'Hamas' Jenkins |
12-30-2014 06:34 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
(Post 11230378)
You seem to have a serious reading comprehension problem.
This whole line of conversation started comparing Sandy's realistic acknowledgement that Smith is here to stay compared to his detractors, many of whom want the entire building to burn.
It doesn't matter if they grudgingly admit it's not likely to happen. It's what they harp on, hope for, and bitch about incessantly.
|
Who said that Smith wasn't here to say? Who said that Reid, Dorsey, et. al weren't here to stay?
It absolutely does matter if they acknowledge its existence. No one is grudgingly admitting that it's not likely. The certainty of it is what breeds the anxiety and discontent.
Your entire train of thought in this thread comes from baseless claims about what you think others have said (that you can't talk about improving WRs or the line, both undeniably false).
In order for Sandy Cheeks to be in reality while everyone else isn't, there would have to be a belief that Smith isn't here long-term. Well, where is that belief?
There is a difference between a desire and a belief, and I don't think someone that conflates the two should begrudge anyone for reading comprehension issues, especially when they can't get elementary facts about what is and isn't said over personnel decisions, correct.
|