ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Cardinals 2018 STL Cardinals Thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=312812)

Jewish Rabbi 06-20-2018 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13600360)
l font totally blame Mo for the bad reliever deals. It’s a good assumption that FA and their agents are well aware of Matheny burning out relievers. They have to overpay to get relievers to come here. If you
Were a reliever would you want your career in Meatheads hands?

I do. Winning teams don’t go after FA relievers.

BigRedChief 06-21-2018 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 13600619)
I do. Winning teams don’t go after FA relievers.

We will just have to agree to disagree on this one.

I don't place the majority of the blame om Mo for this shitfest. He most definitely does deserve some blame. Matheny deserves most of the blame.

It's all on Dewitt at this point for continuing to support Matheny after what we have all seen of Mathenys performance. He has the 6th most MLB experience of all managers. He is what he is.

jd1020 06-21-2018 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13600761)
He has the 6th most MLB experience of all managers. He is what he is.

https://i.imgflip.com/2cmp11.jpg

BigRedChief 06-21-2018 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13600826)

ROFL well played sir, well played! :clap:

kcpasco 06-21-2018 06:27 PM

WTF was that? I thought Ozuna was a gold glove. LOL

Ozuna let a ball bounce off his ass thinking it was a homerun. Yeah I’m out for awhile with this team. My brain needs a break.

Frazod 06-21-2018 06:43 PM

The last three times I've dared to put a game on, whoever they were playing immediately scored a run. Like ****ing clockwork. I've probably watched about three innings over the course of the season, and have no plans to watch anymore. On the off chance that they manage to do something that doesn't suck, there's always highlights.

I'm done with these clowns until Matheny is shitcanned.

BigRedChief 06-21-2018 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 13601822)
WTF was that? I thought Ozuna was a gold glove. LOL

Ozuna let a ball bounce off his ass thinking it was a homerun. Yeah I’m out for awhile with this team. My brain needs a break.

im already in 2019. Maybe just Maybe Matheny is gone. Maybe we convince Franco we made a mistake not hiring him over Matheny, lure him from Cleveland with a Madden level contract. Maybe Giradi is ready to coach again.

Our pitching is going to rock and roll.
Reyes
Martinez
Flaherty
Mikolas
Wacha
Hudson
Weaver

We trade one of those pitchers, Kelly and surplus OF for some Offensive help. We get rid of Fowler. And maybe just maybe we spend some money on FA offense. We are not getting Manny or Harper but there are still going to be some offensive help out there besides those two.

A shit ton of maybes, I know. But hoping for maybes are where this team is now.

kcpasco 06-21-2018 06:53 PM

http://mediadownloads.mlb.com/mlbam/...sset_1200K.mp4

Just LOL. Holliday could play a better LF.

BigRedChief 06-21-2018 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 13601865)
http://mediadownloads.mlb.com/mlbam/...sset_1200K.mp4

Just LOL. Holliday could play a better LF.

ROFL

kcpasco 06-21-2018 07:25 PM

Earth to Mike, CMart doesn’t have it and should probably see a shrink. This is full on train wreck now.

BigRedChief 06-21-2018 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 13601910)
Earth to Mike, CMart doesn’t have it and should probably see a shrink. This is full on train wreck now.

this team in unrecoginizable from teams we are use to seeing. No way Dewitt will bring Matheny back if they continue to play like this. Just fire him at the All-Star break and give Oquendo a chance.

George Liquor 06-21-2018 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13601920)
this team in unrecoginizable from teams we are use to seeing. No way Dewitt will bring Matheny back if they continue to play like this. Just fire him at the All-Star break and give Oquendo a chance.

This

Pasta Little Brioni 06-21-2018 08:24 PM

JFC

kcpasco 06-21-2018 08:27 PM

ROFL

kcpasco 06-21-2018 08:29 PM

We need a Marlins like purge. Everyone for sale at the deadline. Except Yadi because he’s ****ing Yadi that’s why.

Miles 06-21-2018 08:33 PM

Giving up 6 unearned runs while being 2 hit so far seems not good.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-21-2018 08:36 PM

This team is ****ing atrocious. I've never seen a defensive inning worse than that last one.

kcpasco 06-21-2018 08:43 PM

Bases loaded nobody out and 0 runs scored. Hey Mo how about some changes.

kcpasco 06-21-2018 08:45 PM

Like I said Yadi can stay because he’s a potential hall of fame but anyone else can GTFO.

kcpasco 06-21-2018 08:50 PM

I like how Mike was trying to keep it loose by pitching Garcia. It’s not April or May mother****er, tick tock tick tock your time is almost through.

BigRedChief 06-21-2018 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 13601988)
This team is ****ing atrocious. I've never seen a defensive inning worse than that last one.

remember when, not too long ago, people were bitching about Pujols and Molina not running out ground balls in the infield. How spoiled were we as Cardinals fans?

Frazod 06-21-2018 09:30 PM

<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/2co8y1"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/2co8y1.jpg" title="made at imgflip.com"/></a>

kcpasco 06-21-2018 09:30 PM

https://i.imgur.com/uV7sav3.mp4

jd1020 06-21-2018 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 13602053)

What? ROFL

Did he hear some fan yell TIME! or something? Wtf was he doing.

George Liquor 06-21-2018 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13602047)
remember when, not too long ago, people were bitching about Pujols and Molina not running out ground balls in the infield. How spoiled were we as Cardinals fans?

This team is a disaster. I maybe watch 1 game a week and they usually lose. I can't remember the last time i watched them win a game. I think it was the game where Wacha almost no hit the pirates.

Swanman 06-22-2018 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 13601999)
Bases loaded nobody out and 0 runs scored. Hey Mo how about some changes.

Mo should probably be the first change, one nanosecond before Matheny and Mabry are canned. Call Stubby Clapp up and give him the interim tag as a tryout for the job full time.

BigRedChief 06-22-2018 10:07 AM

Meathead thought the game was close.

"Even though it wasn't going well, we got to a spot in the last part of the game where we are five runs away," Mike Matheny said after it was over. "In this park, that happens quick.

VAChief 06-22-2018 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 13600619)
I do. Winning teams don’t go after FA relievers.

If you just look at the last 10 years and who were the top 10 relievers in each of those years, about one third of them would have paid off to sign to a multi-year deals (within reason). For every Rivera you have a Heath Bell, Carlos Marmol, or Jason Motte. For every Craig Kimbrel you have a Matt Capps, Joel Hanrahan or Chris Perez. for every Trevor Hoffman you have a Brian Wilson, Trevor Rosenthal or John Axford. Relievers even the best ones are tough to predict (actually I bet you would find similar results for starters as well).

Jewish Rabbi 06-22-2018 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAChief (Post 13602616)
If you just look at the last 10 years and who were the top 10 relievers in each of those years, about one third of them would have paid off to sign to a multi-year deals (within reason). For every Rivera you have a Heath Bell, Carlos Marmol, or Jason Motte. For every Craig Kimbrel you have a Matt Capps, Joel Hanrahan or Chris Perez. for every Trevor Hoffman you have a Brian Wilson, Trevor Rosenthal or John Axford. Relievers even the best ones are tough to predict (actually I bet you would find similar results for starters as well).

I don’t condone spending big money on FA starters either. When’s the last time that’s worked out? Scherzer?

Remember how pissed we were when the Cards missed out on Price? No one is too upset about that now. You have to develop starters from within, something we’re actually fairly decent at until Matheny gets ahold of them.

BigRedChief 06-22-2018 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 13602627)
I don’t condone spending big money on FA starters either. When’s the last time that’s worked out? Scherzer?

Remember how pissed we were when the Cards missed out on Price? No one is too upset about that now. You have to develop starters from within, something we’re actually fairly decent at until Matheny gets ahold of them.

it seems that one of the few things this team does better than the average team is develop starting pitching. You take Meathead out of the equation. Maybe that would apply to relievers too?

VAChief 06-22-2018 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 13602627)
I don’t condone spending big money on FA starters either. When’s the last time that’s worked out? Scherzer?

Remember how pissed we were when the Cards missed out on Price? No one is too upset about that now. You have to develop starters from within, something we’re actually fairly decent at until Matheny gets ahold of them.

Yes, I think the market has adjusted more conservatively for pitchers in free agency more recently too. I'm sure you will still have some dumbasses whose owners can't help themselves from time to time. I wonder if in response you might see pitchers more open to deals like CMart got. Bird in the hand. I don't mind the DeJong, even Wong type deals. If you miss you aren't out crippling money and you are likely paying closer for future production than past.

BigRedChief 06-22-2018 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAChief (Post 13602643)
Yes, I think the market has adjusted more conservatively for pitchers in free agency more recently too. I'm sure you will still have some dumbasses whose owners can't help themselves from time to time. I wonder if in response you might see pitchers more open to deals like CMart got. Bird in the hand. I don't mind the DeJong, even Wong type deals. If you miss you aren't out crippling money and you are likely paying closer for future production than past.

The NFL learned years ago that the 2nd contract was the prime and best years. the correlation in MLB would usually be to pay for those years starting immediately after the 6 years of MLB service time. They are 24-26 years old. I think this off season it changed to follow the NFL’s lead, pay for future performance, not past.

Yadi type contracts are rare and going to get rarer. He’s not the best in the game. But, he’s still one of the best catchers in the NL. He’s not hitting .200 and still plays with passion. Ya never know but it looks like he may make it to the end without embrassing himself.

jd1020 06-22-2018 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13602659)
the correlation in MLB would usually be to pay for those years starting immediately after the 6 years of MLB service time. They are 24-26 years old.

It's not typical that a player is that age after their first 6 years of MLB service time. It's more like 28-30.

MLB really needs to reduce the requirements for FA.

BigRedChief 06-22-2018 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13602690)
It's not typical that a player is that age after their first 6 years of MLB service time. It's more like 28-30.

MLB really needs to reduce the requirements for FA.

Maybe for a typical MLB player but not for someone that is going to get $100+ million contract.

Going forward, the high end players that are going to get those $100+ million contracts after their 6 years of service time have probably been drafted young out of high school. Prospered in the minors and quickly promoted to the big show and are prospering at that level too. Kind of like your own Baez, Bryant, Russell etc.

BigRedChief 06-22-2018 02:51 PM

After last nights debacle l thought, okay hoped there maybe some sense of urgency might appear somewhere in the Cardinals organization but nooooooo same lineup except for now we have Fowler starting.:shake:

jd1020 06-22-2018 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13602745)
Kind of like your own Baez, Bryant, Russell etc.

None of those players will be younger than 28 when they can be a FA. Bryant wont be a FA til hes 30.

In fact, the ONLY player on the Cubs roster that have been/would be able to be a FA before 28 was Jason Heyward at 26 years old.

Even ex-Cubs like Torres who is really young with the Yankees wont be a FA til he's 27.

You are talking about generational players like A-Rod, Trout, Harper, Machado etc.. fulfilling their service time at a very young age. You just dont see many teenagers make it to MLB.

BigRedChief 06-22-2018 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13602777)
None of those players will be younger than 28 when they can be a FA. Bryant wont be a FA til hes 30.

In fact, the ONLY player on the Cubs roster that have been/would be able to be a FA before 28 was Jason Heyward at 26 years old.

Even ex-Cubs like Torres who is really young with the Yankees wont be a FA til he's 27.

whats your point? You think Bryant is not going to get $100+million? That it will be wasted money? Best years are behind him?

I wouldn’t be in favor of giving any 30 year old not named Trout a 8 year+ contract at top $.

jd1020 06-22-2018 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13602795)
whats your point? You think Bryant is not going to get $100+million? That it will be wasted money? Best years are behind him?

My point is you are well off on your estimation of a players age entering their first year of FA.

Sure, Bryant will get a sizeable contract, assuming that nothing catastrophic happens, but will it be the best possible contract he could have acquired throughout his career if he were able to become a FA at the same age of Harper and Machado? Nope.

The current service time rules are very very very pro-owner.

BigRedChief 06-22-2018 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13602801)
The current service time rules are very very very pro-owner.

l get that.

But, Look at Reyes for us. Not a lot of pitchers with the talent to potentially win a Cy Young. Next year will just be gaining strength. We now will only have 3 full years of top level service if he doesn’t get injured again and actually lives up to the hype. And that’s the best case scenerio.

After their service time, if they are still good, they will get generational changing money for their families and future ancestors. That’s not a small thing.

jd1020 06-22-2018 04:05 PM

You'll have 4 years with Reyes, unless you trade him before his arm falls off the next time he's ready to take to a mound.

His arb years will be dirt cheap, comparatively.

Personally I wouldn't take the risk, though. Cardinals need a reboot.

They feel like how I felt about the Chiefs for the last 8 years. An incomplete team hanging on to a couple good players while not making the necessary moves to not waste the talents of those players.

When Reyes is going to potentially make an impact who is left on the Cardinals? Molina is probably a glorified bench coach. Ozuna won't be on the team unless the Cardinals extend him. Carpenter will be in a walk year and 34 years old. Fowler will be cut.

Unless the Cardinals are going to actually be serious about the upcoming FA and open up the wallet, I just see the Mets as the future.

Jewish Rabbi 06-22-2018 08:11 PM

I don’t think the cupboard is bare. While I admittedly don’t follow the minors like DJ and Hamas, there are several promising pitching prospects and more outfielders than we know what to do with. Knizer, Sosa, Perez at C and INF along with DeJong. I know not everyone pans out but it seems to me the biggest issue right now and into the future is Captain Concussion.

Jewish Rabbi 06-22-2018 08:12 PM

And I didn’t even mention Schrock...

George Liquor 06-22-2018 08:47 PM

Gah... bad way to lose the no-no.

Jewish Rabbi 06-22-2018 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDj23 (Post 13603023)
Gah... bad way to lose the no-no.

Hold them hitless into the 7th and they’ll still figure out how to lose.

jd1020 06-22-2018 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 13603007)
I don’t think the cupboard is bare. While I admittedly don’t follow the minors like DJ and Hamas, there are several promising pitching prospects and more outfielders than we know what to do with. Knizer, Sosa, Perez at C and INF along with DeJong. I know not everyone pans out but it seems to me the biggest issue right now and into the future is Captain Concussion.

Even if they all panned out there's going to be a big void in the middle of the Cardinals lineup. O'neill is the only prospect that has at least a decent power grade, but 44% strikeouts aint gonna cut it.

George Liquor 06-22-2018 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 13603028)
Hold them hitless into the 7th and they’ll still figure out how to lose.

Exactly

Jewish Rabbi 06-22-2018 09:31 PM

Shocked...

George Liquor 06-22-2018 09:38 PM

Can we just make Willie Mcgee the manager?

Jewish Rabbi 06-22-2018 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDj23 (Post 13603053)
Can we just make Willie Mcgee the manager?

Just save DeWitt some money and just set up a ****ing folding chair in the dugout and call it the manager. Might motivate the team more than the current one.

George Liquor 06-22-2018 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 13603057)
Just save DeWitt some money and just set up a ****ing folding chair in the dugout and call it the manager. Might motivate the team more than the current one.

At least Willie would look cool while losing.

BigRedChief 06-23-2018 08:19 AM

You guys know I've been on the Flaherty train since I saw him pitch 2 years ago. But, come on guys, right now he's the best pitcher on our staff.

Maybe I'm grabbing onto anything positive. :hmmm:

The "book" is out on him by other MLB teams but he is still getting people out. It's not a fluke. He can throw that slider for a strike on the inside or outside corners. They cant just ignore it and wait for a fastball. His curve is looking better. He still has a lot of room for improvement.

He has a little Carpenter in him. Look at the video. It’s not some baseball platitude he’s been taught. He is not happy about the losing. At all.

From last night when asked about taking the no hitter into the 7 inning:
"We lost, that's how I look at it. Doesn't matter what I did, Doesn't matter what anybody did, we lost at the end of the day."

ChiefsCountry 06-25-2018 10:30 AM

Mozeliak Running Low On Patience With Cardinals: 'Something Has To Change'
https://kmox.radio.com/articles/moze...ing-has-change

jd1020 06-25-2018 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 13604859)
Mozeliak Running Low On Patience With Cardinals: 'Something Has To Change'
https://kmox.radio.com/articles/moze...ing-has-change

But does he have the balls to basically throw away a season in which the Cardinals are still in striking distance of first place but no real shot of actually contending and blow it all up? He hasn't been willing to in the past and its been no different in recent years.

At least you dont get swept by the Reds in a 4 game series so there's that.

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 13604859)
Mozeliak Running Low On Patience With Cardinals: 'Something Has To Change'
https://kmox.radio.com/articles/moze...ing-has-change

He'll show the assistant to the traveling secretary what's up, that's for damn sure.

The poor peanut vendor in RF loge is probably ****ed. And I gotta imagine that Mike Mayers and Harrison Bader will end up getting optioned to shake things up. Oliver Marmol and Bryan Eversgard will probably be 're-assigned' and we'll probably bring in another of Mike's golfing buddies as a bullpen catcher to show those loafers out there warming up pitchers that we mean business.

**** off, Mozeliak. You don't have the stones to take a risk or the humility to admit the myriad of mistakes you've made over the last 3 years. You go get your stooge Girsch and take a nap or something. Lord knows after your 'being a GM is hard' speech from last trade deadline that I'm not interested in any more of your bloviating.

BigRedChief 06-25-2018 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 13604859)
Mozeliak Running Low On Patience With Cardinals: 'Something Has To Change'
https://kmox.radio.com/articles/moze...ing-has-change

He was just saying the day before that everything was fine. Stay the course. Let things work itself out.

I'm sure he got some major blowback from the fans so he comes out with this new BS spiel. Not buying this. Just political spin to pacify a pissed off fan base.

jd1020 06-25-2018 11:02 AM

Trade Mikolas. Trade Ozuna. Trade Jose Martinez.

I dare you Mozeliak!

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13604897)
He was just saying the day before that everything was fine. Stay the course. Let things work itself out.

I'm sure he got some major blowback from the fans so he comes out with this new BS spiel. Not buying this. Just political spin to pacify a pissed off fan base.

It's okay guys - they earned a split. So all is well now.

God damn Cardinals can't even do a losing streak right. Get swept this weekend and there'd have been meaningful change. But no, they won a couple of games that did very little to demonstrate that the team is meaningfully better than the squad that has meandered through the first half of the season and everyone gets to keep their job for another month or so.

Look at the Reds when they got rid of one of the only managers in baseball who was worse than Matheny. Brian Price was staggeringly terrible and a brief glimpse at the Reds roster vs. their record supported it. Jim Rigglemen is as average as Price was awful. He's a 'replacement level' big league manager; someone who neither adds nor subtracts anything from the true talent level on the squad.

And the Reds, while still not good, are at least fighting through games now and have gone 29-30 with Rigglemen in charge after starting 3-15. The difference is obvious.

I just don't see how you can watch this squad day in, day out and not think that Matheny is due for exactly the same kind of treatment with Oquendo getting his shot.

BigRedChief 06-25-2018 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604866)
At least you dont get swept by the Reds in a 4 game series so there's that.

Aw Boo-Hoo. You have room to blow a series or two. 162 games etc. I'm sure the 27 Yankees got swept by some team.


Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604866)
But does he have the balls to basically throw away a season in which the Cardinals are still in striking distance of first place but no real shot of actually contending and blow it all up? He hasn't been willing to in the past and its been no different in recent year.

I agree with the lack of stones to make a move.
I disagree with blowing it up. Offense, sure but our starting pitching is excellent.
We still have Hudson languishing in AAA because they dont want the service time clock to start ticking. And I get that and agree. We are going nowhere so why burn a year of maybe a future top of the rotation starter for us?

jd1020 06-25-2018 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13604909)
I agree with the lack of stones to make a move.
I disagree with blowing it up. Offense, sure but our starting pitching is excellent.
We still have Hudson languishing in AAA because they dont want the service time clock to start ticking. And I get that and agree. We are going nowhere so why burn a year of maybe a future top of the rotation starter for us?

Blow it up meaning trade the guys your have on your team that are producing and signed in the short term to get better in the long term.

Mikolas is on a 2 year deal and you got him from Japan. You could probably get a really good return from a contender for him.

Same with Ozuna.

I dont see much reason to keep those guys unless there's a plan to go all out on this 2019 FA class. Even if there's a plan to do it, is there any hope to actually persuade one of those players to pick the Cardinals over the other bidders?

Jose Martinez shouldn't be in the NL. Wong should be on the bench and Fowler should be cut.

Whole lot of turnover to be made in a starting roster.

jd1020 06-25-2018 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13604909)
Aw Boo-Hoo. You have room to blow a series or two. 162 games etc. I'm sure the 27 Yankees got swept by some team.

Cubs aren't the 27 Yankees.

This team wont be winning a WS unless they get a consistent bat to put at the top of the lineup and keep Maddon from putting ****ing Rizzo or Bryant there. Maybe this Nico Hoerner guy will be the ticket if he can hit as advertised in the minors and Russell or Baez will be traded next season.

The Cubs can score a lot of runs but for as good as they are and with how many runs they score they get shutout A LOT and it doesn't even have to be a good pitcher. Any bum with a 5+ ERA can make them look like idiots at the plate.

BigRedChief 06-25-2018 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604919)
Mikolas is on a 2 year deal and you got him from Japan. You could probably get a really good return from a contender for him.

I would think so too. He's found money. Should gamble with him on a trade for some possible hgh end talent but not sure things.
Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604919)
You could probably get a really good return from a contender for him.

Same with Ozuna.

Yep. I don't see him signing long term here. Seems like the kind of hitter teams want at the deadline. We have to trade him before next season starts to get the max value.
Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604919)
Jose Martinez shouldn't be in the NL.

But, what can you get from an AL team for him?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604919)
Wong should be on the bench

I thought he was going to turn it around after last season. He was sprayng the ball to all fields. Using that inside out swing to get hits to LF. Hit .275-.285. And now hes back to the home run on every swing approach. He's such a good defensive 2B. What a waste. Again though, I dont see any trade value.
Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604919)
Fowler should be cut.

Agreed and advocated for this in this thread several times. We have the extra money to write off the financial loss. We should cut our on the field losses.

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13604903)
Trade Mikolas. Trade Ozuna. Trade Jose Martinez.

I dare you Mozeliak!

I'd hold Ozuna; his value is suppressed.

I'd absolutely consider offers on Mikolas and Martinez though - both guys are pretty good candidates. Mikolas is unlikely to get a long-term deal past next season due to age and rotation candidates in the minors. He'll test the market at least. Martinez just isn't a National League player and his value will never be higher.

Martinez actually fits Boston nicely. He and JD Martinez could split DH duties while also playing LF (pretty easy in Fenway; Even Jose can be hidden out there). The problem is that the Sox system just isn't very good these days, IMO. Everyone points to Chavis but a power guy with a high K rate in the low minors, a PED suspension and a passable at best glove who only profiles at 1b and 3b is a pretty iffy return as the centerpiece, IMO. I'd be more interested in him if he were lefty. Sam Travis is a JAG. Groome has some odd red flags around him (though I liked him heading into the draft).

I'm as familiar with Houck as anyone in the country who isn't a family member, oddly enough. As a Mizzou season ticket holder for a bit now I saw pretty much all his starts his last 2 years and ultimately his JR (last) season left me a lot underwhelmed. Breaking ball took a step back, fastball command was spotty. He just didn't seem to flourish with the added pressure of being the staff ace on a team with post-season aspirations. And this is petty, but on Sundays when everyone on the team would go out there and sign for the kids on the field, he'd just walk down the tunnel. The kid was big-leaguing 4 yr olds; WTF? So Houck's not a guy I'd build a deal around either.

Bottom line is that I just don't like the Bosox system that much.

MarkDavis'Haircut 06-25-2018 12:45 PM

Well, my Pirates are free falling.

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13604909)
Aw Boo-Hoo. You have room to blow a series or two. 162 games etc. I'm sure the 27 Yankees got swept by some team.


I agree with the lack of stones to make a move.
I disagree with blowing it up. Offense, sure but our starting pitching is excellent.
We still have Hudson languishing in AAA because they dont want the service time clock to start ticking. And I get that and agree. We are going nowhere so why burn a year of maybe a future top of the rotation starter for us?

Hudson isn't a top of the rotation starter, IMO. Solid #3. Let's set aside Rick Porcello's flukey-ass 2016 where he stole a CY, the 2.5-3 win pitcher he's been essentially every other year of his career is probably your best case scenario for Hudson. Maybe a Matt Boyd, Jake Odorizzi, Kyle Gibson sort.

If the Cardinals are looking to bank financial wherewithal via cost-controlled starting pitching and use that to supplement the offense in FA, you hold onto Hudson because he's going to out-pitch his salary by a far amount of the next 6 years. But if the Cardinals hold him because they think he's an ace in waiting, they're making a mistake.

Make Hudson the sweetener in a deal centered around Bader, Kelly, Hudson and a 4th piece for Syndergaard and I'd do it in a hearbeat. If the Mets are seriously considering moving that guy, make it happen. Get him in a rotation with Mike Maddux and he'll win a CY within 3 years, IMO. His stuff and command is that good.

BigRedChief 06-25-2018 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13605072)
I'd hold Ozuna; his value is suppressed.

I'd absolutely consider offers on Mikolas and Martinez though - both guys are pretty good candidates. Mikolas is unlikely to get a long-term deal past next season due to age and rotation candidates in the minors. He'll test the market at least. Martinez just isn't a National League player and his value will never be higher.

Martinez actually fits Boston nicely. He and JD Martinez could split DH duties while also playing LF (pretty easy in Fenway; Even Jose can be hidden out there). The problem is that the Sox system just isn't very good these days, IMO. Everyone points to Chavis but a power guy with a high K rate in the low minors, a PED suspension and a passable at best glove who only profiles at 1b and 3b is a pretty iffy return as the centerpiece, IMO. I'd be more interested in him if he were lefty. Sam Travis is a JAG. Groome has some odd red flags around him (though I liked him heading into the draft).

I'm as familiar with Houck as anyone in the country who isn't a family member, oddly enough. As a Mizzou season ticket holder for a bit now I saw pretty much all his starts his last 2 years and ultimately his JR (last) season left me a lot underwhelmed. Breaking ball took a step back, fastball command was spotty. He just didn't seem to flourish with the added pressure of being the staff ace on a team with post-season aspirations. And this is petty, but on Sundays when everyone on the team would go out there and sign for the kids on the field, he'd just walk down the tunnel. The kid was big-leaguing 4 yr olds; WTF? So Houck's not a guy I'd build a deal around either.

Bottom line is that I just don't like the Bosox system that much.

so who are our realistic trading partners? What does a trade look like?

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carr4MVP (Post 13605074)
Well, my Pirates are free falling.

That's what happens when you enter the season indifferent about winning.

The Pirates were an obvious collapse candidate. They not only didn't attempt to improve, they announced loudly that they didn't really care if they got worse.

So naturally, they did...

VAChief 06-25-2018 12:58 PM

Bernie lays out the despair fairly bluntly...love the phrase mathenaging.

https://www.101sports.com/2018/06/15...p-mathenaging/

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13605101)
so who are our realistic trading partners? What does a trade look like?

No idea at this point.

Seattle? His power would play down in their ballpark and he'd force Cruz into the OF full-time and his body simply can't do that anymore. He's a pending FA though and Martinez could be appealing to them next year. While his HRs would drop, the line drive swing may be a perfect approach to that park. Martinez really can't play OF out there.

Toronto isn't able to compete and isn't sure if Vlad Jr can play the field just yet. I'd be surprised to see them make a move that could lock up DH when they know they may have to stick Vlad there.

LAA has Pujols clogging DH. Cleveland has Encarnacion and Alonso. MN is effectively out of the race though they'd be worth circling back with in the off-season after LoMo's short-term deal expires.

He has to go to the AL and the AL is effectively decided at this point. We know the 5 playoff teams - Houston, NYY, Cleveland, Boston and Seattle. The only intrigue left is some jockying for the division in the East. So I don't see any major pushes until the off-season to add a DH type at this point unless you can get a 3-team deal put together with Boston.

The ship has probably sailed.

MarkDavis'Haircut 06-25-2018 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13605102)
That's what happens when you enter the season indifferent about winning.

The Pirates were an obvious collapse candidate. They not only didn't attempt to improve, they announced loudly that they didn't really care if they got worse.

So naturally, they did...

You are not wrong. The fast start gave me false hope.

The fact that we are keeping Sean Rodriguez is inexcusable.

jd1020 06-25-2018 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carr4MVP (Post 13605157)
You are not wrong. The fast start gave me false hope.

The fact that we are keeping Sean Rodriguez is inexcusable.

He's such a gamer though. Who else would you want to have on your team in a bench clearing "brawl" over nothing? He'll be sure to get heated at something and puff his chest.

MarkDavis'Haircut 06-25-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13605181)
He's such a gamer though. Who else would you want to have on your team in a bench clearing "brawl" over nothing? He'll be sure to get heated at something and puff his chest.

He is batting .1000 against Gatorade containers as well. ROFL

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 13605181)
He's such a gamer though. Who else would you want to have on your team in a bench clearing "brawl" over nothing? He'll be sure to get heated at something and puff his chest.

The spiritual successor to Jonny Gomes.

**** that guy right in his face. Chris Johnson can also eat a big ol bag o' dicks.

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-25-2018 02:22 PM

From people that knew him, I've heard Houck is one of the biggest dumbasses on Earth. No thanks here, too.

Marcellus 06-25-2018 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAChief (Post 13605107)
Bernie lays out the despair fairly bluntly...love the phrase mathenaging.

https://www.101sports.com/2018/06/15...p-mathenaging/


:cuss::cuss::cuss: This is so glaringly obvious watching the games.

Quote:

6. Adjust to a more aggressive hitting approach, or find a new batting coach. I’ve already talked and written about the Cardinals’ foolishly bad habit of watching too many called strikes go by overall — and especially on hitters’ favorites counts such as 2-0 and 3-1. Here’s more: the Cardinals have taken 55.3% of all pitches thrown to them this season, the fourth highest “take” rate in MLB, and second highest in the NL. And to put additional perspective on this, the 55.3% take rate would be the highest by a Cardinals team since 1993. Would someone like to explain the benefit of taking so many pitches? If it’s to get control of the count, fine — unless, of course, that follows with something stupid like watching a called strike on 2-0, or 2-1, or 3-1. And if you’re guessing that this take rate is a strategy to draw more walks and get more runners on base, well, it’s failing, The Cardinals’ current walk rate of 8.4% ranks 18th in the majors. That 8.4% walk rate would be the Cards’ seventh-lowest since 1996, a span of 23 seasons. Swing. The. Damn. Bat.
This of all things is probably the easiest to fix. Swing. The.Damn. Bat.

raybec 4 06-25-2018 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAChief (Post 13605107)
Bernie lays out the despair fairly bluntly...love the phrase mathenaging.

https://www.101sports.com/2018/06/15...p-mathenaging/

A couple of quotes:

If you want to blame all of this on Matheny, well I ain’t gonna allow it to happen because Matheny didn’t put together this roster, and he didn’t negotiate contracts for Dexter Fowler, Brett Cecil, Luke Gregerson, Wong, etc. I’ll be writing on this subject soon, and the Matheny congregation will suspect me of being up to some evil trick … you know: the really insidious, despicable tactics like using statistical and factual information to back up an opinion, and for committing the unforgivable sin of proudly using an independent mind.)

If you want batting coach John Mabry fired, dream on people but it ain’t gonna happen unless Matheny is fired at the same time, because of their special BFF bond that cannot be broken … if you want the Cardinals to designate Fowler for assignment and eat the final 3.5 years of salary owed on a $82.5 million contract, it ain’t gonna happen … if you want Fowler traded, without the Cardinals agreeing to pay for most of what’s left on his contract — that ain’t gonna happen because no MLB general manager in the U.S. or Canada is certifiably insane … if you want Machado, it ain’t gonna happen, unless ownership and Mozeliak change the entire way the franchise does bidness with baseball trades … if you want Josh Donaldson — he’s an obsession in Our Town — it ain’t gonna happen unless the Cardinals are determined to give up a couple of good prospects and take the risk of having another player go to the DL; Donaldson has had two different injuries this season (shoulder, calf) and has played only 36 games for Toronto.

BigRedChief 06-25-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13605123)
No idea at this point.

Seattle? His power would play down in their ballpark and he'd force Cruz into the OF full-time and his body simply can't do that anymore. He's a pending FA though and Martinez could be appealing to them next year. While his HRs would drop, the line drive swing may be a perfect approach to that park. Martinez really can't play OF out there.

Toronto isn't able to compete and isn't sure if Vlad Jr can play the field just yet. I'd be surprised to see them make a move that could lock up DH when they know they may have to stick Vlad there.

LAA has Pujols clogging DH. Cleveland has Encarnacion and Alonso. MN is effectively out of the race though they'd be worth circling back with in the off-season after LoMo's short-term deal expires.

He has to go to the AL and the AL is effectively decided at this point. We know the 5 playoff teams - Houston, NYY, Cleveland, Boston and Seattle. The only intrigue left is some jockying for the division in the East. So I don't see any major pushes until the off-season to add a DH type at this point unless you can get a 3-team deal put together with Boston.

The ship has probably sailed.

Thanks for the response but still :sulk:

DJ's left nut 06-25-2018 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 13605210)
From people that knew him, I've heard Houck is one of the biggest dumbasses on Earth. No thanks here, too.

I would let Trey Harris come over to my house and **** my sister.

He's just not athletic enough for the next level, IMO - but man you'll never meet a nicer or more genuine guy. The Tigers lost a hell of an overall asset to the program there.

I'd always heard that Bond was the idiot in the room. Or at least had the attention span of a caffeinated terrier. Hard to get a great read on secondhand reports from college students but with Harris the guy was just so engaging that you couldn't help but meet him in person here and there. Just a great dude.

Marcellus 06-26-2018 12:45 PM

Ok I am usually against this sort of thing (posting a story from a pay sight) but this story is just too good not to share. -

Quote:

Move over, Bobby Bonilla: The Braves have been paying Bruce Sutter for 30 years thanks to a ludicrous contract



It was the​ winter of 1984. The​ Atlanta Braves,​ fresh off an 80-82 season, decided​ to strike​ while​ the​​ iron was mostly lukewarm, if you’re being charitable. Anchoring their bullpen was the perfectly suitable committee of Gene Garber, Steve Bedrosian, and Donnie Moore; each registered 28 or more Games Finished and had double-digit save totals. But for some reason, the Braves wanted more. They wanted Bruce Sutter.

Sutter was a closer in an era when the role was still emerging. He spent the 1984 season anchoring the bullpen of the St. Louis Cardinals, leading the league in Games Finished with 63 and amassing a then-record-tying 45 saves while pitching a now unheard of 122.2 IP. He finished sixth in MVP voting and third in Cy Young balloting. He was paid handsomely for his services, too — his $975,000 salary made him one of the highest paid players at the time. As he entered free agency that offseason, he expected to cash in even bigger. And the Braves were willing to meet his demands.

When the ink dried on the contract, the basic terms gave Sutter $9.1 million over six years, entering his age-32 season for, again, a team which failed to win half its games the year prior. The length of the contract was absurd at the time, but so was the amount, given the context. His salary — not accounting for some interesting structuring which we’ll get to — was the 10th highest in the Majors in 1985, behind guys like George Foster, Gary Carter, and Keith Hernandez. (Remember when the Mets spent money?) He was the second-highest paid pitcher in the game, only behind José DeLeón (really). Even if things had gone as planned, it would’ve been a crazy, terrible signing by the Braves.

Things didn’t go as planned. But that wasn’t even the worst part.

Over the course of his six-year deal, Sutter collected 40 saves, total, while sporting a 4.55 ERA. He was worth, collectively, -0.3 bWAR, and at no point during his Braves career did he turn in an above-replacement-level season as a pitcher. He was, shockingly, worth more as a batter: he put up a 0.0 bWAR line as a Brave, turning in a career-high 0.1 bWAR in 1988, when he went 0-for-1 with a walk and a strikeout. Injuries cost him his 1987 season and he was so bad in 1988 that he just hung them up. As contracts go, Sutter’s Braves deal was historically bad. The Braves destiny suffered a similar fate — over the six years of Sutter’s contract, the Braves’ best season (1986) ended with a 72-89 record. The other five seasons were all ones with 90 or more losses — one of 92, two of 96, one of 97, and a laughably bad 54-106 in 1988. Sutter, perhaps, retired out of embarrassment.

And again, that wasn’t the worst part.

The worst part was that Sutter decided to use his big free agency contract as a financial planning opportunity. Rather than get all of that $9.1 million paid out in relatively even amounts per year, Sutter insisted that his money be deferred. Both the Braves and the Cardinals agreed to the demands of the former Cy Young winner and future Hall of Famer. In the end, the Braves were the ones who offered more money — about $9 million over 6 to the Cardinals’ $7 million over 5, per The New York Times — and an absolutely whackadoo structure that could only be attributed to irrational exuberance.

First, Sutter was only paid about $750,000 per year while under the Braves’ control. For the thirty years after he retired — 30!!! — the Braves agreed to pay him no less than $1.12 million per year, and potentially more if interest rates spiked above a negotiated floor of 12.3 percent. (They haven’t.) That ends in 2021, and it’s only 2018, so Bruce Sutter, at some point this year, received or will receive a check for $1.12 million for his 112 games of sub-replacement baseball as an Atlanta Brave. On July 1, the New York Mets will pay Bobby Bonilla about $1 million to not play for them. As that date approaches, the Mets become a punchline — and punching bag — for beat writers near and far. And yet, at some point during this same calendar year, the Atlanta Braves will pay Bruce Sutter about the same amount.

But wait: there’s more.

Typically, when a player signs a multiyear contract, the total is paid out over the course of that contract in the form of annual salaries. That’s the case even when money is deferred; until the money is earned, there’s nothing to defer. In the case of Sutter, that means he shouldn’t have gotten the full $9.1 million (plus interest); he retired four years into the six year contact. But Sutter’s contract wasn’t typical.

For some reason, the Braves agreed to pay Sutter the full $9.1 million up front — think of it as a signing bonus of sorts — but then deferred the whole amount. If you do a little bit of math, you’ll realize that 12.3 percent of $9.1 million is $1.12 million, which makes sense. But what about the $750,000 he got during the six years of the contract? Those, too, were interest payments — the Braves agreed to pay him approximately 8 percent of the deferred amount during the first six years. As a pretty funny, and obviously unintended side effect, Sutter ended up getting his negotiated “salary” in both 1989 and 1990, even though he was retired.

And because all of the money he’s earned to date (and will earn through 2021) is interest, that $9.1 million in principal has, to date, gone unpaid. That’s right: it was deferred until 2022. Four years from now, Bruce Sutter will be a 69-year-old Hall of Fame pitcher who last pitched in 1988 who, unlike Bobby Bonilla, will be on the receiving end of a $9.1 million check from the Atlanta Braves.

In total, Sutter will earn north of $45 million for his three years being terrible as a member of the Atlanta Braves. Bobby Bonilla, eat your heart out.
Holy shit Sutter was genius and the Braves were stupid (almost the Cardinals).

banecat 06-26-2018 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 13606481)
Ok I am usually against this sort of thing (posting a story from a pay sight) but this story is just too good not to share. -



Holy shit Sutter was genius and the Braves were stupid (almost the Cardinals).

His agent was a genius

Frazod 06-26-2018 01:01 PM

Damn, and I thought the Angels got hosed on the Pujols deal. At least he's played decent ball for them.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.