ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Bucs abused the defense... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303875)

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12567605)
We were losing at that point. How did that cost us the game?

If they stop them with a 3 and out, we get the ball back with well over 2 min to play and the 2 min warning. Most likely with the ball around our 30 and needing only a FG.

That's how.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567617)
If they stop them with a 3 and out, we get the ball back with well over 2 min to play and the 2 min warning. Most likely with the ball around our 30 and needing only a FG.

That's how.

LMAO you are assuming the offense is going to score.

ROFLROFLROFLROFL

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 12567607)
Same. I think that would have been the final score.


And it could have been had we got a 3 and out at the end.

The Bucs ran over 20+ plays more than the Chiefs did. That says as much about the defense as it does our offense.

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12567622)
LMAO you are assuming the offense is going to score.

ROFLROFLROFLROFL

Did you actually watch the game? What did you see that would make you think we wouldn't have gotten a FG? It's almost like you didn't watch the game.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 06:48 PM

And santos was hurt.

So you are REALLY assuming the offense scored a td.

ROFLROFLROFL

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12567627)
And santos was hurt.

So you are REALLY assuming the offense scored a td.

ROFLROFLROFL

So now you are stipulating we would have had to have a TD? Keep moving the goal posts, no pun intended. You just said we could have kicked a FG instead of the INT? Make up your mind, was the FG kicker hurt or not? Or is he only hurt in my scenario but fine in yours? Which is it? You're all over the place.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567625)
Did you actually watch the game? What did you see that would make you think we wouldn't have gotten a FG? It's almost like you didn't watch the game.

Santos being hurt, drives where we didn't score earlier in the game.

It's almost like you've never watched our offense

SAUTO 11-20-2016 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567629)
So now you are stipulating we would have had to have a TD? Keep moving the goal posts, no pun intended.

Who was gonna kick it? Santos had an ankle injury.

They bypassed a 54 yard fg earlier.

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12567630)
Santos being hurt, drives where we didn't score earlier in the game.

It's almost like you've never watched our offense

So then we couldn't have kicked a FG instead of the INT like you claimed?

Yeah, go argue with yourself some more cause you are making 0 sense.

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12567634)
Who was gonna kick it? Santos had an ankle injury.

They bypassed a 54 yard fg earlier.

The same guy who was going to kick the FG you keep crying we could have won the game with on the INT!!

They passed on the 54 because of the wind. Just like TB did going to same way one drive later.

WOW!

SAUTO 11-20-2016 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567629)
So now you are stipulating we would have had to have a TD? Keep moving the goal posts, no pun intended. You just said we could have kicked a FG instead of the INT? Make up your mind, was the FG kicker hurt or not? Or is he only hurt in my scenario but fine in yours? Which is it? You're all over the place.

When did Santos get hurt? On the kick off after our last td is when they talked about it.

So yes he could have been healthy st one point in the game and injured at another point

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12567645)
When did Santos get hurt? On the kick off after our last td is when they talked about it.

So yes he could have been healthy st one point in the game and injured at another point


And you're assuming he wasn't going to be able to kick. Did they say he was out? If they did then I will say my bad. If they didn't then STFU.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567641)
The same guy who was going to kick the FG you keep crying we could have won the game with on the INT!!

They passed on the 54 because of the wind. Just like TB did going to same way one drive later.

WOW!

once again he got hurt after the int.

SAUTO 11-20-2016 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 12567647)
And you're assuming he wasn't going to be able to kick. Did they say he was out? If they did then I will say my bad. If they didn't then STFU.

No but kicking a fg with an injured kicker in conditions where they bypassed a 54 yarder with that same kicker healthy says the odds are against them getting one in the last two minutes.


Think about it

petegz28 11-20-2016 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12567652)
No but kicking a fg with an injured kicker in conditions where they bypassed a 54 yarder with that same kicker healthy says the odds are against them getting one in the last two minutes.


Think about it

Did they say he couldn't kick? Quit making all these assumptions about it was going to have to be a 54 yard kick. For the 2nd time, they bypassed the 54 yard kick because of the wind in the 3rd Q. Which is why TB didn't try the same kick in the 4th Q.

JFC


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.