Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12372894)

You know what the **** I mean by that. This place is like 10% football discussion at best. You're here for friends and jokes and that's fine, but I'm here to talk football, and you're a clueless moron with nothing to offer in football discussion. So GET OFF MY NUTS.

Originally Posted by Shekelsteinberg (Post 12372906)

How would you rate the current WR corps compared to the WR corps from two seasons ago?

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12372903)

May I get on your nuts?

Or do I need to ask SNR's permission first? Because I'm pretty sure that in CP Prison parlance, you're already his missus.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12372908)

So wait, you guys think that the same guy that is being a hard ass about dishing out cash to the ultimate leader and cancer survivor in Berry, just paid a brokedick Hali that will no longer be effective on Sunday's?

I highly doubt Reid told Teicher that Tamba's knees are done. Does that even make ****ing sense?

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12372897)

It won't have any bearing on his roster status. If he were cut, all those LBTE incentives would fall off anyway. So this doesn't do anything to grease the skids on cutting him.

Originally Posted by Shekelsteinberg (Post 12372906)

How would you rate the current WR corps compared to the WR corps from two seasons ago?

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12372897)

They never should've been called LTBE anyway.

They're mostly 'per game' incentives as well as catch/yards incentives, IIRC. How they're classified is based on how the player played the year before.

Well Streater hardly played the year before and the NFL isn't supposed to consider why in that calculus. He only played 1 game so by the general rule, only 1 game worth of game incentives should've been considered LBTE. And as he had 1 catch for 8 yards, none of the catch/yard incentives should've been considered LBTE.

To me this is just righting a wrong, not actually changing much. I mentioned it the first time I noticed his cap figure; it never made sense for those to be called likely to be earned based on any rule I could find.

It won't have any bearing on his roster status. If he were cut, all those LBTE incentives would fall off anyway. So this doesn't do anything to grease the skids on cutting him.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12372920)

I suppose, but the timing is odd. The Chiefs could have used that cap space earlier in the year to bring in Dwight Freeney or another player.

Why do it now, unless their preparing to announce another extension and plan to use that cap space?

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12372923)

This is why I think it is an indication that he has strengthened his position on this roster.

If he gets cut, then how his contract is structured in terms of LTBE or ULTBE is irrelevant.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12372920)

I suppose, but the timing is odd. The Chiefs could have used that cap space earlier in the year to bring in Dwight Freeney or another player.

Why do it now, unless their preparing to announce another extension and plan to use that cap space?

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12372917)

I think they were in a situation were they didn't have much choice but to pay hali.

Him not being able to practice now, isn't a good sign for the future.

I do wonder if houston were healthy, what they'd have done with halis contract.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12372927)

So why overpay? Why not get him back on a contract closer to Freeney's?

This just doesn't make sense. I'd like to hear the interview because we're just going by Meatloaf's interpretation. I just hear his interpretation of Hali's quote about Ford and it was very overboard/speculative.