ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****OFFICIAL 2013 Kansas City Chiefs Training Camp Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274697)

Dayze 08-01-2013 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9850794)

got I hate Merril Hodge. and his dumbass big not ties.
WTF.

Dayze 08-01-2013 01:29 PM

too Bad for Bray that no matter how awesome he is, and no matter how shitty Smiff is, he'll never see the field. Smith is the starter for at least 3 years.

Rasputin 08-01-2013 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9851136)
That was always the danger with the Fisher pick. Frankly, I was stunned we picked him over Joeckel. The small school thing can mean a far bigger adjustment that needs to get made.

Fisher will be fine, but it's possible he gets drafted to be a starting LT, gets set in at RT for a few years like Oher or Bulaga, and just never makes the switch back. And frankly, I'd be fine with that. At least that would mean we'd be keeping Albert.

Bulaga is switching to LT this year for the Packers. We'll see how he does. If his play during his rookie year was any sign for us, though, it means Fisher may need some time to struggle and figure things out. Again, usually there's nothing wrong with that, but when you draft a position like RT at 1.1, the expectations are way above the norm, even for most high-profile 1st round OTs.


Suppose Fisher struggles too much and the coaches don't think he is good enough for RT. Would they then move him inside to RG and draft another RTotf? This is worst case scenario imo as what a waist of a pick that would be for 1.1

Dayze 08-01-2013 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9851164)
Suppose Fisher struggles too much and the coaches don't think he is good enough for RT. Would they then move him inside to RG and draft another RTotf? This is worst case scenario imo as what a waist of a pick that would be for 1.1

yuck. that would definitely Strike 2 for Andy/Dorsey

Rasputin 08-01-2013 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9851146)
got I hate Merril Hodge. and his dumbass big not ties.
WTF.



Yeah no shit. He started in on Geno Smith accuracy problems and I was like yeah bull shit. His TD INT ratio speaks for itself.

WakkaWakka 08-01-2013 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9851159)
too Bad for Bray that no matter how awesome he is, and no matter how shitty Smiff is, he'll never see the field. Smith is the starter for at least 3 years.

Same as the old boss.

Fat Elvis 08-01-2013 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9851159)
too Bad for Bray that no matter how awesome he is, and no matter how shitty Smiff is, he'll never see the field. Smith is the starter for at least 3 years.

You haven't paid any attention to Andy Reid, have you?

Rasputin 08-01-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9851168)
yuck. that would definitely Strike 2 for Andy/Dorsey


Well I'm under the impression with Andy Reid that we will spend a first round pick on an O-lineman every year if it's up to him.

AdumbGuy 08-01-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9851173)
Yeah no shit. He started in on Geno Smith accuracy problems and I was like yeah bull shit. His TD INT ratio speaks for itself.

I saw that and wondered what the hell he was talking about. You'd think Geno was averaging a 50% completion rate and averaging like 200 yds per game back in college based on his dumbass comments

Ace Gunner 08-01-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 9851037)
Went today. My brief and humble thoughts...

I miss River Falls. Much easier to get around. Much better sight lines. Better to see the whole of the action without moving around a ton.

That said...

Standouts:
Really hard to tell, as it was rarely 1s vs 1s, but,

Albert
Hudson
Charles
Hemingway
Poe and Powe
Houston
D Johnson
Sean smith
Edgar Jones
DeVito

Not bad, but not great
T Jax
Chavis
Schwartz
Toribio
Wylie
Fisher

Had a bad day;
Alex Smith
Baldwin
Kush (awful)


I wasn't terribly impressed with Knile Davis. Thought he played soft.
I see the intrigue with Bray. Looks the part. Amazing arm.
Smith was bad, even against air. I refuse to bitch and moan about him. There's enough of that on the board, and it's boring as hell. Plus, what's done is done. Obviously it's just one day... But he looked BAD.
Kelce had a rough morning. Missed a couple, and fumbled during two-minute.
Wylie looks real good. Quick and fast. Lets hope he can stay out of the tub.
A lot more motion and shifts than we've seen, maybe since the Vermiel days.
Not a ton of yelling by the coaches. Lots of teaching. But it's still very disciplined. I think they have the respect of the players, and don't have to peel paint to keep it.
I really like the little things they are working on, that I never really saw in previous camps. Hand placement and replacement. Hip movement to beat blocks. Alignment. Playing vs pulls, traps and doubles. Very intentional drills, rather than busywork that I feel I used to see. To expand, what I mean is, in the river falls days, you'd see the lines hit the hell out of the sleds. While that's important, that type of movement is only part of what builds skills on the line. They hit the sleds today, but also then worked on those other things I mentioned, which will make them (hopefully) better at shedding blocks and being part of the play. The same thing was happening Offensively. Just very intentional drills focused on body movements they'll actually use rather than pushing a sled 20 yards.

ya, cool, thx.

I would expect the offense to go through growing pains as the staff walks them through each phase of the PB. Now, if the offense is struggling after pre season game 2, it's time to be concerned about the whole team, because we already know what they look like with no ****ing clue on offense.

but, alas -- this is andy reid, not brian ****ing daboll.

-King- 08-01-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9851159)
too Bad for Bray that no matter how awesome he is, and no matter how shitty Smiff is, he'll never see the field. Smith is the starter for at least 3 years.

Once again, that's a good thing for Bray. He hasn't shown mentally he's ready to start in year one or two. With the talent he has, best case for him is to sit and learn for a while before being thrown out in the fire and wasting his talent because he can't get the mental side down.

People preach patience with a 1st round QB. The patience has to be quadrupled with a UDFA QB, no matter how great he looks vs. 3rd team defenses in training camp.

-King- 08-01-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9851097)
But DJ said Bray didn't look the part...bad mechanics, etc...

Where?

Rasputin 08-01-2013 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdumbGuy (Post 9851205)
I saw that and wondered what the hell he was talking about. You'd think Geno was averaging a 50% completion rate and averaging like 200 yds per game back in college based on his dumbass comments


He talked about missing wide open guys. He must have been watching other games in alternative universe I guess?

Dayze 08-01-2013 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9851211)
Once again, that's a good thing for Bray. He hasn't shown mentally he's ready to start in year one or two. With the talent he has, best case for him is to sit and learn for a while before being thrown out in the fire and wasting his talent because he can't get the mental side down.

People preach patience with a 1st round QB. The patience has to be quadrupled with a UDFA QB, no matter how great he looks vs. 3rd team defenses in training camp.

oh yeah, don't get me wrong here. I was coming from the stance that there's probably a 1% chance he'll see the field regardless of how he develops physically/mentally etc. Smith won't have to worry about anything for 3 years, IMO

kepp 08-01-2013 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9851173)
Yeah no shit. He started in on Geno Smith accuracy problems and I was like yeah bull shit. His TD INT ratio speaks for itself.

And he didn't just knock Smith's accuracy, he had to narrow it down to, "he has bad accuracy when the receiver is wide open." Who cares? How many times in an NFL season does a QB get a WR that is wide open...where the coverage is blown.

mcaj22 08-01-2013 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 9851238)
And he didn't just knock Smith's accuracy, he had to narrow it down to, "he has bad accuracy when the receiver is wide open." Who cares? How many times in an NFL season does a QB get a WR that is wide open...where the coverage is blown.

didnt you watch Chiefs games last year? It happens a lot on bad teams.

Mav 08-01-2013 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9851181)
Well I'm under the impression with Andy Reid that we will spend a first round pick on an O-lineman every year if it's up to him.

Other than Danny Watkins, name one olinemen that was drafted in the first round by the Eagles?

They have drafted several D LINEMEN, and a wide receiver in recent memory. But, they usually go dline in the first round.

mcaj22 08-01-2013 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9851306)
Other than Danny Watkins, name one olinemen that was drafted in the first round by the Eagles?

They have drafted several D LINEMEN, and a wide receiver in recent memory. But, they usually go dline in the first round.

Shawn Andrews
Danny Watkins
traded first round pick for Jason Peters

three

Mav 08-01-2013 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9851319)
Shawn Andrews
Danny Watkins
traded first round pick for Jason Peters

three

Drafted mister. Jason Peters does not count lol.

So, they draft both lines apparently.

I was trying to remember the dlinemen, all I could remember was Brandon Graham, but I know they have drafted more.

To be exact: In the past 10 drafts, two of the drafts the eagles didn't have first rounders, but they have selected 5 d linemen in the first round. two offensive linemen, and a wide receiver. That's pretty stunning to me.

Rasputin 08-01-2013 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9851306)
Other than Danny Watkins, name one olinemen that was drafted in the first round by the Eagles?

They have drafted several D LINEMEN, and a wide receiver in recent memory. But, they usually go dline in the first round.


You are right it has mostly been Dlineman but I'm still expecting O-line for the Chiefs with Andy Reid. I think that is the vision he has so he can produce with his precious quarterback.

Mav 08-01-2013 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo (Post 9851333)
You are right it has mostly been Dlineman but I'm still expecting O-line for the Chiefs with Andy Reid. I think that is the vision he has so he can produce with his precious quarterback.

I can see that. Although, wouldn't shock me at all if they go WR next year, especially if Baldwin sucks.

ToxSocks 08-01-2013 02:51 PM

I have a feeling that "dropped balls" is an excuse that is going to be in heavy rotation for much of this season.

Im sure there is going to be plenty of talk about how Bowe wasn't worth the money either.

BigCatDaddy 08-01-2013 03:00 PM

[QUOTE=Detoxing;9851375]<b>I have a feeling that "dropped balls" is an excuse that is going to be in heavy rotation for much of this season. </b>

Im sure there is going to be plenty of talk about how Bowe wasn't worth the money either.QUOTE]

That and "no seperation" seems to be popular.

-King- 08-01-2013 03:00 PM

Got tickets for the 49ers preseason game. Only $7.... why not LMAO

mcaj22 08-01-2013 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9851328)
Drafted mister. Jason Peters does not count lol.

So, they draft both lines apparently.

I was trying to remember the dlinemen, all I could remember was Brandon Graham, but I know they have drafted more.

To be exact: In the past 10 drafts, two of the drafts the eagles didn't have first rounders, but they have selected 5 d linemen in the first round. two offensive linemen, and a wide receiver. That's pretty stunning to me.

Jason Peters absolutely counts they gave up their first round pick slot for him

its like taking an offensive lineman there, no different. that year they didnt like anyone they scouted i guess and went for the known player instead. It's still wasting a pick on an o-lineman

ToxSocks 08-01-2013 03:07 PM

[QUOTE=BigCatDaddy;9851390]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9851375)
<b>I have a feeling that "dropped balls" is an excuse that is going to be in heavy rotation for much of this season. </b>

Im sure there is going to be plenty of talk about how Bowe wasn't worth the money either.QUOTE]

That and "no seperation" seems to be popular.

Just like year 1 of the Cassel era.

The media and fans blamed Cassel's shortcomings on a lack of weapons, dropped balls etc and swore up and down that Cassel would be a good QB once he was surrounded by viable weapons.....

uh huh.......

WakkaWakka 08-01-2013 03:08 PM

[QUOTE=Detoxing;9851405]
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9851390)

Just like year 1 of the Cassel era.

The media and fans blamed Cassel's shortcomings on a lack of weapons, dropped balls etc and swore up and down that Cassel would be a good QB once he was surrounded by viable weapons.....

uh huh.......

2013=2009

Messier 08-01-2013 03:12 PM

[QUOTE=WakkaWakka;9851411]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9851405)

2013=2009

Don't stop there.

Dorsey=Pioli
Smith=Cassel

-King- 08-01-2013 03:14 PM

LMAO It's hilarious how worked up people get over training camp and the conclusions they draw from it.

bishop_74 08-01-2013 03:14 PM

I nominate us to change our name to the Kansas City Sharts! All the media goads you into believing we will be this giant relieving fart, but sneaky trouser chili soon emerges after game 2!!! It's over before it even began!!!

Messier 08-01-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bishop_74 (Post 9851430)
I nominate us to change our name to the Kansas City Sharts! All the media goads you into believing we will be this giant relieving fart, but sneaky trouser chili soon emerges after game 2!!! It's over before it even began!!!

I don't know. The media is doing a pretty good job of tell us how bad things are going.

RealSNR 08-01-2013 03:22 PM

I gotta laugh at the "no separation" thing.

Know why there's no separation between Bowe and his guy? Because there are no speed guys to challenge defenses deep to force the secondary to back off and play with a cushion. And even if we have those speed guys, they're ****ing worthless if the (say it with me) QUAR-TER-BACK isn't worth an ounce of AIDS.

You saw what arguably the best WR in the NFL in Larry Fitzgerald was forced to become without a real QB. And hell, at least he's got some actual legit company helping out in the WR corps.

There won't be any separation until teams start ACTUALLY fearing our QB. And I'm not talking about them fearing his ability to not make mistakes and win games against shitty teams. I'm talking about them fearing his ability to potentially burn them with a big play at ANY GIVEN MOMENT.

Alex is likely not that guy. So until then, people need to sit back and shut the **** up about "no separation" from our WRs. We could be set up with Dwayne Bowe, Calvin Johnson, and a speed guy like Mike Wallace and we still probably wouldn't get the "separation" that these asshole true fans are looking for.

OnTheWarpath15 08-01-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9849283)
I've only found two instances of those 27 losses where the offense scored more than 24 points.

In both cases, they scored 27 points.

In those two games, he's a combined 52/85 for 586 yards, 3 TDs and 3 INTs.

Frank Gore had 170 yards from scrimmage in one game, and 158 YFS in the other - which was a game they lost because Smith threw a pick-6 with 3 minutes left in the game to put SF down 14 points.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9849372)
Alex Smith has participated in eight 30+ point games in his ENTIRE CAREER.

Wow, that escalated quickly.

I'm absolutely shocked how quickly the conversation changed to something else.

One minute, people are bashing Clay for actually, you know, using facts to back up his posts - the next?

Crickets.

OnTheWarpath15 08-01-2013 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9851446)
I gotta laugh at the "no separation" thing.

Know why there's no separation between Bowe and his guy? Because there are no speed guys to challenge defenses deep to force the secondary to back off and play with a cushion. And even if we have those speed guys, they're ****ing worthless if the (say it with me) QUAR-TER-BACK isn't worth an ounce of AIDS.

You saw what arguably the best WR in the NFL in Larry Fitzgerald was forced to become without a real QB. And hell, at least he's got some actual legit company helping out in the WR corps.

There won't be any separation until teams start ACTUALLY fearing our QB. And I'm not talking about them fearing his ability to not make mistakes and win games against shitty teams. I'm talking about them fearing his ability to potentially burn them with a big play at ANY GIVEN MOMENT.

Alex is likely not that guy. So until then, people need to sit back and shut the **** up about "no separation" from our WRs. We could be set up with Dwayne Bowe, Calvin Johnson, and a speed guy like Mike Wallace and we still probably wouldn't get the "separation" that these asshole true fans are looking for.

Rep.

Marcellus 08-01-2013 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9851448)
Wow, that escalated quickly.

I'm absolutely shocked how quickly the conversation changed to something else.

One minute, people are bashing Clay for actually, you know, using facts to back up his posts - the next?

Crickets.

No actually what I said was thats 100% on Smith just like Stafford's record against winning teams is 100% on him.

Correct?

Fairplay 08-01-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 9851037)
Went today. My brief and humble thoughts...

I miss River Falls. Much easier to get around. Much better sight lines. Better to see the whole of the action without moving around a ton.

That said...

Standouts:
Really hard to tell, as it was rarely 1s vs 1s, but,

Albert
Hudson
Charles
Hemingway
Poe and Powe
Houston
D Johnson
Sean smith
Edgar Jones
DeVito

Not bad, but not great
T Jax
Chavis
Schwartz
Toribio
Wylie
Fisher

Had a bad day;
Alex Smith
Baldwin
Kush (awful)


I wasn't terribly impressed with Knile Davis. Thought he played soft.
I see the intrigue with Bray. Looks the part. Amazing arm.
Smith was bad, even against air. I refuse to bitch and moan about him. There's enough of that on the board, and it's boring as hell. Plus, what's done is done. Obviously it's just one day... But he looked BAD.
Kelce had a rough morning. Missed a couple, and fumbled during two-minute.
Wylie looks real good. Quick and fast. Lets hope he can stay out of the tub.
A lot more motion and shifts than we've seen, maybe since the Vermiel days.
Not a ton of yelling by the coaches. Lots of teaching. But it's still very disciplined. I think they have the respect of the players, and don't have to peel paint to keep it.
I really like the little things they are working on, that I never really saw in previous camps. Hand placement and replacement. Hip movement to beat blocks. Alignment. Playing vs pulls, traps and doubles. Very intentional drills, rather than busywork that I feel I used to see. To expand, what I mean is, in the river falls days, you'd see the lines hit the hell out of the sleds. While that's important, that type of movement is only part of what builds skills on the line. They hit the sleds today, but also then worked on those other things I mentioned, which will make them (hopefully) better at shedding blocks and being part of the play. The same thing was happening Offensively. Just very intentional drills focused on body movements they'll actually use rather than pushing a sled 20 yards.




Good report, there is actually something worth reading in this thread sometimes.

OnTheWarpath15 08-01-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9851452)
No actually what I said was thats 100% on Smith just like Stafford's record against winning teams is 100% on him.

Correct?

One, I didn't single out anyone. Plenty of folks were bashing him, and then disappeared.

But, to respond directly to you - you are correct - you did make the above comment.

But the comment itself is 100% incorrect, as someone else pointed out.

The QB only has control over the number of points the offense scores.

Alex Smith led offenses have scored 30+ points in 10% of his games.

Stafford led offense have scored 30+ points in 30% of his starts - and he's lost 4 games when scoring 30+ points and 2 games when scoring 40+ points.

Stafford led offenses score an average of 25 points a game. There's no way in hell I'm blaming a guy that averages 25 points a game.

Smith? 19 points a game.

Hmmm.

I wonder why he has a shit record when the opposition scores 24 points or more?

AdumbGuy 08-01-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9851446)
I gotta laugh at the "no separation" thing.

Know why there's no separation between Bowe and his guy? Because there are no speed guys to challenge defenses deep to force the secondary to back off and play with a cushion. And even if we have those speed guys, they're ****ing worthless if the (say it with me) QUAR-TER-BACK isn't worth an ounce of AIDS.

You saw what arguably the best WR in the NFL in Larry Fitzgerald was forced to become without a real QB. And hell, at least he's got some actual legit company helping out in the WR corps.

There won't be any separation until teams start ACTUALLY fearing our QB. And I'm not talking about them fearing his ability to not make mistakes and win games against shitty teams. I'm talking about them fearing his ability to potentially burn them with a big play at ANY GIVEN MOMENT.

Alex is likely not that guy. So until then, people need to sit back and shut the **** up about "no separation" from our WRs. We could be set up with Dwayne Bowe, Calvin Johnson, and a speed guy like Mike Wallace and we still probably wouldn't get the "separation" that these asshole true fans are looking for.

It's shocking how people don't get that it all works together. And then the more tidbits I hear about Geno's live arm, accuracy, and the way he's quickly grasping that offense, the more aggravating it is to know he's going to be completely wasted on that jet's team. Tyler Bray or bust!

LoneWolf 08-01-2013 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9850708)
Really, I think we'll be okay(ish) at WR2. I know Avery is far from a given even when he's healthy, but I like to think we have enough speed at the position now to at least open up stuff in the slot. If anything, I'd like to see a real slot guy instead of this McCluster/Wylie trainwreck we have going on right now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9851446)
I gotta laugh at the "no separation" thing.

Know why there's no separation between Bowe and his guy? Because there are no speed guys to challenge defenses deep to force the secondary to back off and play with a cushion. And even if we have those speed guys, they're ****ing worthless if the (say it with me) QUAR-TER-BACK isn't worth an ounce of AIDS.

You saw what arguably the best WR in the NFL in Larry Fitzgerald was forced to become without a real QB. And hell, at least he's got some actual legit company helping out in the WR corps.

There won't be any separation until teams start ACTUALLY fearing our QB. And I'm not talking about them fearing his ability to not make mistakes and win games against shitty teams. I'm talking about them fearing his ability to potentially burn them with a big play at ANY GIVEN MOMENT.

Alex is likely not that guy. So until then, people need to sit back and shut the **** up about "no separation" from our WRs. We could be set up with Dwayne Bowe, Calvin Johnson, and a speed guy like Mike Wallace and we still probably wouldn't get the "separation" that these asshole true fans are looking for.

So, do we have enough speed at WR or don't we? You seem confused.

Ceej 08-01-2013 05:17 PM

I heard Geno is outperforming Sanchez @Jets camp.

Can anyone confirm?

LoneWolf 08-01-2013 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9851634)
I heard Geno is outperforming Sanchez @Jets camp.

Can anyone confirm?

Cue Claynus in 3..2..1

AdumbGuy 08-01-2013 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9851634)
I heard Geno is outperforming Sanchez @Jets camp.

Can anyone confirm?

I've heard no INTs for Geno to several for Sanchez in the last few practices. Rex Ryan said everybody loves the guy with the 96mph fastball - referring to geno. Pretty much the only "negative" I've heard is that Geno's conditioning isn't as good as Sanchez's.

Ceej 08-01-2013 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdumbGuy (Post 9851645)
I've heard no INTs for Geno to several for Sanchez in the last few practices. Rex Ryan said everybody loves the guy with the 96mph fastball - referring to geno. Pretty much the only "negative" I've heard is that Geno's conditioning isn't as good as Sanchez's.

I was being facetious, man.

AdumbGuy 08-01-2013 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles (Post 9851651)
I was being facetious, man.

oh, I'm being adumbguy, then.

SAUTO 08-01-2013 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9851212)
Where?

It was dj's left nut.

In this thread somewhere
Posted via Mobile Device

Sully 08-01-2013 05:49 PM

BTW, during 1v1 pass rush, Houston worked exclusively from the right side, and I believe Hali was exclusively from the left.

O.city 08-01-2013 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9851212)
Where?

It was in the Bray thread, IIRC, and he didn't say that. '


He said he looked the part physically, but in terms of mechanics and offensive understanding, he's way lacking at this point.

Which is to be expected.

Hammock Parties 08-01-2013 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 9851697)
BTW, during 1v1 pass rush, Houston worked exclusively from the right side, and I believe Hali was exclusively from the left.

Interesting. Wonder if Houston will be the weakside rusher this year.

RealSNR 08-01-2013 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 9851629)
So, do we have enough speed at WR or don't we? You seem confused.

We don't, but a better WR isn't going to change much.

You still gotta have a QB that defenses fear and respect if you want them to unglue themselves to your receivers

Sully 08-01-2013 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9851703)
Interesting. Wonder if Houston will be the weakside rusher this year.

It's my opinion that Hali, if he hasn't already begun to, is about to drastically fall off the cliff (I hope I'm wrong). If that's the case, I like the proactive thinking.
I also liked what Jones brought to the table today. Last year he was great on special teams, but I think he could contribute defensively this year.
Although... It was just one practice.

Chiefs Pantalones 08-01-2013 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9851703)
Interesting. Wonder if Houston will be the weakside rusher this year.

Tidbit from today.
Defensive coordinator Bob Sutton threw everything he had at the offense, including a pass-rushing alignment that had outside linebackers Tamba Hali and Justin Houston on the same side next to Derrick Johnson. Talk about a modern-day Triple Stack. Houston got a hand on a Daniel pass intended for TE Travis Kelce, and CB Neiko Thorpe broke up a pass intended for Dwayne Bowe.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/08/01...#storylink=cpy

Easy 6 08-01-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9851754)
Defensive coordinator Bob Sutton threw everything he had at the offense, including a pass-rushing alignment that had outside linebackers Tamba Hali and Justin Houston on the same side next to Derrick Johnson. Talk about a modern-day Triple Stack.

HELL. YES.

Get crazy with it, no holds barred... be creative.

ThaVirus 08-01-2013 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully (Post 9851697)
BTW, during 1v1 pass rush, Houston worked exclusively from the right side, and I believe Hali was exclusively from the left.

Hmmm. Putting our best guy on the weak side, perhaps?

Easy 6 08-01-2013 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9851097)
But DJ said Bray didn't look the part...bad mechanics, etc...

The good news is that guys with huge arms can get away with crap mechanics more often than not... Cutler and Favre throw tons of TD's off their back foot or barely stepping into it etc.

Barring some major catastrophe we wont be seeing Bray outside of pre-season this year... but i've got my fingers crossed for a bright future, he hopefully just needs time to mature and mentally grasp the game.

O.city 08-01-2013 07:30 PM

The best thing for the Chiefs and Tyler Bray, is that after preseason this year, we don't hear his name or see him play a down.

He needs to realize that this isn't going to be given to him and work his ass off at owning his craft. It sounds like he's working hard, but those mechanical things and mental things are the things he needs to perfect.

He's a good piece of steak, but he needs time to marinade.

Marcellus 08-01-2013 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9851509)
One, I didn't single out anyone. Plenty of folks were bashing him, and then disappeared.

But, to respond directly to you - you are correct - you did make the above comment.

But the comment itself is 100% incorrect, as someone else pointed out.

The QB only has control over the number of points the offense scores.

Alex Smith led offenses have scored 30+ points in 10% of his games.

Stafford led offense have scored 30+ points in 30% of his starts - and he's lost 4 games when scoring 30+ points and 2 games when scoring 40+ points.

Stafford led offenses score an average of 25 points a game. There's no way in hell I'm blaming a guy that averages 25 points a game.

Smith? 19 points a game.

Hmmm.

I wonder why he has a shit record when the opposition scores 24 points or more?

You don't suppose Stafford's 6 points more a game has anything to do with the fact their defense sucked so they were always in a shoot out do you?

They guy still has a losing record by a mile and if it were Cassel we would call those numbers garbage time stats.

Hell I'm not arguing Smith is better,that's not even the topic. I am just saying the double standard is laughable.

Stafford has had his issues and has not won a single big game. Yet excuses are made because he wings the ball and puts up "statistics" while losing to good teams.

Easy 6 08-01-2013 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9851855)
He's a good piece of steak, but he needs time to marinade.

This

beach tribe 08-01-2013 08:07 PM

http://kckingdom.com/2013/08/01/chie...n=Hot%2BTopics

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...ps82e77874.jpg

The Chiefs were back in full pads Thursday morning after having the day off on Wednesday. The practice consisted of a lot of 11 on 11 reps, more or less a scrimmage. Coach Brad Childress was marking the ball and calling the “obvious” penalties as Coach Reid said in his press conference.
A lot of the notes taken away from day 6 consisted of how dominant the defense was. According to Randy Covitz of the Kansas City Star, the defense was able force several turnovers including a pick six by corner back, Brandon Flowers. Turnovers weren’t the only issues for the Chiefs offense today. Jamaal Charlesdropped a screen pass, Travis Kelce fumbled after making a catch, and Jon Baldwin dropped a wide open pass up the seams on a 3rd down and 15 situation. The very next play, Baldwin was flagged for a false start. Looks like the camp warrior trend may be wearing out of Jon Baldwin.

On the flip-side, the defense really shined. As mentioned earlier, Brandon Flowers jumped a pass by Alex Smith that was intended for Dexter McCluster, and was able to take it back for a touchdown. Rookie linebacker, Nico Johnson, tipped a Chase Daniel pass that resulted in an interception for fellow rookie safety, Bradley McDougald. Reports also said that the defense was in the quarterbacks face most of the time. They did a good job of applying pressure and moving the quarterbacks out of the pocket.

“I thought the defense did a nice job,” Coach Reid said. “That’s what you expect, early in camp, for the defense to be dominant. It always takes the offense a little longer to get going. That’s how it normally works.”
Typically, defenses are ahead of offenses especially this early in camp. The Chiefs have almost everything new on the offensive side of the ball when it comes to coaching. New coordinators, position coaches and of course, a new quarterback. It’s still very early and there shouldn’t be very high concern after the way the offense played today.
“All in all, it was a good day of work,” Coach Reid said, concerning the offense. “We had a chance to move the ball, so play the game in other words.” Coach Reid continued, “We also had a goal line and short yardage day today, which was live, and I thought there was good work there.”
The Chiefs take the field again tomorrow at 8:15 A.M. in St. Joe. I expect to hear a better day from the offense.

Hammock Parties 08-01-2013 08:11 PM

Tyson Jackson looks like a sloppy fatso.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.n...39338247_n.jpg

KCTitus 08-01-2013 08:20 PM

Quote:

“I thought the defense did a nice job,” Coach Reid said. “That’s what you expect, early in camp, for the defense to be dominant. It always takes the offense a little longer to get going. That’s how it normally works.”
I would certainly hope so, considering most of the talent is on that side of the ball...

On a related note, I'm going to visit camp on Tuesday next week...I'll be sporting my Omar Easy jersey, so I should be easy to spot. I'd love to say 'hi' to any fellow Planeteers if you're there.

O.city 08-01-2013 08:22 PM

I think Jackson looks slimmed down.

beach tribe 08-01-2013 08:25 PM

Wild seeing players wear thigh and knee pads. Do they always do that in camp? probably so.

O.city 08-01-2013 08:26 PM

"Box" players normally do, IIRC.

Mav 08-01-2013 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9851999)
"Box" players normally do, IIRC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 9851996)
Wild seeing players wear thigh and knee pads. Do they always do that in camp? probably so.

Its mandatory now for any player. Even Receivers. Thigh and knee pads......

CaliforniaChief 08-01-2013 08:32 PM

I really like what I'm hearing about Sutton's defensive approach. I have said for a long time that we need to stop trying to emulate other "ways" and go back to the Chiefs way. And when I think about that on defense, I think about attacking, QB-killing, play-making defenses.

beach tribe 08-01-2013 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9852020)
Its mandatory now for any player. Even Receivers. Thigh and knee pads......

That's right, I forgot.

It's actually to protect other players from concussions IIRC.

Mav 08-01-2013 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 9852021)
I really like what I'm hearing about Sutton's defensive approach. I have said for a long time that we need to stop trying to emulate other "ways" and go back to the Chiefs way. And when I think about that on defense, I think about attacking, QB-killing, play-making defenses.

absolutely. Bend and don't break defenses, only get you beat. Pressure busts pipes.

O.city 08-01-2013 09:00 PM

Like DJ said earlier, you really have to take all the twitter reports, good or bad, with a grain of salt.

It's really hard to tell what the hell is going on during practice. There is so much shit going on, it's pretty hard to tell one way or another.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-01-2013 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 9850332)
You like the line?

Mother**** YES I love it and so had everyone else better, for what we've invested in it.

And one more time:

For a competent Quarterback, last years line WAS MORE THAN ****ING ADEQUATE TO HELP PRODUCE POSITIVE RESULTS.

FOR A COMPETENT......


QUARTERBACK.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9850600)
he needs to courage

ROFL

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9850794)

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/bFOoEf_Oyj8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

philfree 08-01-2013 09:11 PM

Have we finally fixed out ILB position next to DJ? That'd make a big difference on our D we have.

Mav 08-01-2013 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9852130)
Have we finally fixed out ILB position next to DJ? That'd make a big difference on our D we have.

The Chiefs need to get to a game first to find that out.

CoMoChief 08-01-2013 09:41 PM

NT or Dline pressure on the QB would help the defense a lot more than a ILB.

Though it's not hard to upgrade from Belcher. I doubt he'd even be on the team this season should he be alive.

saphojunkie 08-02-2013 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9852196)
The Chiefs need to get to a game first to find that out.

I'm an unabashed Nico Johnson believer. I wanted us to draft the guy in the third round. When he fell down to us again it was manna from heaven for me. I think the guy is going to be a dominant ILB for a long time.

And Planet Houston is a ****ing nuclear detonation waiting to happen every play.

KCUnited 08-02-2013 07:57 AM

Base D this morning:
Jackson, Poe, DeVito
Houston, Jordan, Johnson, Hali
Flowers, Berry, Lewis, Smith

KCUnited 08-02-2013 08:17 AM

Jeff Allen starting Guard.
Smith big gain on naked boot
Hudson max effort in drills, dust up with Jordan after whistle.

kepp 08-02-2013 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 9852495)
Jeff Allen starting Guard.
Smith big gain on naked boot
Hudson max effort in drills, dust up with Jordan after whistle.

Oh man...I just had a flashback to a time when the donks would kill us about 10 times a game with naked bootlegs.

Tribal Warfare 08-02-2013 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 9852498)
Oh man...I just had a flashback to a time when the donks would kill us about 10 times a game with naked bootlegs.

and they had QBs that could take a hit too

Fat Elvis 08-02-2013 08:23 AM

Quote:

Reid Ferrin @KCChiefs_Reid

Horn sounds . Time for 9-on-7 1s vs 1s #ChiefsCamp Jamaal getting two straight carries, followed by another when he's stopped by J. Powe
Whoa. Powe and (I'm assuming) Poe are running with the first stringers? Can this mean that Sutton can actually tailor a defense that is suited to the strengths of the players on this team? Poe was expected to be on the first string, and a few of us had been touting what Powe could do based on his limited action (though no fault of his own) in the past.... This old man Sutton guy is growing on me. A lot.

KCUnited 08-02-2013 08:26 AM

Smith to Charles, 20yd TD pass.

KCUnited 08-02-2013 08:28 AM

Poe, DeVito, Jackson in obvious passing redzone situation. Poe with would be sack.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.