![]() |
Quote:
|
If Earl Thomas can win one game for the Chiefs they should do it. Because that one game could be in the playoffs.
|
Quote:
And seriously, how do you define "overpay" for a perennial All-Pro? What are you afraid of? It's like battered fan syndrome or something. Chiefs fans have been conditioned by years of failure to believe that deals like this not only don't happen, they CAN'T happen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It isn't your money. And we don't really need any more Dee Ford's. So why are you so hung up on potential compensation? |
Is it because you're afraid he'll play well enough to save Sutton's job?
I wonder if Bears fans wrung their hands about giving up 2 firsts for Khalil Mack? |
Quote:
|
I'd give up a 2nd and a 5th for him. Chances are pretty high that those players won't be starters. Hell I'd give up a 1st and 5th for him. Maybe both of our 2nds for him.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Trading for Earl Thomas doesn't hurt this team's future at all.
1) He's a FS. He could play another 4 years easy. Every bit as long as a draft pick. 2) There's a ton of money going to come off the books next year and after. His salary will be EASY to absorb, even if he's the highest-paid safety in the league. 3) So far, this regime's defensive drafts have demonstrated at least partially that they don't know how to fix this defense through the draft. A bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush. There's no reason not to do this deal, not only for this year but for the next 2 or 3. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But they wouldn't be mortgaging the future anyway. That's a myth that teams foist on fans to justify standing pat and doing nothing. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.