ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Frank Clark ****ing sucks (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=325118)

ThaVirus 10-17-2019 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 14535233)
Man if he keeps playing like this and Jones gets back the narrative does a 360

I'd prefer a 180

Imon Yourside 10-17-2019 08:45 PM

Frank Clark SUCKS!!!!!!! Oh wait jury is back out again.

smithandrew051 10-17-2019 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14535247)
Whole defense is playing out of it’s mind.

They were even good on that first drive. They were just slipping with penalties on third down.

ThaVirus 10-17-2019 08:45 PM

I said it in the game thread and I'll say it again here: this version of Frank Clark is fool's gold. Bolles is just that bad.

stonedstooge 10-17-2019 08:46 PM

DOesn't even look like the same player as last week

Tribal Warfare 10-17-2019 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedstooge (Post 14535284)
DOesn't even look like the same player as last week

LOL, maybe he's back on PEDs and painkillers

Hammock Parties 10-17-2019 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14535414)
LOL, maybe he's back on PEDs and painkillers

Maybe you're just a ****ing clueless moron like usual.

Talent doesn't disappear overnight.

He's getting healthy now.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-17-2019 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14535414)
LOL, maybe he's back on PEDs and painkillers

Whatever it takes.

Tribal Warfare 10-17-2019 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14535439)
Maybe you're just a ****ing clueless moron like usual.

Talent doesn't disappear overnight.

He's getting healthy now.


https://www.espn.com/blog/nfcwest/po...-under-carroll

Sassy Squatch 10-17-2019 09:02 PM

Cautiously optimistic.

kcpasco 10-17-2019 09:21 PM

Nice game Frank!!

Hammock Parties 10-17-2019 09:23 PM

clark ready to take erin to bed!!!

https://i.imgur.com/j4X1nHj.jpg

RealSNR 10-17-2019 09:24 PM

Before tonight, he was at rock bottom.

Tonight we know that he can at the very least make Garrett Bolles his bitch.

It's a start...

Pitt Gorilla 10-17-2019 09:24 PM

He played really well.

MahiMike 10-17-2019 09:24 PM

Nice game Frank!

...and D.

RunKC 10-17-2019 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 14535765)
Before tonight, he was at rock bottom.

Tonight we know that he can at the very least make Garrett Bolles his bitch.

It's a start...

I don’t want to hear this shit when posters are sucking off Khalil Mack when he got 5 sacks m this terrible OL in his all pro season.

Graystoke 10-17-2019 09:37 PM

Great game by Clark and the whole Defense.
Let’s hope it has some longevity

PAChiefsGuy 10-17-2019 09:48 PM

He looked great tonight. Hopefully he keeps it up.

Chris Meck 10-17-2019 09:53 PM

It's a good start for the whole defense, and a step in the right direction for Clark.

Hammock Parties 10-17-2019 10:55 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">...Frank finally showing off the brace we&#39;ve all seen underneath the sleeves this year.</p>&mdash; Craig Stout (@barleyhop) <a href="https://twitter.com/barleyhop/status/1185033068668686337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Chiefs=Champions 10-18-2019 05:43 AM

Over reaction planet as usual LMAO

Chris Meck 10-18-2019 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good (Post 14536614)
Over reaction planet as usual LMAO


hmmn.

pretty much everyone says, " Good game. Keep it up."

how's that overreacting?

I mean, yeah, usually, this is super-overreaction planet.

Chiefs=Champions 10-18-2019 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 14536617)
hmmn.

pretty much everyone says, " Good game. Keep it up."

how's that overreacting?

I mean, yeah, usually, this is super-overreaction planet.

Just a page back people were talking about ending Clark's season.

Sure-Oz 10-18-2019 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14536354)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">...Frank finally showing off the brace we&#39;ve all seen underneath the sleeves this year.</p>— Craig Stout (@barleyhop) <a href="https://twitter.com/barleyhop/status/1185033068668686337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So he's playing hurt? Or protection

pugsnotdrugs19 10-18-2019 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 14536638)
So he's playing hurt? Or protection

Probably a bit of both

notorious 10-18-2019 07:35 AM

LMAO

Denver fan has to LOVE the abortion known as Bolles.

kcclone 10-18-2019 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 14536749)
LMAO

Denver fan has to LOVE the abortion known as Bolles.


Wow, that OL was brutal. I was pretty down on ours, but Denver's is beyond repair. They need to blow that team up. Fire everyone and start over.

unlurking 10-18-2019 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcclone (Post 14536753)
Wow, that OL was brutal. I was pretty down on ours, but Denver's is beyond repair. They need to blow that team up. Fire everyone and start over.

Combined with Flacco's flat footedness in the pocket, they were just a disaster.

Hammock Parties 10-18-2019 08:09 AM

HAHAHAHA

FRANK AND CLAY

FRIENDS FOREVER

https://i.imgur.com/azXjrHd.jpg

LET'S ****ING GOOOO

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Naw keep that same ENERGY. ������</p>&mdash; Frank Clark (@TheRealFrankC_) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRealFrankC_/status/1185115144289955840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

pugsnotdrugs19 10-18-2019 08:17 AM

Surely he’s going to have surgery this offseason on the elbow(s).

Marcellus 10-18-2019 08:20 AM

I know Denver isnt good but I don't think any other defense has so thoroughly dismantled them this season. That was just a brutal beat down.

Hammock Parties 10-18-2019 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unlurking (Post 14536761)
Combined with Flacco's flat footedness in the pocket, they were just a disaster.

The Pats have the same issue.

And two backup OTs.

This is a very good sign.

duncan_idaho 10-18-2019 08:41 AM

Let’s talk about that piece of trash Dee Ford again for a little while.

He’s no longer starting for the 49ers and has been on the field for 78/221 snaps in the past four games - 35 percent.

He’s a productive situational pass rusher. And that’s exactly how the 49ers are using him.

Trading him was absolutely the right thing to do. He’s being paid like a 3-down player/star and isn’t close to that.

If last night was a sign of Clark getting healthy/right and back in business, I’m confident Clark ends up having a better overall year and is the better player going forward.

O.city 10-18-2019 08:43 AM

Piece of trash is harsh

duncan_idaho 10-18-2019 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14536914)
Piece of trash is harsh


Not when you normally refer to him as a piece of shit.

Hammock Parties 10-18-2019 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14536902)
Let’s talk about that piece of trash Dee Ford again for a little while.

He’s no longer starting for the 49ers and has been on the field for 78/221 snaps in the past four games - 35 percent.

He’s a productive situational pass rusher. And that’s exactly how the 49ers are using him.

Trading him was absolutely the right thing to do. He’s being paid like a 3-down player/star and isn’t close to that.

If last night was a sign of Clark getting healthy/right and back in business, I’m confident Clark ends up having a better overall year and is the better player going forward.

Veach is shitting tiffany cufflinks this morning!!!

O.city 10-18-2019 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14536922)
Not when you normally refer to him as a piece of shit.

Still salty about his beating MU days?

WhiteWhale 10-18-2019 08:56 AM

As long as I don't have to wait another seven games for him to do it again... but it's a start.

duncan_idaho 10-18-2019 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14536939)
Still salty about his beating MU days?


Nothing to do with it, actually. Everything to do with him being a soft, weak-ass, off-injured player who also is a goddamn idiot as an NFL player.

Dorsey fell in love with him because he was a workout warrior and passed up a bunch of other good defensive players.

RunKC 10-18-2019 09:39 AM

This was before last nights game

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dee Ford<br>-91.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-4 sacks<br>-12 QB hurries<br>-1 QB hit<br>-0 INT<br>-118 snaps<br><br>Frank Clark<br>-56.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-1 sack<br>-13 QB hurries<br>-3 QB hits<br>-1 INT<br>-354 snaps (exactly triple the amount of snaps of Dee Ford’s snaps)<br><br>Source: PFF</p>&mdash; Farzin Vousoughian (@Farzin21) <a href="https://twitter.com/Farzin21/status/1184452396241637378?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The only thing Dee Ford has was more sacks. That was it. And yes Clark has played far more snaps, BUT that means they know Dee Ford sucks vs the run. He isn’t playing on 1st down very often.

Yeah. Hated the compensation to get him, but Frank Clark is still better.

duncan_idaho 10-18-2019 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14537065)
This was before last nights game



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dee Ford<br>-91.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-4 sacks<br>-12 QB hurries<br>-1 QB hit<br>-0 INT<br>-118 snaps<br><br>Frank Clark<br>-56.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-1 sack<br>-13 QB hurries<br>-3 QB hits<br>-1 INT<br>-354 snaps (exactly triple the amount of snaps of Dee Ford’s snaps)<br><br>Source: PFF</p>— Farzin Vousoughian (@Farzin21) <a href="https://twitter.com/Farzin21/status/1184452396241637378?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



The only thing Dee Ford has was more sacks. That was it. And yes Clark has played far more snaps, BUT that means they know Dee Ford sucks vs the run. He isn’t playing on 1st down very often.



Yeah. Hated the compensation to get him, but Frank Clark is still better.


The missing component from PfF grades, IMO, is positional/situational adjustments.

Ford is a situational speed rusher the Niners are protecting by hiding from non-passing situations.

So his grades, by their system, will always look awesome.

Sweet Daddy Hate 10-18-2019 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14536902)
Let’s talk about that piece of trash Dee Ford again for a little while.

He’s no longer starting for the 49ers and has been on the field for 78/221 snaps in the past four games - 35 percent.

He’s a productive situational pass rusher. And that’s exactly how the 49ers are using him.

Trading him was absolutely the right thing to do. He’s being paid like a 3-down player/star and isn’t close to that.

If last night was a sign of Clark getting healthy/right and back in business, I’m confident Clark ends up having a better overall year and is the better player going forward.

Well, yeah...

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 14536948)
As long as I don't have to wait another seven games for him to do it again... but it's a start.

THERE'S the answer I was looking for.

So yeah, establish a pattern please and let's revisit this a few weeks down the road.

Easy 6 10-18-2019 11:33 AM

He certainly earned a reprieve from my ire last night... but if it’s just a flash in the pan, it’ll bubble right back to the surface

TambaBerry 10-18-2019 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14537065)
This was before last nights game

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dee Ford<br>-91.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-4 sacks<br>-12 QB hurries<br>-1 QB hit<br>-0 INT<br>-118 snaps<br><br>Frank Clark<br>-56.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-1 sack<br>-13 QB hurries<br>-3 QB hits<br>-1 INT<br>-354 snaps (exactly triple the amount of snaps of Dee Ford’s snaps)<br><br>Source: PFF</p>&mdash; Farzin Vousoughian (@Farzin21) <a href="https://twitter.com/Farzin21/status/1184452396241637378?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The only thing Dee Ford has was more sacks. That was it. And yes Clark has played far more snaps, BUT that means they know Dee Ford sucks vs the run. He isn’t playing on 1st down very often.

Yeah. Hated the compensation to get him, but Frank Clark is still better.

this is actually pretty telling by pff on how bad they are. there is no way frank clark on any rating system would be that much worse then dee ford

kcclone 10-18-2019 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TambaBerry (Post 14537495)
this is actually pretty telling by pff on how bad they are. there is no way frank clark on any rating system would be that much worse then dee ford

It has to over value the pass rush and not account for setting an edge, which IMO is very important for the defensive end standpoint.

duncan_idaho 10-18-2019 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcclone (Post 14537534)
It has to over value the pass rush and not account for setting an edge, which IMO is very important for the defensive end standpoint.


For edge players, they seem to place a high value on percentage of plays that generated a pass rush.

Obviously, a situational rusher who is playing roughly 1/3 of snaps, on passing downs, is going to have a higher percentage of pressures because they’re not out there for “unpredictable situation” throws.

Pitt Gorilla 10-18-2019 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14537065)
This was before last nights game

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Dee Ford<br>-91.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-4 sacks<br>-12 QB hurries<br>-1 QB hit<br>-0 INT<br>-118 snaps<br><br>Frank Clark<br>-56.1 overall grade<br>-17 pressures<br>-1 sack<br>-13 QB hurries<br>-3 QB hits<br>-1 INT<br>-354 snaps (exactly triple the amount of snaps of Dee Ford’s snaps)<br><br>Source: PFF</p>&mdash; Farzin Vousoughian (@Farzin21) <a href="https://twitter.com/Farzin21/status/1184452396241637378?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The only thing Dee Ford has was more sacks. That was it. And yes Clark has played far more snaps, BUT that means they know Dee Ford sucks vs the run. He isn’t playing on 1st down very often.

Yeah. Hated the compensation to get him, but Frank Clark is still better.

I don't have a subscription, but I'd love to see a lot of grades for the Chiefs after last night's game.

Pitt Gorilla 10-18-2019 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TambaBerry (Post 14537495)
this is actually pretty telling by pff on how bad they are. there is no way frank clark on any rating system would be that much worse then dee ford

Prison Bitch thinks he's one of the worst players in the NFL.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 10-18-2019 12:26 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">By the way, <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRealFrankC_?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TheRealFrankC_</a> , <a href="https://twitter.com/AnthonyHitchens?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AnthonyHitchens</a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/aokafor57?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@aokafor57</a> are the first team trio to EACH record 2+ sacks and a forced fumble in the same game since the Ravens trio of Terrell Suggs, Adalius Thomas, and Peter Boulware back in 2003.<a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ThursdayNightFootball?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ThursdayNightFootball</a> <a href="https://t.co/JgQlkH7WiX">https://t.co/JgQlkH7WiX</a></p>&mdash; NFL Research (@NFLResearch) <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLResearch/status/1185057620337364994?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 18, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RaidersOftheCellar 10-18-2019 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TambaBerry (Post 14537495)
this is actually pretty telling by pff on how bad they are. there is no way frank clark on any rating system would be that much worse then dee ford

Ford's numbers were way better going into last night's game.

But why does Ford have a third of Clark's snaps?

Chargem 10-18-2019 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TambaBerry (Post 14537495)
this is actually pretty telling by pff on how bad they are. there is no way frank clark on any rating system would be that much worse then dee ford

Have you watched and graded every snap of both Dee Ford and Frank Clark this season?

Also, I mean we're in a thread titled "Frank Clark ****ing sucks", seems like PFF's grade is agreeing with a lot of people here?

duncan_idaho 10-18-2019 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 14537706)
Ford's numbers were way better going into last night's game.



But why does Ford have a third of Clark's snaps?


Because he’s a one-trick pony and the niners are using him as such.

Hammock Parties 10-18-2019 01:16 PM

Ford

Quote:

3.5 sacks, 7 tackles, 2 TFL, 3 QB hits, 2 FF, 1 PD
Frank

Quote:

3 sacks, 17 tackles, 5 TFL, 4 QB hits, 2 FF, 1 INT, 1 PD
Veach WINNING

Hammock Parties 10-18-2019 06:13 PM

Frank is about to ****ing EAT.

Got his health and his confidence back.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/vBLvTb1dHY">pic.twitter.com/vBLvTb1dHY</a></p>&mdash; Frank Clark (@TheRealFrankC_) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRealFrankC_/status/1185346419730853889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 19, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

pugsnotdrugs19 10-18-2019 06:27 PM

I’m not sure if he’s got the health back but Hitchens mentioned that the whole night was just about playing with a new mentality... said some vets challenged everyone to put their foot down; enough was enough.

We’ll see..

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 10-18-2019 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14538640)
I’m not sure if he’s got the health back but Hitchens mentioned that the whole night was just about playing with a new mentality... said some vets challenged everyone to put their foot down; enough was enough.

We’ll see..

Vets was definitely words for Tyrann Mathieu

ShowtimeSBMVP 10-25-2019 11:09 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Didn’t spot Frank Clark (neck) out here today. <a href="https://t.co/oMgUyW6Cen">https://t.co/oMgUyW6Cen</a></p>&mdash; Herbie Teope (@HerbieTeope) <a href="https://twitter.com/HerbieTeope/status/1187777471271329792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


3 days of no practice

St. Patty's Fire 10-25-2019 11:11 AM

AND he’s a brokedick

veach with the ultimate because chiefs

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 10-25-2019 11:14 AM

Mahomes practices but not Clark

pugsnotdrugs19 10-25-2019 11:14 AM

If Clark and Jones are out, definitely don’t play Pat.

This one is over...

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 10-25-2019 11:16 AM

Ogbah has been better than Clark anyways

Tribal Warfare 10-25-2019 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by St. Patty's Fire (Post 14551335)
AND he’s a brokedick

veach with the ultimate because chiefs

Give Frank Clark an I.V. of PEDs, he'll be fine

pugsnotdrugs19 10-25-2019 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14551347)
Ogbah has been better than Clark anyways

No he hasn’t.

I’ve watched enough of the game film to definitively say that isn’t true.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-25-2019 11:19 AM

JFC penbrook

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 10-25-2019 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14551352)
No he hasn’t.

I’ve watched enough of the game film to definitively say that isn’t true.

PFF disagrees with you. Clark is a 59.0 while Ogbah is a 71.1

Mecca 10-25-2019 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14537727)
Because he’s a one-trick pony and the niners are using him as such.

But......if that 1 trick is something valuable and you are smart enough to use him for that...

For example if Dee Ford stays healthier playing less snaps and proceeds to put up better numbers in half the snaps that kinda makes the Chiefs look like idiots.

Mecca 10-25-2019 11:22 AM

Veach is that guy that if he goes bargain shopping he does pretty solid. Ward, Ogbah etc etc.

But the minute he has bank to go spend he uses it on things that turn into lemons.

pugsnotdrugs19 10-25-2019 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14551356)
PFF disagrees with you. Clark is a 59.0 while Ogbah is a 71.1

And that only reaffirms to me how useless PFF is because I promise you that I’ve got more invested in knowing how to evaluate a player than whoever is doing that evaluation.

kcclone 10-25-2019 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14551356)
PFF disagrees with you. Clark is a 59.0 while Ogbah is a 71.1


Regardless we’re paying a lot of money for Frank. Too bad he’s hurt and underperforming

KCUnited 10-25-2019 11:28 AM

https://i.imgur.com/EYFvQ68.jpg?1

duncan_idaho 10-25-2019 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14551359)
But......if that 1 trick is something valuable and you are smart enough to use him for that...



For example if Dee Ford stays healthier playing less snaps and proceeds to put up better numbers in half the snaps that kinda makes the Chiefs look like idiots.


But would you pay that 1-trick $17 million a year? Or $18 million on the franchise tag?

I wouldn’t.

Lzen 10-25-2019 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14551415)
But would you pay that 1-trick $17 million a year? Or $18 million on the franchise tag?

I wouldn’t.

Exactly! That would seem rather irresponsible.

HemiEd 10-25-2019 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 14551380)

WTF does that even mean?

KCUnited 10-25-2019 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 14551656)
WTF does that even mean?

Reworked version of the original.

https://i.imgur.com/FXeOjja.jpg?1

-King- 10-25-2019 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14551415)
But would you pay that 1-trick $17 million a year? Or $18 million on the franchise tag?

I wouldn’t.

If the alternative is paying 20 mil a year and giving up a 1st and a 2nd round pick? Yeah I'd franchise him and use that saved money and those picks elsewhere. You can find run stoppers and other players to supplement Ford's weaknesses there. Case in point...what the 49ers are doing.

dlphg9 10-25-2019 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14551415)
But would you pay that 1-trick $17 million a year? Or $18 million on the franchise tag?

I wouldn’t.

If I thought one trick pony could put up 23 hurries, 17 QB knockdowns, 13 sacks and 7 FF over the course if a contract, then id easily pay him 17-18 million a year. Id rather pay 17-18 million for that instead of 20.5 million a year 1st rounder and 2nd rounder for a guy that is probably a slightly lesser pass rusher, not much less, and just a little bit better run defender.

With that being said, I dont think that Dee Ford will have that kind of production again and it surprises the shit out of me that Dee Ford hasn't missed a game. So if I had to pick between these options:

1. Dee Ford long term 5 yr $85.5 mil
2. Dee Ford franchise tag
3. Frank Clark give up 1st 2nd rnd draft pick and 5 yr $104 mil contract. Basically get our 2nd rounder back.
4. Keep Houston on his contract
5. None of the Aabove

This is how I rank my options

4
5
2
3
1

So in my opinion we didnt choose the worst option, but it was the 2nd worst.

And now Frank's out because he some how hurt hus neck, so after Sunday, Clark will have missed more games than Ford this year.

staylor26 10-25-2019 01:38 PM

Lol have to love how everybody on CP has hindsight on their side.

Like anybody could’ve predicted this happening with one of the leagues best and most consistent edge rushers over the last few years.

RunKC 10-25-2019 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14551666)
If the alternative is paying 20 mil a year and giving up a 1st and a 2nd round pick? Yeah I'd franchise him and use that saved money and those picks elsewhere. You can find run stoppers and other players to supplement Ford's weaknesses there. Case in point...what the 49ers are doing.

So we just need to suck and get top 10 picks for the next few years and get good DL like Armstead, Bosa and Buckner?

Sounds easy

BlackHelicopters 10-25-2019 01:55 PM

10 days to rest and this ****er can’t go.

-King- 10-25-2019 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14551720)
So we just need to suck and get top 10 picks for the next few years and get good DL like Armstead, Bosa and Buckner?

Sounds easy

Yeah because the top 10 of the first round is the only round you can acquire good defensive talent. Good post.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.