![]() |
Quote:
Think about it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The deal is done.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Salvador Perez’s new deal picks up three team options, adds two years. Starts in 2017, at least $30M in new $. <a href="https://twitter.com/JonHeyman">@JonHeyman</a> said it was close.</p>— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) <a href="https://twitter.com/JeffPassan/status/704707101906509824">March 1, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Dayton is my homeboy
|
And here's an article by Passan about it. The Royals will announce it later today. Will be a straight 5 year deal starting next year.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/source-...182419175.html |
No options, its a straight 5 year deal
|
5/52.5
So, we're paying $36MM for the 2 extra years. |
Quote:
Hosmer - you are on the clock!! |
@DBLesky There's no good reason from a baseball perspective to give Perez this deal, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have value. #Royals
|
Out of that 52.5MM, $6MM of it is a signing bonus.
|
Prison Bitch will be apoplectic.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sounds like a win-win. Salvador Perez gets much more security and money up front. Royals get some additional years of control at rates that will still be good as long as he holds up. Adds some risk for the Royals, but they add control of the final few years of what should be his prime as compensation. |
Do we get more years of control? I thought they just turn the last 2 club option years into guaranteed years.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.