ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Knowmo's Homer Thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274917)

vailpass 10-27-2013 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10127019)
Lol your own fellow fan just called your bullshit. STFU

Not calling bs, asking a question.

RunKC 10-27-2013 12:55 AM

Broncos D has allowed 300 or more passing yards from the QB position (Foles and Vick combined were over 300) in every game except last week and vs Oakland, and Pryor had 281 yards, and he's terrible throwing the ball.

JFC Magic they are that bad.

vailpass 10-27-2013 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127025)
Had 213 yards.

Yeah thats not a lot, less than I thought.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10127026)
Not calling bs, asking a question.

Luck had fewer yards against Denver than Keenum had against KC.

RunKC 10-27-2013 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127031)
Luck had fewer yards against Denver than Keenum had against KC.

Luck also scored 4 times as many TD's on your defense than Keenum did to ours. LMAO

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127031)
Luck had fewer yards against Denver than Keenum had against KC.

Luck scored 39 Keenum 16.

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10127026)
Not calling bs, asking a question.

It's bs. It's who hef is

MagicHef 10-27-2013 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10127035)
Luck also scored 4 times as many TD's on your defense than Keenum did to ours. LMAO

Luck is kind of good.

RunKC 10-27-2013 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127043)
Luck is kind of good.

We know. We played him last year and he only had 1 TD and a little over 200 passing yards.

salame 10-27-2013 01:50 AM

my swag is through the roof

AussieChiefsFan 10-27-2013 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127031)
Luck had fewer yards against Denver than Keenum had against KC.

Yet the Colts scored 39 points in the process. Over twice as much as our defense has let up in any game this year.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10127016)
It makes perfect sense. Manning is not a threat that those QB's are with their feet, so why should our rush D be concerned about that when that has been a weakness?

And yes Alex Smith is not Romo or Eli, but my God if Romo can throw 500 on you then I would bet Alex can get 300.

Your pass D is literally that awful.

If you take out the yards, you have to take out the plays, too. If you do that, KC is still just 17th in YPC allowed. It is true that KC is incredibly bad against running QBs, but that doesn't make them good against the run.

I'm not sure why Chiefs fans are so excited about Denver's weak pass defense. It doesn't apply to KC, similar to how a running QB weakness doesn't apply to Manning. You don't have the players to exploit it, even if Alex does manage to have the fourth 300 yard game of his career.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10126965)
The scheme is more naturally inclined to putting pressure on the pass instead of the run. This makes sense when you consider how the defensive linemen are asked to attack, and in all the weird and complex different packages. Sorry, but lining up Allen Bailey over center with Poe, Hali, and Brandon Flowers off the edges may not be the most conducive package to holding the RB to no gain. It might allow 5 or 6 yards.

The point is it's getting the job done in terms of POINTS. That's where it matters. What you're arguing with this YPC bullshit is meaningless.

It's not like our offense is blowing teams out early so they're forced to abandon the run. We've faced some pretty damn good RBs and run-heavy teams, and the damage on the scoreboard has been minimal.

I'll take that over your defense's supposed superior run-stopping ability. We'll see who gives up 39 points to the Colts and who doesn't.

Hint: It's not us.

I agree with the vast majority of this post. Your D is incredibly aggressive, and so far that is working wonders in the pass game, but seems to be failing in the run game. Pass defense is much more important than run defense in the NFL right now, so your defense is doing very well.

However, I don't think it will last. I think the poor showing in run defense is indicative of your success being more scheme-based than talent-based, and schemes get figured out. Houston and Poe both have absurd numbers of sacks per total pressure. Basically, if they aren't sacking the QB, they aren't having much effect in pass rush. This also points to scheming, that offenses aren't sure who is coming from where, and are getting confused. When the blocking is set up and executed properly, they have much less effect on the play. The effect of schemes like this is diminished as the season goes on. I've experienced this many times as a Broncos fan.

If KC's D was as talented as the ppg makes it seem, I don't think there'd be such a gap between yards per pass play (1st in the NFL) and yards per run play (29th in the NFL).

Then again, I could be wrong. I've been wrong plenty of times.

AussieChiefsFan 10-27-2013 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127069)
I agree with the vast majority of this post. Your D is incredibly aggressive, and so far that is working wonders in the pass game, but seems to be failing in the run game. Pass defense is much more important than run defense in the NFL right now, so your defense is doing very well.

However, I don't think it will last. I think the poor showing in run defense is indicative of your success being more scheme-based than talent-based, and schemes get figured out. Houston and Poe both have absurd numbers of sacks per total pressure. Basically, if they aren't sacking the QB, they aren't having much effect in pass rush. This also points to scheming, that offenses aren't sure who is coming from where, and are getting confused. When the blocking is set up and executed properly, they have much less effect on the play. The effect of schemes like this is diminished as the season goes on. I've experienced this many times as a Broncos fan.

If KC's D was as talented as the ppg makes it seem, I don't think there'd be such a gap between yards per pass play (1st in the NFL) and yards per run play (29th in the NFL).

Then again, I could be wrong. I've been wrong plenty of times.

So Houston's success is purely scheme based? So he was an average player last year?

AussieChiefsFan 10-27-2013 03:29 AM

My god. I just headed over to The Mane to the 'pleasent' surprise that my IP was no longer banned.

JFC, we thought Knowmo or MagicHef, or whoever else, were bad. Holy hell. That place is douche central.

mr. tegu 10-27-2013 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127065)
I'm not sure why Chiefs fans are so excited about Denver's weak pass defense. It doesn't apply to KC, similar to how a running QB weakness doesn't apply to Manning. You don't have the players to exploit it, even if Alex does manage to have the fourth 300 yard game of his career.

You just don't get it. We don't need a Romo to pass on your defense. They are so bad that even a QB like Alex can have a career day against them. That is the reason for excitement. Charles is going to have so much space to run on that defense. He might average 20 YPC.

RealSNR 10-27-2013 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127069)
I agree with the vast majority of this post. Your D is incredibly aggressive, and so far that is working wonders in the pass game, but seems to be failing in the run game. Pass defense is much more important than run defense in the NFL right now, so your defense is doing very well.

However, I don't think it will last. I think the poor showing in run defense is indicative of your success being more scheme-based than talent-based, and schemes get figured out. Houston and Poe both have absurd numbers of sacks per total pressure. Basically, if they aren't sacking the QB, they aren't having much effect in pass rush. This also points to scheming, that offenses aren't sure who is coming from where, and are getting confused. When the blocking is set up and executed properly, they have much less effect on the play. The effect of schemes like this is diminished as the season goes on. I've experienced this many times as a Broncos fan.

If KC's D was as talented as the ppg makes it seem, I don't think there'd be such a gap between yards per pass play (1st in the NFL) and yards per run play (29th in the NFL).

Then again, I could be wrong. I've been wrong plenty of times.

LMAO

You're scared, dude. Just admit it. You wouldn't be posting this inane bullshit if you weren't.

Explain how Romeo's defenses were excellent at stopping the run. We had basically the same players apart from Houston and Poe. Are old dick Vrabel and Ron ****ing Edwards the difference in "talent" that it takes to stop the run?

No, they're not. Of course they're not. It's entirely 100% scheme based. Romeo's 2-gap principles placed a premium on stopping the run, so they did.

You're officially as dumb as Knowmo, dude. Christ, man. Get it together.

Ceej 10-27-2013 07:03 AM

Still waiting on MagicQueef to let us know how the KC D ranks in PPG.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 07:39 AM

Hef with the full reerun post of the day....yeah this D isn't talented...only about 5 allpros and 8 pb quality guys ROFL

FlaChief58 10-27-2013 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ceej (Post 10127112)
Still waiting on MagicQueef to let us know how the KC D ranks in PPG.

But, but it's yards that wins games, points don't mean shit /MQ

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 07:57 AM

Same buffoon that compared us to thst POS Brownco defense

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127069)
I agree with the vast majority of this post. Your D is incredibly aggressive, and so far that is working wonders in the pass game, but seems to be failing in the run game. Pass defense is much more important than run defense in the NFL right now, so your defense is doing very well.

However, I don't think it will last. I think the poor showing in run defense is indicative of your success being more scheme-based than talent-based, and schemes get figured out. Houston and Poe both have absurd numbers of sacks per total pressure. Basically, if they aren't sacking the QB, they aren't having much effect in pass rush. This also points to scheming, that offenses aren't sure who is coming from where, and are getting confused. When the blocking is set up and executed properly, they have much less effect on the play. The effect of schemes like this is diminished as the season goes on. I've experienced this many times as a Broncos fan.

If KC's D was as talented as the ppg makes it seem, I don't think there'd be such a gap between yards per pass play (1st in the NFL) and yards per run play (29th in the NFL).

Then again, I could be wrong. I've been wrong plenty of times.

Poor run defense LMAO

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127069)
I agree with the vast majority of this post. Your D is incredibly aggressive, and so far that is working wonders in the pass game, but seems to be failing in the run game. Pass defense is much more important than run defense in the NFL right now, so your defense is doing very well.

However, I don't think it will last. I think the poor showing in run defense is indicative of your success being more scheme-based than talent-based, and schemes get figured out. Houston and Poe both have absurd numbers of sacks per total pressure. Basically, if they aren't sacking the QB, they aren't having much effect in pass rush. This also points to scheming, that offenses aren't sure who is coming from where, and are getting confused. When the blocking is set up and executed properly, they have much less effect on the play. The effect of schemes like this is diminished as the season goes on. I've experienced this many times as a Broncos fan.

If KC's D was as talented as the ppg makes it seem, I don't think there'd be such a gap between yards per pass play (1st in the NFL) and yards per run play (29th in the NFL).

Then again, I could be wrong. I've been wrong plenty of times.

Wut?

Lucy, you got some splainin' to do!

Hmmm...let's see DJ pro bowler, Hali pro bowler, Houston pro bowler, Poe pro bowler, Berry pro bowler

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 08:19 AM

By watching the games, anyone can see the KC run D is not a liability...donco pass D on the other hand...don't need stats to tell me what I see.

TimBone 10-27-2013 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ceej (Post 10127112)
Still waiting on MagicQueef to let us know how the KC D ranks in PPG.

Dey furst.

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 08:43 AM

@mortreport: Both of P. Manning's ankles are sprained, including a high right ankle sprain aggravated by Robert Mathis' 2nd sack. Pain killer for today.

Gona bust his ankles baby

Quesadilla Joe 10-27-2013 09:00 AM

Bye week couldn't have come at a better time.

TimBone 10-27-2013 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10127206)
@mortreport: Both of P. Manning's ankles are sprained, including a high right ankle sprain aggravated by Robert Mathis' 2nd sack. Pain killer for today.

Gona bust his ankles baby

Here's to hoping Orakpo can finish the job. :toast:

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10127206)
@mortreport: Both of P. Manning's ankles are sprained, including a high right ankle sprain aggravated by Robert Mathis' 2nd sack. Pain killer for today.

Gona bust his ankles baby

I said this earlier a couple days ago before it was ever reported. Let's just say I got scooped and Knowmo better be concerned a bit.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Von Dumbass (Post 10127228)
Bye week couldn't have come at a better time.

Going to that glorified Lil Richard concert at Pile High today? What was Baba O'Reilly by the Who taken for TD music?

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 09:23 AM

Rat tail complete. Donco/bandwago Peyton fan costume complete.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 10127071)
So Houston's success is purely scheme based? So he was an average player last year?

Uh, no. He's very good. He's just not "obliterate the sack record" good, which we're already seeing in him falling off the pace he was on earlier this season.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10127106)
LMAO

You're scared, dude. Just admit it. You wouldn't be posting this inane bullshit if you weren't.

Explain how Romeo's defenses were excellent at stopping the run. We had basically the same players apart from Houston and Poe. Are old dick Vrabel and Ron ****ing Edwards the difference in "talent" that it takes to stop the run?

No, they're not. Of course they're not. It's entirely 100% scheme based. Romeo's 2-gap principles placed a premium on stopping the run, so they did.

You're officially as dumb as Knowmo, dude. Christ, man. Get it together.

Uh, your post pretty much agrees with what I was saying, then you call me dumb.

So, um... what?

bowener 10-27-2013 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127393)
Uh, no. He's very good. He's just not "obliterate the sack record" good, which we're already seeing in him falling off the pace he was on earlier this season.

I disagree. Houston has been seeing a lot more TEs and RBs help the tackle, which has been freeing up Hali one on one more often. Now Hali has racked up sacks the last few weeks and teams with weaker lines are going to have a hell of a time deciding who they want to stop.

RunKC 10-27-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127065)
If you take out the yards, you have to take out the plays, too. If you do that, KC is still just 17th in YPC allowed. It is true that KC is incredibly bad against running QBs, but that doesn't make them good against the run.

I'm not sure why Chiefs fans are so excited about Denver's weak pass defense. It doesn't apply to KC, similar to how a running QB weakness doesn't apply to Manning. You don't have the players to exploit it, even if Alex does manage to have the fourth 300 yard game of his career.

Alex Smith had a great game against the best passing defense in the NFL. He had over 250 on them.

Imagine what he could do to the worst pass D in the league.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10127507)
Alex Smith had a great game against the best passing defense in the NFL. He had over 250 on them.

Imagine what he could do to the worst pass D in the league.

I'm sure he'll have lots of yards. Teams tend to throw a lot when they're losing.

RealSNR 10-27-2013 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127399)
Uh, your post pretty much agrees with what I was saying, then you call me dumb.

So, um... what?

Did you read the bold section?

Personnel isn't the problem. We've got the talent we need on this roster to stop the run.

Talent is not the issue.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10127515)
Did you read the bold section?

Personnel isn't the problem. We've got the talent we need on this roster to stop the run.

Talent is not the issue.

But they aren't stopping the run, regardless of talent.

Why? What does that mean? What can we expect as the season goes on?

I know my answers to those questions.

RunKC 10-27-2013 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127513)
I'm sure he'll have lots of yards. Teams tend to throw a lot when they're losing.

So you think your offense is going to blow our defense out of the water?

MagicHef 10-27-2013 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10127536)
So you think your offense is going to blow our defense out of the water?

I think our offense will do significantly better against your defense than any offense has done so far.

threebag 10-27-2013 12:31 PM

Magicher and Knowmo have to be bunking up

AussieChiefsFan 10-27-2013 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127393)
Uh, no. He's very good. He's just not "obliterate the sack record" good, which we're already seeing in him falling off the pace he was on earlier this season.

Well yeah, nobody expected him to keep up his 5 sacks/game pace.

BigMeatballDave 10-27-2013 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10128118)
I think our offense will do significantly better against your defense than any offense has done so far.

Remember how the Dallas offense shredded your defense?

Our D held them to 16.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10128679)
Remember how the Dallas offense shredded your defense?

Our D held them to 16.

Remember how the Dallas defense held your offense to 17 points?

Our O shredded them for 51 points.

BigMeatballDave 10-27-2013 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10128729)
Remember how the Dallas defense held your offense to 17 points?

Our O shredded them for 51 points.

LMAO You are such a ****ing moron.

No one here argues over how good our offense is.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 02:28 PM

8 and 0 bitches

RealSNR 10-27-2013 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10127524)
But they aren't stopping the run, regardless of talent.

So you're NOT in agreement with me, then LMAO

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 02:41 PM

Cleveland had -1 yard rushing at halftime. But you're right hef, we don't stop the run

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 03:05 PM

Alfred Morris running on that "dominant" run D

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 03:09 PM

Skins runnin wild. Bad snap only thing stopped em

King_Chief_Fan 10-27-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10128729)
Remember how the Dallas defense held your offense to 17 points?

Our O shredded them for 51 points.

Yeah we remember.....but I remember holding that offense to 16 points while your team got shredded for 48:p

Pasta Little Brioni 10-27-2013 03:47 PM

Turn it off yet knowmo?

FlaChief58 10-27-2013 03:55 PM

Watching the donkeys implode with a donkey fan is AWESOME :)

mr. tegu 10-27-2013 04:06 PM

I want to hear more about the amazing run defense.

Brock 10-27-2013 04:11 PM

Fetushead pick 6

Nightfyre 10-27-2013 04:12 PM

LMAO.

The Bad Guy 10-27-2013 04:14 PM

This is a defense that got lit up by Josh McCown last week.

**** you Hef and Knowshit.

Crush 10-27-2013 04:14 PM

Manning throws the best pick six in NFL history.

Hammock Parties 10-27-2013 04:17 PM

http://i.imgur.com/VpgkIzx.gif

http://i.imgur.com/jaDzJLq.gif

Nightfyre 10-27-2013 04:29 PM

LMAO Vickerson strikes again!

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 04:39 PM

****ing crybaby ass Denver. All they do

loochy 10-27-2013 05:20 PM

hey knowmo

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s...m/Sorry/18.jpg

mr. tegu 10-27-2013 05:35 PM

Peyton looked awful today throwing the ball more than 10 yards. Especially to the outside.

loochy 10-27-2013 05:37 PM

EPIC D WITH A PICK 6 ENSURES THAT DENVER HAS A BETTER D THAN KC /knowmo

MagicHef 10-27-2013 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10130337)
So you're NOT in agreement with me, then LMAO

29th in the league in YPC allowed is stopping the run? That's what you're saying?

OK, great job then. I hope you enjoy watching KC's run-stuffing defense as much as their high-flying, explosive offense.

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10132141)
29th in the league in YPC allowed is stopping the run? That's what you're saying?

OK, great job then. I hope you enjoy watching KC's run-stuffing defense as much as their high-flying, explosive offense.

Oh STFU already. Your shtick is old.

BigMeatballDave 10-27-2013 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10132141)
29th in the league in YPC allowed is stopping the run? That's what you're saying?

OK, great job then. I hope you enjoy watching KC's run-stuffing defense as much as their high-flying, explosive offense.

Please die.

The Bad Guy 10-27-2013 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10132141)
29th in the league in YPC allowed is stopping the run? That's what you're saying?

OK, great job then. I hope you enjoy watching KC's run-stuffing defense as much as their high-flying, explosive offense.

Care to explain to me why LeSean McCoy is the only back to have any success all year against them?

I'll await your response, you couch stain.

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 07:11 PM

Cleveland had -1 rush yard in the first half. Ya I'm real worried. The only teams that run on us have mobile QBs

Mother****erJones 10-27-2013 07:12 PM

Morris averaged 5.5 YPC tonight against Denver, JC will do that

lcarus 10-27-2013 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 10132306)
Cleveland had -1 rush yard in the first half. Ya I'm real worried. The only teams that run on us have mobile QBs

This dude probably actually thinks Denver's shit stable of RBs are gonna run all over us. Face it, if Denver is beating us, they're beating us with Peyton Manning's arm.

RealSNR 10-27-2013 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10132141)
29th in the league in YPC allowed is stopping the run? That's what you're saying?

OK, great job then. I hope you enjoy watching KC's run-stuffing defense as much as their high-flying, explosive offense.

You: "KC does not possess talent that can stop the run. Their statistical standing demonstrates that."

Me: "This is basically the same defensive team Romeo had minus Ron Edwards and Mike Vrabel. What flaws that show up in our run defense should be attributed to scheme, not talent. And it's not like the scheme is really an issue. Points is all that matters"

You: "That's what I said"

Me: "Uhh..."

You: "Oooga booga booga booga!"

RealSNR 10-27-2013 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 10132322)
This dude probably actually thinks Denver's shit stable of RBs are gonna run all over us. Face it, if Denver is beating us, they're beating us with Peyton Manning's arm.

I already dared him to suggest that Denver would be better off doing more run plays than pass plays at KC, since it exploits this supposed awful gaping weakness in our defense. A successful running team like Denver grinding out the clock and wearing down our defense would neutralize our team's strength and force Alex Smith to put up 30+ points (probably 40+) to win.

He hasn't yet risen to the challenge.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10132286)
Care to explain to me why LeSean McCoy is the only back to have any success all year against them?

I'll await your response, you couch stain.

Quarterbacks are backs.

Also, many RBs were having success, but didn't see many carries due to being behind. David Wilson was doing better against KC than any other team he played.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10132333)
You: "KC does not possess talent that can stop the run. Their statistical standing demonstrates that."

Me: "This is basically the same defensive team Romeo had minus Ron Edwards and Mike Vrabel. What flaws that show up in our run defense should be attributed to scheme, not talent. And it's not like the scheme is really an issue. Points is all that matters"

You: "That's what I said"

Me: "Uhh..."

You: "Oooga booga booga booga!"

That is not what I said.

MagicHef 10-27-2013 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10132356)
I already dared him to suggest that Denver would be better off doing more run plays than pass plays at KC, since it exploits this supposed awful gaping weakness in our defense. A successful running team like Denver grinding out the clock and wearing down our defense would neutralize our team's strength and force Alex Smith to put up 30+ points (probably 40+) to win.

He hasn't yet risen to the challenge.

I'm confident that we will do what will work best against your defense. I'm sure we will test your pass defense in many different ways. If we can't find a good way to attack it, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a run-centered game plan. It's not like we will need to try very hard to out-pace your offense.

RealSNR 10-27-2013 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10132465)
That is not what I said.

Go on...

I'm not going to dig up shit that I KNOW you said. The burden of proof lies with you.

RealSNR 10-27-2013 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10132494)
I'm confident that we will do what will work best against your defense. I'm sure we will test your pass defense in many different ways. If we can't find a good way to attack it, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a run-centered game plan. It's not like we will need to try very hard to out-pace your offense.

But our run defense is so weak! Why would you even bother trying to attack our pass D when we've got the worst run defense ever!

There's absolutely no reason at all why your play selection shouldn't be at LEAST 55-45 in favor of the run when you face us.

Right?

Hammock Parties 10-27-2013 07:47 PM

Shut up, Hef.

http://i.imgur.com/cBMvgZr.jpg

MagicHef 10-27-2013 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10132505)
Go on...

I'm not going to dig up shit that I KNOW you said. The burden of proof lies with you.

I said that KC's defensive success in points and against the pass was a result of the scheme, not talent, and that the gap in pass defense and run defense was indicative of such. I never said KC did not have the talent to stop the run.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.