![]() |
Quote:
Serious question because when I look a back, the Patriots only had 1 year where they had a great amount of catches for an RB. So I don't see the need for a "great" pass catcher out of the backfield. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Like I said, he had 1 great year which he had 48, but other than that... EDIT: My mistake, it was 2 great years. 1 with 51, and the other with 48. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2004 (Pre-Weis) : 10 receptions, 74 yards 2005 (Weis) : 43 receptions, 351 yards 2006 (Weis) : 56 receptions, 391 yards |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
if we have a rb catching passes i want it to be charles. our back up should get some carries, but why take your most explosive player out of the passing game? charles >taylor
Posted via Mobile Device |
with our crappy offensive line we need to make sure and have a quality outlet to keep the QB from getting killed.
|
Quote:
The Chiefs were interested, but not for 4 years. The whole point was to get a complimentary back who could help Charles prepare to be a full-time starter. If you are asking me who I'd rather, it would be Thomas Jones every day of the year. |
Quote:
I agree with this. However, it is kind of funny that you lambasted me for saying I wanted the Chiefs to sign Thomas Jones earlier in the process. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.