I'd prefer to wait until the regular season before making that determination.

Mccluster may well lead the receivers in production. But only because casshole is blind and/or scared

Clay, I'm moving to Florida soon and I'm going to visit Dex' restaurant and post pics on here just to spite you.

LOL

Whoa. That would be awful.

If McCluster led the Chiefs in receiving yards, they're looking at a 1-15 or 2-14 season.

Breaston 2011 yards: 810
McClusters 2011 yards: 844 yards

And the trend continues into 2012.

Are you really? Cool man, congrats!

:thumb:

Somehow, I think you'll like it better than Ohio (plus, IIRC, you'll be close to your son).

Take a massive shit and clog one of the toilets.

I think this is a real possibility. And Dane is right, we'd suck in this case.

And then I could champion Dexter as the worst Chiefs player ever. :evil:

Isn't that total yardage for McCluster and not just receiving yards?

Pretty sure you're trolling with this post, because only a ****ing idiot would compare RB yards to WR yards, especially when one player is no longer even a RB.

:facepalm:

Okay, as "enlightening" as this has been, I'm off to bed.

'Night, All!

Yeah. He had 328 yards receiving.

Mostly on BS dumpoffs.

Are you claiming that versatility is a hinderance and not a strength?

He averaged 4.5 yards per rush...not exactly poor performance.

I disagree. We'll be better with an injured matt and Brady's arm throwing deep at least three times a game.

Let me also say that when you have "bs dumpoff" options like Hillis, Charles and Dexter....I have no problem with Cassel checking down as long as he is throwing passes to the receivers and spreading the ball around.

He does that and those "bs dumpoffs" will be highly effective.

It was poor enough that he's no longer a RB.

Game, set, match.

Now we get to see him fail as a WR. A position he already failed at as a rookie.