ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Knowmo's Homer Thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274917)

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von Dumbass (Post 10125521)
The Broncos defense played pretty well against Indy. The offense kept putting them in bad spots. The Broncos were giving up 7+ yards per play before Von returned, against Indy they only gave up 5 yards per play... just wait until Woodyard comes back too.

Woodyard has played this year you stupid ****ing bastard

Quesadilla Joe 10-26-2013 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10125595)
Woodyard has played this year you stupid ****ing bastard

Not with Von.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-26-2013 07:08 PM

JFC what a tard

CaliforniaChief 10-26-2013 07:19 PM

Shit, I'm scared now. Can you guys imagine how great that Denver defense is going to be when Atwater and Romonowski come back too?

:)

MagicHef 10-26-2013 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 10125111)
Because Indy backed off. Once they started attacking again Denver looked like crap again.

What are you talking about? The 20 total yards the Colts had in the 4th quarter? Or the two touchdowns plus another 80+ yard drive that Hillman fumbled away?

Yeah, the Colts really made us look like crap.

Easy 6 10-26-2013 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10125245)
Plus Poe is going against a slapdick center and Houston is going against a slapdick RT

A buncha ****in slapdicks the lot of'em.

MagicHef 10-26-2013 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10125101)
Chris Clark was quite a slapdick going up against Robert Mathis.

I can't wait until Sutton dials up an overload blitz. Peyton is possibly the most immobile QB in the NFL.

Betcha we tack on at least 10 sacks combined in the two Donks games.

I'll take that bet.

vailpass 10-26-2013 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 10125564)
LMAO You serious? Again your defense was hot garbage without Von and Champ, they come back and it is still hot garbage. Now you think Woodyard coming back will make them a great defense? Seriously just stop. You were wrong on one prediction, I am pretty sure you will be wrong on this one as well. Give it up.

Champ is done. Woodyard matters.

tredadda 10-26-2013 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10125707)
What are you talking about? The 20 total yards the Colts had in the 4th quarter? Or the two touchdowns plus another 80+ yard drive that Hillman fumbled away?

Yeah, the Colts really made us look like crap.

Backed off on defense. Guess I should have been more clear for individuals such as you.

tredadda 10-26-2013 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10125739)
Champ is done. Woodyard matters.

If you think having him back makes you a Top 10 defense, then you go with that belief.

RealSNR 10-26-2013 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10125721)
I'll take that bet.

We already have a bet going.

CaliforniaChief 10-26-2013 07:39 PM

Woodyard is definitely a big part of that defense, not denying that at all. But from my perspective, enver's efense (There's no D in Denver), like KC's offense, hasn't shown anything. And potential/pieces don't mean anything until it comes together.

Hell, remember all the Pro Bowlers we had on defense last year? Now it's clicking. But last year? It never came together. Wrong scheme/approach.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-26-2013 07:43 PM

Are they really trying to argue the donco D isn't awful? Pathetic.

Easy 6 10-26-2013 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 10125816)
Hell, remember all the Pro Bowlers we had on defense last year? Now it's clicking. But last year? It never came together. Wrong scheme/approach.

Absolutely, approach and scheme kept those guys from maximizing their talents, but don't forget the power of belief... deep down, those guys knew that no matter what they did, Cassel, Quinn, Slapdick McGroin or whoever, were going to go out there and lose it for them.

Not to mention that they hated their leaders, but now that they believe in something...

Pasta Little Brioni 10-26-2013 07:48 PM

I said all offseason they were a one man gang on both sides. Now they are forced to concede it...but they sre still shit on D.

RealSNR 10-26-2013 07:49 PM

I want the Donks at full strength when we play them, but I also want to see them go about four games or so without Peyton at QB. Just so we can watch the offense implode and turn even shittier than KC's

vailpass 10-26-2013 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 10125767)
If you think having him back makes you a Top 10 defense, then you go with that belief.

Huh?

vailpass 10-26-2013 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10125866)
I want the Donks at full strength when we play them, but I also want to see them go about four games or so without Peyton at QB. Just so we can watch the offense implode and turn even shittier than KC's

Unpossible.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-26-2013 08:04 PM

Knowmo quit pretending Woodyard is DJ

MagicHef 10-26-2013 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 10125111)
Because Indy backed off. Once they started attacking again Denver looked like crap again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 10125755)
Backed off on defense. Guess I should have been more clear for individuals such as you.

Here's what I was responding to, since you seem to be unaware of what you wrote.

vailpass 10-26-2013 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 10125829)
Are they really trying to argue the donco D isn't awful? Pathetic.

Run D is solid.
Pass D? No.

RealSNR 10-26-2013 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10125930)
Unpossible.

Brock.

Assweiler.

vailpass 10-26-2013 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10125961)
Brock.

Assweiler.

Alice.
Smiff.
:)

MMXcalibur 10-26-2013 08:10 PM

It's pathetic hearing Donk fans cover up their defensive awfulness.

2013 Donks = 2003 Chiefs

tredadda 10-26-2013 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10125945)
Here's what I was responding to, since you seem to be unaware of what you wrote.

I am well aware of what you were responding to. Didn't change the fact Indy backed off.

AussieChiefsFan 10-26-2013 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 10110031)
LMAO

Back in January, I created an account at the Mane called "ThatWasHilarious".

I got banned instantly. LMAO

MagicHef 10-26-2013 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 10125994)
I am well aware of what you were responding to. Didn't change the fact Indy backed off.

"Once they started attacking again Denver looked like crap again."

This is what you said. It makes no sense. Please explain.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10125707)
What are you talking about? The 20 total yards the Colts had in the 4th quarter? Or the two touchdowns plus another 80+ yard drive that Hillman fumbled away?

Yeah, the Colts really made us look like crap.

They did, they forced the turnovers nothing fluky at all

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10125950)
Run D is solid.
Pass D? No.

Could it be that no one needs to run on you so they pass because that's the weakness

Quesadilla Joe 10-26-2013 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCtotheSB (Post 10125987)
It's pathetic hearing Donk fans cover up their defensive awfulness.

2013 Donks = 2003 Chiefs

Excellent point, except for the fact that Denver put up 42 ppg through the first 7 weeks and the 2003 Chiefs only managed to average 29 ppg.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-26-2013 08:35 PM

Chief D wasn't that shitty though at this point. Historic bad Denver d

vailpass 10-26-2013 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10126054)
Could it be that no one needs to run on you so they pass because that's the weakness

I don't know. Just going from what I've seen...

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von Dumbass (Post 10126146)
Excellent point, except for the fact that Denver put up 42 ppg through the first 7 weeks and the 2003 Chiefs only managed to average 29 ppg.

Both had offenses that could move down the field at will but needed opportunistic defenses. You have Von that's it. Woodward is ok. The rest aren't anything special.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10126161)
I don't know. Just going from what I've seen...

From the little I've watched, it's been pass because teams can get big chunks through the air.

vailpass 10-26-2013 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10126195)
From the little I've watched, it's been pass because teams can get big chunks through the air.

That they do...

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10126207)
That they do...

We shall see in the next few weeks. Setting up to be epic battles

AussieChiefsFan 10-26-2013 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10125950)
Run D is solid.
Pass D? No.

The fact that teams are forced to pass more than run against the Broncos could inflate their Run D stats. Just a thought.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 10126391)
The fact that teams are forced to pass more than run against the Broncos could inflate their Run D stats. Just a thought.

Don't tell that to magichef

MagicHef 10-26-2013 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 10126391)
The fact that teams are forced to pass more than run against the Broncos could inflate their Run D stats. Just a thought.

They're second in the league in yards per carry allowed. Fewer attempts wouldn't inflate that.

MagicHef 10-26-2013 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10125815)
We already have a bet going.

...and?

Pasta Little Brioni 10-26-2013 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126522)
They're second in the league in yards per carry allowed. Fewer attempts wouldn't inflate that.

ROFL

AussieChiefsFan 10-26-2013 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126522)
They're second in the league in yards per carry allowed. Fewer attempts wouldn't inflate that.

There's a reason they have a 'minimum' for most stats. A smaller sample size is less accurate.

Chiefs=Champions 10-26-2013 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126522)
They're second in the league in yards per carry allowed. Fewer attempts wouldn't inflate that.

http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/Hahaha_a2221c_724334.gif

AussieChiefsFan 10-26-2013 10:02 PM

5. Robert Griffin III will approach 500 total yards against the Broncos defense this week. Running quarterbacks have given the Broncos fits this year, as Terrelle Pryor and Andrew Luck have had success against them.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200...k_writers_rank

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-26-2013 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 10126679)
5. Robert Griffin III will approach 500 total yards against the Broncos defense this week. Running quarterbacks have given the Broncos fits this year, as Terrelle Pryor and Andrew Luck have had success against them.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200...k_writers_rank

Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 10:07 PM

If the redskins pull the upset Knowmo needs to come get his lashings. But like always he'll hide because he's a bitch

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-26-2013 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10126705)
If the redskins pull the upset Knowmo needs to come get his lashings. But like always he'll hide because he's a bitch

He'll be using Manning's joy juice to salve them with.

MagicHef 10-26-2013 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 10126579)
There's a reason they have a 'minimum' for most stats. A smaller sample size is less accurate.

Ok

Denver has faced 3 more rushing attempts than KC.

They've also given up 229 fewer rushing yards than KC, by the way.

Quesadilla Joe 10-26-2013 10:11 PM

I was here the day after the Colts game and I didn't hide after the Baltimore game I was honoring a bet.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-26-2013 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von Dumbass (Post 10126725)
I was here the day after the Colts game and I didn't hide after the Baltimore game I was honoring a bet.

LMAO

You are the Greatest Troll that evar lived.

AussieChiefsFan 10-26-2013 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126721)
Ok

Denver has faced 3 more rushing attempts than KC.

They've also given up 229 fewer rushing yards than KC, by the way.

I was just responding to you saying that fewer attempts doesn't change anything, it does.

Also, I'm fairly certain that the Eagles game would skew our total rush yards allowed stat.

RunKC 10-26-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126721)
Ok

Denver has faced 3 more rushing attempts than KC.

They've also given up 229 fewer rushing yards than KC, by the way.

LeSean McCoy was torching your D for 4.6 YPC and MJD had 3.6 YPC with a TD, and MJD is not what he once was.

None of them had very many carries either, especially MJD.

If McCoy is getting about 5 YPC on your rush D, I see no reason why Jamaal can't do that as he is just as good as McCoy (actually better).

Also think Alex Smith can rush for first downs on your D if there's trouble. Your D has been just as vulnerable as ours against QB's that can run the ball.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-26-2013 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 10126735)
I was just responding to you saying that fewer attempts doesn't change anything, it does.

Also, I'm fairly certain that the Eagles game would skew our total rush yards allowed stat.

I'm surprised they didn't run Vick more.

MagicHef 10-26-2013 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 10126735)
I was just responding to you saying that fewer attempts doesn't change anything, it does.

Also, I'm fairly certain that the Eagles game would skew our total rush yards allowed stat.

Every game skews the stats. That's the point of an average.

MagicHef 10-26-2013 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10126740)
LeSean McCoy was torching your D for 4.6 YPC and MJD had 3.6 YPC with a TD, and MJD is not what he once was.

None of them had very many carries either, especially MJD.

If McCoy is getting about 5 YPC on your rush D, I see no reason why Jamaal can't do that as he is just as good as McCoy (actually better).

Also think Alex Smith can rush for first downs on your D if there's trouble. Your D has been just as vulnerable as ours against QB's that can run the ball.

Let's discuss what McCoy did against KC.

Coach 10-26-2013 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 10126751)
I'm surprised they didn't run Vick more.

I think they realize seeing how bad Foles and Barkley was, they didn't want to run the risk of getting him injured.

RunKC 10-26-2013 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126780)
Let's discuss what McCoy did against KC.

He bashed us as well, and so did Vick.

The difference is that Moreno couldn't hold McCoy's jock and we all know Manning isn't going to run the football, ever, while Alex Smith is a very good running QB and Charles is the same outstanding talent that McCoy is.

We present a similar style as them with guys who can run very well, where you don't present that against us.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126721)
Ok

Denver has faced 3 more rushing attempts than KC.

They've also given up 229 fewer rushing yards than KC, by the way.

Vick had a 61 yard run and like a 30 yard run, McCoy had a 50 yard run. That skews it.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126780)
Let's discuss what McCoy did against KC.

Yes let's ****ing discuss it. We had 1 day to practice for the game. It was a road game on a Thursday. Had we had a full week I guarantee it would've been different.

stevieray 10-26-2013 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126780)
Let's discuss what McCoy did against KC.

.....lost.

BigMeatballDave 10-26-2013 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126780)
Let's discuss what McCoy did against KC.

Let's discuss what a ****ing moron you are.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 11:03 PM

Let's talk about what we did to Houston, we knocked Foster out of the game and broke four of Tate's ribs. Held Houston to 3.3 ypc. We made Houston's all pro center have one of his worst games ever.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 11:11 PM

Funny little clip from NFL.com

Of course, Peyton Manning did not take a beating on his clutch rating as he certainly deserved it. How about his awareness? He's the one who dialed up a play for his fumble-prone running back near the goal line instead of going to one of his fifty unstoppable receivers. Come on guys, fair is fair.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200...k_writers_rank

BigMeatballDave 10-26-2013 11:12 PM

MagicBoob is miserable cockbag.

We are all quite aware of how good Denver's offense is. We admit it.

This douche won't acknowledge the Chiefs D. He's hung up on rush YPC.

Mother****erJones 10-26-2013 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10126888)
MagicBoob is miserable cockbag.

We are all quite aware of how good Denver's offense is. We admit it.

This douche won't acknowledge the Chiefs D. He's hung up on rush YPC.

Denver douches all have their niche.

MagicHef 10-26-2013 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10126809)
Vick had a 61 yard run and like a 30 yard run, McCoy had a 50 yard run. That skews it.

Take all those huge, embarrassing runs out, and KC is still giving up more rushing yards on fewer carries than Denver.

Bowser 10-26-2013 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126950)
Take all those huge, embarrassing runs out, and KC is still giving up more rushing yards on fewer carries than Denver.

no1curr

We're on a historic pace for QB sacks, and no team has scored more than 16 on us all season. Congrats on having a better run D, I guess. Now learn to cover someone.

RealSNR 10-26-2013 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126950)
Take all those huge, embarrassing runs out, and KC is still giving up more rushing yards on fewer carries than Denver.

The scheme is more naturally inclined to putting pressure on the pass instead of the run. This makes sense when you consider how the defensive linemen are asked to attack, and in all the weird and complex different packages. Sorry, but lining up Allen Bailey over center with Poe, Hali, and Brandon Flowers off the edges may not be the most conducive package to holding the RB to no gain. It might allow 5 or 6 yards.

The point is it's getting the job done in terms of POINTS. That's where it matters. What you're arguing with this YPC bullshit is meaningless.

It's not like our offense is blowing teams out early so they're forced to abandon the run. We've faced some pretty damn good RBs and run-heavy teams, and the damage on the scoreboard has been minimal.

I'll take that over your defense's supposed superior run-stopping ability. We'll see who gives up 39 points to the Colts and who doesn't.

Hint: It's not us.

RealSNR 10-26-2013 11:54 PM

If the run is our defense's weak point, I'm sure Manning will be content to hand it off to Knowmo and Ball far more often than he drops back to pass, right? After all, handing it off negates our strength, which is the pass rush, and it puts up a damn good fight in terms of winning TOP and field position, which is how our offense operates and contributes to the game the best.

Do you think Peyton is ready to do that? He's welcome to try it out. A run-heavy offense certainly appears to be the best way to neutralizing and perhaps even cracking our defense.

RunKC 10-26-2013 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10126950)
Take all those huge, embarrassing runs out, and KC is still giving up more rushing yards on fewer carries than Denver.

Chiefs have given up 769 yards rushing (22nd in the league).

If you take out the 99 yards rushing from Vick, 50 from Fitzpatrick and 56 from Pryor (your QB is not running for any rushing yards), that's 205 yards taken out and it puts us at 564, good for 5th in the NFL.

Yes we got torn up by McCoy, but he had 4.6 YPC against you as well, so it's not like you held him down either.

Difference is, our pass D, pass rush, and overall defense is better than yours, and Knowshon Moreno is not even close to the talent that McCoy is, so I doubt he'll go off on us like McCoy did, whereas we are a top 10 rushing team and Jamaal is the most dangerous RB in the AFC.

RunKC 10-26-2013 11:59 PM

Also funny that we give around 12 PPG on D and the Broncos give up 28 LMAO

Bowser 10-27-2013 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10126969)
Chiefs have given up 769 yards rushing (22nd in the league).

If you take out the 99 yards rushing from Vick, 50 from Fitzpatrick and 56 from Pryor (your QB is not running for any rushing yards), that's 205 yards taken out and it puts us at 564, good for 5th in the NFL.

Yes we got torn up by McCoy, but he had 4.6 YPC against you as well, so it's not like you held him down either.

Difference is, our pass D, pass rush, and overall defense is better than yours, and Knowshon Moreno is not even close to the talent that McCoy is, so I doubt he'll go off on us like McCoy did, whereas we are a top 10 rushing team and Jamaal is the most dangerous RB in the AFC.

http://verastic.com/site/wp-content/...s-Away-Gif.gif

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 12:27 AM

Jax scored 19 IN Denver.

AussieChiefsFan 10-27-2013 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10126972)
Also funny that we give around 12 PPG on D and the Broncos give up 28 LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10126996)
Jax scored 19 IN Denver.

Nice.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10126969)
Chiefs have given up 769 yards rushing (22nd in the league).

If you take out the 99 yards rushing from Vick, 50 from Fitzpatrick and 56 from Pryor (your QB is not running for any rushing yards), that's 205 yards taken out and it puts us at 564, good for 5th in the NFL.

Yes we got torn up by McCoy, but he had 4.6 YPC against you as well, so it's not like you held him down either.

Difference is, our pass D, pass rush, and overall defense is better than yours, and Knowshon Moreno is not even close to the talent that McCoy is, so I doubt he'll go off on us like McCoy did, whereas we are a top 10 rushing team and Jamaal is the most dangerous RB in the AFC.

I love when you guys do this. It makes no sense.

In related news, it turns out that Denver is just susceptible to passes thrown by guys named Romo or Manning. Take those out, and we have a top 5 pass defense.

RunKC 10-27-2013 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127013)
I love when you guys do this. It makes no sense.

In related news, it turns out that Denver is just susceptible to passes thrown by guys named Romo or Manning. Take those out, and we have a top 5 pass defense.

It makes perfect sense. Manning is not a threat that those QB's are with their feet, so why should our rush D be concerned about that when that has been a weakness?

And yes Alex Smith is not Romo or Eli, but my God if Romo can throw 500 on you then I would bet Alex can get 300.

Your pass D is literally that awful.

vailpass 10-27-2013 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127013)
I love when you guys do this. It makes no sense.

In related news, it turns out that Denver is just susceptible to passes thrown by guys named Romo or Manning. Take those out, and we have a top 5 pass defense.

Luck?

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127013)
I love when you guys do this. It makes no sense.

In related news, it turns out that Denver is just susceptible to passes thrown by guys named Romo or Manning. Take those out, and we have a top 5 pass defense.

Lol your own fellow fan just called your bullshit. STFU

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127013)
I love when you guys do this. It makes no sense.

In related news, it turns out that Denver is just susceptible to passes thrown by guys named Romo or Manning. Take those out, and we have a top 5 pass defense.

Henne was lighting you up. STFU

MagicHef 10-27-2013 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10127018)
Luck?

Had 213 yards.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.