut him next season. If he's gone....then we'll have $55 million. Who are the important players that we need to sign?

Isn't there a way to front load a deal with Thomas? Hypothetically pay him, I dont know, $22 million next year. Take stress off the cap for the remainder of his contract?

It definitely not ideal to have two of the highest paid safeties....but no one saw Berry missing 20 out of 21 games after signing a mega deal. Dorsey saw potential for a scenario like this though.

It's a strange situation...both KCs starting safeties are hurt coupled with Mahomes setting the NFL on fire. Their defense is allowing 500 yards a game...something has to give. Could signing Thomas make Sorensen expendable after this season? Is there a cash savings there? Thomas also provides long-term insurance in case Berry never gets back to 100%.


Dee Ford is injured too often to offer anything long term...and definitely not worth franchise tag money.

O.city 09-25-2018 11:17 AM

I would trade a 2nd and a 3rd in 2020

O.city 09-25-2018 11:17 AM

Wheres that dude that had the Watkins signing?

Sassy Squatch 09-25-2018 11:18 AM

I doubt Earl Thomas was at KCI and nobody nationally knew about it.

TambaBerry 09-25-2018 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13761976)
I doubt Earl Thomas was at KCI and nobody nationally knew about it.

wouldn't the trade be announced pending a physical anyway?

O.city 09-25-2018 11:21 AM

If they've got that many moving parts, they'll wanna keep it quiet. Agree to compensation with Seattle, a new deal with Thomas, probably have to restructure some deals somewhere as well.

Sassy Squatch 09-25-2018 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13761974)
Wheres that dude that had the Watkins signing?

He has nothing about it

O.city 09-25-2018 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13761987)
He has nothing about it

Ask him about it.

carcosa 09-25-2018 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13761976)
I doubt Earl Thomas was at KCI and nobody nationally knew about it.

Ya neber know!!!

Sassy Squatch 09-25-2018 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13761991)
Ask him about it.

RedMamba707

Kiimo 09-25-2018 11:26 AM

Soren Petro, who I usually agree with, was flat out wrong about Earl Thomas.

In no way is a second round pick more valuable than Earl Thomas. First, let's say you draft his equivalent. How long does it take him to get to that level. Second, the Chiefs are dogshit at drafting second round picks.

The window for the Super Bowl got sped the hell up when Mahomes blew up. It's currently "NOW" and for the next three years. Earl Thomas will be good for three years and a contract for him absolutely makes sense.

He's like "you'll regret it when it comes time to sign some of these young players."

Uh, no we won't, Soren. Not if we win a Super Bowl first.

Dayze 09-25-2018 11:27 AM

I'll wait until I hear some concrete info from Nick Athan before I get too excited.

SAUTO 09-25-2018 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kgrund (Post 13761596)
It was not a "below market deal" at the time. I believe, when signed, Thomas was the highest paid Safety in the league.

Berry signed for 5 and 50 when he was drafted

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 11:35 AM

Who knows if this will happen.

But getting excited about it sure is fun!

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 13762001)
Soren Petro, who I usually agree with, was flat out wrong about Earl Thomas.

In no way is a second round pick more valuable than Earl Thomas. First, let's say you draft his equivalent. How long does it take him to get to that level. Second, the Chiefs are dogshit at drafting second round picks.

The window for the Super Bowl got sped the hell up when Mahomes blew up. It's currently "NOW" and for the next three years. Earl Thomas will be good for three years and a contract for him absolutely makes sense.

He's like "you'll regret it when it comes time to sign some of these young players."

Uh, no we won't, Soren. Not if we win a Super Bowl first.


:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

Mecca 09-25-2018 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 13762001)
Soren Petro, who I usually agree with, was flat out wrong about Earl Thomas.

In no way is a second round pick more valuable than Earl Thomas. First, let's say you draft his equivalent. How long does it take him to get to that level. Second, the Chiefs are dogshit at drafting second round picks.

The window for the Super Bowl got sped the hell up when Mahomes blew up. It's currently "NOW" and for the next three years. Earl Thomas will be good for three years and a contract for him absolutely makes sense.

He's like "you'll regret it when it comes time to sign some of these young players."

Uh, no we won't, Soren. Not if we win a Super Bowl first.

There are some people that value draft picks above all else...do you think the Patriots would be better if they had kept Chandler Jones than the guys they drafted with that pick?

Draft picks have value..sometimes the player you can get has more value, it depends on the spot of the team. If you are a horrible rebuilding team, yea picks. Win now teams..players. Green Bay never signs any FA or makes trades look how they are still the Aaron Rodgers show just with a bunch of disappointing draft picks.

Mecca 09-25-2018 11:37 AM

I've come to a realization, this market doesn't truly understand what it means to play for this year with the Chiefs. It's always been "next year" so that's why we are getting takes like the pick has more value.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 13761970)
Isn't there a way to front load a deal with Thomas? Hypothetically pay him, I dont know, $22 million next year. Take stress off the cap for the remainder of his contract?

There's a myriad of ways they could structure the contract. The bottom line is if they want him, they absolutely CAN do it.

BlackOp 09-25-2018 11:39 AM

Veach is an aggressive GM...and not afraid to deal picks to get who he wants. *cough Speaks*

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13761905)
Just don't see it happening with things as they are. Seattle will probably stop being ****ing reeruned and just extend the guy like they should have a while ago.

He doesn't want to be there now. That bridge is likely burnt.

Mecca 09-25-2018 11:42 AM

The Seahawks done ****ed that up, he'd have stayed if they'd have simply said, you did us a solid 4 years ago so now we'll do you one back.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13762027)
I've come to a realization, this market doesn't truly understand what it means to play for this year with the Chiefs. It's always been "next year" so that's why we are getting takes like the pick has more value.

Right.

Plus for everybody saying the NFL isn't like baseball, it's more like baseball than EVER before. With the newer rules and the emphasis on the passing game, more than ever before, the NFL is about individual players at skill positions.

This isn't the same old NFL it's always been. There absolutely is a place in the 2018 NFL for putting your team over the top at the trading deadline.

Beef Supreme 09-25-2018 11:43 AM

Saw him at Hyvee buying rutabaga.

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 11:45 AM

Eric Berry - Earl Thomas -Kendall Fuller - Stud 1st rnd corner.

I'm in.

BigRedChief 09-25-2018 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13762040)
Right.

Plus for everybody saying the NFL isn't like baseball, it's more like baseball than EVER before. With the newer rules and the emphasis on the passing game, more than ever before, the NFL is about individual players at skill positions.

This isn't the same old NFL it's always been. There absolutely is a place in the 2018 NFL for putting your team over the top at the trading deadline.

I get that and agree. But still.....
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13762027)
I've come to a realization, this market doesn't truly understand what it means to play for this year with the Chiefs. It's always been "next year" so that's why we are getting takes like the pick has more value.

I think a first round pick with 5 years of cost control has more value to our defense than 12 games of Thomas. We can get a stud there. If we are talking a 2nd or a 3rd for Thomas. I can get behind that idea.

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13762048)
I think a first round pick with 5 years of cost control has more value to our defense than 12 games of Thomas.

No one is giving up a 1st rnd pick for Earl Thomas. Why did you have to go with two unlikely extremes here?

BlackOp 09-25-2018 11:46 AM

KC's offense is essentially set for the foreseeable future...and they have an entire draft, next year, to spend on defense.

Flip a 2nd (Peters pick) for Thomas..he's a no lose proposition barring injury. Unless the thought of missing out on the next Speaks/K-pass scares you...

Chris Meck 09-25-2018 11:46 AM

so-
you know, I posted earlier that this isn't MLB and a small market team has a tiny window to compete so you absolutely spend all possible capital to make use of that window, it's the NFL and so you have a window as long as you have a franchise QB.

That being said, taking a page from the Royals playbook here-there was a lot of talk last offseason about how the Safety position was 'devalued' and corners were what all the teams were spending the money on, drafting their safeties instead. AND-offensive yardage is way, way up league-wide. Perhaps the NFL was remiss.

IF the problem is not scheme, it would appear that Sutton's scheme as it currently exists is dependent on excellent Safety play. Maybe it'd be worth it to have the hands-down no contest best safety tandem in football.

Mecca 09-25-2018 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13762048)
I get that and agree. But still.....I think a first round pick with 5 years of cost control has more value to our defense than 12 games of Thomas. We can get a stud there. If we are talking a 2nd or a 3rd for Thomas. I can get behind that idea.

Earl Thomas is going to cost more but you don't think he has 4 or 5 years in him? And it's not going to be a high pick, someone should go look at like the last 5 drafts and fine me someone taken between 25-32 that you'd trade Earl Thomas for.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13762048)
I get that and agree. But still.....I think a first round pick with 5 years of cost control has more value to our defense than 12 games of Thomas. We can get a stud there. If we are talking a 2nd or a 3rd for Thomas. I can get behind that idea.

First of all, it won't be a 1st round pick.

And second, he's not signing anywhere if he's not getting a new deal.

This isn't a 12-game rental.

If he's coming here, it's for 3-4 years and large money.

carcosa 09-25-2018 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 13762054)
so-
you know, I posted earlier that this isn't MLB and a small market team has a tiny window to compete so you absolutely spend all possible capital to make use of that window, it's the NFL and so you have a window as long as you have a franchise QB.

That being said, taking a page from the Royals playbook here-there was a lot of talk last offseason about how the Safety position was 'devalued' and corners were what all the teams were spending the money on, drafting their safeties instead. AND-offensive yardage is way, way up league-wide. Perhaps the NFL was remiss.

IF the problem is not scheme, it would appear that Sutton's scheme as it currently exists is dependent on excellent Safety play. Maybe it'd be worth it to have the hands-down no contest best safety tandem in football.

Yes!

mnchiefsguy 09-25-2018 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13762040)
Right.

Plus for everybody saying the NFL isn't like baseball, it's more like baseball than EVER before. With the newer rules and the emphasis on the passing game, more than ever before, the NFL is about individual players at skill positions.

This isn't the same old NFL it's always been. There absolutely is a place in the 2018 NFL for putting your team over the top at the trading deadline.

The talk on Good Morning Football this morning was that the increase in offense has led to an increase in ratings, and the shield is hell bent on protecting qb's and offense as that is the future of the league. Chiefs just need to get this defense to respectable....and Earl Thomas does that instantly.

Get it done Veach!

The Franchise 09-25-2018 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13762069)
First of all, it won't be a 1st round pick.

And second, he's not signing anywhere if he's not getting a new deal.

This isn't a 12-game rental.

If he's coming here, it's for 3-4 years and large money.

This. FFS people.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 13762054)
so-
you know, I posted earlier that this isn't MLB and a small market team has a tiny window to compete so you absolutely spend all possible capital to make use of that window, it's the NFL and so you have a window as long as you have a franchise QB.

That being said, taking a page from the Royals playbook here-there was a lot of talk last offseason about how the Safety position was 'devalued' and corners were what all the teams were spending the money on, drafting their safeties instead. AND-offensive yardage is way, way up league-wide. Perhaps the NFL was remiss.

IF the problem is not scheme, it would appear that Sutton's scheme as it currently exists is dependent on excellent Safety play. Maybe it'd be worth it to have the hands-down no contest best safety tandem in football.

See now you're seeing it. NFL passing and passing TDs are on pace to break every record ever. This just isn't the same old NFL anymore. Times are changing. It's time to get ahead of the curve.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 13762073)
The talk on Good Morning Football this morning was that the increase in offense has led to an increase in ratings, and the shield is hell bent on protecting qb's and offense as that is the future of the league. Chiefs just need to get this defense to respectable....and Earl Thomas does that instantly.

Get it done Veach!

:clap::clap:

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 13762073)
The talk on Good Morning Football this morning was that the increase in offense has led to an increase in ratings, and the shield is hell bent on protecting qb's and offense as that is the future of the league. Chiefs just need to get this defense to respectable....and Earl Thomas does that instantly.

Get it done Veach!

I'd argue that the increase in ratings is not from an increase in offense, but instead a plethora of fresh, new young QB talent. The NFL has been in a QB dry spell for the past few years while the last of the old guard play out their final seasons.

O.city 09-25-2018 11:54 AM

Theres no chance it ends up costing a first. I'd be surprised if it's more than just a single 2nd.

The addition of the contract is gonna lower the price and his age.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 13762080)
I'd argue that the increase in ratings is not from an increase in offense, but instead a plethora of fresh, new young QB talent. The NFL has been in a QB dry spell for the past few years while the last of the old guard play out their final seasons.

It's all of the above. The NFL is changing right before our eyes.

mnchiefsguy 09-25-2018 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 13762080)
I'd argue that the increase in ratings is not from an increase in offense, but instead a plethora of fresh, new young QB talent. The NFL has been in a QB dry spell for the past few years while the last of the old guard play out their final seasons.

I think that argument is basically the same. The new fresh qb's are bringing a helluva lot of offense with them.

Either way, we have the offense and a new young stud QB. Go get Earl Thomas and let's fight for a Super Bowl!

BigRedChief 09-25-2018 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 13762067)
Earl Thomas is going to cost more but you don't think he has 4 or 5 years in him? And it's not going to be a high pick, someone should go look at like the last 5 drafts and fine me someone taken between 25-32 that you'd trade Earl Thomas for.

No, Thomas would be worth more. Just leary of him signing long term.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13762069)
First of all, it won't be a 1st round pick.

And second, he's not signing anywhere if he's not getting a new deal.

This isn't a 12-game rental.

If he's coming here, it's for 3-4 years and large money.

Last I heard from the talking heads on ESPN was that a sign and trade is not possible in the NFL. You have to make the trade and then work out a contract. Just going off what I heard. No idea if thats true or not.


Why would ESPN get something that basic wrong? Are you telling me that Thomas and the Seahawks aren't trading Thomas without a long term deal in place with the new team?

Chris Meck 09-25-2018 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13762077)
See now you're seeing it. NFL passing and passing TDs are on pace to break every record ever. This just isn't the same old NFL anymore. Times are changing. It's time to get ahead of the curve.

I still don't like the scheme. BUT-it is what it is. If you can go get the players to run it this far into the season, your window is open NOW. Do it.

O.city 09-25-2018 11:57 AM

The Seahawks could agree to let the Chiefs and Thomas agent discuss an extension IIRC.

Same with the Bears and Khalil, that was done before they finalized the trade.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13762086)
No, Thomas would be worth more. Just leary of him signing long term.

Last I heard from the talking heads on ESPN was that a sign and trade is not possible in the NFL. You have to make the trade and then work out a contract. Just going off what I heard. No idea if thats true or not.


Why would ESPN get something that basic wrong? Are you telling me that Thomas and the Seahawks aren't trading Thomas without a long term deal in place with the new team?

In the NFL, the Seahawks can workout the terms of a trade, in principle, with the Chiefs and then give the Chiefs permission to negotiate a deal with Thomas in good faith.

Both the Seahawks' compensation (draft picks) and Thomas' (money) can be worked out ahead of time.

ESPN is wrong. Go read the timeline of the Alex Smith deal and you'll see how it is done. Alex Smith was effectively traded before the league season even started.

Mecca 09-25-2018 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13762086)
No, Thomas would be worth more. Just leary of him signing long term.

Last I heard from the talking heads on ESPN was that a sign and trade is not possible in the NFL. You have to make the trade and then work out a contract. Just going off what I heard. No idea if thats true or not.


Why would ESPN get something that basic wrong? Are you telling me that Thomas and the Seahawks aren't trading Thomas without a long term deal in place with the new team?

The Seahawks give you permission to talk to him, you work out the deal, trade occurs he signs the contract when he comes in.

htismaqe 09-25-2018 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 13762087)
I still don't like the scheme. BUT-it is what it is. If you can go get the players to run it this far into the season, your window is open NOW. Do it.

Yeah, the scheme isn't changing this year so it really isn't a discussion worth having anymore.

Getting rid of Sutton is an offseason decision. With the way Mahomes is playing now, we can't wait to do something different.

Try Thomas and change coordinators this spring if it doesn't quite pay off.

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-25-2018 12:02 PM

Adam Teicher
ESPN Staff Writer
Andy Reid wouldn't talk specifically about Seattle's unhappy safety, Earl Thomas, and whether the Chiefs would be interested in trading for him. But he seemed to indicate they're not in that market when he said in talking about trades in general: "I know the rumors are out there but that's not where we're at

The Franchise 09-25-2018 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 13762119)
Adam Teicher
ESPN Staff Writer
Andy Reid wouldn't talk specifically about Seattle's unhappy safety, Earl Thomas, and whether the Chiefs would be interested in trading for him. But he seemed to indicate they're not in that market when he said in talking about trades in general: "I know the rumors are out there but that's not where we're at

That was yesterday. Keep up.

Clyde Frog 09-25-2018 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 13762119)
Adam Teicher
ESPN Staff Writer
Andy Reid wouldn't talk specifically about Seattle's unhappy safety, Earl Thomas, and whether the Chiefs would be interested in trading for him. But he seemed to indicate they're not in that market when he said in talking about trades in general: "I know the rumors are out there but that's not where we're at

He has to say that. We already got nailed (undeservedly so) for tampering, no way he risks it again.

TEX 09-25-2018 12:05 PM

We're a little more than half way to the Breeland thread total...

:popcorn:

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-25-2018 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Pest (Post 13762126)
That was yesterday. Keep up.

I hate megathreads. Who started this sum bitch?

Strongside 09-25-2018 12:07 PM

People also need to realize that, since Maclin, Reid will shoot down any and all talk of the team acquiring new personnel.

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13762086)

Last I heard from the talking heads on ESPN was that a sign and trade is not possible in the NFL. You have to make the trade and then work out a contract. Just going off what I heard. No idea if thats true or not.


Why would ESPN get something that basic wrong? Are you telling me that Thomas and the Seahawks aren't trading Thomas without a long term deal in place with the new team?

Not quite. You would work out the contract with the agent. You couldn't SIGN the contract until the trade was completed. So yes, they would agree to a contract in principle, execute the trade, and then sign the contract.

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 13762119)
Adam Teicher
ESPN Staff Writer
Andy Reid wouldn't talk specifically about Seattle's unhappy safety, Earl Thomas, and whether the Chiefs would be interested in trading for him. But he seemed to indicate they're not in that market when he said in talking about trades in general: "I know the rumors are out there but that's not where we're at

"That's not where we're at"

Wtf does that even mean? Coach speak. It means nothing.

Strongside 09-25-2018 12:11 PM

I did check, and Thomas DID start following the Chiefs on Twitter yesterday. So that part is at least true.

ToxSocks 09-25-2018 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13762154)
I did check, and Thomas DID start following the Chiefs on Twitter yesterday. So that part is at least true.

To my understanding, he follows a lot of teams. Wouldn't be surprised if his agent told him to, to create smoke.

saphojunkie 09-25-2018 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 13762132)
I hate megathreads. Who started this sum bitch?

This isn't a megathread. It's about one specific topic that has a lot of burn. Do you want a thread for literally every quotation or piece of news on a topic?

*****Official First and ten from our own 25 yard line MNF thread*****

*****Official Second and three from the 32 yard line MNF thread*****

*****Official First and ten from the 12 yard line RED ZONE MNF thread******

*****Official Patrick Mahomes twelve yard touchdown to Travis Kelce MNF thread*****


*****Official extra point thread*****

Kiimo 09-25-2018 12:13 PM

NFL: "Safety is a position we no longer care about, therefore Eric Reid not getting signed has seriously nothing to do with his lawsuit, there is no collusion, it's just safety doesn't matter as much."

NFL Games: *breaks passing records every week of the season so far*

Direckshun 09-25-2018 12:14 PM

For a dude that is not keeping up with this thread, can you all summarize where we are at right now?

penguinz 09-25-2018 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 13762154)
I did check, and Thomas DID start following the Chiefs on Twitter yesterday. So that part is at least true.

Stalker?

O.city 09-25-2018 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 13762166)
For a dude that is not keeping up with this thread, can you all summarize where we are at right now?

Imagine your life and what it would be if you never read or even saw this thread.


That's about where we are.

saphojunkie 09-25-2018 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 13762156)
To my understanding, he follows a lot of teams. Wouldn't be surprised if his agent told him to, to create smoke.

For what purpose? either he's getting traded or he isn't, and certainly the agent would know better. He can call any GM directly, I doubt he needs to bury a twitter follow so that the most hardcore of nerd message board fans can create smoke.

I would, however, say that Thomas hears wind of KC being interested and follows them to see if there's any smoke, but I doubt it is to create said smoke.

smoke.


smoke smoke smokey smoke.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.