How were they trying to overcompensate?

We lost our best rb so they were trying to throw more? And what happened?

psst! we had the same injuries post Cassel.

Don't agree with that statement their brudda...

My trolling is getting better and better.

Thanks LA for the help.

Pioli's ego, the thing that we were all warned about, is the same thing that will prevent him from admitting mistakes.

"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of a small mind."

Actually they reigned him in and played ultra conservative. With Cassell you gotta let him loose a little bit

That's what i'm saying, after the Cassell injury and haleys departure everything changed

Orton had 780 yards in 3 games. 780/3 = 260 per game. 260 X 16 = 4160. I'd say 4500 is a doable thing for Orton.

Haha now Orton its better than brees. This guy is a clown, at least I back my shit up with facts

After Cassel's injury, Palko showed that we had open receivers down the field that Cassel could not find. Only problem was, Palko could not get it to them. Orton can/could. Case closed.

Yes, because you're only actually committed to that franchise number of 14 for the first year. We owned his rights for the next year due to the expiration of the CBA, and after his horrible performance, could have lowballed him or let him walk.

We owned his rights for two years at 14 million + and undetermined amount. There's no need to give him $60, or $28 for that matter.

You ****ed up thats not what you were saying.

Nothing changed after Haleys departure in terms of playcalling.

ya let's forget that Charles will be back and defenses will have extra time to prepare for him. Wtf is a matter with you people?

Wouldn't Charles coming back put more guys up in the box and make it easier to throw?

that's exactly what I said.