ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****OFFICIAL 2013 Kansas City Chiefs Training Camp Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274697)

BossChief 08-07-2013 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave (Post 9865145)
He's 6 years older than Fisher.

The Chiefs are not going to pay him what he wants.

I really like Albert, but you're forgetting about the business aspect.

Hahaha

"the business aspect"

Gimme a ****ing break...they took Fisher because he was their mythical "best player available" and are jettisoning their existing talent to make room for him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9865214)
Not if Reid and Dorsey feel he was the best player.

so, what if a punter is the best player?

Need and positional value needs to figure in, obviously.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865285)
Now I got it- reach for a QB to sit on the bench behind Alex over taking Fish- a Beast that can play this year and be All Pro for years to come.

The Chiefs want to win now and must feel they can. I don't think there is a doubt in their head they can win the SB this year. At least that is what they are portraying. clark is tired of losing and wants to win now.

Hahaha

Funny post

Hammock Parties 08-07-2013 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865323)
As a freakin #1 pick when you have two players just like him? :hmmm:

There is no one on this team like Tavon Austin.

No one.

RealSNR 08-07-2013 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865128)
This has been discused to death-who else were they going to take? And the B A trade was still on the table with the Fins up until the last minute.

When we lead the NFL in rushing this year you will change your tune. Fish will be a Beast!

Ugh.

Stick to talking about Rush on this forum, please.

Halfcan 08-07-2013 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9865326)
Hahaha

"the business aspect"

Gimme a ****ing break...they took Fisher because he was their mythical "best player available" and are jettisoning their existing talent to make room for him.
so, what if a punter is the best player?

Need and positional value needs to figure in, obviously.


Hahaha

Funny post

HUH? Who are they jettisoning?

BossChief 08-07-2013 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9865321)
That's a little overboard, Dude. You can't expect fans of every pro team to know about every college player available in the draft each year.

Most NFL fans I know don't even watch college football.

Then how was my post "a little overboard?"

Anyone that thinks Tavon Austin wouldn't be a MAJOR upgrade over Dexter McCluster needs to take those rose colored glasses off

Talon is a threat to score every single time he touches the ball...Dexter isn't.

Sorter 08-07-2013 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865280)
Dex was used as a FN Fullback many many times last year- running straight up the middle on a stacked D. Is that his fault? He lost a fumble in the Palyoffs when Killer Ray drilled him- so that is a lot of the hate. To say Autin is better is a stretch when they are pretty close to the same player- and on top of that we have Whylie which is already Dex 2.0- so we take a similar player that we already have two of-clogging that same position as #1 over the Best O Line in the draft? :hmmm:

Sweat Daddy is just trowing a bunch of troll shit on the wall trying to get something to stick. Brown #1 ROFL

Congratulations on one of the worst posts I've read.

Jesus.

BigMeatballDave 08-07-2013 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865341)
HUH? Who are they jettisoning?

Albert, eventually.

DaneMcCloud 08-07-2013 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9865342)
Then how was my post "a little overboard?"

Anyone that thinks Tavon Austin wouldn't be a MAJOR upgrade over Dexter McCluster needs to take those rose colored glasses off

Talon is a threat to score every single time he touches the ball...Dexter isn't.

I don't think it's "Rose Colored Glasses", it's that not everyone knows about guys like Tavon Austin.

On the surface, they appear to be similar players and that's what most people see.

FWIW, Halfcan's a good dude. There's no reason to insult him because he doesn't know the diff between Austin and McCluster.

Sorter 08-07-2013 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865285)
Now I got it- reach for a QB to sit on the bench behind Alex over taking Fish- a Beast that can play this year and be All Pro for years to come.

The Chiefs want to win now and must feel they can. I don't think there is a doubt in their head they can win the SB this year. At least that is what they are portraying. clark is tired of losing and wants to win now.

One can make the argument that the 49ers reached on a 2nd round QB to sit behind Alex Smith.


They must be filled with regret.

DaneMcCloud 08-07-2013 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9865346)
Congratulations on one of the worst posts I've read.

Jesus.

Then you haven't seen SDH's post stating that the Chiefs should have taken Arthur Brown at 1.1.

Arthur Brown. 1.1.

Halfcan 08-07-2013 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9865340)
Ugh.

Stick to talking about Rush on this forum, please.

:clap: good advice

Much better than the same 3 arguments everyone is repeating adnauseam on every thread on the Planet.

1. Fisher sucks- terrible pick- should have drafted Author Brown or Geno instead, dumbest move ever- he is getting thrown around like a little bitch in camp by scrubs.

2. Alex sucks- we gave away the farm for another brokedick 49ers QB.

3. Chiefs are stoopid and suck- always have always will- woo is me- the sky is falling- boo hoo!! :deevee:

BossChief 08-07-2013 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 9865341)
HUH? Who are they jettisoning?

Evidently, BOTH of our starting tackles from last year.

Sorter 08-07-2013 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9865359)
The you haven't seen SDH's post stating that the Chiefs should have taken Arthur Brown at 1.1.

Arthur Brown. 1.1.

Oh dear.


Uh...

DaneMcCloud 08-07-2013 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9865363)
Oh dear.


Uh...

Yeah, he really schooled me with that statement.

I'm not sure I'll ever recover.

Halfcan 08-07-2013 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9865342)
Then how was my post "a little overboard?"

Anyone that thinks Tavon Austin wouldn't be a MAJOR upgrade over Dexter McCluster needs to take those rose colored glasses off

Talon is a threat to score every single time he touches the ball...Dexter isn't.

At 1.1???? You are the only one that thinks that would have been a Great pick.

So he is better than Dex-did I say he wasn't- I said we have 2 players very very similar- so they must have thought the same thing or they would have drafted him. Do we need 3 short shifty player doing the same exact thing at the cost of the Number 1 overall pick? :rolleyes:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.