'I"m sick of the media acting like a foul just didn't happen. Basically saying **** the Chiefs don't call fouls on the Eagles if it's close. ****ing stupid.



****ing Eagle fans Bengal fans are sore losers


Rioting in Philli because they lost & "controversial penalty" ****ing and idiots.


It's not ****ing controversial when the player made tugged and held the player he even admitted to causing the foul.


We are the Champions and they can suck it.


Love the tears

I heard less media defending it today, then I heard promoting it.

I think you’re hearing a vocal minority

TMZ Sports

Not saying that narrative isn’t being repeated. It’s just not in the national media except for a few small location.

Also, TMZ has no desire to be truthful. They just want clicks.

is there a reason i cant imbed my damn youtube link, wth am i missing here

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aIHKD6W4K3M" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

LMAO

Eisen: Did he restrict him? Sure. Did he tug his jersey? Yeah. But should that be called??


ROFL

JFC

Honestly, I think a lot of his has to do with the broadcast not showing the angle where the holding is clear right away, and with that moron Greg Olsen freaking out about it. By the time Olsen has ended his tirade and Mike Pereira had tried respectfully to correct him, the cows were out of the barn.

Eagles fans are mostly going to see what they want to see (same as if it'd been us), but even rational people who didn't have a rooting interest in the game would have agreed that he was pulling on the jersey and its was done with intent to avoid getting beat on the play.

And it looks for all the world like JuJu was getting the first down and that the ball is coming his way because Mahomes was looking there and saw it happen.

Let me channel the shit we heard from the Cinci game....."he only tugged 15% of the jersey".....

Really... If he doesn't pull his Jersey it's a first down, since the defender was in his hip pocket after the tug, he then turned it into a wheel route and he grabbed his hip again or it would have been a TD. **** everyone, if he doesn't grab they most likely lose in a similar fashion.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Bengals fans have been boycotting the Super Bowl for over 50 years and it hasn&#39;t accomplished anything to this point ��*♂️</p>&mdash; Shy Gorgeous Alexander (@ChetSteadman222) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChetSteadman222/status/1625521414366281728?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 14, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Went to look into the full interview to see what call he didn't agree with and it was the catch ruled incomplete on the sideline where the ball clearly moved when he only had 1 hand on the ball as it was trapped between his body and the ground. Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't give much credence into the idea that a player has control of a ball that he's trapping against his helmet with 1 hand. If it doesn't move or he doesn't go to the ground then sure, it's a catch. But if you go to ground and it clearly ****ing moves then it's not a catch. Doesn't even matter if it hits the ground or not because you are out of bounds.

Then he said he agreed with the overturn on the fumble TD because he never got a 3rd foot down. Bitch.... The rule doesn't say that a player HAS to take a 3rd step.

Yeah, you can't change my mind that Sanders caught and fumbled that ball

Yeah, I agree about that. Brady can't replace Olsen fast enough.