ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   KU **** OFFICIAL 2015-2016 Kansas Basketball Repository Thread **** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=291487)

Mr. Plow 02-07-2016 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 12068086)
Sac is such a worthless poster.

He's been trolling the board for months now. Not just this thread.

KC_Connection 02-07-2016 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 12067987)
I'm sure this has been addressed but I can't help but point out the fact that some know it all's in this thread just said the other day that Oklahoma was way better than KU. But they lost to KSU yesterday.

ROFL

OU remains way better than KU this year regardless of a road loss. I'm sorry that it hurts you to admit that, I'd love for it to be different.

Bearcat 02-07-2016 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12068164)
OU remains way better than KU this year regardless of a road loss. I'm sorry that it hurts you to admit that, I'd love for it to be different.

I guess they'll eventually prove it if that's the case, since they haven't so far this season in terms of actual results.


And as I've said before, I do think OU is legit and think they're probably better than Kansas, but unless/until OU makes it to the FF and Kansas loses in the first weekend, there isn't much point in carrying on the conversation game by game.

KC_Connection 02-07-2016 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 12068010)
I was told that Frank Mason was better than Perry Ellis by someone in this thread as well.

Feels good to be right.

Mason was certainly better last year than Ellis and the first two months of this season. The fact that a guy who doesn't defend at all became our best player in January, though, is kind of the issue with this team.

KC_Connection 02-07-2016 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 12068173)
I guess they'll eventually prove it if that's the case, since they haven't so far this season in terms of actual results.

The statistical rating systems of BPI (2nd to 17th), KenPom (5th to 10th), Sagarin (3rd to 9th), and Massey (2nd to 10th) would seem to beg to differ on that point.

Quote:

And as I've said before, I do think OU is legit and think they're probably better than Kansas, but unless/until OU makes it to the FF and Kansas loses in the first weekend, there isn't much point in carrying on the conversation game by game.
I'm not the one doing it. I resigned myself months ago to the fact OU was the better team, even before KU's awful January. If KU can somehow win the Big 12 regardless, then great. It's just unlikely.

Bearcat 02-07-2016 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12068199)
The statistical rating systems of BPI (2nd to 17th), KenPom (5th to 10th), Sagarin (3rd to 9th), and Massey (2nd to 10th) would seem to beg to differ on that point.


I'm not the one doing it. I resided myself months ago to the fact OU was the better team, even before KU's awful January. If KU can somehow win the Big 12 regardless, then great. It's just unlikely.

Kenpom has Kansas at -0.0174, 10 spots worse on offense and 11 spots better on defense.... Sagarin is at -.63, with actual results against top 25 and top 100 being very close. Neither suggest OU is far and away the better team. And of course none of them are all that decisive anyway (except probably a few years ago when even the computers had to know Kentucky would win it all).

KC_Connection 02-07-2016 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 12068237)
Kenpom has Kansas at -0.0174, 10 spots worse on offense and 11 spots better on defense....

That's a fairly significant margin, one I certainly wouldn't expect KU to make up in a month with the way they've played all season.


Quote:

Sagarin is at -.63, with actual results against top 25 and top 100 being very close.
Closer, but they still reflect OU being the better team.

Quote:

Neither suggest OU is far and away the better team. And of course none of them are all that decisive anyway (except probably a few years ago when even the computers had to know Kentucky would win it all).
The other two systems I cited suggest it fairly decisively (especially BPI where OU is 2nd and KU is 17th). If you're going to argue that OU isn't a better team than KU right now, you're simply arguing against the stats.

Bearcat 02-07-2016 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12068665)
That's a fairly significant margin, one I certainly wouldn't expect KU to make up in a month with the way they've played all season.



Closer, but they still reflect OU easily being the better team.


The other two systems I cited suggest it fairly decisively (especially BPI where OU is 2nd and KU is 17th). If you're going to argue that OU isn't a much better team than KU right now, you're simply arguing against the stats.

Doesn't BPI suck? Don't think I've ever heard a good thing about it (regardless of the current point, obviously).

It's the first time I've seen "right now" in your argument, beyond repeatedly saying Kansas has been terrible in the past month... and like I've said multiple times, I'm not really even arguing the point beyond the "way better," since that doesn't really exist inside of the top 10 of CBB.

KC_Connection 02-07-2016 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 12068719)
Doesn't BPI suck? Don't think I've ever heard a good thing about it (regardless of the current point, obviously).

No? If anything it might be considered more accurate than some of the others because it accounts for the absence of key players.

Quote:

It's the first time I've seen "right now" in your argument, beyond repeatedly saying Kansas has been terrible in the past month... and like I've said multiple times, I'm not really even arguing the point beyond the "way better," since that doesn't really exist inside of the top 10 of CBB.
If we weren't talking about what the two teams are "right now," I'm not sure what we've be talking about. The whole "way better" thing is pretty semantical, but I find it hard to argue based on the stats that the two teams are all that close at the moment.

Bearcat 02-07-2016 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12069027)
No? If anything it might be considered more accurate than some of the others because it accounts for the absence of key players.


If we weren't talking about what the two teams are "right now," I'm not sure what we've be talking about. The whole "way better" thing is pretty semantical, but I find it hard to argue based on the stats that the two teams are all that close at the moment.

Huh... guess I'll take your word for it. I personally like looking at kenpom and Sagarin, but they're all just estimates that are subject to tweaking season by season to hopefully make them a little more accurate.

Yeah, semantics, I guess... tied in conference, .5 a game overall, a handful of spots in various rankings. As I said before, give KU some toughness or a Withey/(healthy) Embiid type big or somehow equalize Heald and 'way better' becomes even pretty quickly. And as I've said multiple times, I'm not even arguing OU is better. :shrug:

Bambi 02-07-2016 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12068192)
Mason was certainly better last year than Ellis and the first two months of this season. The fact that a guy who doesn't defend at all became our best player in January, though, is kind of the issue with this team.


Bwahahaha. Keep diggin

KC_Connection 02-07-2016 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bambi (Post 12069116)
Bwahahaha. Keep diggin

Isn't it cute when the poor man's Prison Bitch tries to troll? LMAO

Bambi 02-07-2016 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12069142)
Isn't it cute when the poor man's Prison Bitch tries to troll? LMAO


I busted your ass. Deal with it like a man.

Bearcat 02-07-2016 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12069142)
Isn't it cute when the poor man's Prison Bitch tries to troll? LMAO

I'd ban all the trolls from the thread, but then no one would have anything to talk about/make fun of, so the thread would go silent.

KC_Connection 02-07-2016 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 12069097)
Huh... guess I'll take your word for it. I personally like looking at kenpom and Sagarin, but they're all just estimates that are subject to tweaking season by season to hopefully make them a little more accurate.

Here's an explanation of BPI from Dean Oliver with comparisons to both KenPom and Sagarin: http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bask...ndex-explained


Quote:

Yeah, semantics, I guess... tied in conference, .5 a game overall, a handful of spots in various rankings. As I said before, give KU some toughness or a Withey/(healthy) Embiid type big or somehow equalize Heald and 'way better' becomes even pretty quickly. And as I've said multiple times, I'm not even arguing OU is better. :shrug:
Yeah, if KU had a Withey with this group, they'd be the top team in the country. The team would still be softer than we've become accustomed to in the Self era, but the effect of that would be much less with an elite rim protector (and think how good a fit Perry would be with him). As it stands, though, the team is pretty flawed. Again we head into March stuck with a no-offense big like Lucas/Traylor getting significant minutes. And Frank Mason (who was either the best or 2nd best player over the last two years depending on whether you're willing to ignore Perry Ellis' defense) has fallen off a cliff over the last month for whatever reason. It's hard to be too positive going forward considering that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.