ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft We are not taking a QB in the first round (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=220851)

BossChief 01-02-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6398213)
I will say this, however, if Phillips were fired in Dallas, and the Chiefs hired him (about as likely as winning the lotto, but I digress), Boss Chief's idea of drafting Suh and and moving Dorsey to the nose would be a great idea.

I would be happier than when I heard we signed Ty Law.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 6398803)
If we were talking about a 5th year senior who had started for 4 years and broke a million records, had no mechanics issues, and no injury history then it'd be good enough. In other words, if Manning was out there yeah. But the fact is most juniors that come out fail and fail miserably. No junior is ever worth taking as far as I am concerned because the failure rate in junior QB's is so high.

This
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6398817)
Yes. that's exactly what happened every game, every play in 2008. WR screens. He never ever completed any pass downfield. Duh. Clearly you didn't watch any Patriots games in 2008. He had back to back 400 yard games throwing WR screens. Sure.
Posted via Mobile Device

Pass Thrown: Behind line 81 95 741 85.3 7.80 76 3 1 0.0 105.3 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 1-10 yds. 184 267 1856 68.9 6.95 64 6 2 0.0 92.8 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 11-20 yds. 54 116 825 46.6 7.11 37 8 6 0.0 72.0 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 21-30 yds. 6 18 172 33.3 9.56 51 3 1 0.0 86.1 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 31-40 yds. 1 14 33 7.1 2.36 33 0 0 0.0 39.6 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 41+ yds. 1 6 66 16.7 11.00 66 1 1 0.0 72.9 0 0 0.0 0 0

2-20 on passes over 30 yards.

Id say the statement was pretty accurate

TheGuardian 01-02-2010 06:31 PM

There was an article I read a while back talking about how starts/time in college ARE in fact very important and are tied in with a QB's success rate in the NFL. Basically when you start as little as Sanchez did, you have almost no shot. Not that he was even worth a shit at USC anyway in his limited time.

SPATCH 01-02-2010 06:32 PM

I'd rather wait for a guy like Ryan Mallett or Blaine Gabbert.

Jimmy Clausen is a pussy. There is no way he is an upgrade over Cassel.

TheGuardian 01-02-2010 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6398931)
Someone is going to come into this thread and berate you saying that every single one of those guys looked better than Sanchez.

Do you really want to put Sanchez rookie season up against Peyton Manning?

Sweet Dick Willy 01-02-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6398928)
Stafford and Sanchez have nearly identical stats this year.

Stafford was a 3 year starter, and Sanchez started 1 year.

Stafford has the better weapons to throw to, while Sanchez has the better OL and running game.

I don't think college starts really has THAT much to do with it - both guys have played like rookies this year.

And that's what everybody seems to forget - Rothlisberger, Ryan, etc are the exception, not the rule.

Peyton sucked his rookie year. So did Aikman. So did Elway. Fact is, almost ALL rookie QB's have a learning curve.

Christ, it took Eli Manning 4 years to play to his potential, and once he did, he won a Championship.

Sweet Dick did some number checking between Matt and Mark, and the numbers are negligible UNTIL you factor in three missed starts on the part of Stafford. If Stafford had started those games, it wouldn't even be close.

Touchdown Bowe 01-02-2010 06:35 PM

Its gonna be hard to pass up a guy who makes all the throws that Cassel doesnt

keg in kc 01-02-2010 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6398935)
Granted, it's early, but everything I've heard from my guy here in town is that they're going to have to come up with a damn good reason NOT to take Suh.

They think that with better OL play, Boller can be serviceable, and they are intrigued by Craig Nall.

Time will tell, I guess.

Suh would be the no-brainer for me, I think he's a generational player, but QBs are overvalued, as well you know.

My only real beef with Clausen is that he's a ****ing domer. I hate domers.

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6398938)
I would be happier than when I heard we signed Ty Law.


This


Pass Thrown: Behind line 81 95 741 85.3 7.80 76 3 1 0.0 105.3 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 1-10 yds. 184 267 1856 68.9 6.95 64 6 2 0.0 92.8 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 11-20 yds. 54 116 825 46.6 7.11 37 8 6 0.0 72.0 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 21-30 yds. 6 18 172 33.3 9.56 51 3 1 0.0 86.1 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 31-40 yds. 1 14 33 7.1 2.36 33 0 0 0.0 39.6 0 0 0.0 0 0
Pass Thrown: 41+ yds. 1 6 66 16.7 11.00 66 1 1 0.0 72.9 0 0 0.0 0 0

2-20 on passes over 30 yards.

Id say the statement was pretty accurate

Holy Christ.

I knew it was bad, but I didn't realize it was THAT bad.

62/154 for a 40% completion percentage.

20% of his passing yardage came from passes originating from behind the LOS.

70% of his passing yardage came from passes thrown 10 yards or less.

That's pretty damning evidence.

philfree 01-02-2010 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6398916)
I mean that's nice and all but there are so many different ways to knock a QB there aren't even bench marks anymore.

Rivers had basically all of the stats all this all that, he got knocked because he throws the ball funny.

I wasn't really knocking anybody. I do think the number of starts thing is significant but like all things that trend could change I guess. That said you won't see me freak out if we draft a QB in the 1st round. I wouldn't have last year if we hadn't traded for Cassel. But we traded for Cassel so that horse was still born.

PhilFree:arrow:

SPATCH 01-02-2010 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Touchdown Bowe (Post 6398946)
Its gonna be hard to pass up a guy who makes all the throws that Cassel doesnt

a guy like?

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2010 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 6398958)
a guy like?

Hell, that could be just about anyone.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-02-2010 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6398909)
OK he did start 1 more year than I thought, confused him with someone else there, my mistake.

I didn't think he was a 3 year starter since he declared as a junior.

He did have limited experience. He only played the position for 4 years total, as he was a WR until Sr. year b/c the QB at Findlay was the coach's son.

Mecca 01-02-2010 06:42 PM

It was pretty obvious Cassel wasn't asked to do much to get his NE stats, NE lead the league in YAC yards by a significant margin.

The stats bear it out but it was obvious even when watching everything was designed on letting him throw simple passes.

TheGuardian 01-02-2010 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6398928)
Stafford and Sanchez have nearly identical stats this year.

No they ****ing don't.

Stafford has 10 games and Sanchez 14. When you look at the per game numbers Stafford is miles ahead of Sanchez. 226 passing yards per game compared to 170. And 1.3 passing TD's per game for Stafford (comes out to about 20 for 16 games) and 0.8 for Sanchez (about 13 over 16 games for Sanchez).

Stafford has more picks on a per game basis but Sanchez has 10 freaking fumbles so that evens out. Either way, Stafford has been far better and it's not really even close. Sanchez has just had a great defense bailing him out all year.

Mecca 01-02-2010 06:43 PM

See, told you that was coming.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.