ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL Rumors: Mahomes, Watson atop KC's QB wish list (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306510)

Eleazar 04-04-2017 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12808814)
I'd rather have a QB that's either a B+ or C- than one that's either an A or F. It's not even a question.
Posted via Mobile Device

https://media.giphy.com/media/11Z4zciA8ISJhu/giphy.gif

Chiefnj2 04-04-2017 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12809114)
Yea, he's exactly like Manziel. Only difference is that he's bigger, has a better arm, and has all the intangibles! :rolleyes:

What intangibles? His mechanics suck. He leaves the pocket, rolls to the right and makes some very good throws that he can get away with in college because of his excellent arm strength. That is what JM did, shit broke down and he made plays scrambling around.

The NFL is a game of being a pocket QB first and foremost.

pugsnotdrugs19 04-04-2017 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 12809134)
What intangibles? His mechanics suck. He leaves the pocket, rolls to the right and makes some very good throws that he can get away with in college because of his excellent arm strength. That is what JM did, shit broke down and he made plays scrambling around.

The NFL is a game of being a pocket QB first and foremost.

Aaron Rodgers says hi.

And no, I'm not saying Mahomes is going to be on that level, but it just goes to show that you can succeed playing that way in the league.

pugsnotdrugs19 04-04-2017 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12809117)

ROFL ROFL ROFL

Tribal Warfare 04-04-2017 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12809140)
Aaron Rodgers says hi.

And no, I'm not saying Mahomes is going to be on that level, but it just goes to show that you can succeed playing that way in the league.

If you look at KC's 1st round picks in the Dorsey/Reid era they're all boom or bust selections

Bewbies 04-04-2017 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12808814)
I'd rather have a QB that's either a B+ or C- than one that's either an A or F. It's not even a question.
Posted via Mobile Device

In today's NFL if you whiff on a QB and get an F you've done the same toward getting a title as you did if you drafted a 1st ballot hall of famer at any other position.

Without a QB you're going nowhere.

Eleazar 04-04-2017 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 12809267)
In today's NFL if you whiff on a QB and get an F you've done the same toward getting a title as you did if you drafted a 1st ballot hall of famer at any other position.

Without a QB you're going nowhere.

And in today's NFL if you whiff on a QB and get an F, you've done the same toward getting a title as you did if you drafted a B- or C+ in the first round.

Bewbies 04-04-2017 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12809269)
And in today's NFL if you whiff on a QB and get an F, you've done the same toward getting a title as you did if you drafted a B- or C+ in the first round.

Exactly.

RustShack 04-04-2017 01:12 PM

With a coaching staff like ours, and already a starting QB for at least another year.. you take the home run talent at QB. Dorsey knows how to draft, and Reid knows how to develop QB's. Mahomes should be the top target without question.

beach tribe 04-04-2017 01:45 PM

Kind of off topic but I love how every draft has a QB with "Farve like arm talent"

I have yet to see another guy who could break your fingers trying to catch his passes.

Here he is at 47. Listen to the ball LEAVE his hand much less when it hits the receiver's.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/m-y9Jqo-lTM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

-King- 04-04-2017 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12808888)
That's a stupid analogy.

The ultimate goal isn't to just get 700-850000 dollars, it's to have a QB worth enough on his own that you have a chance to win the Super Bowl with him.

Alex Smith is that 700000-850000 type QB that gets a team into QB purgatory.

This QB class is a gift from the gods to help us out of that funk.

Mahomes sitting behind Alex for a year (maybe 2) is our best chance at having the QB situation solved for the next decade.

How is it a stupid analogy? If you needed a million dollar QB to win Superbowls why does Aaron Rodgers only have one almost a decade ago? Why have Manning and Wilson won it in recent years?
Posted via Mobile Device

RunKC 04-04-2017 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12809368)
How is it a stupid analogy? If you needed a million dollar QB to win Superbowls why does Aaron Rodgers only have one almost a decade ago? Why have Manning and Wilson won it in recent years?
Posted via Mobile Device

Bc they had great QB's AND and a lgreat team overall. Do you even realize how god awful the Packers were and have been the last few years?

Rodgers carried an 8-8 caliber team to the NFCCG.

-King- 04-04-2017 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12809388)
Bc they had great QB's AND and great team overall. Do you even realize how god awful the Packers were and have been the last few years?

Rodgers took an 8-8 caliber team to the NFCCG.

How are the Packers awful? Their defense is below average but offense is full of weapons. And I thought elite QBs were able to get past deficiencies in the team?

The same people who blame Smith because he needs everything perfect around him are the same people who blame the Packers because they aren't perfect around Rodgers. It's ironic huh?
Posted via Mobile Device

RunKC 04-04-2017 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12809395)
How are the Packers awful? Their defense is below average but offense is full of weapons. And I thought elite QBs were able to get past deficiencies in the team?

The same people who blame Smith because he needs everything perfect around him are the same people who blame the Packers because they aren't perfect around Rodgers. It's ironic huh?
Posted via Mobile Device

The Packers had massive injuries in their secondary and couldn't stop anyone. They were 21st in points allowed and 22nd in yards allowed. They also had no RB all year...they literally had to move a WR to play RB.

Who here is saying things need to be perfect? Did you not read the post?

Despite an 8-8 team with huge holes, Rodgers put that team on his back and carried them to an NFCCG.
The Packers in no way deserves to go that far, but their QB took control.

The goal is to get one of those QB's, which Alex will never be....ever, and you trying to blame a QB like Rodgers for not dragging an average team to a SB to defend Alex is completely idiotic.

-King- 04-04-2017 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12809114)
Yea, he's exactly like Manziel. Only difference is that he's bigger, has a better arm, and has all the intangibles! :rolleyes:

What intangibles? His fundamentals are worse than Manziels.
Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.