WhiteWhale |
04-06-2014 12:36 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman
(Post 10542950)
Phisophically, I agree with the build through the draft approach.
However, I can not support the mixed approach that the two off seasons have entailed.
Building through the draft behind trading two premium picks for a 29 year old QB is limiting any potential window.
When the pieces you are adding in this draft are ready, Smith and other pieces you already have in place will be hitting the end of their windows.
These contradictory moves are almost assuredly setting this franchise up for an endless cycle of mediocrity.
|
Your logic is sound, but I don't entirely agree.
This idea that you have to do one or the other is bad, and the average 'youth movement' is a stupid garbage philosophy that rarely bears fruit. Look at what Herm did. He got talented players and built entirely with youth and the result was a team that simply could not figure out how to win.
To build a good team, good franchises use all avenues available to them. I don't feel that losing two 2nd round picks is a back breaker moving forward. I cannot look at the guys who were available and think we're be further along with Geno Smith or Matt Barkley.
Alex Smith brought a stabilizing presence to a team that has been in total flux at QB since Trent Green left. Now I'd much prefer to find that guy who can start for us until 2030, but I don't really want to sit through 3-4 more 2-14 seasons waiting for us to get him. I don't like playing for draft position. That's what perpetually shitty teams do (except the Colts, who tanked in the right season). Mediocrity is better than being a gutter team, like the Lions or modern Raiders. The chances of making a leap are much better.
It doesn't take a decade to improve.
|