ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****OFFICIAL 2013 Kansas City Chiefs Training Camp Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274697)

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-07-2013 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865149)
ROFLROFL Brown as a #1 pick? Put down the pipe before you post.

As compared to "Whats My University Again" RT fatty at 1.1???

Get the **** outta' here with that shit.

Tribal Warfare 08-07-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9865156)
Why do you care?


Nice answering a question with a question.

Mav 08-07-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9865147)
I like his playing style and aggression. I like that he's local. He or Austin would have been great pickups for KC.

Okay, I can respect that. Local guy and all, but you understand the backlash that would of come with that? You already have DJ, and now you take BROWN, and at that time, the Albert situation was very much in the air.

Just saying. I like Brown too. Just don't know if I would of gone 1.1

Chris Meck 08-07-2013 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9865141)
Since we clearly drafted for need, yes. And **** you, I'll be here until the site is eradicated.

No, that's not true at all. We absolutely did NOT draft for need, we took the best football player in the draft, in Dorsey/Reid (and really, 50% of the rest of the prognosticators. The other 50% feel is was Joekel) 's view. He is, unfortunately for positional value, a right tackle right now, which is a position that could doubtlessly have been upgraded in a less costly way. So how the **** is that drafting for need?

Seems to me, they had a board and stayed true to it, regardless of need.

So you can hate on that if you want, but history shows that teams that approach the draft in that manner tend to do better over the long haul than teams that reach for need.

-King- 08-07-2013 01:40 PM

Yes we should have drafted the guy that went 2-56 at 1-1. :)
Posted via Mobile Device

the Talking Can 08-07-2013 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9865156)
Why do you care?

There are Chargers fans, Donkey Fans, Jags fans, all over this ****ing board. Im a football fan, im a browns and niners fan, who came here because Alex Smith came here, and I stayed because I like it. Why the **** do you care why I am here?

You have made a shit load of incorrect accusations at me repeatedly. Why do you give a shit why I am here, and what I have to say?

Clearly, to you, everything I say Alex Smith related is, "ALEXZ IZ DA GODZ OF FOOZEBALL." If that is how you perceive someone, or at least if I did, I would just tune that shit out completely.

I am here because I have grown fond of the Chiefs. Truth be told, I have spent way more time this offseason, talking Chiefs football, than I have 49ers football. I like the team make up, I like Alex Smith, generally, I really like most Chiefs fans, and I absolutely can not stand most 49er fans who believe that the team is so ****ing good that they cant lose to anyone, EVER.

It repulses me.

You're here because you're Alex Smith's cock ring....

2800 posts about a backup QB from the 49ers on a Chiefs board..

yikes

DaneMcCloud 08-07-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9865141)
Since we clearly drafted for need, yes. And **** you, I'll be here until the site is eradicated.

LMAO

You and your soulmate, Claynus, are perfect for each other.

He would have taken the #39 player at 1.1 and you would have taken the #56 player at 1.1.

It's a good thing that adoption is the only option for you dipshits.

Mav 08-07-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9865170)
No, that's not true at all. We absolutely did NOT draft for need, we took the best football player in the draft, in Dorsey/Reid (and really, 50% of the rest of the prognosticators. The other 50% feel is was Joekel) 's view. He is, unfortunately for positional value, a right tackle right now, which is a position that could doubtlessly have been upgraded in a less costly way. So how the **** is that drafting for need?

Seems to me, they had a board and stayed true to it, regardless of need.

So you can hate on that if you want, but history shows that teams that approach the draft in that manner tend to do better over the long haul than teams that reach for need.

Yeah, people poke at the 1.1 pick, but didn't 6 olinemen including 2 guards go in the top 10, and with DJ Fluker going at 12 that puts 7 in the top 12. It unfortunately was an unsexy draft.

DaneMcCloud 08-07-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9865147)
I like his playing style and aggression. I like that he's local. He or Austin would have been great pickups for KC.

LMAO

How many K-State games did you watch in Albuquerque this past year?

LMAO

****ing moron.

Mav 08-07-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9865175)
You're here because you're Alex Smith's cock ring....

2800 posts about a backup QB from the 49ers on a Chiefs board..

yikes

Yes and you spent all of your 46 thousand posts being a worthless wind bag. So whats your point? And, clearly, you too are reeruned and stupid.

I have spent equal time talking about all facets of the Chiefs.

And to just shut you up further. I have spent far more time PIMPING TYLER BRAY, THE FUTURE OF THE CHIEFS, than I have Alex Smith. Go eat some more mcdonalds you fat slob.

When was the last time you were able to see you cock you jabba the hut looking **** tard......off my nuts.

Chris Meck 08-07-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9865158)
As compared to "Whats My University Again" RT fatty at 1.1???

Get the **** outta' here with that shit.

man, you just throw shit at the wall. You're like a little kid.

Halfcan 08-07-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9865147)
I like his playing style and aggression. I like that he's local. He or Austin would have been great pickups for KC.

Austin would have be perfect paired up with Mccluster for all the double midget formations Andy loves to run.

A #1 for Austin-ROFL

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-07-2013 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9865162)
Okay, I can respect that. Local guy and all, but you understand the backlash that would of come with that? You already have DJ, and now you take BROWN, and at that time, the Albert situation was very much in the air.

Just saying. I like Brown too. Just don't know if I would of gone 1.1

There was some debate over whether moving Jordan around would be acceptable in light of DJ, but since we're blindly flinging linemen all over creation, who the **** cares?

The bottom line is that few if any linemen are of the generational talent variety to warrant a high first round pick. A talented LB with a very visible mean streak can work in multiple packages, when you consider how the game has evolved. Talent is talent.

DaneMcCloud 08-07-2013 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9865190)
man, you just throw shit at the wall. You're like a little kid.

Nah, little kids aren't addicted to heroin. Plus, they're generally smarter than this rube.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-07-2013 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865192)
Austin would have be perfect paired up with Mccluster for all the double midget formations Andy loves to run.

A #1 for Austin-ROFL

Or, we could shit-can the more useless midget. So there's that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.