![]() |
I bet KCJohnny has positive repped him 500 times by now.
|
That should do it.
|
Quote:
Btw. I've seen your powerful negative reps. But they have been overshadoed by many more greens that appreciate that I'm not backing down from your romper room style of "debate". Many teams draft multiple OL and switch them around. You not only improve your left tackle you improve right tackle or left guard if albert moves back there. You draft a stud center later or sign a FA and you got an awesome line to build out from. Have a strong OL you will have an offense that controls the game and helps the defense. You act like you've never heard this before All things. Being said if he drafts the qb I'll trust his judgement Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
Name all these "many" teams that spend more than 1 top 15 pick on the OL and switch them around. To further that, name a successful team that does it. |
I'd love to see us trade down and grab Sanchez, but I don't think other teams will allow us to do it. If the potential and the tools are there, I don't see why a good coaching staff can't develop a talent like Sanchez. I wouldn't be upset if we took him at 3.
Aaron curry, however, would upset me a bit. |
Quote:
Name me college qbs who looked liked stiffs as often as stafford and suddenly became great in the pros just because the teams the teams fanbase wished it so Sanchez actually has more upside although mecca turned me off him by comparing him to bledsoe. I just don't get why you guys get so unraveled by the idea it might not be a qb. Its football. Lighten up. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
How many of those Patriot and Cowboy lineman were top 15 picks? Or just for the hell of it, forget top 15. How about just first round picks? |
Quote:
The 91 and 92 Patriots selected a Tackle at 11th and 13th. However in 91 the Patriots had two 1st round picks. And the '92 pick wasn't even on the roster in 95. And the '91 pick wasn't on the roster in 96. Neither helped the Patriots reach the Super Bowl. |
Quote:
Look at how stupid you are. This has been explained so many goddamned times on here its preposterous. |
Quote:
|
I guess I offended Pioli Stuffer with my insults of facts and history.
|
Different teams approach the draft from different angles. The Steelers draft offensive linemen in the first round quite a bit, for example. I'm not exactly sure how these different approaches make anyone here brilliant or reeruned, but there is no uniform approach to the draft.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's really just a matter of team approach. The "top 15" part of the argument is a loaded question, because any team consistently drafting in the "top 15" is a team that you don't want to follow anyway, usually because they draft poorly along with everything else. Thus, the "top 15" argument really says "do teams that suck draft OL and then move them around?". Or, to put it another way..... Irregardless of the actual player picked, when Millen was still running the show in Detroit, did you have more faith in Millen drafting in the top 10 or in NE, Pitt, Bal and Ind drafting at the bottom of the round? |
Yes, let's move Albert. Let's move the one good thing we had last year on the offensive line into a position we don't know how well he'll play or adjust to.
While we are at it, let's move Tony Gonzalez to RT. He can block well and it's easier to get TEs - especially with how fast they ran yesterday. I wish someone would go Chris Brown on Pioli Zombie already. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.