ChiefsPlanet
Page 22 of 24 « First 1218192021 22 2324
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs could be ready to move on from Alex Smith, per Jason Cole (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306119)

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 12756348)
After reading the bottom line on ESPN, it appears Jax, Coughlin in particular, is not sold on Bortles due to the turnovers. Coughlin seems like a guy who would be interested in Smith. Maybe for a swap of 2nds. 35 for 59 and Smith. That's 3rd round value on points, and nobody looses a draft pick.

Then go after Romo and a draft QB, or Garoppolo. Do the due diligence on both scenarios. One or the other.

And don't say no to Garoppolo just because of Matt. Matt was Pioli's boy. Scouted him as a TE while he was at USC, became infatuated with making him a QB, and was hell bent on proving he knew what he was doing. Different situation altogether if Dorsey and Reid see Garoppolo as a guy who can take us to the next level.
**** that. I will say "no" to Giraffolo because of Matt all day, and every day due to the laziness such a move represents.

Never again, please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 12756363)
Can't speak for anyone else but I'm not saying no to Garoppolo because of Matt, I'm saying no because the Pats *should* be preparing for life after Brady and if he had promise they would hang on to him. Then again, Belechick may be out the door with Brady when the time comes and may not give a ****. Who knows, but I don't trust the Pats either way. **** dealing with them at all.
This.

RealSNR 02-25-2017 12:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12756413)
If Dorsey thinksJimmy G can improve the team how can you doubt him given his record with talent evaluation?
Because it's hopelessly unlikely that someone's halfway developed 3rd-4th round backup will blossom into a QB better than Alex Smith.

Yes, I said it. How many traded backup experiments have we seen across the league over the years? How many of them worked out BETTER than what Alex Smith has given us?

Let that not be a statement in praise of Alex Smith. Let that be a statement against backup QBs who get traded.

Yes, ALL of them. I don't care what the **** you see on tape. Dorsey had a ****ing chance to draft Garrapolo and ****ing passed. And now that he looked good on tape for 2 games with New England that's all of a sudden an acceptable solution for his QB problems?

****. That.

I'll bet every ****ing dollar I've got that Garrapolo is not the answer. For ANY team, except the outside possibility of New England should he stick around that team long enough to witness Tom Brady retiring and get handed the reins.

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12756441)
Because it's hopelessly unlikely that someone's halfway developed 3rd-4th round backup will blossom into a QB better than Alex Smith.

Yes, I said it. How many traded backup experiments have we seen across the league over the years? How many of them worked out BETTER than what Alex Smith has given us?

Let that not be a statement in praise of Alex Smith. Let that be a statement against backup QBs who get traded.

Yes, ALL of them. I don't care what the **** you see on tape. Dorsey had a ****ing chance to draft Garrapolo and ****ing passed. And now that he looked good on tape for 2 games with New England that's all of a sudden an acceptable solution for his QB problems?

****. That.

I'll bet every ****ing dollar I've got that Garrapolo is not the answer. For ANY team, except the outside possibility of New England should he stick around that team long enough to witness Tom Brady retiring and get handed the reins.
SNR knows.

Coogs 02-25-2017 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12756441)
Because it's hopelessly unlikely that someone's halfway developed 3rd-4th round backup will blossom into a QB better than Alex Smith.

Yes, I said it. How many traded backup experiments have we seen across the league over the years? How many of them worked out BETTER than what Alex Smith has given us?

Let that not be a statement in praise of Alex Smith. Let that be a statement against backup QBs who get traded.

Yes, ALL of them. I don't care what the **** you see on tape. Dorsey had a ****ing chance to draft Garrapolo and ****ing passed. And now that he looked good on tape for 2 games with New England that's all of a sudden an acceptable solution for his QB problems?

****. That.

I'll bet every ****ing dollar I've got that Garrapolo is not the answer. For ANY team, except the outside possibility of New England should he stick around that team long enough to witness Tom Brady retiring and get handed the reins.
We didn't have a 2nd round pick, and they did bring him in for a pre draft visit.

CasselGotPeedOn 02-25-2017 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12756241)
state your real username, turd. Don't hide behind a mult.
Sorry man, all I stated were Facts not Fiction.

keg in kc 02-25-2017 03:26 PM
All the talk about preparing for 'life after Brady', when Brady wants to play into his mid-40s.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 12756624)
Sorry man, all I stated were Facts not Fiction.
Don't use my line

staylor26 02-25-2017 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 12756657)
All the talk about preparing for 'life after Brady', when Brady wants to play into his mid-40s.
Brady can think that all he wants, but father time is coming to collect sooner than later.

Bugeater 02-25-2017 03:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 12756657)
All the talk about preparing for 'life after Brady', when Brady wants to play into his mid-40s.
Just because he wants to, doesn't mean he will physically be able to. Age catches up to everyone eventually.

TigeRRUppeRRcut 02-25-2017 03:32 PM
I just don't see how 1 of the following doesn't take significant damage in a full NFL season in 2017: ankle, back, rotator cuff.

That suspension handed down to him was a blessing in disguise.

CasselGotPeedOn 02-25-2017 03:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12756660)
Don't use my line
Except for the fact that I actually posted facts. You post drivel.

Titty Meat 02-25-2017 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12756512)
SNR knows.
No he thought Geno Smith was a franchise QB. You can't say Dorsey is a great GM then bash him because he goes and gets a QB via trade,

dodgy 02-25-2017 04:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12756429)
**** that. I will say "no" to Giraffolo because of Matt all day, and every day due to the laziness such a move represents.

Never again, please.



This.
Brady has 2 to 3 more years. Grop is set to sign a larger deal next year, and the Pats know they will probably lose him, unless Brady retires after this year. They aren't moving on from him because they don't like him, they're moving on because they know he will walk next year and they will have no compensation, or they will have to resign him to a more expensive contract to sit on the bench for another year or two. I'm team Grop for sure..

Sweet Daddy Hate 02-25-2017 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMeatballBillay (Post 12756696)
No he thought Geno Smith was a franchise QB. You can't say Dorsey is a great GM then bash him because he goes and gets a QB via trade,
I can and will.

No more of that shit. Grow balls and do your own drafting.

Easy 6 02-25-2017 04:25 PM
I'd rather have Janeane Garofalo than Jimmy Garoppolo


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 PM.
Page 22 of 24 « First 1218192021 22 2324
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.