ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Veach's '21 Offseason Plan to Keep Us Thriving: Let's speculate

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Veach's '21 Offseason Plan to Keep Us Thriving: Let's speculate (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=336980)

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15589672)

Can't be right 100% of the time.

Complete offensive line overhaul, baby.

The more I think about all of these scenarios, I feel like Trading 31 for Orlando Brown is the best option.

He is much better than anyone we could get at 31. He doesnt require multiple picks to acquire. LT is in his blood, his father told him to never settle for being a RT. That is some serious motivation.

Chiefs showing him that they want him to protect their most valuable asset would also motivate him.

He is young, could solve the LT issue for years. He is experienced and proven.

Yes there is a different scheme to consider. Lamar is not that different than Patrick when in the pocket. He likes to extend the play and scramble around quite a bit so this isnt new to him.

The other options like sign an old vet draft a LT at 31 and let him sit for a year or so, does NOT help us now. NOW is very important.

Not liking the idea of trading future picks to move up in round one to get a Possible good LT either as we need to keep our draft capital since we are paying most of our studs at the top of the market.

The Ravens may not be willing to trade with us but they want a top 40 pick and we have a first rounder to offer.

If I'm trading for a LT and paying him, I would want one better than Brown. I think I'm out on that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15589681)

It really doesn't matter.

There is a ZERO percent chance Andy Reid is going to roll with two rookie OT's in 2021.

ZERO.

I don't care if they give up the next two years entire drafts for Jesus H. Christ himself, it ain't happenin'.

We're not rolling with two rookie OT's. It's not happening.

Don't do this to yourself.

**** Orlando Brown. Jesus.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15589690)

If I'm trading for a LT and paying him, I would want one better than Brown. I think I'm out on that.

Yep. Brown really isn't an option.

The Ravens aren't trading him to KC either.

Tackles just go so early fellas. I dunno. I might just stopgap it for a year and see what happens.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15589700)

The Ravens aren't trading him to KC either.

on that we agree.

I'd send a few 1's to the Texans for Tunsil and be done with it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15589706)

Tackles just go so early fellas. I dunno. I might just stopgap it for a year and see what happens.

Lots of bust tackles go early too. Trading away precious draft capital on a maybe just isn't good business.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15589711)

Lots of bust tackles go early too. Trading away precious draft capital on a maybe just isn't good business.

Not really. Who was the last bust tackle that went early?

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15589710)

I'd send a few 1's to the Texans for Tunsil and be done with it.

Doubt they're willing to trade Tunsil for anything less than or equal to what they paid for him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15589715)

Doubt they're willing to trade Tunsil for anything less than or equal to what they paid for him.

Sunk cost fallacy and all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15589690)

If I'm trading for a LT and paying him, I would want one better than Brown. I think I'm out on that.

OK but thats easy to say. Realistically, who are you thinking about?

Tunsil? Not avaiable first off and he would require a lot more than 31.

Dillard? Not known to be available and we dont know if he can really be a LT. Or what the compensation would be? Probably more than 31.

I get the concerns but if you really think about what is possible. I keep coming back to Brown.