Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 16523783)

Um, I already addressed this. I said it was a big enough deal that Adams should be suspended for at least a game, which is a significant amount of money. And I suggested he should pay a separate fine. That right there is a pretty big deal, isn't it? Just how much more a 'big deal' should anyone make of this?

I mean I get it, Adams is a Raider, and we have to hate Raiders. He made the mistake of venting some of his frustration on some stranger, in this case some kid carrying some equipment.

That was wrong of Adams, and he should be punished accordingly. And this kind of thing can't happen, so at the very least there should be a 1 game suspension, as I already said, a few times now.

But the kid isn't seriously injured. Most likely the only thing really hurt is his pride.

So what?

The league will do whatever they have in place for this sort of thing. The police will do whatever they do in these cases, which will probably amount to some kind of fine.

My question is why isn't that enough?

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16523813)

Phony ass explanation.

You did not call him a noun, you messed up his name.

Ask any player on the Chiefs what they think of what you wrote and if you cared about race when you wrote it.

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16524780)

Well, why don't you be my friend and specify which points I make that you agree with and the ones you disagree with?

Seems like the argument against is to call me a name and then rewrite what I actually wrote and argue against that.

You think Chiefs game operations isn't addressing this for what could have been done to prevent the collision with the player?

You think the NFL isn't going to look into this more than to just say Adams is in the wrong.

If Adams pushed him only enough to protect himself and not knock him down, that guy would be in danger of losing privilege to work on the field.

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 16524828)

So tomorrow, when I leave work, you walk in front of my. I'll shove your ass to the ground. I'm sure you will just be cool with it and just carry on about your day. BTW, in Missouri, by law, shoving someone to the ground is considered assault.

Originally Posted by InChiefsHeaven (Post 16523766)

I dunno. I mean, I'd be pissed if the dude shoved me at work, and if I sprained an ankle or something, I'd expect some compensation for that, but I'm not gonna sue the pants off a guy, just because he's a Raider.

I'd actually tell him I appreciate the apology, and could he please help me with the medical bills and the trip to the hospital.

As far as the criminal assault, I think Adams was walking and the guy popped in front of him. Seemed more a reflexive defensive thing to me. BUT...he should have stopped to help the guy up and check on him.

Whatever. He should not be sued, but he should do the right thing and make it right for the guy. But nowadays, we all gotta sue don't we...

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 16524838)

What the **** dies his paying payroll taxes have to do with assault?

Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16524780)

Well, why don't you be my friend and specify which points I make that you agree with and the ones you disagree with?

Seems like the argument against is to call me a name and then rewrite what I actually wrote and argue against that.

You think Chiefs game operations isn't addressing this for what could have been done to prevent the collision with the player?

You think the NFL isn't going to look into this more than to just say Adams is in the wrong.

If Adams pushed him only enough to protect himself and not knock him down, that guy would be in danger of losing privilege to work on the field.

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 16524838)

What the **** does his paying payroll taxes have to do with assault?

Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 16524832)

What charge did you get for choking out the little league ump? This has to be at least that bad.

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16524859)

Why waste time and resources to write a city charge on that? You already got thousands of dollars from him and Chiefs have road games too.



Let's ticket the other teams players on some weak thing like that and let the other cities set up collisions with Chiefs players and write tickets on that.



It sure is not a state court case.



It is not like he would not have a justification defense that would be based on the NFL games operation manual and the instructions given to workers with field passes.

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 16524869)

LMAO. The legend grows. It wasn't an umpire. It was another dad, on our team even, that was assaulting the head coach. No charges filed. But I do like the legend growing.

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 16524828)

So tomorrow, when I leave work, you walk in front of my. I'll shove your ass to the ground. I'm sure you will just be cool with it and just carry on about your day. BTW, in Missouri, by law, shoving someone to the ground is considered assault.

Originally Posted by jettio (Post 16524859)

Why waste time and resources to write a city charge on that? You already got thousands of dollars from him and Chiefs have road games too.

Let's ticket the other teams players on some weak thing like that and let the other cities set up collisions with Chiefs players and write tickets on that.

It sure is not a state court case.

It is not like he would not have a justification defense that would be based on the NFL games operation manual and the instructions given to workers with field passes.

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 16524885)

So you're saying anyone that pays taxes in a municipality shouldn't get charged with crimes because they've already paid in to the city?

Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk