kccrow |
01-16-2025 04:12 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunerdr
(Post 17912686)
Your one of the posters on this board who I respect highly, you do your homework with the best of them. Do you have any opinions on the Thuneys not getting more help than Morris/Kingsley?
|
Unfortunately, I have not watched All-22 on replay of the games. I can only go off what my eyeballs saw and my brain remembers... In that light, it looked to me like Thuney benefitted more from protection slides, chips, and a shorter/quicker passing attack than the others.
That shorter/quicker passing attack is partially thanks to the return of Brown but Patrick clearly wasn't going through full-read progressions and was getting the ball out quickly on short passes. Getting the ball out quickly was proved by his time to pass and the short pass component was proved by Intended Air Yards per Pass Attempt. In the final two games of the year he had 5.7 IAY/PA, lower than his previous 5 contests and only 4 other games were lower (Weeks 2, 3, 5, and 9). Yards after Catch per Completion was also higher than it had been the prior 5 weeks and higher than all but 5 other games (Weeks 1, 2, 5, 6, and 9), which helps explain some of the success from it.
I will say this, of the games Patrick was pressured 20% or more, we scored 21 or fewer points in 5 of those 7 contests. The only other time we scored 21 or less was against the Chargers when we faced a 17.5% pressure rate, which was near our mean. I'd say it is critical that we limit pressure, whatever that means for the OL. The 28% pressure given up to Cleveland in Thuney's 1st game was our 5th highest of the season. The 9% given up to Houston was our lowest. The 15.4% to Denver was our 5th lowest, and that game looked terrible because our offensive skill positions were atrocious too.
|