ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****OFFICIAL 2013 Kansas City Chiefs Training Camp Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274697)

DaneMcCloud 07-30-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846835)
He plays for the ****ing Detroit Lions.

The only winning season they have had in 12 years is because of one reason: MATTHEW ****ING STAFFORD

The fact this is lost on you calls into question your intelligence.

That's your excuse?

LMAO

****ing A, you're full of shit. Do you know that?

Hammock Parties 07-30-2013 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9846842)
That's your excuse?

No excuses here, Dane.

Just recognizing a badass QB who can sling the rock a country mile.

-King- 07-30-2013 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846825)
We're talking about the awesome Matt Stafford, and how he alone got the Lions into the playoffs in 2011.

Alex Myth has never done anything remotely as awesome.

Quick question.... how many teams with a winning record did Matt Stafford beat in 2011?

DaneMcCloud 07-30-2013 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846844)
No excuses here, Dane.

Just recognizing a badass QB who can sling the rock a country mile.

Which just further proves that you're completely ****ing clueless

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...-detroit-lions

When news broke Tuesday of Matthew Stafford's reported three-year contract extension, the Around The League crew immediately wondered if the Detroit Lions overpaid for a quarterback who owns a career 1-23 record versus teams with a winning percentage over .500.

Mav 07-30-2013 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9846828)
Give me a break. There's no better way to compare teams than for them to play the same exact team consecutively.

Falcons lose 24-2.

49ers lose 20-17.

Patriots lose 17-14.

One of these things is not like the other.

you forgot the packer game. That was the most impressive job they did. At Lambeau, an unseasonably warm January game, and they DEMOLISHED Aaron Rodgers, and the Packers.

Hammock Parties 07-30-2013 10:49 PM

Alex Smith would be 0-24 if he was in Detroit.

Mav 07-30-2013 10:51 PM

I love how people can mention Matt Stafford, and not mention that other guy. No worries, he just broke Jerry Rices yardage record. No big deal or anything.

Hammock Parties 07-30-2013 10:52 PM

With Alex Smith, it's possible Megatron could have broken one of John Taylor's records (if he has any).

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-30-2013 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846878)
With Alex Smith, it's possible Megatron could have broken one of John Taylor's records (if he has any).

He had one, back in the day:

http://www.duranduranstore.com/ekmps...bum-8445-p.jpg

Mav 07-30-2013 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846878)
With Alex Smith, it's possible Megatron could have broken one of John Taylor's records (if he has any).

Not the point. The point is you are giving all this credit to Matt Stafford, when its catches like Megatrons catch over 3 cowboys during the 2011 season, that really is the difference maker. Yes, huge arm is a plus, but its in a dome most of the time, and Megatron can literally catch anything.

So it loses some merit. If I recall, even Shaun NOODLE ARM hill completed a hail mary last year at Tennessee to Megatron to send the game to over time. Alex Smiths arm is stronger than HIlls.

it was titus young who caught it. But, point still stands. It was targeted for Calvin, 3 defenders ran right to him, batted it to titus, who caught it and scored.

Hammock Parties 07-30-2013 10:54 PM

I can't wait for my debut album

Chiefs Are Good
and Other Lies

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-30-2013 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846884)
I can't wait for my debut album

Chiefs Are Good
and Other Lies

ROFL

Mav 07-30-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846884)
I can't wait for my debut album

Chiefs Are Good
and Other Lies

Lol. Sighs. Its gonna be a depressing year for you my friend

Tribal Warfare 07-30-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846875)
Alex Smith would be 0-24 if he was in Detroit.

you think he'd survive 24 games behind the Detroit OL. I'd give him 9 then a bodybag as a parting gift.

Mav 07-30-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9846890)
you think he'd survive 24 games behind the Detroit OL. I'd give him 9 then a bodybag as a parting gift.

you would give him 9? Id of given him about 3.......

-King- 07-30-2013 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9846890)
you think he'd survive 24 games behind the Detroit OL. I'd give him 9 then a bodybag as a parting gift.

The Lions don't have a bad offensive line.

Mav 07-30-2013 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9846897)
The Lions don't have a bad offensive line.

Its getting better. In 2011 though, it was absolutely AWFUL.....

-King- 07-30-2013 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9846901)
Its getting better. In 2011 though, it was absolutely AWFUL.....

In what way? They allowed 29 sacks in 700+ pass attempts last year. 36 sacks in 660+ attempts in 2011. And Matt Stafford is average AT BEST at pocket presence. A lot of those sacks are on him.

Mav 07-30-2013 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9846904)
In what way? They allowed 29 sacks in 700+ pass attempts last year. 36 sacks in 660+ attempts in 2011. And Matt Stafford is average AT BEST at pocket presence. A lot of those sacks are on him.

Whew, being up here in Wisconsin, im shocked by that. There was constant pressure on Stafford. And, if we are talking oline, it has more to do with pass blocking, it was also an awful run blocking oline as well.

But no biggie. Don't wanna argue. I didn't realize they gave up that few sacks though. maybe it was better than I thought.

DaneMcCloud 07-30-2013 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9846904)
In what way? They allowed 29 sacks in 700+ pass attempts last year. 36 sacks in 660+ attempts in 2011. And Matt Stafford is average AT BEST at pocket presence. A lot of those sacks are on him.

As are his interceptions. 20/17 in 2012. That's pitiful.

DaneMcCloud 07-30-2013 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9846875)
Alex Smith would be 0-24 if he was in Detroit.

More proof that you talk out of your ass.

Messier 07-31-2013 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9846920)
More proof that you talk out of your ass.

It's all become trolling.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzz.....

Fritz88 07-31-2013 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9846329)
With Davis/McCluster doing special teams we are bound to lead the league in turnovers again.

That's scary.
Posted via Mobile Device

Dayze 07-31-2013 08:05 AM

I wonder what Baldwin is doing. Have we heard much about him so far?

Hammock Parties 07-31-2013 08:08 AM

PREPARE FOR THE GREAT DEXTER MCCHUCKSTER

http://chiefconcerns.com/dexter-mccl...s-time-is-now/

Quote:

Reid’s core West Coast scheme requires receivers be able to run precise routes, get immediate separation in traffic and make plays after short/intermediate range catches. McCluster epitomizes those skills. He’s ultra-quick, fast, explosive and – above all - determined. It’s no surprise that he seems particularly confident in his prospects under Reid:

“Most definitely,” McCluster said when recently asked if this would be a big year for him. “Every year is a big year. I’m coming in with a chip on my shoulder, and I know what I can do and what I am capable of. I think it’s about time for people to know who I am.”

Never underestimate a man who feels he has something to prove. This could be the year McCluster’s fuse is lit – igniting all the gun powder that is tightly packed into his 5-foot-8, 170-pound frame. The detonator rests in the sinister clutches of offensive demolitions expert Andy Reid. Stand back NFL. This is gonna be loud.

mdchiefsfan 07-31-2013 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9847267)
I wonder what Baldwin is doing. Have we heard much about him so far?

From the sounds of it, he's struggling

Ace Gunner 07-31-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9847271)
PREPARE FOR THE GREAT DEXTER MCCHUCKSTER

http://chiefconcerns.com/dexter-mccl...s-time-is-now/

it was a good run mcwendler

-King- 07-31-2013 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 9847314)
From the sounds of it, he's struggling

According to whom? From what I'm reading, he's been alright. He's dropped the same number of passes as everybody else and made plays. He's been neither good nor bad.
Posted via Mobile Device

Messier 07-31-2013 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 9847314)
From the sounds of it, he's struggling

It could also be that even if he did something good, it'll be ignored because of how much of a camp darling he was last year.

Camp reports, especially early on, have to be taken with a grain of salt. Struggling players can have good seasons, and players that look great can do nothing.

Ace Gunner 07-31-2013 08:47 AM

on the other hand, what have y'all heard on Bowe??

aw shit. must be playin his way off the roster.

charles too.

mdchiefsfan 07-31-2013 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9847325)
It could also be that even if he did something good, it'll be ignored because of how much of a camp darling he was last year.

Camp reports, especially early on, have to be taken with a grain of salt. Struggling players can have good seasons, and players that look great can do nothing.

I understand that, but there were a few drops reported, I recall a report saying getting off the line was still an apparent issue, etc. I know to take it light and wait for the finished product, but when a report says that the Chiefs will be actively checking the waiver wire for receivers, it means there is an issue there.

-King- 07-31-2013 08:49 AM

The good, the bad, and the ugly of the first week of TC.

http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2013/7...-good-bad-ugly
Posted via Mobile Device

Ace Gunner 07-31-2013 08:50 AM

mods can you pleez reassign clayton's avitar to Dex's #1 ho. thx

Hammock Parties 07-31-2013 08:53 AM

Might want to wait for him to score a touchdown or, hell, gain a first down in a real game first there, Lil Chiefy.

Ace Gunner 07-31-2013 09:06 AM

no need -- yer a ho :D

ShortRoundChief 07-31-2013 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9847337)
Might want to wait for him to score a touchdown or, hell, gain a first down in a real game first there, Lil Chiefy.

Because he's never done that or because he hasn't done that this year?

Hammock Parties 07-31-2013 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9847352)
Because he's never done that or because he hasn't done that this year?

I really don't remember the last meaningful TD Dexter scored. What was it, 2010?

Pasta Little Brioni 07-31-2013 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9846408)
When you look at the collective we have reason for some hope this season. From the talking heads to the coaches to the players coupled with the fact that we do have some talent on this team it is plain as day as to what our problem was the last 4 years..

Pioli
Haley
Pioli
Romeo
Pioli
Cassel
Pioli
Quinn
Pioli


Tamba broke it down when he said this camp is more physical, more team oriented and smarter

Incompetence is what he saw the last 4 years. Even ****ing Gunther's teams were better than that shit

We had 1 good year in the last 4 and that was when we had an actual coach as an OC who understood how to make chicken salad out of chicken shit but we promptly ran him off

The team was blown out more under Pioli in 4 years than they had in all of their existence combine. Absolutely pathetic. Some of the worst home games in team history. Being taken to the woodshed by the ****ing Bills...wow

Pasta Little Brioni 07-31-2013 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9846711)
Uhh 40 touchdowns 5, 000 yards

727 pass attempts :eek:

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9847337)
Might want to wait for him to score a touchdown or, hell, gain a first down in a real game first there, Lil Chiefy.

LMAO:LOL::clap:

http://www.animated-gifs.eu/transpor...rains/0139.gif

And ON WE ROLL!

ShortRoundChief 07-31-2013 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9847378)

Congratulations, you now have an alliance with Simple Jack.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9847387)
Congratulations, you now have an alliance with Simple Jack.

LMAO YOU shall not stop me...

ShortRoundChief 07-31-2013 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9847357)
I really don't remember the last meaningful TD Dexter scored. What was it, 2010?

I love how the king of statistical manipulation tries to make a qualifier out of what is meaningful.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to argue what should be deemed meaningful by a guy who uses meaningless statistics to try to prove his point on a daily basis.

Hammock Parties 07-31-2013 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9847397)
I love how the king of statistical manipulation tries to make a qualifier out of what is meaningful.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to argue what should be deemed meaningful by a guy who uses meaningless statistics to try to prove his point on a daily basis.

Do you like Dexter or something?

ShortRoundChief 07-31-2013 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9847389)
LMAO YOU shall not stop me...

Your movement is a bowel movement. Sure it looks like it might pick up steam but the only thing pushing it is ass and is followed in a split second by a splash down in a turd pot.

ShortRoundChief 07-31-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9847401)
Do you like Dexter or something?

Not particularly. I think he's overrated but he's nowhere near as bad as some people make him out to be because they wanted someone else with the pick.

I also think it's safe to say that I'm not a big fan of your statistical cherry picking.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-31-2013 09:40 AM

Lil Chiefy is good. You guys just don't like the poster that started it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9847404)
Your movement is a bowel movement. Sure it looks like it might pick up steam but the only thing pushing it is ass and is followed in a split second by a splash down in a turd pot.

By the end of Axl's career, it will embedded in to the living rock....

of Stonehenge.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9847414)
Lil Chiefy is good. You guys just don't like the poster that started it.

Then I guess they don't like SNR....or was it you?

Hammock Parties 07-31-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9847414)
Lil Chiefy is good. You guys just don't like the poster that started it.

It's degrading in a cute way. Subtly effective.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9847411)
Not particularly. I think he's overrated but he's nowhere near as bad as some people make him out to be because they wanted someone else with the pick.

I also think it's safe to say that I'm not a big fan of your statistical cherry picking.

How do you cherry pick a ****ing number?

Mr. Laz 07-31-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 9846282)
#3:
Nick Jacobs ‏@Jacobs71 now

Bray with the deep ball. Poor decision because Greg Castillo had inside position. Copper breaks up the almost INT

I hate this

if the pass is incomplete then it's a poor decision

if the pass is complete then it's a QB trusting his receiver and letting the WR make a play.




our receivers suck

ShortRoundChief 07-31-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9847424)
How do you cherry pick a ****ing number?

I dunno Lil Queefy.

How are 3 apples compared to 3 oranges.

They're both numbers, amirite?

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9847431)
I dunno Lil Queefy.

How are 3 apples compared to 3 oranges.

They're both numbers, amirite?

Clay's stats are the greatest ever posted on this forum. Deal with it.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-31-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9847421)
Then I guess they don't like SNR....or was it you?

:evil:

You are attached to it though.

ShortRoundChief 07-31-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil Queefy (Post 9847435)
Clay's stats are the greatest ever posted on this forum. Deal with it.

Wut?

I had a vision of the girl saying "Leave Brittany alone" screaming that.

He picks through stats at Pro Football Reference with a confirmation bias. He illuminates the ones that, in his mind, prove his point and completely disregards any outside factors, outliers or confounders.

Anyway, good talking to you I've got shit I've got to do.

Marcellus 07-31-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9846870)
Which just further proves that you're completely ****ing clueless

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...-detroit-lions

When news broke Tuesday of Matthew Stafford's reported three-year contract extension, the Around The League crew immediately wondered if the Detroit Lions overpaid for a quarterback who owns a career 1-23 record versus teams with a winning percentage over .500.


Clutch.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-31-2013 10:52 AM

He did have that sweet TD against the Browns..

saphojunkie 07-31-2013 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9846395)
All the reports during camp last year was how much better Romeo ran the camp, etc, etc

I heard Matt Williamson say last year that Romeo's camps were awful. He was at Browns camp with him and said he looked around thinking, "This is really not going to work." From there on, the 810 guys were all dubious about Romeo and their camp reports reflected it.

saphojunkie 07-31-2013 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9847424)
How do you cherry pick a ****ing number?

Read his sig. It's cherry picking. When an opponent scores more than 24 points, Alex Loses! AMIRITE?

Well, actually, that statistic means nothing if Alex Smith's team ALSO scored more than 24 points. If his team loses 48-45, then it would fall under Clay's "Statistical analysis" (see: bullshit), because Smith's team technically lost while the opponent scored over 24 points. But so did his team. So, if the defense had held the opponent to 24 points, he would have won, and Clay's point would be meaningless. Granted, this isn't true for all of these losses or even a majority, but even one contrary example shows the fallacy in relying on statistical propaganda, which is what the sig is.

Still, it's an arbitrary benchmark. He's using statistics to prove points he already believes. That's cherry picking. He would have you believe that the only thing you have to do is to beat Smith is score 24 points, because clearly he was incapable of leading his team to more than four scores in a game. Ever.

They make for great discussion, but it's annoying as **** to have to go and do the research just to disprove a bullshit theory that shouldn't have existed in the first place.

edit: I ****ing love the gifs though. They are far superior to statistics for making an argument.

aturnis 07-31-2013 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9847429)
I hate this

if the pass is incomplete then it's a poor decision

if the pass is complete then it's a QB trusting his receiver and letting the WR make a play.




our receivers suck

It was a poor decision because he wasn't open. That it's all.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9847444)
Wut?

I had a vision of the girl saying "Leave Brittany alone" screaming that.

He picks through stats at Pro Football Reference with a confirmation bias. He illuminates the ones that, in his mind, prove his point and completely disregards any outside factors, outliers or confounders.

Anyway, good talking to you I've got shit I've got to do.

Yep, them ditches ain't gonna' dig themselves.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9847443)
:evil:

You are attached to it though.

I AM the man, what can I say?

The Bad Guy 07-31-2013 11:22 AM

People still read GoChiefs football opinions?

ChiefMojo 07-31-2013 11:23 AM

Yup typical Clay bullsh*t but SHOULD expected on this board. He is the master of the cherry pick info.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-31-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9847647)
Read his sig. It's cherry picking. When an opponent scores more than 24 points, Alex Loses! AMIRITE?

Well, actually, that statistic means nothing if Alex Smith's team ALSO scored more than 24 points. If his team loses 48-45, then it would fall under Clay's "Statistical analysis" (see: bullshit), because Smith's team technically lost while the opponent scored over 24 points. But so did his team. So, if the defense had held the opponent to 24 points, he would have won, and Clay's point would be meaningless. Granted, this isn't true for all of these losses or even a majority, but even one contrary example shows the fallacy in relying on statistical propaganda, which is what the sig is.

Still, it's an arbitrary benchmark. He's using statistics to prove points he already believes. That's cherry picking. He would have you believe that the only thing you have to do is to beat Smith is score 24 points, because clearly he was incapable of leading his team to more than four scores in a game. Ever.

They make for great discussion, but it's annoying as **** to have to go and do the research just to disprove a bullshit theory that shouldn't have existed in the first place.

Sounds like Clay is keeping you on your toes. Good show.

ChiefMojo 07-31-2013 11:24 AM

No it is just annoying!

aturnis 07-31-2013 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9847647)
Read his sig. It's cherry picking. When an opponent scores more than 24 points, Alex Loses! AMIRITE?

Well, actually, that statistic means nothing if Alex Smith's team ALSO scored more than 24 points. If his team loses 48-45, then it would fall under Clay's "Statistical analysis" (see: bullshit), because Smith's team technically lost while the opponent scored over 24 points. But so did his team. So, if the defense had held the opponent to 24 points, he would have won, and Clay's point would be meaningless. Granted, this isn't true for all of these losses or even a majority, but even one contrary example shows the fallacy in relying on statistical propaganda, which is what the sig is.

Still, it's an arbitrary benchmark. He's using statistics to prove points he already believes. That's cherry picking. He would have you believe that the only thing you have to do is to beat Smith is score 24 points, because clearly he was incapable of leading his team to more than four scores in a game. Ever.

They make for great discussion, but it's annoying as **** to have to go and do the research just to disprove a bullshit theory that shouldn't have existed in the first place.

I ****ing love the gifs though. They are far superior to statistics for making an argument.

I disagree with this. I think it is absolutely relevant. It shows that if his defense isn't capable of beating the other team, you can't really on him to beat them. Pretty simple shit.

saphojunkie 07-31-2013 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9847669)
I disagree with this. I think it is absolutely relevant. It shows that if his defense isn't capable of beating the other team, you can't really on him to beat them. Pretty simple shit.

You might be right, but you can't infer that from that statistic.

aturnis 07-31-2013 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9847678)
You might be right, but you can't infer that from that statistic.

I think you are thinking too much in absolutes. Of course it's not THAT easy. It's not a guarantee you win if you show 24pts, but by how much do your odds of winning go up?

-King- 07-31-2013 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9847656)
People still read GoChiefs football opinions?

I don't why people still respond to him. It's clear he's trolling.

lcarus 07-31-2013 06:32 PM

Hey Knile Davis didn't say anything about not ever muffing a kick......

Fat Elvis 07-31-2013 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9847669)
I disagree with this. I think it is absolutely relevant. It shows that if his defense isn't capable of beating the other team, you can't really on him to beat them. Pretty simple shit.

Fuggin' Trent Green. If it weren't for him we could of beat the Colts in the playoffs. Pretty simple shit.

petegz28 07-31-2013 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9848876)
Fuggin' Trent Green. If it weren't for him we could of beat the Colts in the playoffs. Pretty simple shit.

No shit! :LOL:

Marcellus 07-31-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9847669)
I disagree with this. I think it is absolutely relevant. It shows that if his defense isn't capable of beating the other team, you can't really on him to beat them. Pretty simple shit.

So if the defense gives up 38 and Alex scores 35 they lost because of Alex Smith?

Yea its not that simple and you are just looking at it one sided.

Marcellus 07-31-2013 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9848876)
Fuggin' Trent Green. If it weren't for him we could of beat the Colts in the playoffs. Pretty simple shit.

Oh snap! Thats what I mean.

Simple shit LMAO

OnTheWarpath15 07-31-2013 08:17 PM

I've only found two instances of those 27 losses where the offense scored more than 24 points.

In both cases, they scored 27 points.

In those two games, he's a combined 52/85 for 586 yards, 3 TDs and 3 INTs.

Frank Gore had 170 yards from scrimmage in one game, and 158 YFS in the other - which was a game they lost because Smith threw a pick-6 with 3 minutes left in the game to put SF down 14 points.

farmerchief 07-31-2013 08:24 PM

Soybeans are looking better with the recent rains

aturnis 07-31-2013 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9849283)
I've only found two instances of those 27 losses where the offense scored more than 24 points.

In both cases, they scored 27 points.

In those two games, he's a combined 52/85 for 586 yards, 3 TDs and 3 INTs.

Frank Gore had 170 yards from scrimmage in one game, and 158 YFS in the other - which was a game they lost because Smith threw a pick-6 with 3 minutes left in the game to put SF down 14 points.

Oh Snap!

Hammock Parties 07-31-2013 08:28 PM

OnTheWarpath with a slam dunk after I started the fast break.

Hammock Parties 07-31-2013 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9849183)
So if the defense gives up 38 and Alex scores 35 they lost because of Alex Smith?

Yea its not that simple and you are just looking at it one sided.

Alex Smith has participated in eight 30+ point games in his ENTIRE CAREER.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.